Growing Technological Relatedness to the ICT Industry and Its Impacts

References

• Adomavicius G, Bockstedt JC, Gupta A, Kauffman RJ (2008) Making sense of technology trends in the information technology landscape: A design science approach. MIS Quart. 32(4):779–809.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alcácer J, Gittelman M, Sampat B (2009) Applicant and examiner citations in U.S. patents: An overview and analysis. Res. Policy 38(2):415–427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amit R, Zott C (2012) Creating value through business model innovation. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 53(3):41–49.Google Scholar
• Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev. Econom. Stud. 58(2):277–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arellano M, Bover O (1995) Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. J. Econometrics 68(1):29–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Branstetter LG, Drev M (2013) Going soft: How the rise of software-based innovation led to the decline of Japan’s IT industry and the resurgence of Silicon Valley. Rev. Econom. Statist. 95(3):757–775.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Atouba Y, Shumate M (2010) Interorganizational networking patterns among development organizations. J. Comm. 60(2):293–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bardhan I, Krishnan V, Lin S (2013) Research note: Business value of information technology: Testing the interaction effect of IT and R&D on Tobin’s Q. Inform. Systems Res. 24(4):1147–1161.Link, Google Scholar
• Benkler Y (2006) The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
• Bessen J, Hunt R (2004) The software patent experiment. Bus. Rev. (Q3):22–32.Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj A, Sawy OAE, Pavlou PA, Venkatraman N (2013) Digital business strategy: Toward a next generation of insights. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 37(2):471–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blundell R, Bond S (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J. Econometrics 87(1):115–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boland RJ, Lyytinen K, Yoo Y (2007) Wakes of innovation in project networks: The case of digital 3-D representations in architecture, engineering, and construction. Organ. Sci. 18(4):631–647.Link, Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ (2011) Let a thousand flowers bloom? An early look at large numbers of software app developers and patterns of innovation. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1409–1427.Link, Google Scholar
• Branstetter LG, Drev M, Kwond N (2019) Get with the program: Software-driven innovation in traditional manufacturing. Management Sci. 65(2):541–558.Link, Google Scholar
• Bresnahan TF, Trajtenberg M (1995) General purpose technologies ‘Engines of growth’? J. Econometrics 65(1):83–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carnabuci G, Operti E (2013) Where do firms’ recombinant capabilities come from? Intraorganizational networks, knowledge, and firms’ ability to innovate through technological recombination. Strategic Management J. 34(13):1591–1613.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan TH, Bharadwaj A, Varadarajan D (2022) Business method innovation in US manufacturing and trade. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag. 25(1):50–69.Google Scholar
• Cockburn IM, Kortum S, Stern S (2002) Are all patent examiners equal? The impact of examiner characteristics. NBER Working Paper No. 8980, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Cohen L, Diether K, Malloy C (2013) Misvaluing innovation. Rev. Financial Stud. 26(3):635–666.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corrocher N, Malerba F, Montobbio F (2007) Schumpeterian patterns of innovative activity in the ICT field. Res. Policy 36(3):418–432.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cranmer SJ, Desmarais BA (2011) Inferential network analysis with exponential random graph models. Political Anal. 19(1):66–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeDeo S, Hawkins RX, Klingenstein S, Hitchcock T (2013) Bootstrap methods for the empirical study of decision-making and information flows in social systems. Entropy 15(6):2246–2276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Desyllas P, Sako M (2013) Profiting from business model innovation: Evidence from Pay-As-You-Drive auto insurance. Res. Policy 42(1):101–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feng GU (2016) Innovation, future earnings, and market efficiency. J. Accounting Auditing Finance 20(4):385–418.Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Mithas S, Morgeson FV III, Krishnan M (2018) Customer satisfaction and stock prices: High returns, low risk. J. Marketing 70(1):3–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frischkorn H-G (2004) Automotive software-the silent revolution. Keynote, Automotive Software Workshop, San Diego.Google Scholar
