Understanding Lenders’ Investment Behavior in Online Peer-to-Peer Lending: A Construal Level Theory Perspective

References

• Agrawal A, Catalini C, Goldfarb A (2015) Crowdfunding: Geography, social networks, and the timing of investment decisions. J. Econom. Management Strategy 24(2):253–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahlers GK, Cumming D, Günther C, Schweizer D (2015) Signaling in equity crowdfunding. Entrepreneurial Theory Practice 39(4):955–980.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alexander DL, Lynch JG Jr, Wang Q (2008) As time goes by: Do cold feet follow warm intentions for really new versus incrementally new products? J. Marketing Res. 45(3):307–319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allison TH, Davis BC, Short JC, Webb JW (2015) Crowdfunding in a prosocial microlending environment: Examining the role of intrinsic versus extrinsic cues. Entrepreneurial Theory Practice 39(1):53–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson C, John OP, Keltner D (2012) The personal sense of power. J. Personality 80(2):313–344.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bar-Anan Y, Liberman N, Trope Y (2006) The association between psychological distance and construal level: Evidence from an implicit association test. J. Experiment. Psych. General 135(4):609.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bar-Anan Y, Liberman N, Trope Y, Algom D (2007) Automatic processing of psychological distance: Evidence from a Stroop task. J. Experiment. Psych. General 136(4):610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Battilana J, Dorado S (2010) Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Acad. Management J. 53(6):1419–1440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonfadelli H (2002) The internet and knowledge gaps: A theoretical and empirical investigation. Eur. J. Comm. 17(1):65–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burtch G, Chan J (2019) Investigating the relationship between medical crowdfunding and personal bankruptcy in the United States: Evidence of a digital divide. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 43(1):237–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burtch G, Ghose A, Wattal S (2013) An empirical examination of the antecedents and consequences of contribution patterns in crowd-funded markets. Inform. Systems Res. 24(3):499–519.Link, Google Scholar
• Burtch G, Ghose A, Wattal S (2014) Cultural differences and geography as determinants of online prosical lending. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 38(3):773–794.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caglayan M, Talavera O, Zhang W (2021) Herding behaviour in P2p lending markets. J. Empirical Finance 63:27–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cai S, Lin X, Xu D, Fu X (2016) Judging online peer-to-peer lending behavior: A comparison of first-time and repeated borrowing requests. Inform. Management 53(7):857–867.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen S, Gu Y, Liu Q, Tse Y (2020) How do lenders evaluate borrowers in peer-to-peer lending in China? Internat. Rev. Econom. Finance 69:651–662.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen L, Hsieh J, Rai A, Xu S (2021) How does employee infusion use of CRM systems drive customer satisfaction? Mechanism differences between face-to-face and virtual channels. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 45(2):719–754.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS (2013) Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (Routledge).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Custers R, Aarts H (2005) Positive affect as implicit motivator: On the nonconscious operation of behavioral goals. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 89(2):129–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eveland WP Jr, Nathanson AI, Detenber BH, McLeod DM (1999) Rethinking the social distance corollary: Perceived likelihood of expsoure and the third-person perception. Comm. Res. 26(3):275–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eyal T, Liberman N, Trope Y, Walther E (2004) The pros and cons of temporally near and distant action. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 86(6):781–795.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiske ST (2010) Envy up, scorn down: How comparison divides us. Amer. Psych. 65(8):698–706.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flippen AR, Hornstein HA, Siegal WE, Weitzman EA (1996) A comparison of similarity and interdependence as triggers for in-group formation. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 22(9):882–893.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fujita K, Trope Y, Liberman N, Levin-Sagi M (2006) Construal levels and self-control. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 90(3):351–367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galak J, Small D, Stephen AT (2011) Microfinance decision making: A field study of prosocial lending. J. Marketing Res. 48:S130–S137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garen J (1984) The returns to schooling: A selectivity bias approach with a continuous choice variable. Econometrica 52(5):1199–1218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ge R, Feng J, Gu B, Zhang P (2017) Predicting and deterring default with social media information in peer-to-peer lending. J. Management Inform. Systems 34(2):401–424.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ge R, Zheng Z, Tian X, Liao L (2021) Human–robot interaction: When investors adjust the usage of robo-advisors in peer-to-peer lending. Inform. Systems Res. 32(3):774–785.Link, Google Scholar
