The Open Prison of the Big Data Revolution: False Consciousness, Faustian Bargains, and Digital Entrapment

References

• Aaen J, Nielsen JA, Carugati A (2022) The dark side of data ecosystems: A longitudinal study of the DAMD project. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 31(3):288–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abbasi A, Sarker S, Chiang RH (2016) Big data research in information systems: Toward an inclusive research agenda. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 17(2):i–xxxii.Google Scholar
• Adorno T (2006) Minima Moralia: Reflections from Damaged Life (Verso, London).Google Scholar
• Agger B (1991) Critical theory, poststructuralism, postmodernism: Their sociological relevance. Annual Rev. Sociol. 17(1):105–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akerlof GA (1970) The market for ‘lemons’: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quart. J. Econom. 84(3):488–500.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akkermans H, van Helden K (2002) Vicious and virtuous cycles in ERP implementation: A case study of interrelations between critical success factors. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 11(1):35–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bakir V (2020) Psychological operations in digital political campaigns: Assessing Cambridge Analytica’s psychographic profiling and targeting. Frontiers Comm. 5:1–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balabanian N (1980) Presumed neutrality of technology. Society 17(3):7–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bales RA, Stone KV (2020) The invisible web at work: Artificial intelligence and electronic surveillance in the workplace. Berkeley J. Emp. & Lab. L. 41(1):1–60.Google Scholar
• Baskerville RL, Myers MD, Yoo Y (2020) Digital first: The ontological reversal and new challenges for information systems research. MIS Quart. 44(2):509–523.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beck U (1992) From industrial society to the risk society: Questions of survival, social structure and ecological enlightenment. Theory Culture Soc. 9(1):97–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Birch K (2020) Automated neoliberalism? The digital organisation of markets in technoscientific capitalism. New Formations 100(100–101):10–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Birch K, Chiappetta M, Artyushina A (2020) The problem of innovation in technoscientific capitalism: Data rentiership and the policy implications of turning personal digital data into a private asset. Policy Stud. 41(5):468–487.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Birch K, Cochrane D, Ward C (2021) Data as asset? The measurement, governance, and valuation of digital personal data by Big Tech. Big Data Soc. 8(1), https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211017308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bobocel DR, Meyer JP (1994) Escalating commitment to a failing course of action: Separating the roles of choice and justification. J. Appl. Psych. 79(3):360–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bodle R (2016) A critical theory of advertising as surveillance: Algorithms, big data, and power. Hamilton JF, Bodle R, Korin E, eds. Explorations in Critical Studies of Advertising (Routledge, London), 148–162.Google Scholar
• Boggs C (2016) Technological rationality and the post-Orwellian society. Glimpse 17:10–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borgefalk G, Leon ND (2019) The ethics of persuasive technologies in pervasive industry platforms: The need for a robust management and governance framework. Persuasive Technology: Development of Persuasive and Behavior Change Support Systems: 14th Internat. Conf., PERSUASIVE 2019, Proceedings 14 (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 156–167.Google Scholar
• Boudon R (1998) Limitations of rational choice theory. Amer. J. Sociol. 104(3):817–828.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brubaker R (1987) The Limits of Rationality: An Essay on the Social and Moral Thought of Max Weber (Routledge, London).Google Scholar
• Busch T, Schank C, Leicht-Deobald U, Weibel A, Schafheitle S, Kasper G, Wildhaber I (2018) 2018: Workplace surveillance and big data: Contextualizing digital threats to employee’s moral agency and integrity. Acad. Management Global Proc., 129.Google Scholar
