An Empirical Investigation of the Antecedents and Consequences of Privacy Uncertainty in the Context of Mobile Apps

References

• Acquisti A, Grossklags J (2007) What can behavioral economics teach us about privacy? Acquisti A, Gritzalis S, Lambrinoudakis C, De Capitani di Vimercati S, eds. Digital Privacy: Theory, Technologies, and Practices (Auerbach Publications, Boca Raton, FL), 363–377.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acquisti A, Grossklags J (2012) An online survey experiment on ambiguity and privacy. Digiworld Econom. J. 88(4):19–39.Google Scholar
• Acquisti A, Adjerid I, Brandimarte L (2013) Gone in 15 seconds: The limits of privacy transparency and control. IEEE Security Privacy 11(4):72–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acquisti A, Brandimarte L, Loewenstein G (2015) Privacy and human behavior in the age of information. Science 347(6221):509–514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acquisti A, Adjerid I, Balebako R, Brandimarte L, Cranor LF, Komanduri S, Leon P, et al.. (2017) Nudges for privacy and security: Understanding and assisting users’ choices online. ACM Comput. Surveys 50(3):1–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adjerid I, Peer E, Acquisti A (2018) Beyond the privacy paradox: Objective vs. relative risk in privacy decision making. MIS Quart. 42(2):465–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adjerid I, Acquisti A, Loewenstein G (2014) Framing and the malleability of privacy choices. Proc. 13th Workshop Econom. Inform. Security (The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA).Google Scholar
• Adjerid I, Acquisti A, Brandimarte L, Loewenstein G (2013) Sleights of privacy: Framing, disclosures, and the limits of transparency. Proc. 9th Sympos. Usable Privacy Security (ACM, New York), Article 9.Google Scholar
• Akerlof GA (1970) The market for lemons: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quart. J. Econom. 84(3):488–500.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Almuhimedi H, Schaub F, Sadeh N, Adjerid I, Acquisti A, Gluck J, Cranor L, Agarwal Y (2015) Your location has been shared 5,398 times!: A field study on mobile app privacy nudging. Proc. 33rd Annual ACM Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (ACM, New York), 787–796.Google Scholar
• Al-Natour S, Benbasat I, Cenfetelli R (2011) The adoption of online shopping assistants: Perceived similarity as an antecedent to evaluative beliefs. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 12(5):347–374.Google Scholar
• Arrow KJ (1963) Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care. Amer. Econom. Rev. 53(5):941–973.Google Scholar
• Arrow KJ (1971) Essays in the Theory of Risk-Bearing (Markham Publishing, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Balebako R, Schaub F, Adjerid I, Acquisti A, Cranor L (2015) The impact of timing on the salience of smartphone app privacy notices. Proc. 5th Annual ACM CCS Workshop Security Privacy Smartphones Mobile Devices (ACM, New York), 63–74.Google Scholar
• Bar-Anan Y, Liberman N, Trope Y (2006) The association between psychological distance and construal level: Evidence from an implicit association test. J. Experiment. Psych. Gen. 135(4):609–622.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barclay D, Thompson R, Higgins C (1995) The partial least squares (PLS) approach to causal modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Tech. Stud. 2(2):285–324.Google Scholar
• Beatty SE, Smith SM (1987) External search effort: An investigation across several product categories. J. Consumer Res. 14(1):83–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belanger F, Hiller JS, Smith WJ (2002) Trustworthiness in electronic commerce: The role of privacy, security, and site attributes. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 11(3–4):245–270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bettman JR, Park CW (1980) Effects of prior knowledge and experience and phase of the choice process on consumer decision processes: A protocol analysis. J. Consumer Res. 7(3):234–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhatnagar A, Misra S, Rao HR (2000) On risk, convenience, and internet shopping behavior. Comm. ACM 43(11):98–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boudreau MC, Gefen D, Straub DW (2001) Validation in information systems research: A state-of-the-art assessment. MIS Quart. 25(1):1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boulding W, Kirmani A (1993) A consumer-side experimental examination of signaling theory: do consumers perceive warranties as signals of quality? J. Consumer Res. 20(1):111–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowles N (2018) After Cambridge Analytica, privacy experts get to say ‘I told you so.’ New York Times (April 12), https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/12/technology/privacy-researchers-facebook.html.Google Scholar
• Cenfetelli RT, Bassellier G (2009) Interpretation of formative measurement in information systems research. MIS Quart. 33(4):689–707.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chellappa RK, Sin R (2005) Personalization vs. privacy: An empirical examination of the online consumer’s dilemma. Inform. Tech. Management 6(2–3):181–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Connelly BL, Certo ST, Ireland RD, Reutzel CR (2011) Signaling theory: A review and assessment. J. Management 37(1):39–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crocker KE (1986) The influence of the amount and type of information on individuals’ perception of legal services. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 14(4):18–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Darrough MN, Stoughton NM (1986) Moral hazard and adverse selection: The question of financial structure. J. Finance 41(2):501–513.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davidson P (1991) Is probability theory relevant for uncertainty? A post Keynesian perspective. J. Econom. Perspect. 5(1):129–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dellarocas C (2003) The digitization of word of mouth: Promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms. Management Sci. 49(10):1407–1424.Link, Google Scholar
