The Phishing Funnel Model: A Design Artifact to Predict User Susceptibility to Phishing Websites

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2020.0973

References

  • Abbasi A , Lau RY , Brown DE (2015) Predicting behavior. IEEE Intelligence Systems 30(3):35–43.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Abbasi A , Zahedi FM , Chen Y (2012a) Impact of anti-phishing tool performance on attack success rates. Proc. IEEE Internat. Conf. on Intelligence and Security Informatics (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 12–17.Google Scholar
  • Abbasi A , Albrecht C , Vance A , Hansen J (2012b) Metafraud: A meta-learning framework for detecting financial fraud. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 36(4):1293–1327.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Abbasi A , Zhang Z , Zimbra D , Chen H , Nunamaker JF Jr (2010) Detecting fake websites: The contribution of statistical learning theory. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 34(3):435–461.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agarwal A , Hosanagar K , Smith MD (2011) Location, location, location: An analysis of profitability of position in online advertising markets. J. Marketing Res. 48(6):1057–1073.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Akhawe D , Felt AP (2013) Alice in warningland: A large-scale field study of browser security warning effectiveness. Proc. 22nd USENIX Security Sympos. (USENIX Association, Berkeley, CA).Google Scholar
  • Alnajim A , Munro M (2009) Effects of technical abilities and phishing knowledge on phishing websites detection. Proc. IASTED Internat. Conf on Software Engineering (ACTA Press, Calgary, AB, Canada), 120–125.Google Scholar
  • Anderson B , Vance A , Kirwan B , Eargle D , Jenkins J (2016a) How users perceive and respond to security messages: A NeuroIS research agenda and empirical study. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 25(4):364–390.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson BB , Jenkins JL , Vance A , Kirwan CB , Eargle D (2016b) Your memory is working against you: How eye tracking and memory explain habituation to security warnings. Decision Support Systems 92(0):3–13.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Angst CM , Agarwal R (2009) Adoption of electronic health records in the presence of privacy concerns: The elaboration likelihood model and individual persuasion. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 33(2):339–370.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bansal G , Zahedi FM , Gefen D (2010) The impact of personal dispositions on information sensitivity, privacy concern and trust in disclosing health information online. Decision Support Systems 49(2):138–150.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bar‐Ilan J , Keenoy K , Levene M , Yaari E (2009) Presentation bias is significant in determining user preference for search results A user study. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. Tech. 60(1):135–149.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bardhan I , Oh JH , Zheng Z , Kirksey K (2015) Predictive analytics for readmission of patients with congestive heart failure. Inform. Systems Res. 26(1):19–39.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Benbasat I , Barki H (2007) Quo vadis TAM? J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 8(4):7.Google Scholar
  • Bishop M , Engle S , Peisert S , Whalen S , Gates C (2009). Case studies of an insider framework. Proc. 42nd Hawaii Internat. Conf. on System Sciences (IEEE, New York), 1–10.Google Scholar
  • Boss S , Galletta D , Lowry PB , Moody GD , Polak P (2015) What do systems users have to fear? Using fear appeals to engender threats and fear that motivate protective security behaviors. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 39(4):837–864.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bravo-Lillo C , Cranor LF , Downs JS , Komanduri S (2011) Bridging the gap in computer security warnings: A mental model approach. IEEE Security Privacy 9(2):18–26.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burges CJ (1998) A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition. Data Mining Knowledge Discovery 2(2):121–167.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Camp LJ (2009) Mental models of privacy and security. IEEE Tech. Soc. Magazine 28(3):37–46.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Canfield CI , Fischhoff B (2018) Setting priorities in behavioral interventions: An application to reducing phishing risk. Risk Analysis 38(4):826–838.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cavusoglu H , Mishra B , Raghunathan S (2005) The value of intrusion detection systems in information technology security architecture. Inform. Systems Res. 16(1):28–46.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen H , Chiang RH , Storey VC (2012) Business intelligence and analytics: From big data to big impact. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 36(4):1165–1188.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Y , Zahedi FM , Abbasi A (2011) Interface design elements for anti-phishing systems. Internat. Conf. on Design Science Research in Information Systems (Springer, Berlin), 253–265. Google Scholar