• Calvo P (2020) The ethics of Smart City (EoSC): Moral implications of hyperconnectivity, algorithmization and the datafication of urban digital society. Ethics Inform. Tech. 22(2):141–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Calzada I (2023) Emerging digital citizenship regimes: Pandemic, algorithmic, liquid, metropolitan, and stateless citizenships. Citizenship Stud. 27(2):160–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caron X, Bosua R, Maynard SB, Ahmad A (2016) The Internet of Things (IoT) and its impact on individual privacy: An Australian perspective. Comput. Law Security Rev. 32(1):4–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chandler D, Fuchs C, eds. (2019) Digital Objects, Digital Subjects: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Capitalism, Labour and Politics in the Age of Big Data (University of Westminster Press, London).Google Scholar
• Chen H, Chiang RH, Storey VC (2012) Business intelligence and analytics: From big data to big impact. MIS Quart. 36(4):1165–1188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chivukula SS, Brier J, Gray CM (2018) Dark intentions or persuasion? UX designers’ activation of stakeholder and user values. Proc. 2018 ACM Conf. Companion Publ. Designing Interactive Systems, 87–91.Google Scholar
• Choi JP, Jeon DS, Kim BC (2019) Privacy and personal data collection with information externalities. J. Public Econom. 173(5):113–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ciborra C, Hanseth O (1998) From tool to Gestell Agendas for managing the information infrastructure. Inform. Tech. People 11(4):305–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clarke R (2019) Risks inherent in the digital surveillance economy: A research agenda. J. Inform. Tech. 34(1):59–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clemons EK, Schreieck M, Hermes S, Rowe F, Krcmar H (2022a) The cooperation paradox: Forming a single coalition in order to increase, rather than decrease, the number of economically viable alternatives. Electronic Markets 32(2):459–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clemons EK, Waran RV, Hermes S, Schreieck M, Krcmar H (2022b) Computing and social welfare. Electronic Markets 32(2):417–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coeckelbergh M (2018) Scientific suspects, romantic witnesses? Magic technologies, alienation, and self-destruction in the Anthropocene. Glimpse 19:39–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corley KG, Gioia DA (2011) Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Acad. Management Rev. 36(1):12–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Couldry N, Mejias UA (2019) The Costs of Connection: How Data Are Colonizing Human Life and Appropriating it for Capitalism (Stanford University Press, Redwood City, CA).Google Scholar
• Crowther BT (2012) (Un)reasonable expectation of digital privacy. BYU Law Rev. 2012(1):343–369.Google Scholar
• Cukier W, Ngwenyama O, Bauer R, Middleton C (2009) A critical analysis of media discourse on information technology: Preliminary results of a proposed method for critical discourse analysis. Inform. Systems J. 19(2):175–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Demetis D, Lee A (2018) When humans using the IT artifact becomes IT using the human artifact. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 19(10):929–952.Google Scholar
• DeMoya JF, Pallud J (2020) From panopticon to heautopticon: A new form of surveillance introduced by quantified self practices. Inform. Systems J. 30(6):940–976.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Desouza K (2014) Realizing the promise of big data. IBM Center for the Business of Government. Accessed July 15, 2023, https://indianstrategicknowledgeonline.com/web/Realizing%20the%20Promise%20of%20Big%20Data_0.pdf.Google Scholar
• Dignam A (2020) Artificial intelligence, tech corporate governance and the public interest regulatory response. Cambridge J. Regions Econom. Soc. 13(1):37–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drengson AR (1982) Four philosophies of technology. Philos. Today 26(2):103–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Egliston B, Carter M (2020) Oculus imaginaries: The promises and perils of Facebook’s virtual reality. New Media Soc. 24(1):70–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Esposti SD (2014) When big data meets dataveillance: The hidden side of analytics. Surveillance Soc. 12(2):209–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feenberg A (2005) Critical theory of technology: An overview. Tailoring Biotechnologies 1(1):47–64.Google Scholar
• Flick C (2016) Informed consent and the Facebook emotional manipulation study. Res. Ethics Rev. 12(1):14–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fuchs C (2016) Critical Theory of Communication: New Readings of Lukács, Adorno, Marcuse, Honneth and Habermas in the Age of the Internet (University of Westminster Press, London).Google Scholar
