Following the MAP (Methods, Approaches, Perspectives) in Information Systems Research

References

• Aliseda A (2006) Abductive Reasoning: Logical Investigations into Discovery and Explanation (Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands).Google Scholar
• Bacharach S (1989) Organizational theories: Some criteria for evaluation. Acad. Management. Rev. 14(4):496–515.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bamberger PA (2018) AMD—Clarifying what we are about and where we are going. Acad. Management Discoveries 4(1):1–10.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beath C , Berente N , Gallivan MJ , Lyytinen K (2013) Expanding the frontiers of information systems research: Introduction to the special issue. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 14(Special Issue):i–xvi.Google Scholar
• Behfar K , Okhuysen GA (2018) Perspective—Discovery within validation logic: Deliberately surfacing, complementing, and substituting abductive reasoning in hypothetico-deductive inquiry. Organ. Sci. 29(2):323–340.Link, Google Scholar
• Bell RG , Filatotchev I , Aguilera RV (2014) Corporate governance and investors’ perceptions of foreign IPO value: An institutional perspective. Acad. Management J. 57(1):301–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berg-Schlolsser D , De Meur G (2009) Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) as an approach. Rihoux B, Ragin CC, eds. Configurational. Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) Related Tech niques (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA), 19–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burton-Jones A , McLean ER , Monod E (2015) Theoretical perspectives in IS research: From variance and process to conceptual latitude and conceptual fit. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 24(6):664–679.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan YE , Huff SL , Barclay DW , Copeland DG (1997) Business strategic orientation, information systems strategic orientation and strategic alignment. Inform. Systems Res. 8(2):125–150.Link, Google Scholar
• Chatterjee S , Moody G , Lowry PB , Chakraborty S , Hardin A (2015) Strategic relevance of organizational virtues enabled by information technology in organizational innovation. J. Management Inform. Systems 32(3):158–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Checkland P (1981) Systems Thinking, Systems Practice (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK).Google Scholar
• Checkland P (2011) Systems thinking and soft systems methodology. Galliers RD, Currie WL, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Management Information Systems: Critical Perspectives and New Directions (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 87–112.Google Scholar
• Checkland P , Haynes M (1994) Varieties of systems thinking: The case of soft systems methodology. System Dynamics Rev. 10(2–3):189–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen DQ , Mocker M , Preston DS , Teubner A (2010) Information systems strategy: Reconceptualization, measurement, and implications. MIS Quart. 34(2):233–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chin WW (1995) Open peer commentary on “the partial least squares (PLS) approach to causal modeling.” Tech. Stud. 2(2):315–319.Google Scholar
• Chong AYL , Lim ETK , Hua X , Zheng S , Tan CW (2019) Business on chain: A comparative case study of five blockchain-inspired business models. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 20(9):1308–1337.Google Scholar
• Crossan MM , Cunha MPE , Vera D , Cunha J (2005) Time and organizational improvisation. Acad. Management Rev. 30(1):129–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dawson GS , Denford JS , Desouza KC (2016a) Governing innovation in U.S. state government: An ecosystem perspective. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 25(4):299–318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dawson GS , Denford JS , Williams CK , Preston D , Desouza KC (2016b) An examination of effective IT governance in the public sector using the legal view of agency theory. J. Management Inform. Systems 33(4):1180–1208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Meur G , Rihoux B (2002) L’Analyse Quali-Quantitative Comparée (AQQC-QCA): Approche , Techniques et Applications en Sciences Humaines (Academia Bruylant, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium).Google Scholar
• El Sawy OA , Malhotra A , Park Y , Pavlou PA (2010) Research commentary—Seeking the configurations of digital ecodynamics: It takes three to tango. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):835–848.Link, Google Scholar
• Ferratt TW , Agarwal R , Brown CV , Moore JE (2005) IT human resource management configurations and IT turnover: Theoretical synthesis and empirical analysis. Inform. Systems Res. 16(3):237–255.Link, Google Scholar
• Fichman R (2004) Going beyond the dominant paradigm for information technology innovation research: Emerging concepts and methods. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 5(8):314–355.Google Scholar
