The Unintended Consequences of Antipiracy Laws on Markets with Asymmetric Piracy: The Case of the French Movie Industry

References

• Adermon A, Liang CY (2014) Piracy and music sales: The effects of an anti-piracy law. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 105(September):90–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aguiar L, Claussen J, Peukert C (2018) Catch me if you can: Effectiveness and consequences of online copyright enforcement. Inform. Systems Res. 29(3):656–678.Link, Google Scholar
• Association de lutte contre la piraterie audiovisuelle (2008) Le téléchargement illégal des oeuvres cinématographiques francophones. Report, Association de lutte contre la piraterie audiovisuelle, Paris.Google Scholar
• Bai J, Waldfogel J (2012) Movie piracy and sales displacement in a sample of Chinese college students. Inform. Econom. Policy 24(3):187–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belleflamme P, Peitz M (2012) Digital piracy: Theory. The Oxford Handbook of the Digital Economy (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 1–29.Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S (2004) How much should we trust differences-in- differences estimates? Quart. J. Econom. 119(1):249–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhattacharjee S, Gopal RD, Lertwachara K, Marsden JR (2006) Impact of legal threat on online music sharing activity: An analysis of music industry legal actions. J. Law Econom. 49(1):91–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhattacharjee S, Gopal R, Lertwachara K, Marden J, Telang R (2007) The effects of digital sharing technologies on music markets: A survival analysis of albums on ranking charts. Management Sci. 53(9):1359–1374.Link, Google Scholar
• Cameron AC, Gelbach JB, Miller DL (2008) Bootstrap-based improvements for inference with clustered errors. Rev. Econom. Statist. 90(3):414–427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conley TG, Taber CR (2011) Inference with “difference in differences” with a small number of policy changes. Rev. Econom. Statist. 93(1):113–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cumming E, Henry WE (1961) Growing Old: The Process of Disengagement (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Danaher B, Smith MD (2014) Gone in 60 seconds: The impact of the Megaupload shutdown on movie sales. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 33(March):1–8.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danaher B, Waldfogel J (2012) Reel piracy: The effect of online film piracy of international box office sales. Working paper, Chapman University, Orange.Google Scholar
• Danaher B, Smith MD, Telang R (2017) Copyright enforcement in the digital age: Empirical evidence and policy implications. Comm. ACM 60(2):68–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danaher B, Dhanaobhon S, Smith MD, Telang R (2010) Converting pirates without cannibalizing purchasers: The impact of digital distribution on physical sales and internet piracy. Marketing Sci. 29(6):125–139.Link, Google Scholar
• Danaher B, Smith MD, Telang R, Chen S (2014) The effect of graduated response anti-piracy laws on music sales: Evidence from an event study in France. J. Indust. Econom. 62(3):541–553.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Einav L (2007) Seasonality in the U.S. motion picture industry. RAND J. Econom. 38(1):127–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Einav L, Orbach B (2007) Uniform prices for differentiated goods: The case of the movie-theater industry. Internat. Rev. Law Econom. 27(2):129–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elberse A, Eliashberg J (2003) Demand and supply dynamics for sequentially released products in international markets: The case of motion pictures. Marketing Sci. 22(3):329–354.Link, Google Scholar
• Forman C, Ghose A, Goldfarb A (2009) Competition between local and electronic markets: How the benefit of buying online depends on where you live. Management Sci. 55(1):47–57.Google Scholar
• Gentzkow M (2007) Valuing new goods in a model with complementarity: Online newspapers. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(3):713–744.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghose A, Smith MD, Telang R (2006) Internet exchanges for used books: An empirical analysis of product cannibalization and welfare impact. Inform. Systems Res. 17(1):3–19.Link, Google Scholar
• Giorcelli M, Moser P (2020) Copyright and creativity: Evidence from Italian opera in the Napoleanic age. Forthcoming. J. Political Econom.Google Scholar
• HADOPI (2011) Hadopi, biens culturels et usages d’Internet: Pratiques et perceptions des internautes français. Report, HAPDOPI Agency.Google Scholar