• Fuller R (2016) The paradox of workplace productivity. Harvard Bus. Rev. (April 19), https://hbr.org/2016/04/the-paradox-of-workplace-productivity.Google Scholar
• Gal U, Jensen TB, Stein MK (2020) Breaking the vicious cycle of algorithmic management: A virtue ethics approach to people analytics. Inform. Organ. 30(2):100301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gambetti R (2020) Netnography, digital habitus, and technocultural capital. Kozinets RV, Gambetti R, eds. Netnography Unlimited (Routledge, London), 293–319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geiger S, Gross N (2021) A tidal wave of inevitable data? Assetization in the consumer genomics testing industry. Bus. Soc. 60(3):614–649.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geradin D, Karanikioti T, Katsifis D (2021) GDPR myopia: How a well-intended regulation ended up favouring large online platforms-the case of ad tech. Eur. Competition J. 17(1):47–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghasemaghaei M, Turel O (2021) Possible negative effects of big data on decision quality in firms: The role of knowledge hiding behaviours. Inform. Systems J. 31(2):268–293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giermindl LM, Strich F, Christ O, Leicht-Deobald U, Redzepi A (2022) The dark sides of people analytics: Reviewing the perils for organizations and employees. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 31(3):410–435.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gordon T (2019) Capitalism, neoliberalism, and unfree labour. Crit. Sociol. 45(6):921–939.Google Scholar
• Gregory R, Henfridsson O, Kaganer E, Kyriakou SH (2021) The role of artificial intelligence and data network effects for creating user value. Acad. Management Rev. 46(3):534–551.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gregory RW, Henfridsson O (2021) Bridging art and science: Phenomenon-driven theorizing. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 22(6):1509–1523.Google Scholar
• Habermas J (1971) Technology and science as ‘ideology.’ Toward a Rational Society: Student Protest, Science, and Politics (Beacon Press, Boston), 49–55.Google Scholar
• Habermas J (1992) Post Metaphysical Thinking: Philosophical Essays (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Habermas J (2021) The tasks of a critical theory of society. Meja V, Misgeld D, Stehr N, eds. Modern German Sociology (Routledge, London), 187–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heidegger M (1954) The question concerning technology. Hanks C, ed. Technology and Values: Essential Readings (Wiley-Blackwell, Totnes, UK), 3–35.Google Scholar
• Helbing D (2015) Thinking Ahead-Essays on Big Data, Digital Revolution, and Participatory Market Society (Springer, Heidelberg, Germany).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoffman R (2017) Microsoft office and metadata forensics: A deeper dive. Vacca JR, ed. Computer and Information Security Handbook (Morgan Kaufmann, Cambridge, MA), 659–667.Google Scholar
• Holmes L (2016) Digital Taylorism: Hybrid Knowledge Professionals in the UK ICT Sector. Re-Tayloring Management (Routledge, London), 121–136.Google Scholar
• Honneth A (1993) The Critique of Power: Reflective Stages in a Critical Social Theory (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Honneth A (2014) Disrespect: The Normative Foundations of Critical Theory (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Horkheimer M (1982) Critical Theory: Selected Essays, 2nd ed. (Continuum Publishing, New York).Google Scholar
• Hovorka D, Peter S (2021) Research perspectives: From other worlds: Speculative engagement through digital geographies. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 22(6):1736–1752.Google Scholar
• Hüllmann JA, Krebber S, Troglauer P (2021) The IT artifact in people analytics: Reviewing tools to understand a nascent field. Ahlemann F, Schütte R, Stieglitz S, eds. Innovation Through Information Systems: Volume III: A Collection of Latest Research on Management Issues (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 238–254.Google Scholar
• Hylving L, Koutsikouri D, Bornemark J, Lindberg S (2022) Ratio and intellectus: Toward a conceptual framework for understanding human and artificial intelligence. ICIS 2022 Proc.Google Scholar
• Ihde D (1990) Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth (Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN).Google Scholar