• Galunic DC, Rodan S (1998) Resource recombinations in the firm: Knowledge structures and the potential for Schumpeterian innovation. Strategic Management J. 19:1193–1201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gatignon H, Tushman ML, Smith W, Anderson P (2002) A structural approach to assessing innovation: Construct development of innovation locus, type, and characteristics. Management Sci. 48(9):1103–1122.Link, Google Scholar
• Gaulé P (2018) Patents and the success of venture-capital backed startups: Using examiner assignment to estimate causal effects. J. Industrial Econom. 66(2):350–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gawer A (2009) Platforms, Markets, and Innovation (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldfarb A, Taska B, Teodoridis F (2022) Could machine learning be a general purpose technology? A comparison of emerging technologies using data from online job postings. NBER Working Paper No. 29767, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Goodreau SM, Kitts JA, Morris M (2009) Birds of a feather, or friend of a friend? Using exponential random graph models to investigate adolescent social networks. Demography 46(1):103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graham SJ, Mowery DC (2003) Intellectual property protection in the US software industry. Merrill SA, Cohen WM, eds. Patents in the Knowledge-Based Economy, Illustrated ed. (National Academies Press, Washington, DC), 219–231.Google Scholar
• Griliches Z (1990) Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. J. Econom. Literature 28(4):1661–1707.Google Scholar
• Grimm K (2003) Software technology in an automotive company: Major challenges. Proc. Internat. Conf. Software Engrg. (IEEE Computer Society, Piscataway, NJ), 498–503.Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Lawrence PR, Puranam P (2005) Adaptation in vertical relationships: Beyond incentive conflict. Strategic Management J. 26(5):415–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall BH, Trajtenberg M (2004) Uncovering GPTS with patent data. NBER Working Paper No. 10901, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Hall BH, Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M, Berglass E (2001) The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. NBER Working Paper No. 8498, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Hanseth O, Lyytinen K (2016) Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: The case of building internet. Enacting Res. Methods Inform. Systems 3:104–142.Google Scholar
• Henderson RM, Clark KB (1990) Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):9.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henfridsson O, Bygstad B (2013) The generative mechanisms of digital infrastructure evolution. Manage. Inf. Syst. Q. 37(3):907–931.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirshleifer D, Hsu PH, Li D (2013) Innovative efficiency and stock returns. J. Financial Econom. 107(3):632–654.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoberg G, Phillips G (2016) Text-based network industries and endogenous product differentiation. J. Political Econom. 124(5):1423–1465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang AG (2009) The cross section of cashflow volatility and expected stock returns. J. Empirical Finance 16(3):409–429.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iyer B, Venkatraman N (2015) What comes after smart products. Accessed April 24, 2024, https://hbr.org/2015/07/what-comes-after-smart-products.Google Scholar
• Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M, Henderson R (1993) Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quart. J. Econom. 108(3):577–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joshi KD, Chi L, Datta A, Han S (2010) Changing the competitive landscape: Continuous innovation through IT-enabled knowledge capabilities. Inform. Systems Res. 21(3):472–495.Link, Google Scholar
• Jovanovic B, Rousseau PL (2005) General purpose technologies. Handbook of Economic Growth, vol. 1, 1st ed. (Elsevier, New York), 1181–1224.Google Scholar
• Katila R, Ahuja G (2002) Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Acad. Management J. 45(6):1183–1194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keefe MO, Yaghoubi M (2016) The influence of cash flow volatility on capital structure and the use of debt of different maturities. J. Corporate Finance 38:18–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kerr WR, Lincoln WF (2010) The supply side of innovation: H-1B visa reforms and U.S. ethnic invention. J. Labor Econom. 28(3):473–508.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim K, Gopal A, Hoberg G (2016b) Does product market competition drive CVC investment? Evidence from the U.S. IT industry. Inform. Systems Res. 27(2):259–281.Link, Google Scholar