• Heath C, Soll B (1996) J. Mental budgeting and consumer decisions. J. Consum. Res. 23(1):40–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hennig-Thurau T, Henning V, Sattler H (2007) Consumer file sharing of motion pictures. J. Marketing 71(4):1–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hilger J, Rafert G, Villas-Boas S (2011) Expert opinion and the demand for experience goods: An experimental approach in the retail wine market. Rev. Econom. Statist. 93(4):1289–1296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holloway IR (2017) Learning via sequential market entry: Evidence from international releases of U.S. movies. J. Internat. Econom. 104(January):104–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liebowitz S (2006) File-sharing: Creative destruction or just plain destruction? J. Law Econom. 49(1):1–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liebowitz S (2008) Testing file-sharing’s impact by examining record sales in cities. Management Sci. 54(4):852–859.Link, Google Scholar
• Liebowitz S, Zentner A (2012) Clash of the titans: Does internet use reduce television viewing? Rev. Econom. Statist. 94(1):234–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ma L, Montgomery AL, Singh PV, Smith MD (2014) An empirical analysis of the impact of pre-release movie piracy on box office revenue. Inform. Systems Res. 25(3):590–603.Link, Google Scholar
• McCalman P (2005) International diffusion and intellectual property rights: An empirical analysis. J. Internat. Econom. 67(2):353–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKenzie J (2017) Graduated response policies to digital piracy: Do they increase box office revenues of movies? Inform. Econom. Policy 38(Suppl. C):1–11.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Brashears ME (2006) Social isolation in America: Changes in core discussion networks over two decades. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 71(3):353–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer BD (1995) Natural and quasi-experiments in economics. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 13(2):151–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oberholzer-Gee F, Strumpf K (2007) The effect of file sharing on record sales: An empirical analysis. J. Political Econom. 115(1):1–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peukert C, Claussen J, Kretschmer T (2017) Piracy and box office movie revenues: Evidence from Megaupload. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 52(May):188–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reimers I (2016) Can private copyright protection be effective? Evidence from book publishing. J. Law Econom. 59(2):411–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rob R, Waldfogel J (2006) Piracy on the high C’s: Music downloading, sales displacement, and social welfare in a sample of college students. J. Law Econom. 49(1):29–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rob R, Waldfogel J (2007) Piracy on the silver screen. J. Indust. Econom. 55(3):379–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sandvine (2011) Global internet phenomena report. Report, Sandvine, San Jose, CA.Google Scholar
• Sandvine (2018) Global internet phenomena report. Report, Sandvine, San Jose, CA. Accessed May 12, 2020, https://www.sandvine.com/hubfs/downloads/phenomena/2018-phenomena-report.pdf.Google Scholar
• Smith M, Telang R (2012) Assessing the academic literature regarding the impact of media piracy on sales. Working paper, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
• Spangler T (2019) How will “Avengers: Endgame” piracy affect box office? It’s an issue but not a crisis, analysts say. Variety (April 26), https://variety.com/2019/digital/news/avengers-endgame-piracy-box-office-1203198888/.Google Scholar
• Spiller SA (2011) Opportunity cost consideration. J. Consumer Res. 38(4):595–610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Telang R, Waldfogel J (2018) Piracy and new product creation: A Bollywood story. Inform. Econom. Policy 43(June):1–11.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thaler R (1985) Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Sci. 4(3):199–214.Link, Google Scholar
• Thaler R (1999) Mental accounting matters. J. Behav. Decision Making 12(3):183–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Torrentfreak (2008) Top 10 most popular torrent sites of 2008. Accessed May 12, 2020, https://torrentfreak.com/top-10-torrent-sites-of-2008-081228/.Google Scholar
• Waldfogel J (2012a) Digital piracy: Empirics. The Oxford Handbook of the Digital Economy (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 1–12.Google Scholar
• Waldfogel J (2012b) Copyright research in the digital age: Moving from piracy to the supply of new product. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(3):337–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zentner A (2005) File sharing and international sales of copyrighted music: An empirical analysis with a panel of countries. Topics Econom. Anal. Policy 5(2):1–17.Google Scholar
• Zentner A (2006) Measuring the effect of file sharing on music purchases. J. Law Econom. 49(1):63–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zentner A (2010) Measuring the impact of file sharing on the movie industry: An empirical analysis using a panel of countries. Working paper, University of Texas, Dallas.Google Scholar
• Zentner A, Smith M, Kaya C (2012) How video rental patterns change as consumers move online. Management Sci. 59(11):2622–2634.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang L (2018) Intellectual property strategy and the long tail: Evidence from the recorded music industry. Management Sci. 64(1):24–42.Link, Google Scholar