• Introna LD (2016) Algorithms, governance, and governmentality: On governing academic writing. Sci. Tech. Human Values 41(1):17–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones M (2019) What we talk about when we talk about (big) data. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 28(1):3–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kane GC, Young AG, Majchrzak A, Ransbotham S (2021) Avoiding an oppressive future of machine learning: A design theory for emancipatory assistants. MIS Quart. 45(1):371–396.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kitchens B, Johnson SL, Gray P (2020) Understanding echo chambers and filter bubbles: The impact of social media on diversification and Partisan shifts in news consumption. MIS Quart. 44(4):1619–1649.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kitchin R (2014) Big Data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts. Big Data Soc. 1(1):1–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kokolakis S (2017) Privacy attitudes and privacy behaviour: A review of current research on the privacy paradox phenomenon. Comput. Security 64:122–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koukouvinou P, Holmström J (2022) AI management beyond the narratives of dystopian nightmares and utopian dreams: A systematic review and synthesis of the literature. ECIS 2022 Research Papers.Google Scholar
• Krämer J, Schnurr D (2022) Big data and digital markets contestability: Theory of harm and data access remedies. J. Competition Law Econom. 18(2):255–322.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kranzberg M (1986) Technology and history: “Kranzberg’s laws. Tech. Culture 27(3):544–560.Google Scholar
• Kreps D, Rowe F (2021) Free will in philosophy and in IS research: Where do we stand and where do we want to be? ICIS 2021 Proc.Google Scholar
• Kunst K, Ringberg T, Vatrapu R (2022) Beyond popularity: A user perspective on observable behaviours in a digital platform. Inform. Systems J. 32(3):595–622.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lebovitz S, Levina N, Lifshitz-Assaf H (2021) Is AI ground truth really true? The dangers of training and evaluating AI tools based on experts’ know-what. MIS Quart. 45(3):1501–1525.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leclercq-Vandelannoitte A, Aroles J (2020) Does the end justify the means? Information systems and control society in the age of pandemics. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 29(6):746–761.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lefebvre H (1991) Critique of Everyday Life, vol. 1 (Verso, London).Google Scholar
• Leidner DE, Tona O (2021) The CARE theory of dignity amid personal data digitalization. MIS Quart. 45(1):343–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis P, Davies H, O’Carroll L, Goodley S, Lawrence F (2022) The Uber whistleblower: I’m exposing a system that sold people a lie. The Guardian (July 11), https://www.theguardian.com/news/2022/jul/11/uber-files-whistleblower-lobbyist-mark-macgann.Google Scholar
• Lindgren S, Holmström J (2020) A social science perspective on artificial intelligence: Building blocks for a research agenda. J. Digital Soc. Res. 2(3):1–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Zhou G (2012) Key technologies and applications of internet of things. ICICTA 2012 Fifth Internat. Conf. Intelligent Comput. Tech. Automation (IEEE, Washington, DC), 197–200.Google Scholar
• Löfgren K, Webster CWR (2020) The value of Big Data in government: The case of ‘smart cities.’ Big Data Soc. 7(1), https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720912775.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luguri J, Strahilevitz LJ (2021) Shining a light on dark patterns. J. Legal Anal. 13(1):43–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lycett M (2013) ‘Datafication’: Making sense of (big) data in a complex world. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 22(4):381–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacCarthy M (2011) New directions in privacy: Disclosure, unfairness and externalities. Law Policy Inform. Soc. 6(3):425–512.Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A, Markus ML, Wareham J (2016) Designing for digital transformation: Lessons for information systems research from the study of ICT and societal challenges. MIS Quart. 40(2):267–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marcuse H (1964) One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society (Routledge & Keegan Paul, London).Google Scholar