• Heckman JJ (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1):153–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman J (1997) Instrumental variables: A study of implicit behavioral assumptions used in making program evaluations. J. Human Resources 32(3):441–462.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heider F (2013) The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations (Psychology Press, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson MD, Wakslak CJ, Fujita K, Rohrbach J (2011) Construal level theory and spatial distance: Implications for mental representation, judgment, and behavior. Soc. Psych. 42(3):165–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herzenstein M, Sonenshein S, Dholakia UM (2011) Tell me a good story and I may lend you money: The role of narratives in peer-to-peer lending decisions. J. Marketing Res. 4:S138–S149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang N, Burtch G, Hong Y, Polman E (2016) Effects of multiple psychological distances on construal and consumer evaluation: A field study of online reviews. J. Consumer Psych. 26(4):474–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huberman G (2001) Familiarity breeds investment. Rev. Financial Stud. 14(3):659–680.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iyer R, Khwaja AI, Luttmer EF, Shue K (2016) Screening peers softly: Inferring the quality of small borrowers. Management Sci. 62(6):1554–1577.Link, Google Scholar
• Jia L, Hirt ER, Karpen SC (2009) Lessons from a faraway land: The effect of spatial distance on creative cognition. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 45(5):1127–1131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jiang Y, Ho Y-C, Yan X, Tan Y (2020) When online lending meets real estate: Examining investment decisions in lending-based real estate crowdfunding. Inform. Systems Res. 31(3):715–730.Link, Google Scholar
• Jiang Y, Ho Y-C, Yan X, Tan Y (2022) What’s in a “username”? The effect of perceived anonymity on herding in crowdfunding. Inform. Systems Res. 33(1):1–17.Link, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D (2003) A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. Amer. Psych. 58(9):697.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kashyap V, Murtha BR (2017) The joint effects of ex ante contractual completeness and ex post governance on compliance in franchised marketing channels. J. Marketing 81(3):130–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim K, Hann I-H (2019) Crowdfunding and the democratization of access to capital—An illusion? Evidence from housing prices. Inform. Systems Res. 30(1):276–290.Link, Google Scholar
• Kim BK, Zauberman G, Bettman JR (2012) Space, time, and intertemporal preferences. J. Consumer Res. 39(4):867–880.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Komarova Loureiro Y, Gonzalez L (2015) Competition against common sense: Insights on peer-to-peer lending as a tool to allay financial exclusion. Internat. J. Bank Marketing 33(5):605–623.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krahnen JP, Weber M (2001) Generally accepted rating principles: A primer. J. Bank. Finance 25(1):3–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazarsfeld PF, Merton RK (1954) Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. Freedom Control Modern Soc. 18(1):18–66.Google Scholar
• Lermer E, Streicher B, Sachs R, Raue M, Frey D (2015) The effect of construal level on risk‐taking. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 45(1):99–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewbel A (2012) Using heteroscedasticity to identify and estimate mismeasured and endogenous regressor models. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 30(1):67–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liberman N, Trope Y (1998) The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 75(1):5–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liberman N, Sagristano MD, Trope Y (2002) The effect of temporal distance on level of mental construal. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 38(6):523–534.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liberman N, Trope Y, Stephan E (2007) Psychological distance, Kruglanski AW, Higgins ET, eds. Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles, 2nd ed. (The Guilford Press, New York), 353–383.Google Scholar
• Lin M, Viswanathan S (2016) Home bias in online investments: An empirical study of an online crowdfunding market. Management Sci. 62(5):1393–1414.Link, Google Scholar
• Lin M, Prabhala NR, Viswanathan S (2013) Judging borrowers bythe company they keep: Friendship networks and information asymmetry in online peer-to-peer lending. Management Sci. 59(1):17–35.Link, Google Scholar
• Liu H, Chen W (2017) A review of research on the distribution of basic education resources in China. Progress Geography 36(5):557–568.Google Scholar
• Liu D, Brass DJ, Lu Y, Chen D (2015) Friendships in online peer-to-peer lending: Pipes, prisms, and relational herding. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 39(3):729–742.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liviatan I, Trope Y, Liberman N (2008) Interpersonal similarity as a social distance dimension: Implications for perception of others’ actions. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 44(5):1256–1269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loewenstein GF, Weber EU, Hsee CK, Welch N (2001) Risk as feelings. Psych. Bull. 127(2):267–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCune B, Grace JB, Urban DL (2002) Analysis of Ecological Communities (MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, OR).Google Scholar