• Fischer C , Gregor S (2011) Forms of Reasoning in the Design Science Research Process (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg), 17–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisher G , Aguinis H (2017) Using theory elaboration to make theoretical advancements. Organ. Res. Methods 20(3):438–464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiss PC (2007) A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations. Acad. Management Rev. 32(4):1180–1198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiss PC (2011) Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Acad. Management J. 54(2):393–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiss PC , Marx A , Cambré B (2013) Introduction. Configurational Theory and Methods in Organizational Research, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 38 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gefen D , Straub D , Boudreau MC (2000) Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems 4:1–76.Google Scholar
• Goertz G (2017) Multimethod Research, Causal Mechanisms, and Case Studies: An Integrated Approach (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Greckhamer T , Misangyi VF , Fiss PC (2013) The two QCAs: From a small-N to a large-N set theoretic approach. Fiss PC, Cambré B, Marx A, eds. Configurational Theory and Methods in Organizational Research (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 49–75.Google Scholar
• Gregor S (2006) The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Quart. 30(3):611–642.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grover V , Lyytinen K (2015) New state of play in information systems research: The push to the edges. MIS Quart. 39(2):271–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hair JF Jr , Sarstedt M , Hopkins L , Kuppelwieser VG (2014) Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. Eur. Bus. Rev. 26(2):106–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hume D (1739) A Treatise of Human Nature (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Jick TD (1979) Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Admin. Sci. Quart. 24(4):602–611.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan B , Duchon D (1988) Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in information systems research: A case study. MIS Quart. 12(4):571–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kenworthy L , Hicks A (2008) Method and Substance in Macrocomparative Analysis (Palgrave Macmillan, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• King JL , Myers MD , Rivard S , Saunders C , Weber R (2010) What do we like about the IS field? Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems 26(Article 20):441–450.Google Scholar
• Kyriakopoulos K (2011) Improvisation in product innovation: The contingent role of market information sources and memory types. Organ. Stud. 32(8):1051–1078.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee JN , Park Y , Straub DW , Koo Y (2019) Holistic archetypes of IT outsourcing strategy: A contingency fit and configurational approach. MIS Quart. 43(4):1–25.Google Scholar
• Leidner DE , Lo J , Preston D (2011) An empirical investigation of the relationship of IS strategy with firm performance. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 20(4):419–437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levallet N , Chan YE (2016) IT capabilities and strategic improvisation: A multi-method investigation. 22nd Americas Conf. Inform. Systems (Association for Information Systems, Atlanta), 1– 10.Google Scholar
• Levallet N , Chan YE (2018) Role of digital capabilities in unleashing the power of managerial improvisation. MIS Quart. Executive 17(1):1–21.Google Scholar
• Liu Y , Mezei J , Kostakos V , Li H (2017) Applying configurational analysis to IS behavioural research: A methodological alternative for modelling combinatorial complexities. Inform. Systems J. 27(1):59–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A , Markus ML , Wareham J (2016) Designing for digital transformation: Lessons for information systems research from the study of ICT and societal challenges. MIS Quart. 40(2):267–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marx A , Cambré B , Rihoux B , Ragin CC (2013) Crisp-set qualitative comparative analysis in organizational studies. Configurational Theory and Methods in Organizational Research, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 38 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley), 23–47.Google Scholar
• Mingers J (2001) Combining IS research methods: Toward a pluralist methodology. Inform. Systems Res. 12(3):240–259.Link, Google Scholar
• Mingers J (2003) The paucity of multi-method research: A review of the information systems literature. Inform. Systems J. 13(3):233–249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Misangyi VF , Greckhamer T , Furnari S , Fiss PC , Crilly D , Aguilera R (2017) Embracing causal complexity: The emergence of a neo-configurational perspective. J. Management 43(1):255–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mohr L (1982) Explaining Organizational Behavior (Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Moorman C , Miner AS (1998) The convergence of planning and execution: Improvisation in new product development. J. Marketing 62(July):1–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ortiz de Guinea A , Webster J (2017) Combining variance and process in information systems research: Hybrid approaches. Inform. Organ. 27(3):144–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park Y , El Sawy OA , Fiss PC (2017) The role of business intelligence and communication technologies in organizational agility: A configurational approach. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 18(9):648–686.Google Scholar