• Marcuse H (1972) Counterrevolution and Revolt (Beacon Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Marjanovic O, Cecez-Kecmanovic D, Vidgen R (2021) Algorithmic pollution: Making the invisible visible. J. Inform. Tech. 36(4):391–408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markus ML, Rowe F (2018) Is IT changing the world? Conceptions of causality for IS theorizing. MIS Quart. 42(4):1255–1280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marlowe C (1604) The Tragical History of the Life and Death of Doctor Faustus (Legacy Collection Digital Museum). Accessed December 15, 2019, https://proxy.yphs.tp.edu.tw/∼ypi/hpclasssample/6information/6_5_06/0027.pdf.Google Scholar
• Mason RO (1980) Forming the social contract for the information society. ICIS 1980 Proc., vol. 17, 69–74.Google Scholar
• Mason RO (1986) Four ethical issues of the information age. MIS Quart. 10(1):5–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayer-Schönberger V, Cukier K (2013) Big Data: Die Revolution, die Unser Leben verändern wird (Redline, Munich, Germany).Google Scholar
• McDonough T, McMahon C, Kotz DM, eds. (2021) Handbook on Social Structure of Accumulation Theory (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meng S-Q, Cheng J-L, Li Y-Y, Yang X-Q, Zheng J-W, Chang X-W, Shi Y, et al. (2022) Global prevalence of digital addiction in general population: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psych. Rev. 92:102128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Microsoft (2022) Workplace insights repository. Accessed July 12, 2022, https://workplaceinsights.microsoft.com/repository/.Google Scholar
• Möhlmann M, Henfridsson O (2019) What people hate about being managed by algorithms, according to a study of Uber drivers. Harvard Bus. Rev. (August 30), https://hbr.org/2019/08/what-people-hate-about-being-managed-by-algorithms-according-to-a-study-of-uber-drivers.Google Scholar
• Möhlmann M, Zalmanson L, Henfridsson O, Gregory RW (2021) Algorithmic management of work on online labor platforms: When matching meets control. MIS Quart. 45(4):1999–2021.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montag C, Lachmann B, Herrlich M, Zweig K (2019) Addictive features of social media/messenger platforms and freemium games against the background of psychological and economic theories. Internat. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16(14):2612.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mujica A, Crowell C, Villano M, Uddin K (2022) Addiction by design: Some dimensions and challenges of excessive social media use. Medical Res. Arch. 10(2), https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v10i2.2677.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mulligan DK, Regan PM, King J (2020) The fertile dark matter of privacy takes on the dark patterns of surveillance. J. Consumer Psych. 30(4):767–773.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Munk T (2021) Does online privacy exist in the GDRP era? The Google voice assistant case. Synodinou T-E, Jougleux P, Markou C, Prastitou-Merdi T, eds. EU Internet Law in the Digital Single Market (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 479–507.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Myers MD, Klein HK (2011) A set of principles for conducting critical research in information systems. MIS Quart. 35(1):17–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nadella S (2017) Hit Refresh: The Quest to Rediscover Microsoft’s Soul and Imagine a Better Future for Everyone (Harper Collins Publishers, New York).Google Scholar
• Newell S, Marabelli M (2015) Strategic opportunities (and challenges) of algorithmic decision-making: A call for action on the long-term societal effects of ‘datification.’ J. Strategic Inform. Systems 24(1):3–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ngwenyama O, Henriksen HZ, Hardt D (2023) Public management challenges in the digital risk society: A critical analysis of the public debate on implementation of the Danish NemID. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 32(2):108–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ngwenyama OK, Lee AS (1997) Communication richness in electronic mail: Critical social theory and the contextuality of meaning. MIS Quart. 21(2):145–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ninet AA (2019) Protecting the homo digitalis. Naveiñ Reet Nordic J. Law Soc. Res. 9:153–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nyman S, Bødker M, Jensen TB, Gudmand-Høyer M (2021) Exploring the archive: A problematization lens for conducting critical IS research. ICIS 2021 Proc.Google Scholar
