Are Online Reviews of Physicians Reliable Indicators of Clinical Outcomes? A Focus on Chronic Disease Management

References

• Agarwal A, Zhang W, Kuo Y, Sharma G (2016) Process and outcome measures among COPD patients with a hospitalization cared for by an advance practice provider or primary care physician. PLoS One 11(2):e0148522.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Gao GG, DesRoches C, Jha AK (2010) The digital transformation of healthcare: Current status and the road ahead. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):796–809.Link, Google Scholar
• Angst CM, Devaraj S, Queenan CC, Greenwood B (2011) Performance effects related to the sequence of integration of healthcare technologies. Production Oper. Management 20(3):319–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arrow KJ (1963) Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care. Amer. Econom. Rev. 53(5):941–973.Google Scholar
• Bardach NS, Asteria-Penaloza R, Boscardin WJ, Dudley RA (2012) The relationship between commercial website ratings and traditional hospital performance measures in the USA. BMJ Quality Safety 22(3):194–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bao C, Bardhan IR, Singh H, Meyer BA, Kirksey K (2020) Patient-provider engagement and its impact on health outcomes: A longitudinal study of patient portal use. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 44(2):699–723.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bardhan I, Chen HC, Karahanna E (2020) The role of information systems and analytics in chronic disease management. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 44(1):185–200.Google Scholar
• Bardhan I, Oh C, Zheng Z, Kirksey K (2015) Predictive analytics for readmission of patients with congestive heart failure. Inform. Systems Res. 26(1):19–39.Link, Google Scholar
• Berger JA, Iyengar R (2012) How interest shapes word-of-mouth over different channels. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2013141.Google Scholar
• Blei DM, Ng AY, Jordan MI (2003) Latent Dirichlet allocation. J. Machine Learn. Res. 3:993–1022.Google Scholar
• Boulding W, Glickman SW, Manary M, Schulman KA, Staelin R (2011) Relationship between patient satisfaction with inpatient care and hospital readmission within 30 Days. Amer. J. Managed Care 17(1):41–48.Google Scholar
• Burkle CM, Keegan MT (2015) Popularity of internet physician rating sites and their apparent influence on patients’ choices of physicians. BMC Health Services Res. 15:416.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castaneda R (2018) Rating doctors: What you need to know. U.S. News Online (February 15), https://health.usnews.com/health-care/patient-advice/articles/rating-doctors-what-you-need-to-know.Google Scholar
• Chen H, Zheng Z, Ceran Y (2016) Debiasing the reporting bias in social media analytics. Production Oper. Management 25(5):849–865.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Xie J (2008) Online consumer review: Word-of-mouth as a new element of marketing communication mix. Management Sci. 54(3):477–491.Link, Google Scholar
• Chevalier JA, Mayzlin D (2006) The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. J. Marketing Res. 43(3):345–354.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chintagunta PK, Gopinath S, Venkataraman S (2010) The effects of online user reviews on movie box office performance: Accounting for sequential rollout and aggregation across local markets. Marketing Sci. 29(5):944–957.Link, Google Scholar
• Clarke, JL, Bourn S, Skoufalos A, Beck EH, Castillo DJ (2017) An innovative approach to healthcare delivery for patients with chronic conditions. Population Health Management 20(1):23–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clemons EK, Gao GG, Hitt LM (2006) When online reviews meet hyperdifferentiation: A study of the craft beer industry. J. Management Inform. Systems 23(2):149–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Darby MR, Karni E (1973) Free competition and the optimal amount of fraud. J. Law Econom. 16(1):67–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daskivich TJ, Houman J, Fuller G, Black JT, Kim HL, Spiegel B (2018) Online physician ratings fail to predict actual performance measures on quality, value, and peer review. J. Amer. Medical Informatics Assoc. 25(4):401–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dellarocas C, Narayan R (2006) What motivates consumers to review a product online? A study of the product-specific antecedents of online movie reviews. Workshop on Information Systems and Economics, Evanston, IL.Google Scholar
• Doyle C, Lennox L, Bell D (2013) A systematic review of evidence on the links between patient satisfaction and clinical safety and effectiveness. BMJ Open 3(1):1–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dranove D, Kessler D, McClellan M, Satterthwaite M (2003) Is more information better? The effects of “report cards” on healthcare providers. J. Political Econom. 111(3):555–588.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dulleck U, Kerschbamer R (2006) On doctors, mechanics, and computer specialists: The economics of credence goods. J. Econom. Literature 44(1):5–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dulleck U, Kerschbamer R, Sutter M (2011) The economics of credence goods: An experiment on the role of liability, verifiability, reputation, and competition. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(2):526–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
• East R, Hammond K, Wright M (2007) The relative incidence of positive and negative word of mouth: A multi-category study. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 24(2):175–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellimoottil C, Hart A, Greco K, Quek ML, Farooq A (2013) Online reviews of 500 urologists. J. Urology 189(6):2269–2273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Emmert M, Meszmer N, Sander U (2016) Do healthcare providers use online patient ratings to improve the quality of care? Results from an online-based cross-sectional study. J. Medical Internet Res. 18(9)e254.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Emmert M, Sander U, Pisch F (2013) Eight questions about physician-rating websites: A systematic review. J. Medical Internet Res. 15(2)e24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferguson WJ, Candib LM (2002) Culture, language, and the doctor-patient relationship. Family Medicine Community Health Publications 34(5):353–361.Google Scholar
