Augmenting Medical Diagnosis Decisions? An Investigation into Physicians’ Decision-Making Process with Artificial Intelligence

References

• Ackerman RA, Thompson VA (2017) Meta-reasoning: Monitoring and control of thinking and reasoning. Trends Cognitive Sci. 21(8):607–617.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adomavicius G, Bockstedt JC, Curley SP, Zhang J (2013) Do recommender systems manipulate consumer preferences? A study of anchoring effects. Inform. Systems Res. 24(4):956–975.Link, Google Scholar
• Ahsen ME, Ayvaci MUS, Raghunathan S (2019) When algorithmic predictions use human-generated data: A bias-aware classification algorithm for breast cancer diagnosis. Inform. Systems Res. 30(1):97–116.Link, Google Scholar
• Alberdi E, Povyakalo A, Strigini L, Ayton P (2004) Effects of incorrect computer-aided detection (CAD) output on human decision making in mammography. Acad. Radiology 11(8):909–918.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arnold V, Clark N, Collier PA, Leech SA, Sutton S (2006) The differential use and effect of knowledge-based system explanations in novice and expert judgment decisions. MIS Quart. 30(1):79–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arnott D, Pervan G (2014) A critical analysis of decision support systems research revisited: The rise of design science. J. Inform. Tech. 29(4):269–293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berg M (1997) Rationalizing Medical Work: Decision Support Techniques and Medical Practices (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Bonaccio S, Dalal RS (2006) Advice taking and decision-making: An integrative literature review, and implications for the organizational sciences. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processing 101(2):127–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burgess DJ (2010) Are providers more likely to contribute to healthcare disparities under high levels of cognitive load? How features of the healthcare setting may lead to biases in medical decision making. Medical Decision Making 30(2):246–257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burton JW, Stein MK, Jensen TB (2020) A systematic review of algorithm aversion in augmented decision making. J. Behav. Decision Making 33(2):220–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheng JZ, Ni D, Chou YH, Qin J, Tiu CM, Chang YC, Huang CS, Shen D, Chen CM (2016) Computer-aided diagnosis with deep learning architecture: Applications to breast lesions in US images and pulmonary nodules in CT Scans. Nature Sci. Rep. 6(1):1–13.Google Scholar
• Davern M, Shaft T, Te’eni D (2012) Cognition matters: Enduring questions in cognitive IS research. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 13(4):273–314.Google Scholar
• Demetis D, Lee AS (2018) When humans using the IT artifact becomes IT using the human artifact. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 19(10):929–952.Google Scholar
• Dietvorst BJ, Simmons JP, Massey C (2015) Algorithm aversion: People erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err. J. Experiment. Psych. General 144(1):114–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dietvorst BJ, Simmons JP, Massey C (2018) Overcoming algorithm aversion: People will use imperfect algorithms if they can (even slightly) modify them. Management Sci. 64(3):1155–1170.Link, Google Scholar
• Elkins AC, Dunbar NE, Adame B, Nunamaker JF (2013) Are users threatened by credibility assessment systems? J. Management Inform. Systems 29(4):249–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Endsley MR (2017) From here to autonomy: Lessons learned from human-automation research. Human Factors 59(1):5–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Evans JSBT, Stanovich KE (2013) Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspect. Psych. Sci. 8(3):223–241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fazal MI, Patel ME, Tye J, Gupta Y (2018) The past, present and future role of artificial intelligence in imaging. Eur. J. Radiology 105:246–250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferratt TW, Prasad J, Dunne EJ (2018) Fast and slow processes underlying theories of information technology use. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 19(1):1–22.Google Scholar
• Fiedler K, Hofferbert J, Wöllert F (2018) Metacognitive myopia in hidden-profile tasks: The failure to control for repetition biases. Frontiers Psych. 9(903):1–13.Google Scholar
• Fiedler K, Hütter M, Schott M, Kutzner F (2019) Metacognitive myopia and the overutilization of misleading advice. J. Behav. Decision Making 32(3):317–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gawlitza J, Sturm T, Spohrer K, Henzler T, Akin I, Schönberg S, Borggrefe M, Haubenreisser H, Trinkmann F (2019) Predicting pulmonary function testing from quantified computed tomography using machine learning algorithms in patients with COPD. Diagnostics 9:1–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goddard K, Roudsari A, Wyatt J (2012) Automation bias: A systematic review of frequency, effect mediators, and mitigators. J. Amer. Medical Inform. Assoc. 19(1):121–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hausmann D, Läge D (2008) Sequential evidence accumulation in decision making: The individual desired level of confidence can explain the extent of information acquisition. Judgment Decision Making 3(3):229–243.Google Scholar
• Heart T, Zucker A, Parmet Y, Pliskin JS, Pliskin N (2011) Investigating physicians’ compliance with drug prescription notifications. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 12(3):235–254.Google Scholar