• O’Neill C (2017) Taylorism, the European science of work, and the quantified self at work. Sci. Tech. Human Values 42(4):600–621.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prahl A, Goh WWP (2021) “Rogue machines” and crisis communication: When AI fails, how do companies publicly respond? Public Relations Rev. 47(4):102077.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prainsack B (2020) The political economy of digital data: Introduction to the special issue. Policy Stud. 41(5):439–446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ransbotham S, Fichman RG, Gopal R, Gupta A (2016) Special section introduction—Ubiquitous IT and digital vulnerabilities. Inform. Systems Res. 27(4):834–847.Link, Google Scholar
• Ravenelle AJ (2019) “We’re not Uber:” Control, autonomy, and entrepreneurship in the gig economy. J. Management Psych. 34(4):269–285.Google Scholar
• Richards N, Hartzog W (2018) The pathologies of digital consent. Washington Univ. Law Rev. 96(6):1461–1503.Google Scholar
• Riemer K, Johnston RB (2017) Clarifying ontological inseparability with Heidegger’s analysis of equipment. MIS Quart. 41(4):1059–1082.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Riemer K, Peter S (2021) Algorithmic audiencing: Why we need to rethink free speech on social media. J. Inform. Tech. 36(4):409–426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rindova VP, Petkova AP (2007) When is a new thing a good thing? Technological change, product form design, and perceptions of value for product innovations. Organ. Sci. 18(2):217–232.Link, Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Ulloa R, Paucar-Caceres A (2005) Soft system dynamics methodology (SSDM): Combining soft systems methodology (SSM) and system dynamics (SD). Systemic Practice Action Res. 18(3):303–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Romele A, Rodighiero D (2020) Digital habitus or personalization without personality. HUMANA MENTE J. Philos. Stud. 13(37):98–126.Google Scholar
• Rosen J, Alvarez León LF (2022) The digital growth machine: Urban change and the ideology of technology. Ann. Assoc. Amer. Geographers 112(8):2248–2265.Google Scholar
• Rosen M (2016) On Voluntary Servitude: False Consciousness and the Theory of Ideology (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Rowe F (2018) Being critical is good, but better with philosophy! From digital transformation and values to the future of IS research. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 27(3):380–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rowe F, Markus ML (2022) Taking the measure of digital giants: Amazon and the social welfare computing research agenda. Electronic Markets 32(2):437–446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rowe F, Ngwenyama O, Richet JL (2020) Contact tracing apps and alienation in the age of Covid-19. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 29(5):545–562.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sadowski J (2019) When data are capital: Datafication, accumulation, and extraction. Big Data Soc. 6(1), https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517188205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sarker S, Chatterjee S, Xiao X, Elbanna A (2019) The sociotechnical axis of cohesion for the IS discipline: Its historical legacy and its continued relevance. MIS Quart. 43(3):695–720.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schafheitle S, Weibel A, Ebert I, Kasper G, Schank C, Leicht-Deobald U (2020) No stone left unturned? Toward a framework for the impact of datafication technologies on organizational control. Acad. Management Discoveries 6(3):455–487.Google Scholar
• Schou J, Pors AS (2019) Digital by default? A qualitative study of exclusion in digitalised welfare. Soc. Policy Admin. 53(3):464–477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schüßler E, Attwood-Charles W, Kirchner S, Schor JB (2021) Between mutuality, autonomy and domination: Rethinking digital platforms as contested relational structures. Socio-economic Rev. 19(4):1217–1243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwarz O (2019) Facebook rules: Structures of governance in digital capitalism and the control of generalized social capital. Theory Culture Soc. 36(4):117–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seele P, Dierksmeier C, Hofstetter R, Schultz MD (2021) Mapping the ethicality of algorithmic pricing: A review of dynamic and personalized pricing. J. Bus. Ethics 170(4):697–719.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sindzingre AN (2018) Can the concept of exploitation be associated with that of inferiorisation? A critical analysis. Cahiers d’economie Politique 75(2):203–226.Google Scholar
• Siqueira ÉS, Diniz EH, Pozzebon M (2023) Surveilled inclusion and the pitfalls of social fintech platforms. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 24(5):1292–1312.Google Scholar