• Dimoka A, Hong Y, Pavlou PA (2012) On product uncertainty in online markets: Theory and evidence. MIS Quart. 36(2):395–426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM (1989) Agency theory: An assessment and review. Acad. Management Rev. 14(1):57–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellsberg D (1961) Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms. Quart. J. Econom. 75(4):643–669.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Featherman MS, Pavlou PA (2003) Predicting e-services adoption: A perceived risk facets perspective. Internat. J. Human Comput. Stud. 59(4):451–474.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Felt AP, Ha E, Egelman S, Haney A, Chin E, Wagner D (2012) Android permissions: User attention, comprehension, and behavior. Proc. 8th Sympos. Usable Privacy Security, Paper 3 (ACM, New York).Google Scholar
• Fiedler K (2007) Construal level theory as an integrative framework for behavioral decision‐making research and consumer psychology. J. Consumer Psych. 17(2):101–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisher RA (1915) Frequency distribution of the values of the correlation coefficient in samples from an indefinitely large population. Biometrika 10(4):507–521.Google Scholar
• Fleiss JL, Cohen J (1973) The equivalence of weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. Ed. Psych. Measurement 33(3):613–619.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Marketing Res. 18(1):39–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghose A (2009) Internet exchanges for used goods: An empirical analysis of trade patterns and adverse selection. MIS Quart. 33(2):263–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodwin C (1991) Privacy: Recognition of a consumer right. J. Public Policy Marketing 10(1):149–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grossman S, Hart O (1983) An analysis of the principal-agent problem. Econometrica 51(1):7–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gu J, Xu YC, Xu H, Zhang C, Ling H (2017) Privacy concerns for mobile app download: An elaboration likelihood model perspective. Decision Support Systems 94(2):19–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hair JF Jr, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC (1995) Multivariate Data Analysis, 3rd ed. (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
• Hann I, Hui K, Lee S, Png I (2007) Overcoming online information privacy concerns: An information-processing theory approach. J. Management Inform. Systems 24(2):13–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harman HH (1967) Modern Factor Analysis (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Holmström B (1979) Moral hazard and observability. Bell J. Econom. 10(1):74–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jasso G (2006) Factorial survey methods for studying beliefs and judgments. Sociol. Methods Res. 34(3):334–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen C, Potts C (2004) Privacy policies as decision-making tools: An evaluation of online privacy notices. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (ACM, New York), 471–478.Google Scholar
• John LK, Acquisti A, Loewenstein G (2010) Strangers on a plane: Context-dependent willingness to divulge sensitive information. J. Consumer Res. 37(5):858–873.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson EJ, Russo JE (1984) Product familiarity and learning new information. J. Consumer Res. 11(1):542–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 42(2):263–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keith MJ, Thompson SC, Hale J, Greer C (2012) Examining the rationality of information disclosure through mobile devices. Proc. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (Association for Information Systems, Atlanta).Google Scholar
• Keith MJ, Thompson SC, Hale J, Greer C, Lowry PB (2012) Information disclosure on mobile devices: Re-examining privacy calculus with actual user behavior. Internat. J. Human Comput. Stud. 71(12):1163–1173.Google Scholar
• Kirmani A, Rao AR (2000) No pain, no gain: A critical review of the literature on signaling unobservable product quality. J. Marketing 66(2):66–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knight FH (1921) Risk, Uncertainty and Product (Hart, Schaffner and Marx, New York).Google Scholar
• Kock N (2015) Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. Internat. J. e-Collaboration 11(4):1–10.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laffont J-J, Martimort D (2002) The Theory of Incentives: The Principal-Agent Model (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li H, Sarathy R, Xu H (2010) Understanding situational online information disclosure as a privacy calculus. J. Comput. Inform. Systems 51(1):62–71.Google Scholar
• Lindell MK, Whitney DJ (2001) Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. J. Appl. Psych. 86(1):114–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Linder S, Foss NJ (2015) Agency theory. Wright JD, ed. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 344–350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malhotra NK, Kim SS, Agarwal J (2004) Internet Users’ Information Privacy Concerns (IUIPC): The construct, the scale, and a causal model. Inform. Systems Res. 15(4):336–355.Link, Google Scholar