• Kim JY, Howard M, Cox Pahnke E, Boeker W (2016a) Understanding network formation in strategy research: Exponential random graph models. Strategic Management J. 37(1):22–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleis L, Chwelos P, Ramirez RV, Cockburn I (2012) Information technology and intangible output: The impact of IT investment on innovation productivity. Inform. Systems Res. 23(1):42–59.Link, Google Scholar
• Kogan L, Papanikolaou D, Seru A, Stoffman N (2017) Technological innovation, resource allocation, and growth. Quart. J. Econom. 132(2):665–712.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kortum S, Putnam J (2006) Assigning patents to industries: Tests of the Yale technology concordance. Econom. Systems Res. 9(2):161–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koutroumpis P, Leiponen A, Thomas LDW (2017) Invention machines: How control instruments and information technologies drove global technologigal progress over a century of invention. ETLA Working Papers No. 52, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy (ETLA), Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar
• Krasnikov A, Mishra S, Orozco D (2009) Evaluating the financial impact of branding using trademarks: A framework and empirical evidence. J. Marketing 73(6):154–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lavie D (2006) Capability reconfiguration: An analysis of incumbent responses to technological change on JSTOR. Acad. Management Rev. 31(1):153–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lemley M, Sampat B (2012) Examiner characteristics and patent office outcomes. Rev. Econom. Statist. 94(3):817–827.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonard Barton D (1992) Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management J. 13(S1):111–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lev B, Sougiannis T (1996) The capitalization, amortization, and value-relevance of R&D. J. Accounting Econom. 21(1):107–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu X, Lu J, Filatotchev I, Buck T, Wright M (2010) Returnee entrepreneurs, knowledge spillovers and innovation in high-tech firms in emerging economies. J. Internat. Bus. Studies 41(7):1183–1197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lusher D, Koskinen J, Robins G (2012) Exponential Random Graph Models for Social Networks: Theory, Methods, and Applications (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• McAfee A, Brynjolfsson E (2008) Investing in the IT that makes a competitive difference. Harvard Bus. Rev. 86(7):98–107.Google Scholar
• McElheran K (2015) Do market leaders lead in business process innovation? The case(s) of E-business adoption. Management Sci. 61(6):1197–1216.Link, Google Scholar
• Melero E, Palomeras N, Wehrheim D (2020) The effect of patent protection on inventor mobility. Management Sci. 66(12):5485–5504.Link, Google Scholar
• Merges R (1999) The law and economics of employee inventions. Havard J. Law Tech. 13(1):1–54.Google Scholar
• Nandkumar A, Mani D, Bharadwaj A (2018) Market returns to digital innovations: A group based trajectory approach. Acad. Management J. 2018(1):15241.Google Scholar
• Pavlou PA, Sawy OA (2010) The “third hand”: IT-enabled competitive advantage in turbulence through improvisational capabilities. Inform. Systems Res. 21(3):443–471.Link, Google Scholar
• Petralia S (2020) Mapping general purpose technologies with patent data. Res. Policy 49(7):104013.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter M, Heppelmann J (2014) How smart, connected products are transforming competition. Harvard Bus. Rev. 92(11):64–68.Google Scholar
• Porter ME, Heppelmann JE (2015) How smart, connected products are transforming companies. Harvard Bus. Rev. 93(10):96–114.Google Scholar
• Rahmati P, Tafti A, Westland JC, Hidalgo C (2021) When all products are digital: Complexity and intangible value in the ecosystem of digitizing firms. MIS Quart. 45(3):1025–1058.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rappaport A (1986) Creating Shareholder Value: The New Standard for Business Performance (Simer and Schuster Publishing Group, New York).Google Scholar
• Ravichandran T, Han S, Mithas S (2017) Mitigating diminishing returns to R&D: The role of information technology in innovation. Inform. Systems Res. 28(4):812–827.Link, Google Scholar
• Righi C, Simcoe T (2019) Patent examiner specialization. Res. Policy. 48(1):137–148.Google Scholar