  • Christensen RHB (2015) Analysis of ordinal data with cumulative link models—Estimation with the R-package ordinal. https://mran.microsoft.com/snapshot/2017-12-11/web/packages/ordinal/vignettes/clm_intro.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Chu W , Keerthi SS (2007) Support vector ordinal regression. Neural Comput. 19(3):792–815.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chua CEH , Wareham J (2004) Fighting internet auction fraud: An assessment and proposal. IEEE Comput . 37(10):31–37.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cram WA , D’arcy J , Proudfoot JG (2019) Seeing the forest and the trees: A meta-analysis of the antecedents to information security policy compliance. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 43(2):525–554.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cranor L (2008). A framework for reasoning about the Human in the Loop. Proc. 1st Conf. on Usability, Psychology, and Security (USENIX Association, Berkeley, CA).Google Scholar
  • Crossler RE , Long JH , Loraas TM , Trinkle BS (2014) Understanding compliance with bring your own device policies utilizing protection motivation theory: Bridging the intention-behavior gap. J. Inform. Systems 28(1):209–226.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cummings A , Lewellen T , McIntire D , Moore A , Trzeciak R (2012) Insider threat study: Illicit cyber activity involving fraud in the U.S. financial services sector. Report, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
  • Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 13(3):319–340.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Desolda G , Di Nocera F , Ferro L , Lanzilotti R , Maggi P , Marrella A (2019) Alerting users about phishing attacks. Internat. Conf. on Human-Computer Interaction (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 134–148.Google Scholar
  • Dhamija R , Tygar JD , Hearst M (2006) Why phishing works. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems (ACM, New York), 581–590.Google Scholar
  • Dinev T (2006) Why spoofing is serious Internet fraud. Commun. ACM 49(10):76–82.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Downs JS , Holbrook MB , Cranor LF (2006). Decision strategies and susceptibility to phishing. Proc. Sympos. on Usable Privacy and Security (USENIX Association, Berkeley, CA), 79–90.Google Scholar
  • Downs JS , Holbrook M , Cranor LF (2007). Behavioral response to phishing risk. Proc. ACM Anti-Phishing Working Groups Annu. eCrime Researchers Summit (ACM, New York), 37–44.Google Scholar
  • Egelman S , Cranor LF , Hong J (2008). You’ve been warned: An empirical study of the effectiveness of web browser phishing warnings. Proc. ACM SIGCHI Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems (ACM, New York), 1065–1074.Google Scholar
  • Fang X (2012) Inference-based naive Bayes: Turning naive Bayes cost-sensitive. IEEE Trans. Knowledge. Data Engrg. 25(10):2302–2313.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fawcett T (2006) An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 27(8):861–874.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Felt AP , Ainslie A , Reeder RW , Consolvo S , Thyagaraja S , Bettes A , Harris H , et al. (2015) Improving SSL warnings. Proc. ACM Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2893–2902.Google Scholar
  • Floyd D , Prentice-Dunn S , Rogers R (2000) A meta-analysis of research on protection motivation theory. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 30(2):407–429.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Freed L (2011) Managing Forward: Customer Satisfaction as a Predictive Metric for Banks. U.S. ForeSee Results 2011 Online Banking Study (ACM, New York), http://bankblog.optirate.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/u.s.-foresee-results-2011-online-banking-study.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Gartner (2011) Magic quadrant for web fraud detection, April 19, 2011. https://www.gartner.com/en/documents/1641814/magic-quadrant-for-web-fraud-detection.Google Scholar
  • Gefen D , Straub D (1997) Gender differences in the perception and use of email: An extension to the technology acceptance model. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 21(4):389–400.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goes P (2014) Editor’s comments: Design science research in top information systems journals. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 38(1):iii–viii.Google Scholar
  • Grazioli S , Jarvenpaa SL (2000) Perils of Internet fraud: An empirical investigation of deception and trust with experienced Internet consumers. IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernetics Part A 30(4):395–410.Google Scholar
  • Grazioli S , Jarvenpaa SL (2003) Consumer and business deception on the internet: Content analysis of documentary evidence. Internat. J. Electron. Commerce 7(4):93–118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gregor S , Hevner AR (2013) Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 37(2):337–355.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guyon I , Weston J , Barnhill S , Vapnik V (2002) Gene selection for cancer classification using support vector machines. Machine Learning 46(1-3):389–422.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gyongyi Z , Garcia-Molina H (2005) Spam: It’s not for inboxes anymore. IEEE Comput. 38(10):28–34.Google Scholar