• Sloan RH, Warner R (2014) Beyond notice and choice: Privacy, norms, and consent. J. High Tech. L. 14(2):370.Google Scholar
• Southerton C, Taylor E (2020) Habitual disclosure: Routine, affordance, and the ethics of young peoples’ social media data surveillance. Soc. Media Soc. 6(2), https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120915612.Google Scholar
• Stahl BC (2012a) Morality, ethics, and reflection: A categorization of normative IS research. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 13(8):1–20.Google Scholar
• Stahl BC (2012b) Responsible research and innovation in information systems. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 21(3):207–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stahl WA (1995) Venerating the black box: Magic in media discourse on technology. Sci. Tech. Human Values 20(2):234–258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steinberg SR, Kincheloe JL (2010) Power, emancipation, and complexity: Employing critical theory. Power Ed. 2(2):140–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stolterman E, Fors AC (2004) Information technology and the good life. Kaplan B, Truex D, Wastell D, Wood-Harper T, De Gross J, eds. Information Systems Research: Relevant Theory and Informed Practice (Springer, Boston), 687–692.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strang KD, Sun Z (2017) Big data paradigm: What is the status of privacy and security? Ann. Data Sci. 4(1):1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Susser D, Roessler B, Nissenbaum H (2019) Technology, autonomy, and manipulation. Internet Policy Rev. 8(2):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thatcher J (2014) Living on fumes: Digital footprints, data fumes, and the limitations of spatial big data. Internat. J. Comm. 8(1):1765–1783.Google Scholar
• Thompson MJ (2015) False consciousness reconsidered: A theory of defective social cognition. Critical Sociol. 41(3):449–461.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsang EW, Ellsaesser F (2011) How contrastive explanation facilitates theory building. Acad. Management Rev. 36(2):404–419.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tucker C (2017) Network stability, network externalities, and technology adoption. Furman J, Gawer A, Silverman BS, Stern S, eds. Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Platforms, Advances in Strategic Management, vol. 37 (Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 151–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Urquhart L, Miranda D (2022) Policing faces: The present and future of intelligent facial surveillance. Inform. Comm. Tech. Law 31(2):194–219.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Dijck J (2014) Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big Data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveillance Soc. 12(2):197–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• West SM (2019) Data capitalism: Redefining the logics of surveillance and privacy. Bus. Soc. 58(1):20–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiener M, Cram W, Benlian A (2021) Algorithmic control and gig workers: A legitimacy perspective of Uber drivers. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 32(3):485–507.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wood AW (1988) Ideology, false consciousness, and social illusion. McLaughlin BP, Rorty AO, eds. Perspectives on Self-Deception (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA), 345–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yearworth M, White L (2013) The uses of qualitative data in multimethodology: Developing causal loop diagrams during the coding process. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 231(1):151–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Young JA, Smith TJ, Zheng SH (2020) Call me BIG PAPA: An extension of Mason’s information ethics framework to big data. J. Midwest Assoc. Inform. Systems 2:17–34.Google Scholar
• Zuboff S (2015) Big other: Surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. J. Inform. Tech. 30(1):75–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuboff S (2019a) Surveillance capitalism and the challenge of collective action. New Labor Forum 28(1):10–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuboff S (2019b) The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power (Public Affairs Publishing, New York).Google Scholar
• Zuboff S (2022) Surveillance capitalism or democracy? The death match of institutional orders and the politics of knowledge in our information civilization. Organ. Theory 3(3), https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877221129290.Google Scholar