• McGraw AP, Warren C, Williams LE, Leonard B (2012) Too close for comfort, or too far to care? Finding humor in distant tragedies and close mishaps. Psych. Sci. 23(10):1215–1223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mollick E (2014) The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. J. Bus. Venturing 29(1):1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mooi EA, Ghosh M (2010) Contract specificity and its performance implications. J. Marketing 74(2):105–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nygren TE, Isen AM, Taylor PJ, Dulin J (1996) The influence of positive affect on the decision rule in risk situations: Focus on outcome (and especially avoidance of loss) rather than probability. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 66(1):59–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pope DG, Sydnor JR (2011) What’s in a picture? Evidence of discrimination from Prosper.com. J. Human Resources 46(1):53–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwarz N, Clore G (1988) How do I feel about it? Information functions of affective states. Affect, Cognition and Social Behavior (Hogrefe International, Toronto), 44–62.Google Scholar
• Slovic P, Peters E (2006) Risk perception and affect. Current Directives Psych. Sci. 15(6):322–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith RH (2008) Envy: Theory and Research (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith PK, Trope Y (2006) You focus on the forest when you’re in charge of the trees: Power priming and abstract information processing. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 90(4):578–596.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith JA, McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L (2014) Social distance in the United States: Sex, race, religion, age, and education homophily among confidants, 1985 to 2004. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 79(3):432–456.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sonenshein S, Herzenstein M, Dholakia UM (2011) How accounts shape lending decisions through fostering perceived trustworthiness. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 115(1):69–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stiglitz JE, Weiss A (1981) Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information. Amer. Econom. Rev. 71(3):393–410.Google Scholar
• Stock JH, Yogo M (2002) Testing for Weak Instruments in Linear IV Regression (National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tang H (2019) Peer-to-peer lenders versus banks: Substitutes or complements? Rev. Financial Stud. 32(5):1900–1938.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thoits PA (1992) Identity structures and psychological well-being: Gender and marital status comparisons. Soc. Psych. Quart. 55(3):236–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trope Y, Liberman N (2000) Temporal construal and time-dependent changes in preference. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 79(6):876–889.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trope Y, Liberman N (2003) Temporal construal. Psych. Rev. 110(3):403–421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trope Y, Liberman N (2010) Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psych. Rev. 117(2):440–463.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157):1124–1131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vincenty T (1975) Direct and inverse solutions of geodesics on the ellipsoid with application of nested equations. Survey Rev. 23(176):88–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wakslak C, Trope Y (2009) The effect of construal level on subjective probability estimates. Psych. Sci. 20(1):52–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang X, Jiang M, Han W, Qiu L (2022) Do emotions sell? The impact of emotional expressions on sales in the space‐sharing economy. Production Oper. Management 31(1):65–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wei Z, Lin M (2016) Market mechanisms in online peer-to-peer lending. Management Sci. 63(12):4236–4257.Link, Google Scholar
• Williams LE, Bargh JA (2008) Keeping one’s distance: The influence of spatial distance cues on affect and evaluation. Psych. Sci. 19(3):302–308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams LE, Stein R, Galguera L (2014) The distinct affective consequences of psychological distance and construal level. J. Consumer Res. 40(6):1123–1138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xu JJ, Chau M (2018) Cheap talk? The impact of lender-borrower communication on peer-to-peer lending outcomes. J. Management Inform. Systems 35(1):53–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yan D (2014) Future events are far away: Exploring the distance-on-distance effect. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 106(4):514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zajonc RB (1980) Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. Amer. Psych. 35(2):151–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Liu P (2012) Rational herding in microloan markets. Management Sci. 58(5):892–912.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang M, Wang J (2009) Psychological distance asymmetry: The spatial dimension vs. other dimensions. J. Consumer Psych. 19(3):497–507.Crossref, Google Scholar