  • Herath T , Chen R , Wang J , Banjara K , Wilbur J , Rao HR (2014) Security services as coping mechanisms: An investigation into user intention to adopt an email authentication service. Inform. Systems J. 24(1):61–84.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Herley C (2009) So long, and no thanks for the externalities: The rational rejection of security advice by users. Proc. Workshop on New Security Paradigms, 133–144.Google Scholar
  • Herzberg A , Jbara A (2008) Security and identification indicators for browsers against spoofing and phishing attacks. ACM Trans. Internet Tech. 8(4):1–36.Google Scholar
  • Hevner AR , March ST , Park J , Ram S (2004) Design science in information systems research. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 28(1):75–105.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hong J (2012) The state of phishing attacks. Commun. ACM 55(1):74–81.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jagatic TN , Johnson NA , Jakobsson M , Menczer F (2007) Social phishing. Commun. ACM 50(10):94–100.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jenkins J , Anderson B , Vance A , Kirwan B , Eargle D (2016) More harm than good? How security messages that interrupt make us vulnerable. Inform. Systems Res. 27(4):880–896.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jensen ML , Lowry PB , Burgoon JK , Nunamaker JF (2010) Technology dominance in complex decision making: The case of aided credibility assessment. J. Management Inform. Systems 27(1):175–202.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jobber D , Ellis-Chadwick F (1995) Principles and Practice of Marketing (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  • Kahneman D , Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–292.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kaushik A (2011) Web Analytics 2.0: The Art of Online Accountability and Science of Customer Centricity (Wiley Publishing, New York). Google Scholar
  • Keith M , Shao B , Steinbart P (2009) A behavioral analysis of passphrase design and effectiveness. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 10(2):63–89.Google Scholar
  • Kirlappos I , Beautement A , Sasse MA (2013) “Comply or die” is dead: Long live security-aware principal agents. Internat. Conf. on Financial Cryptography and Data Security (Springer, Berlin), 70–82.Google Scholar
  • Kitchens B , Dobolyi D , Li J , Abbasi A (2018) Advanced customer analytics: Strategic value through integration of relationship-oriented big data. J. Management Inform. Systems 35(2):540–574.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kolari P , Finin T , Joshi A (2006) SVMs for the blogosphere: Blog identification and splog detection. AAAI Spring Sympos.: Computational Approaches to Analyzing Weblogs, 92–99.Google Scholar
  • Korolov M (2015). Phishing is a $3.7-million annual cost for average large company. CSO (August 26). Accessed October 7, 2018, https://www.csoonline.com/article/2975807/phishing-is-a-37-million-annual-cost-for-average-large-company.html Google Scholar
  • Kumar N , Mohan K , Holowczak R (2008) Locking the door but leaving the computer vulnerable: Factors inhibiting home users’ adoption of software firewalls. Decision Support Systems 46(1):254–264.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kumaraguru P , Sheng S , Aquisti A , Cranor LF , Hong J (2010) Teaching Johnny not to fall for phish. ACM Trans. Internet Tech. 10(2):1–31.Google Scholar
  • Lennon M (2011) Cisco: Targeted attacks cost organizations $1.29 billion annually. Security Week (June 30). Accessed August 14, 2016, https://www.securityweek.com/cisco-targeted-attacks-cost-organizations-129-billion-annually.Google Scholar
  • Li L , Helenius M (2007) Usability evaluation of anti-phishing toolbars. J. Comput. Virology 3(2):163–184.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li L , Berki E , Helenius M , Ovaska S (2014) Toward a contingency approach with whitelist-and blacklist-based anti-phishing applications: What do usability tests indicate? Behav. Inform. Tech. 33(11):1136–1147.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li S , Schmitz R (2009) A Novel Anti-Phishing Framework Based on Honeypots (IEEE, New York). Google Scholar