• Robins G, Pattison P, Wang P (2009) Closure, connectivity and degree distributions: Exponential random graph (p*) models for directed social networks. Soc. Networks 31(2):105–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saldanha TJV, Mithas S, Krishnan MS (2017) Leveraging customer involvement for fueling innovation: The role of relational and analytical information processing capabilities. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 41(1):267–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sampat B, Lemley M (2010) Examining patent examination. Stanford Tech. Law Rev. 2010:2.Google Scholar
• Sampat B, Williams HL (2019) How do patents affect follow-on innovation? Evidence from the human genome. Amer. Econom. Rev. 109(1):203–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scherer FM (1982) Inter-industry technology flows and productivity growth. Rev. Econom. Statist. 64(4):627.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schumpeter JA (1939) Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process, vol. 1 (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Schumpeter JA (1947) The creative response in economic history. J. Econom. History 7(2):149–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shorey R (2011) Emerging trends in vehicular communications. Technical report, IEEE, New York.Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1996) The Sciences of the Artificial (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Snijders TA, Pattison PE, Robins GL, Handcock MS (2006) New specifications for exponential random graph models. Sociol. Methodology 36(1):99–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srinivasan S, Pauwels K, Silva-Risso J, Hanssens DM (2009) Product innovations, advertising, and stock returns. J. Marketing 73(1):24–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srivastava RK, Shervani TA, Fahey L (1998) Market-based assets and shareholder value: A framework for analysis. J. Marketing 62(1):2–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece DJ (2010) Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning 43(2–3):172–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tiwana A (2015) Evolutionary competition in platform ecosystems. Inform. Systems Res. 26(2):266–281.Link, Google Scholar
• Tiwana A, Konsynski B, Bush AA (2010) Research commentary-platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):675–687.Link, Google Scholar
• Tushman ML, Anderson P (1986) Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(3):439.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ulrich K (1995) The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Res. Policy 24(3):419–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Um S, Yoo Y, Wattal S, Kulathinal R, Zhang B (2013) The architecture of generativity in a digital ecosystem: A network biology perspective. ICIS 2013 Proc. 15 (AIS Electronic Library, Atlanta).Google Scholar
• USPTO (2017) USPTO white paper - automated business methods - Section III Class 705. Accessed April 24, 2024, https://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/classification/uspc705/defs705.htm.Google Scholar
• Verspagen B (1996) Measuring intersectoral technology spillovers: Estimates from the European and US Patent Office databases. Econom. Systems Res. 9(1):47–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wadhwa A, Kotha S (2006) Knowledge creation through external venturing: Evidence from the telecommunications equipment manufacturing industry on JSTOR. Acad. Management J. 49(4):819–835.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang P, Robins G, Pattison P, Lazega E (2013) Exponential random graph models for multilevel networks. Social Networks 35(1):96–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wasserman S, Pattison P (1996) Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks: I. An introduction to Markov graphs and p. Psychometrika 61(3):401–425.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wimmer A, Lewis K (2010) Beyond and below racial homophily: ERG models of a friendship network documented on Facebook. Amer. J. Sociol. 116(2):583–642.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yayavaram S, Ahuja G (2008) Decomposability in knowledge structures and its impact on the usefulness of inventions and knowledge-base malleability. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(2):333–362.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yoo Y, Henfridsson O, Lyytinen K (2010) Research commentary: The new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):724–735.Link, Google Scholar
• Yoo Y, Boland RJ, Lyytinen K, Majchrzak A (2012) Organizing for innovation in the digitized world. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1398–1408.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhong RI (2018) Transparency and firm innovation. J. Accounting Econom. 66(1):67–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zittrain JL (2006) The generative internet. Harvard Law Rev. 119(7):1974–2040.Google Scholar