• Jaspers MWM, Smeulers M, Vermeulen H, Peute LW (2011) Effects of clinical decision-support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: A synthesis of high-quality systematic review findings. J. Amer. Medical Inform. Assoc. 18(3):327–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jha S, Topol EJ (2016) Adapting to artificial intelligence: Radiologists and pathologists as information specialists. JAMA 316(22):2353–2354.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jiang F, Jiang Y, Zhi H, Dong Y, Li H, Ma S, Wang Y, Dong Q, Shen H, Wang Y (2017) Artificial intelligence in healthcare: Past, present and future. Stroke Vascular Neurology 2(4):230–243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Klein G (2009) Conditions for intuitive expertise: A failure to disagree. Amer. Psych. 64(6):515–526.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick K (2016) Battling algorithmic bias. Comm. ACM 59(10):16–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein G (2008) Naturalistic decision making. Human Factors 50(3):456–460.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein G (2015) A naturalistic decision making perspective on studying intuitive decision making. J. Appl. Res. Memory Cognition 4(3):164–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein G, Pliske R, Crandall B, Woods DD (2005) Problem detection. Cognitive Tech. Work 7(1):14–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleinberg J, Lakkaraju H, Leskovec J, Ludwig J, Mullainathan S (2018) Human decisions and machine predictions. Quart. J. Econom. 133(1):237–293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kohli R, Tan SSL (2016) Electronic health records: How can IS researchers contribute to transforming healthcare? MIS Quart. 40(3):553–573.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee CS, Nagy PG, Weaver SJ, Newman-Toker DE (2013) Cognitive and system factors contributing to diagnostic errors in radiology. Amer. J. Roentgenology 201(3):611–617.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li M, Tan CH, Wei KK, Wang K (2017) Sequentiality of product review information provision: An information foraging perspective. MIS Quart. 41(3):867–892.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liberati EG, Ruggiero F, Galuppo L, Gorli M, González-Lorenzo M, Maraldi M, Ruggieri P, et al.. (2017) What hinders the uptake of computerized decision support systems in hospitals? A qualitative study and framework for implementation. Implementation Sci. 12(113):1–13.Google Scholar
• Logg JM, Minson JA, Moore DA (2019) Algorithm appreciation: People prefer algorithmic to human judgment. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processing 151:90–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Longoni C, Bonezzi A, Morewedge CK (2019) Resistance to medical artificial intelligence. J. Consumer Res. 46(4):629–650.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayo RC, Leung J (2018) Artificial intelligence and deep learning – Radiology’s next frontier? Clinical Imaging 49:87–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayo RC, Kent D, Sen LC, Kapoor M, Leung JWT, Watanabe AT (2019) Reduction of false-positive markings on mammograms: A retrospective comparison study using an artificial intelligence-based CAD. J. Digital Imaging 32:618–624.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Nissen ME, Segupta K (2006) Incorporating software agents into supply chains: Experimental investigation with a procurement task. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 30(1):145–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parasuraman R, Manzey DH (2010) Complacency and bias in human use of automation: An attentional integration. Human Factors 52(3):381–410.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rahwan I, Cebrian M, Obradovich N, Bongard J, Bonnefon JF, Breazeal C, Crandall JW, et al.. (2019) Machine behaviour. Nature 568(7753):477–486.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rai A (2020) Explainable AI: From black box to glass box. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 48(1):137–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Russell SJ, Norvig P (2010) Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (Pearson Education Limited, Malaysia).Google Scholar
• Saldaña J (2013) The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (Sage Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Schuetz S, Venkatesh V (2020) The rise of human machines: How cognitive computing systems challenge assumptions of user-system interaction. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 21(2):460–482.Google Scholar
• Schultze T, Mojzisch A, Schulz-Hardt S (2017) On the inability to ignore useless advice: A case for anchoring in the judge-advisor-system. Experiment. Psych. 64(3):170–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shen J, Zhang CJ, Jiang B, Chen J, Song J, Liu Z, He Z, et al. (2019) Artificial intelligence vs. clinician in disease diagnosis: Systematic review. JMIR Medical Inform. 7(3):e10010.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin J (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques (Sage, Newbury Park, CA).Google Scholar
• Tan CH, Teo HH, Benbasat I (2010) Assessing screening and evaluation decision support systems: A resource-matching approach. Inform. Systems Res. 21(2):305–326.Link, Google Scholar
• Todd P, Benbasat I (1991) An experimental investigation of the impact of computer based decision aids on decision making strategies. Inform. Systems Res. 2(2):87–115.Link, Google Scholar
• Tsai TL, Fridsma DB, Gatti G (2003) Computer decision support as a source of interpretation error: The case of electrocardiograms. J. Amer. Medical Inform. Assoc. 10(5):478–483.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under ucnertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157):1124–1131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Someren MW, Barnard YF, Sandberg JAC (1994) The Think Aloud Method: A Practical Guide to Modelling Cognitive Processes (Academic Press, London).Google Scholar
• Wang X, Du X (2018) Why does advice discounting occur? The combined roles of confidence and trust. Frontiers Psych. 9(2381):1–13.Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (2018) World health statistics. Retrieved July 10, 2020, https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/the-top-10-causes-of-death.Google Scholar
• Xiao B, Benbasat I (2007) E-commerce product recommendation agents: Use, characteristics, and impact. MIS Quart. 31(1):137–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xiao B, Benbasat I (2011) Product-related deception in e-commerce: A theoretical perspective. MIS Quart. 35(1):169–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xiao B, Benbasat I (2015) Designing warning messages for detecting biased online product recommendations: An empirical investigation. Inform. Systems Res. 26(4):793–811.Link, Google Scholar
• Xiao B, Benbasat I (2018) An empirical examination of the influence of biased personalized product recommendations on consumers’ decision making outcomes. Decision Support Systems 110:46–57.Crossref, Google Scholar