• Malhotra NK, Kim SS, Patil A (2006) Common method variance in IS research: A comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research. Management Sci. 52(12):1865–1883.Link, Google Scholar
• Meng XL, Rosenthal R, Rubin DB (1992) Comparing correlated correlation coefficients. Psych. Bull. 111(1):172–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mishra DP, Heide JANB, Cort SG (1998) Information asymmetry agency and levels of relationships. J. Marketing Res. 35(3):277–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitra K, Reiss MC, Capella LM (1999) An examination of perceived risk, information search and behavioral intentions in search, experience and credence services. J. Service Marketing 13(3):208–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore C (2018) End of the book? 1.8 MILLION Australian social media users delete Facebook in wake of privacy scandal as the network is named as the country’s ‘most distrusted media brand.’ Daily Mail (June 25), http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5883781/End-book-1-8-MILLION-Australian-users-delete-Facebook-scandal.html.Google Scholar
• Moore GC, Benbasat I (1991) Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inform. Systems Res. 2(3):192–222.Link, Google Scholar
• Pavlou PA, Liang HG, Xue YJ (2007) Understanding and mitigating uncertainty in online exchange relationships: A principal-agent perspective. MIS Quart. 31(1):105–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ringle CM, Wende S, Becker JM (2015) SmartPLS 3. (Computer software.) SmartPLS GmbH, Boenningstedt, Germany. http://www.smartpls.de. (last accessed on April 14, 2019).Google Scholar
• Ross SA (1973) The economic theory of agency: The principal’s problem. Amer. Econom. Rev. 63(2):134–139.Google Scholar
• Rossi PH, Anderson AB (1982) The factorial survey approach: An introduction. Rossi PH, Nock S, eds. Measuring Social Judgments: The Factorial Survey Approach (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA), 15–67.Google Scholar
• Smith HJ, Milberg SJ, Burke SJ (1996) Information privacy: Measuring individuals’ concerns about organizational practices. MIS Quart. 20(2):167–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sommerlad J (2018) MyFitnessPal suffers data breach as 150m users’ details stolen by hackers. Independent (March 30), https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/myfitnesspal-hacked-data-breach-exercise-app-subscribers-information-stolen-a8281026.html.Google Scholar
• Son JY, Kim SS (2008) Internet users’ information privacy-protective responses: A taxonomy and a nomological model. MIS Quart. 32(3):503–529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spence M (1973) Job market signaling. Quart. J. Econom. 87(3):355–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spence M (2002) Signaling in retrospect and the informational structure of markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(3):434–459.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutanto J, Palme E, Tan CH, Phang CW (2013) Addressing the personalization-privacy paradox: An empirical assessment from a field experiment on smartphone users. MIS Quart. 37(4):1141–1164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tan E (2018) One in 20 Brits delete Facebook accounts after the Cambridge Analytica scandal. Campaign (April 2), https://www.campaignlive.co.uk/article/one-20-brits-delete-facebook-accounts-cambridge-analytica-scandal/1460836.Google Scholar
• Tobacyk J, Milford G (1983) Belief in paranormal phenomena: Assessment instrument development and implications for personality functioning. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 44(5):1029–1037.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trope Y, Liberman N (2010) Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psych. Rev. 117(2):440–463.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsai JY, Egelman S, Cranor L, Acquisti A (2011) The effect of online privacy information on purchasing behavior: An experimental study. Inform. Systems Res. 22(2):254–268.Link, Google Scholar
• Vance A, Lowry PB, Eggett DL (2015) Increasing accountability through user-interface design artifacts: A new approach to addressing the problem of access-policy violations. MIS Quart. 39(2):345–366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1944) Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Wallander L (2009) 25 years of factorial surveys in sociology: A review. Soc. Sci. Res. 38(3):505–520.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Warzel C (2019) The loophole that turns your apps into spies. New York Times (September 24), https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/24/opinion/facebook-google-apps-data.html.Google Scholar
• Winter RA (2000) Optimal insurance under moral hazard. Dionne G, ed. Handbook of Insurance (Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands), 155–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xu H, Luo XR, Carroll JM, Rosson MB (2011) The personalization privacy paradox: An exploratory study of decision making process for location-aware marketing. Decision Support Systems 51(1):42–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xu H, Teo HH, Tan BC, Agarwal R (2009) The role of push-pull technology in privacy calculus: the case of location-based services. J. Management Inform. Systems 26(3):135–174.Crossref, Google Scholar