Does Money Talk? The Impact of Monetary Incentives on User-Generated Content Contributions
Published Online:18 Mar 2021https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2020.0971
References
- (2011) A fistful of dollars: Are financial rewards a suitable management practice for distributed models of innovation? Eur. Management Rev. 8(3):165–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Giving gifts to groups: How altruism depends on the number of recipients. J. Public Econom. 91(9):1731–1749.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Collaborating with customer communities: Lessons from the lego group. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 53(3):73–79.Google Scholar
- (2014) How to manage the quantity and quality of idea in a co-creation community: The case of recipe site. 12th Annual Open User Innovation Conf. (Harvard Business School, Boston), 31.Google Scholar
- (2009) Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(1):544–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Incentives and prosocial behavior. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(5):1652–1678.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1986) Prosocial organizational behaviors. Acad. Management Rev. 11(4):710–725.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Why do users broadcast? Examining individual motives and social capital on social live streaming platforms. Pacific-Asia Conf. Inform. Systems, Chiayi, Taiwan, 332.Google Scholar
- (2015) What are social incentives worth? A randomized field experiment in user content generation. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (ICIS, Fort Worth) .Google Scholar
- (2017) Does monetary incentive lead to better stock recommendations on social media? Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (ICIS, South Korea) .Google Scholar
- (2001) The Attention Economy: Understanding the New Currency of Business (Harvard Business Press, Cambridge, MA). Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1962) A Lanchester model of guerrilla warfare. Operations Res. 10(6):818–827.Link, Google Scholar
- (2013) Modeling and simulation on collective intelligence in future internet—A study of Wikipedia. Inform. Tech. J. 12(20):5531–5535.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1985) A model of advertising competition. J. Marketing Res. 22(3):297–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Do money-based incentives improve user effort and UGC quality? Evidence from a travel blog platform. Pacific-Asia Conf. Inform. Systems (PACIS, Japan) , 132.Google Scholar
- (2001) Motivation crowding theory. J. Econom. Survey 15(5):589–611.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Vicious and virtuous circles in the management of knowledge: The case of Infosys Technologies. MIS Quart. 29(1):9–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Incentivizing high-quality user-generated content. Proc. 20th Internat. Conf. World Wide Web, 137– 146.Google Scholar
- (2000) Pay enough or don’t pay at all. Quart. J. Econom. 115(3):791–810.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) When and why incentives (don’t) work to modify behavior. J. Econom. Perspective 25(4):191–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Competing for attention in knowledge markets: Electronic document dissemination in a management consulting company. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(1):1–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Effort for payment: A tale of two markets. Psychol. Sci. 15(11):787–793.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) A structural model of employee behavioral dynamics in enterprise social media. Management Sci 61(12):2825–2844.Google Scholar
- (2013) Leveraging philanthropic behavior for customer support: The case of user support forums. MIS Quart. 38(1):187–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Markov perfect equilibrium advertising strategies of Lanchester duopoly model: A technical note. Management Sci. 50(7):995–1000.Link, Google Scholar
- (2005) Contributing knowledge to electronic knowledge repositories: An empirical investigation. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 29(1):113–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Extrinsic versus intrinsic rewards for contributing reviews in an online platform. Inform. Systems Res. 29(4):871–892.Link, Google Scholar
- (2012) The institutionalization of Youtube: From user-generated content to professionally generated content. Media Culture Soc. 34(1):53–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1973) Undermining children’s intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: A test of the” overjustification” hypothesis. J. Personality Soc. Psychol. 28(1):129.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Monetizing user-generated content in Fintech: An empirical study of a social investing site. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (ICIS, Dublin) .Google Scholar
- (2013) Why people share knowledge in virtual communities? The use of Yahoo! Kimo Knowledge+ as an example. Internet Res. 23(2):133–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Attracting whom? Managing user-generated-content communities for monetization. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (ICIS, Arizona) , 8.Google Scholar
- (2012) User-generated online content: Overview, current state and context. First Monday 17(6):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Mining User Generated Content (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL). Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Understanding the motivations, participation, and performance of open source software developers: A longitudinal study of the apache projects. Management Sci. 52(2):984–999.Link, Google Scholar
- (2015) Competing for attention: An empirical study of online reviewers’ strategic behaviors. MIS Quart. 39(3):683–696.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Using user- and marketer-generated content for box office revenue prediction: Differences between microblogging and third-party platforms. Inform. Systems Res. 30(1):191–203.Link, Google Scholar
- (2017) Motivation of user-generated content: social connectedness moderates the effects of monetary rewards. Marketing Sci. 36(3):329–337.Link, Google Scholar
- (2012a) Content contribution for revenue sharing and reputation in social media: A dynamic structural model. J. Management Inform. Systems 29(2):41–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012b) Content contribution in social media: The case of Youtube. 45th Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sciences, HICSS (IEEE, Hawaii) , 4476–4485.Google Scholar
- (2014) The 1% rule in four digital health social networks: An observational study. J. Med. Internet Res. 16(2):1–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Five steps to creating a global knowledge-sharing system: Siemens’ Sharenet. Acad. Management Executives 19(2):9–23.Google Scholar
- (2001) A duopolistic model of dynamic competitive advertising. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 128(1):213–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quart. 29(1):35–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Knowledge sharing: The effects of incentives, environment, and person. J. Inform. Systems 22(2):53–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) An empirical study of the motivations for content contribution and community participation in Wikipedia. Inform. Management 52(3):275–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Differentiation with user-generated content. Management Sci. 61(4):898–914.Link, Google Scholar
- (2010) Group size and incentives to contribute: A natural experiment at Chinese Wikipedia. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(4):7–22.Google Scholar