• Forman C, Ghose A, Wiesenfeld B (2008) Examining the relationship between reviews and sales: The role of reviewer identity disclosure in electronic markets. Inform. Systems Res. 19(3):291–313.Link, Google Scholar
• Friis K, Lasgaard M, Osborne RH, Maindal HT (2016) Gaps in understanding health and engagement with healthcare providers across common long-term conditions: A population survey of health literacy in 29,473 Danish citizens. BMJ Open 6(1):e009627.Google Scholar
• Gao GG, Greenwood BN, Agarwal R, McCullough JS (2015) Vocal minority and silent majority: How do online ratings reflect population perceptions of quality? Management Inform. Systems Quart. 39(3):565–589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gao GG, McCullough JS, Agarwal R, Jha A (2012) A changing landscape of physician quality reporting: Analysis of patients’ online ratings of their physicians over a 5-year period. J. Medical Internet Res. 14(1):e38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glickman SW, Boulding W, Manary M, Staelin R, Roe MT, Wolosin RJ, Ohman EM, Peterson ED, Schulman KA (2010) Patient satisfaction and its relationship with clinical quality and inpatient mortality in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation Cardiovascular Quality Outcomes 3(2):188–195.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Godes D, Silva JC (2012) Sequential and temporal dynamics of online opinion. Marketing Sci. 31(3):448–473.Link, Google Scholar
• Goldman E (2015) Another failed doctor lawsuit against a patient for online reviews—Brandner v. Molonguet. Technology & Marketing Law Blog (January 8), http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2015/01/another-failed-doctor-lawsuit-against-a-patient-for-online-reviews-brandner-v-molonguet.htm.Google Scholar
• Gray B, Vandergrift JL, Gao GG, McCullough JS, Lipner RS (2015) Website ratings of physicians and their true quality of care. JAMA Internal Medicine 175(2):291–293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanauer DA, Zheng K, Singer DC, Gebremariam A, Davis MM (2014) Public awareness, perception, and use of online physician rating sites. JAMA. 311(7):734–735.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hedges L (2019) How patients use online reviews. Software Advice. Accessed July 10, 2019, https://www.softwareadvice.com/resources/how-patients-use-online-reviews/.Google Scholar
• Jain S (2010) Googling ourselves—What physicians can learn from online rating sites. New England J. Medicine 362(1):6–7.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kc DS, Terwiesch C (2009) Impact of workload on service time and patient safety: An econometric analysis of hospital operations. Management Sci. 55(9):1486–1498.Link, Google Scholar
• Lagu T, Hannon NS, Rothberg MB, Lindenauer PK (2010) Patients’ evaluations of healthcare providers in the era of social networking: An analysis of physician-rating websites. J. General Internal Medicine 25(9):942–946.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu B (2012) Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining: Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies (Morgan & Claypool Publishers, San Rafael, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lu SF, Rui H (2018) Can we trust online physician ratings? Evidence from cardiac surgeons in Florida. Management Sci. 64(6):2557–2573.Link, Google Scholar
• Luca M, Zervas G (2016) Fake it till you make it: Reputation, competition, and Yelp review fraud. Management Sci. 62(12):3412–3427.Link, Google Scholar
• Mayzlin D, Dover Y, Chevalier J (2014) Promotional reviews: An empirical investigation of online review manipulation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(8):2421–2455.Google Scholar
• Moe WW, Trusov M (2011) The value of social dynamics in online product ratings forums. J. Marketing Res. 48(3):444–456.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mudambi SM, Schuff D (2010) Research note: What makes a helpful online review? A study of customer reviews on Amazon.com. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 34(1):185–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muchnik L, Aral S, Taylor SJ (2013) Social influence bias: A randomized experiment. Sci. 341(6146):647–651.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson P (1970) Information and consumer behavior. J. Political Econom. 78(2):311–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nielsen FÅ (2011) A New ANEW: Evaluation of a word list for sentiment analysis in microblogs. Rowe M, Stankovic M, Dadzie AM, Hardey M, eds. Proc. ESWC2011 Workshop Making Sense Microposts: Big Things Come Small Packages (CEUR Workshop Proc., No. 718) (CEUR, Herakleion, Greece), 93–98.Google Scholar
• O’Donnell J, Alltucker K (2018) Doctors, hospitals sue patients who post negative comments, reviews on social media. USA Today Online (July 18), https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/07/18/doctors-hospitals-sue-patients-posting-negative-online-comments/763981002/.Google Scholar
• Ornstein C (2016) Doctors fire back at bad Yelp reviews—And reveal patients’ information online. Washington Post Online (May 27), https://www.oregonlive.com/today/2015/11/doctor_sues_patient_over_negat.html.Google Scholar
• Segal J, Sacopulos M, Sheets V, Thurston I, Brooks K, Puccia R (2012) Online doctor reviews: Do they track surgeon volume, a proxy for quality of care? J. Medical Internet Res. 14(2)e50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Senot C, Chandrasekaran A, Ward PT, Tucker AL, Moffatt-Bruce SD (2016) The impact of combining conformance and experiential quality on hospitals’ readmissions and cost performance. Management Sci. 62(3):829–848.Link, Google Scholar
• Sloan FA (2001) Arrow’s concept of the consumer of medical care. J. Health Politics Policy Law 26(5):899–910.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith Y (2014) Credence goods: The unique economics of healthcare. Naked Capitalism (May 23), https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2014/05/credence-goods-unique-economics-health-care.html.Google Scholar
• Sun M (2012) How does the variance of product ratings matter? Management Sci. 58(4):696–707.Link, Google Scholar
• Tirunillai S, Tellis GJ (2014) Mining marketing meaning from online chatter: Strategic brand analysis of big data using latent Dirichlet allocation. J. Marketing Res. 51(4):463–479.Google Scholar
• Zhu F, Zhang X (2010) Impact of online consumer reviews on sales: The moderating role of product and consumer characteristics. J. Marketing 74(2):133–148.Crossref, Google Scholar