• Pascal A , Aldebert B , Rouziès A (2018) Les méthodes mixtes en systèmes d’information: Enjeux épistémologiques et méthodologiques. Inform. Management 23(3):99–126.Google Scholar
• Pavlou PA , El Sawy OA (2010) The “third hand”: IT-enabled competitive advantage in turbulence through improvisational capabilities. Inform. Systems Res. 21(3):443–471.Link, Google Scholar
• Peirce CS (1931) Hartshorne C , Weiss P , Burks A , eds. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce , vol. 1–8 (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Plano Clark VL , Badiee M (2010) Research questions in mixed methods research. Tashakkori A, Teddlie C, eds. SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research (Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA), 275–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Popper K (1959) The Logic of Scientific Discovery (Routledge, London).Google Scholar
• Ragin CC (1994) Constructing Social Research: The Unity and Diversity of Method (Pine Forge Press, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Ragin CC (2000) Fuzzy-Set Social Science (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Ragin CC (2008) Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ragin CC , Rihoux B (2004) Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA): State of the art and prospects. Qualitative Methods 2(2):3–13.Google Scholar
• Riedl R , Rueckel D (2011) Historical development of research methods in the information systems discipline. Proc. 17th Americas Conf. Inform. Systems (Association for Information Systems, Atlanta), 1–15.Google Scholar
• Rihoux B , Ragin CC (2009) Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques (Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rivard S , Lapointe L (2012) Information technology implementers’ responses to user resistance: Nature and effects. MIS Quart. 36(3).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sabherwal R , Robey D (1995) Reconciling variance and process strategies for studying information system development. Inform. Systems Res. 6(4):303–327.Link, Google Scholar
• Schneider CQ , Wagemann C (2010) Standards of good practice in qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and fuzzy-sets. Comparative Sociol. 9(3):397–418.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schumacker RE , Lomax RG (2010) A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling , 3rd ed. (Taylor and Francis Group, New York).Google Scholar
• Shook CL , Ketchen DJ , Cycyota CS , Crockett D (2003) Data analytic trends and training in strategic management. Strategic Management. J. 24(12):1231–1237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutton R , Staw BM (1995) What theory is not. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(3):371–384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tallon PP , Pinsonneault A (2011) Competing perspectives on the link between strategic information technology alignment and organizational agility: Insights from a mediation model. MIS Quart. 35(2):463–486.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thiem A , Baumgartner M , Bol D (2016) Still lost in translation! A correction of three misunderstandings between configurational comparativists and regressional analysts. Comparative Political Stud. 49(6):742–774.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tiwana A , Kim SK (2019) From bricks to an edifice: Cultivating strong inference in information systems research. Inform. Systems Res. 30(3):1029–1036.Link, Google Scholar
• Tracy SJ (2010) Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry 16(10):837–851.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van de Ven AH , Poole MS (2005) Alternative approaches for studying organizational Change. Organ. Stud. 26(9):1377–1404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V , Brown SA , Bala H (2013) Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide: Guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems. MIS Quart. 37(1):21–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V , Brown SA , Sullivan YW (2016) Guidelines for conducting mixed-methods research: An extension and illustration. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 17(7):435–494.Google Scholar
• Vera D , Crossan M (2005) Improvisation and innovative performance in teams. Organ. Sci. 16(3):203–224.Link, Google Scholar
• Vis B (2012) The comparative advantages of fsQCA and regression analysis for moderately large-N analyses. Sociol. Methods Res. 41(1):168–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber R (2003) Editor’s comments: Theoretically speaking. MIS Quart. 27(3):iii–xii.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber R (2004) Editor’s comments: The rhetoric of positivism vs. interpretivism: A personal view. MIS Quart. 28(1):iii–xii.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winter SJ , Butler BS (2011) Creating bigger problems: Grand challenges as boundary objects and the legitimacy of the information systems field. J. Inform. Tech. 26(2):99–108.Crossref, Google Scholar