  • Liang H , Xue Y (2009) Avoidance of information technology threats: A theoretical perspective. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 33(1):71–90.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liu W , Deng X , Huang G , Fu AY (2006) An antiphishing strategy based on visual similarity assessment. IEEE Internet Comput. 10(2):58–65.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ma Z , Sheng ORL , Pant G , Iriberri A (2012) Can visible cues in search results indicate vendors’ reliability? Decision Support Systems 52(3):768–775.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mahmood MA , Siponen M , Straub D , Rao HR , Raghu TS (2010) Moving toward black hat research in information systems security: An editorial introduction to the special issue. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 34(3):431–433.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mayer RC , Davis JH , Schoorman FD (1995) An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad. Management Rev. 20(3):709–734.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McAfee (2013) McAfee threats report. First quarter . McAfee (April 10). Accessed March 23, 2017, http://www.mcafee.com/us/resources/reports/rp-quarterly-threat-q1-2013.pdf.Google Scholar
  • McCullagh P (1980) Regression models for ordinal data. J. Royal Statist. Soc. B 42(2):109–127.Google Scholar
  • McKnight DH , Choudhury V , Kacmar C (2002) Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Inform. Systems Res. 13(3):334–359.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McKnight DH , Cummings LL , Chervany NL (1998) Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Acad. Management Rev. 23(3):473–490.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morris M , Venkatesh V , Ackerman P (2005) Gender and age differences in employee decisions about new technology: An extension to the theory of planned behavior. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 52(1):69–84.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Musthaler L (2013) Security analytics will be the next big thing in IT security. Network World (May 31). Accessed March 23, 2017, https://www.networkworld.com/article/2166806/security-analytics-will-be-the-next-big-thing-in-it-security.html.Google Scholar
  • Oliveira D , Rocha H , Yang H , Ellis D , Dommaraju S , Weir D , Muradoglu M , et al. (2017) Dissecting spear phishing emails for older vs young adults: On the interplay of weapons of influence and life domains in predicting susceptibility to phishing. Proc. 2017 CHI Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems (ACM, New York), 6412–6424.Google Scholar
  • Parrish JL Jr , Bailey JL , Courtney JF (2009) A Personality Based Model for Determining Susceptibility to Phishing Attacks (University of Arkansas, Little Rock).Google Scholar
  • Pavlou PA , Gefen D (2004) Building effective online marketplaces with institution-based trust. Inform. Systems Res. 15(1):37–59.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Porter CE , Donthu N (2006) Using technology acceptance model to explain how attitudes determine Internet usage: The role of perceived access barriers and demographics. J. Bus. Res. 59:999–1007.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Prat N , Comyn-Wattiau I , Akoka J (2015) A taxonomy of evaluation methods for information systems artifacts. J. Management Inform. Systems 32(3):229–267.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Qi X , Davison BD (2009) Web page classification: Features and algorithms. ACM Comput. Survey 41(2):1–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rajab M , Ballard L , Jagpal N , Mavrommatis P , Nojiri D , Provos N , Schmidt L (2011) Trends in circumventing web-malware detection. Technical report, Google, https://static.googleusercontent.com/media/research.google.com/en//archive/papers/rajab-2011a.pdf, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.357.2542.Google Scholar
  • Ransbotham S , Mitra S (2009) Choice and chance: A conceptual model of paths to information security compromise. Inform. Systems Res. 20(1):121–139.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Richards K , LaSalle R , van den Dool F , Kennedy-White J (2017) 2017 cost of cyber crime study. Technical report, Ponemon Institute, North Traverse City, MI, https://www.accenture.com/_acnmedia/PDF-62/Accenture-2017CostCybercrime-US-FINAL.pdf#zoom=50.Google Scholar
  • Rogers RW , Prentice-Dunn S (1997) Protection motivation theory. Gochman DS, ed. Handbook of Health Behavior Research 1: Personal and Social Determinants. (Plenum Press), 113–132.Google Scholar
  • Santhanam R , Sethumadhavan M , Virendra M (2010) Cyber Security, Cyber Crime and Cyber Forensics: Applications and Perspectives (Information Science Reference/IGI Global, Hershey, PA).Google Scholar
  • Sarkar S , Vance A , Ramesh B , Demestihas M , Wu D (2020) The influence of professional subculture on information security policy violations: A field study in a healthcare context. Inform. Systems. Res. 31(4):1240–1259LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schneier B (2000) Inside risks: Semantic network attacks. Commun. ACM 43(12):168.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shashua A , Levin A (2003) Ranking with large margin principle: Two approaches. Adv. Neural Inform. Processing Systems 15:961–968.Google Scholar
  • Sheng S , Holbrook M , Kumaraguru P , Cranor LF , Downs J (2010) Who falls for phish?: A demographic analysis of phishing susceptibility and effectiveness of interventions. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems (ACM, New York), 373–382.Google Scholar
  • Shields K (2015) Cybersecurity: Recognizing the risk and protecting against attacks. NC Banking Inst. 19:345.Google Scholar
