Navigating Temporal Plurality in Agile Software Development: A Process Explanation

References

• Ancona D, Waller MJ (2007) The dance of entrainment: Temporally navigating across multiple pacers. Rubin BA, ed. Workplace Temporalities (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 115–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Avgerou C (2013) Social mechanisms for causal explanation in social theory based IS research. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 14(8):399–419.Google Scholar
• Ballard DI (2009) Organizational temporality over time: Activity cycles as sources of entrainment. Roe RA, Waller MJ, Clegg SR, eds. Time in Organizational Research (Routledge, New York), 238–254.Google Scholar
• Ballard DI, Seibold DR (2004) Organizational members’ communication and temporal experience: Scale development and validation. Commun. Res. 31(2):135–172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beck K, Beedle M, van Bennekum A, Cockburn A, Cunningham W, Fowler M, Highsmith J, et al. (2001) Manifesto for Agile software development. Accessed March 1, 2023, http://agilemanifesto.org/.Google Scholar
• Berends H, Deken F (2021) Composing qualitative process research. Strategic Organ. 19(1):134–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berente N, Yoo Y (2012) Institutional contradictions and loose coupling: Postimplementation of NASA’s enterprise information system. Inform. Systems Res. 23(2):376–396.Link, Google Scholar
• Biesenthal C, Sankaran S, Pitsis T, Clegg S (2015) Temporality in organization studies: Implications for strategic project management. Open Econom. Management J. 2(1):45–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blagoev B, Schreyögg G (2019) Why do extreme work hours persist? Temporal uncoupling as a new way of seeing. Acad. Management J. 62(6):1818–1847.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blagoev B, Hernes T, Kunisch S, Schultz M (2024) Time as a research lens: A conceptual review and research agenda. J. Management 50(6):2152–2196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bluedorn AC (2002) The Human Organization of Time: Temporal Realities and Experience (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brooks FP (1975) The Mythical Man-Month (Addison-Wesley Longman, Boston).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cao L, Mohan K, Xu P, Ramesh B (2009) A framework for adapting agile development methodologies. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 18(4):332–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carmel E, Espinosa JA, Dubinsky Y (2010) “Follow the sun”: Workflow in global software development. J. Management Inform. Systems 27(1):17–38. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chari K, Agrawal M (2018) Impact of incorrect and new requirements on waterfall software project outcomes. Empirical Software Engrg. 23(1):165–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cloutier C, Langley A (2020) What makes a process theoretical contribution? Organ. Theory 1(1), https://doi.org/10.1177/2631787720902473. Google Scholar
• Conboy K (2009) Agility from first principles: Reconstructing the concept of agility in information systems development. Inform. Systems Res. 20(3):329–354.Link, Google Scholar
• Cornelissen J (2017) Editor’s comments: Developing propositions, a process model, or a typology? Addressing the challenges of writing theory without a boilerplate. Acad. Management Rev. 42(1):1–9.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dennehy D, Conboy K (2019) Breaking the flow: A study of contradictions in information systems development (ISD). Inform. Tech. People 33(2):477–501.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Digital.ai (2023) 17th state of Agile report. Accessed October 5, 2025, https://info.digital.ai/rs/981-LQX-968/images/RE-SA-17th-Annual-State-Of-Agile-Report.pdf.Google Scholar
• Dikert K, Paasivaara M, Lassenius C (2016) Challenges and success factors for large-scale agile transformations: A systematic literature review. J. Systems Software 119:87–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dille T, Hernes T, Vaagaasar AL (2023) Stuck in temporal translation? Challenges of discrepant temporal structures in interorganizational project collaboration. Organ. Stud. 44(6):867–888.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):532–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM (2021) What is the Eisenhardt Method, really? Strategic Organ. 19(1):147–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Ott TE (2017) Rigor in theory building from multiple cases. Raza M, Jain S, eds. Routledge Companion to Qualitative Research in Organization Studies (Routledge, New York), 79–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elbanna A, Sarker S (2016) The risks of agile software development: Learning from adopters. IEEE Software 33(5):72–79. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisher G, Aguinis H (2017) Using theory elaboration to make theoretical advancements. Organ. Res. Methods 20(3):438–464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forrester JW (1968) Industrial dynamics—After the first decade. Management Sci. 14(7):398–415.Link, Google Scholar
• Glaser BG (1978) Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory (Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA). Google Scholar
• Granqvist N, Gustafsson R (2016) Temporal institutional work. Acad. Management J. 59(3):1009–1035.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gregory P, Barroca L, Taylor K, Salah D, Sharp H (2015) Agile challenges in practice: A thematic analysis. Agile Processes Software Engrg. Extreme Program. XP 2015 Internat. Conf. Agile Software Development (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 64–80.Google Scholar
• Hassard J (1996) Images of time in work and organization. Clegg SR, Hardy C, Nord W, eds. Handbook of Organization Studies (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA), 581–598.Google Scholar
• Hedström P, Ylikoski P (2010) Causal mechanisms in the social sciences. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 36:49–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hernes T, Obstfeld D (2022) A temporal narrative view of sensemaking. Organ. Theory 3(4), https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877221131585. Google Scholar
• Hoda R, Noble J, Marshall S (2011) The impact of inadequate customer collaboration on self-organizing Agile teams. Inform. Software Tech. 53(5):521–534.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iivari J (2021) A paradox lens to systems development projects: The case of agile software development. Commun. Assoc. Inform. Systems 49, https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.04901.Google Scholar