  • Shmueli G , Koppius O (2011) Predictive analytics in information systems research. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 35(3):553–572.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Siponen M , Vance A (2010) Neutralization: New insights into the problem of employee information systems security policy violations. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 34(3):487–502.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sunshine J , Egelman S , Almuhimedi H , Atri N , Cranor LF (2009). Crying wolf: An empirical study of SSL warning effectiveness. Proc. USENIX Security Sympos. (USENIX Association, Berkeley, CA), 399–416.Google Scholar
  • Symantec (2012) Norton cybercrime report: The human impact. Symantec (April 10). Accessed March 23, 2017, http://us.norton.com/content/en/us/home_homeoffice/media/pdf/cybercrime_report/Norton_USA-Human%20Impact-A4_Aug4-2.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Taylor B (2014) How big data are changing the security analytics landscape. TechRepublic (January 2). Accessed March 23, 2017, https://www.techrepublic.com/blog/big-data-analytics/how-big-data-is-changing-the-security-analytics-landscape/.Google Scholar
  • Vance A , Lowry PB , Eggett D (2015) Increasing accountability through user-interface design artifacts: A new approach to address the problem of access-policy violations. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 39(2):345–366.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vance A , Anderson B , Kirwan B , Eargle D (2014) Using measures of risk perception to predict information security behavior: Insights from electroencephalography (EEG). J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 15(10):679–722.Google Scholar
  • Vance A , Jenkins J , Anderson B , Bjornn D , Kirwan B (2018) Tuning out security warnings: A longitudinal examination of habituation through fMRI, eye tracking, and field experiments. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 42(2):355–380.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V , Morris M , Davis G , Davis F (2003) User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 27(3):397–423.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Verizon (2016) Data breach investigations report. Accessed March 23, 2017, http://www.verizonenterprise.com/DBIR/2016/ Google Scholar
  • Vishwanath A , Herath T , Chen R , Wang J , Rao HR (2011) Why do people get phished? Testing individual differences in phishing vulnerability within an integrated, information processing model. Decision Support Systems 51(3):576–586.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang DY , Savage S , Voelker GM (2011) Cloak and dagger: Dynamics of web search cloaking. Proc. 18th ACM Conf. on Computer and Communications Security (ACM, New York), 477–490.Google Scholar
  • Wang J , Gupta M , Rao HR (2015) Insider threats in a financial institution: Analysis of attack-proneness of information systems applications. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 39(1):91–112.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang J , Li Y , Rao HR (2016) Overconfidence in phishing email detection. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 17(11):759.Google Scholar
  • Wang J , Li Y , Rao HR (2017) Coping responses in phishing detection: An investigation of antecedents and consequences. Inform. Systems Res. 28(2):378–396.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wang J , Chen R , Herath T , Vishwanath A , Rao HR (2012) Phishing susceptibility: An investigation into the processing of a targeted spear phishing email. IEEE Trans. Professional Comm. 55(4):345–362.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wright RT , Marett K (2010) The influence of experiential and dispositional factors in phishing: An empirical investigation of the deceived. J. Management Inform. Systems 27(1):273–303.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wright RT , Jensen ML , Thatcher JB , Dinger M , Marett K (2014) Influence techniques in phishing attacks: An examination of vulnerability and resistance. Inform. Systems Res. 25(2):385–400.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wu M , Miller RC , Garfunkel SL (2006) Do security toolbars actually prevent phishing attacks? Proc. SIGCHI Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems (ACM, New York), 601–610.Google Scholar
  • Zahedi FM , Song J (2008) Dynamics of trust revision: Using health infomediaries. J. Management Inform. Systems 24(4):225–248.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zahedi FM , Abbasi A , Chen Y (2015) Fake-website detection tools: Identifying elements that promote individuals’ use and enhance their performance. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 16(6):448.Google Scholar
  • Zhang D , Yan Z , Jiang H , Kim T (2014) A domain-feature enhanced classification model for detection of phishing e-business websites. Inform. Management 51(7):845–853.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang Y , Egelman S , Cranor L , Hong J (2007) Phinding phish: Evaluating anti-phishing tools. Proc. 14th Annual Network and Distributed System Security Sympos. 1–16.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.