• Jansen KJ, Shipp AJ (2019) Fitting as a temporal sensemaking process: Shifting trajectories and stable themes. Human Relations 72(7):1154–1186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim G, Humble J, Debois P, Willis J (2021) The DevOps Handbook: How to Create World-Class Agility, Reliability, & Security in Technology Organizations (IT Revolution, Portland, OR).Google Scholar
• Klein KJ, Kozlowski SWJ (2000) Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Kula E, Greuter E, Van Deursen A, Gousios G (2022) Factors affecting on-time delivery in large-scale agile software development. IEEE Trans. Software Engrg. 48(9):3573–3592. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kunzl F, Messner M (2023) Temporal structuring as self-discipline: Managing time in the budgeting process. Organ. Stud. 44(9):1439–1464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langley A (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad. Management Rev. 24(4):691–710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee G, Xia W (2010) Toward agile: An integrated analysis of quantitative and qualitative field data on software development agility. MIS Quart. 4(1):87–114. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mangalaraj G, Nerur S, Mahapatra R, Price KH (2014) Distributed cognition in software design: An experimental investigation of the role of design patterns and collaboration. MIS Quart. 38(1):249–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H (1979) The Structuring of Organizations (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Moe NB, Dingsøyr T, Dybå T (2010) A teamwork model for understanding an agile team: A case study of a Scrum project. Inform. Software Tech. 52(5):480–491.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moe NB, Šmite D, Paasivaara M, Lassenius C (2021) Finding the sweet spot for organizational control and team autonomy in large-scale agile software development. Empirical Software Engrg. 26(5):101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moe NB, Dahl BH, Stray V, Karlsen LS, Schjødt-Osmo S (2019) Team autonomy in large-scale agile. Proc. Annu. Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. HICSS (AIS Electronic Library, Maui, HI), 6997–7006. Google Scholar
• Mohammed S, Nadkarni S (2011) Temporal diversity and team performance: The moderating role of team temporal leadership. Acad. Management J. 54(3):489–508.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nandhakumar J, Jones M (2001) Accounting for time: Managing time in project-based teamworking. Accounting Organ. Soc. 26(3):193–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Connor M, Conboy K, Dennehy D, Carroll N (2024) Temporal complexity in information systems development flow: Challenges and recommendations. Commun. Assoc. Inform. Systems 54:699–735.Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ, Yates J (2002) It’s about time: Temporal structuring in organizations. Organ. Sci. 13(6):684–700.Link, Google Scholar
• Pang M-S, Lee G (2022) The impact of IT decision-making authority on IT project performance in the U.S. federal government. MIS Quart. 46(3):1759–1776.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pentland BT, Kremser W, Goh KT (2025) Path nets: Concurrence and recurrence in the dynamics of organizing. Acad. Management Rev. 50(1):114–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pérez-Nordtvedt L, Payne GT, Short JC, Kedia BL (2008) An entrainment-based model of temporal organizational fit, misfit, and performance. Organ. Sci. 19(5):785–801.Link, Google Scholar
• Reinecke J, Ansari S (2015) When times collide: Temporal brokerage at the intersection of markets and developments. Acad. Management J. 58(2):618–648.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reinecke J, Lawrence TB (2023) The role of temporality in institutional stabilization: A process view. Acad. Management Rev. 48(4):639–658.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sarker S, Sahay S (2004) Implications of space and time for distributed work: An interpretive study of US–Norwegian systems development teams. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 13(1):3–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sarker S, Xiao X, Beaulieu T (2013) Qualitative studies in information systems: A critical review and some guiding principles. MIS Quart. 37(4):iii–xviii.Google Scholar
• Shipp AJ, Richardson HA (2021) The impact of temporal schemata: Understanding when individuals entrain versus resist or create temporal structure. Acad. Management Rev. 46(2):299–319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Slawinski N, Bansal P (2015) Short on time: Intertemporal tensions in business sustainability. Organ. Sci. 26(2):531–549.Link, Google Scholar
• Stacey P, Nandhakumar J (2009) A temporal perspective of the computer game development process. Inform. Systems J. 19(5):479–497.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vial G, Rivard S (2016) A process explanation of the effects of institutional distance between parties in outsourced information systems development projects. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 25(5):448–464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vidgen R, Wang X (2009) Coevolving systems and the organization of agile software development. Inform. Systems Res. 20(3):355–376.Link, Google Scholar
• Wiedemann A, Wiesche M, Gewald H, Krcmar H (2023) Integrating development and operations teams: A control approach for DevOps. Inform. Organ. 33(3):100474. Google Scholar
• Wunderlich P, Veit DJ, Sarker S (2019) Adoption of sustainable technologies: A mixed-methods study of German households. MIS Quart. 43(2):673–691.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yakura EK (2002) Charting time: Timelines as temporal boundary objects. Acad. Management J. 45(5):956–970.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yetton P, Martin A, Sharma R, Johnston K (2000) A model of information systems development project performance. Inform. Systems J. 10(4):263–289.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ylikoski P (2013) Causal and constitutive explanation compared. Erkenntnis 78:277–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Yoo Y, Lyytinen K, Lindberg A (2021) The unknowability of autonomous tools and the liminal experience of their use. Inform. Systems Res. 32(4):1192–1213.Link, Google Scholar