Standing Up or Standing By: Understanding Bystanders’ Proactive Reporting Responses to Social Media Harassment
Published Online:17 Feb 2021https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2020.0983
References
- (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
- (2016) Cyber-bystanding in context: A review of the literature on witnesses’ responses to cyberbullying. Children Youth Services Rev. 65(June):183–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Anti-Defamation League (2019) More than one-third of Americans experience severe online hate and harassment, new ADL study finds. Accessed May 19, 2019, https://www.adl.org/news/press-releases/more-than-one-third-of-americans-experience-severe-online-hate-and-harassment.Google Scholar
- (2015) Adaptation to information technology: A holistic nomological network from implementation to job outcomes. Management Sci. 62(1):156–179.Link, Google Scholar
- (2011) Who will help prevent sexual violence: Creating an ecological model of bystander intervention. Psych. Violence 1(3):216–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Individual and collective social cognitive influences on peer aggression: Exploring the contribution of aggression efficacy, moral disengagement, and collective efficacy. Aggressive Behav. 37(2):107–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) A meta-theory for understanding information systems within sociotechnical systems. J. Management Inform. Systems 26(1):17–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. Papacharissi Z, ed. A Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites (Routledge, New York), 47–66.Google Scholar
- (2016) Bystander intervention in cyberbullying. Comm. Monographs 83(1):94–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) A situational model of sexual assault prevention through bystander intervention. Sex Roles 60(11–12):779–792.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Cyberbullying in adolescents: Modalities and aggressors’ profile. Comput. Human Behav. 26(5):1128–1135.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1979) Reliability and Validity Assessment , vol. 17 (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Cyberbullying among youth: A comprehensive review of current international research and its implications and application to policy and practice. School Psych. Internat. 34(6):575–612.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Interpretation of formative measurement in information systems research. MIS Quart. 33(4):689–708.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Cyberbullying on social networking sites: The crime opportunity and affordance perspectives. J. Management Inform. Systems 36(2):574–609.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Cyberbullying on social networking sites: A literature review and future research directions. Inform. Management 58(2):103411.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1995) Application of social cognitive theory to training for computer skills. Inform. Systems Res. 6(2):118–143.Link, Google Scholar
- (2016) What is a flag for? Social media reporting tools and the vocabulary of complaint. New Media Soc. 18(3):410–428.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1968) Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 8(4):377–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Deciding whether to look after them, to like it, or leave it: A multidimensional analysis of predictors of positive and negative bystander behavior in cyberbullying among adolescents. Comput. Human Behav. 57(April):398–415.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Formative vs. reflective indicators in organizational measure development: A comparison and empirical illustration. British J. Management 17(4):263–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative to scale development. J. Marketing Res. 38(2):269–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Unresponsive or un-noticed?: Cyberbystander intervention in an experimental cyberbullying context. Comput. Human Behav. 45(April):144–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) The Social Psychology of Prosocial Behavior (Psychology Press, New York).Google Scholar
- (1985) Potential predictors of whistle-blowing: A prosocial behavior perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 10(4):823–836.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Online harassment 2017. Pew Research Center (July 11), http://www.pewinternet.org/2017/07/11/online-harassment-2017/.Google Scholar
- (2013) The role of perceptions, appraisals and anticipated emotions in shaping reporting behavior in response to wrongdoing. Burke RJ, Cooper CL, eds. Voice and Whistleblowing in Organizations: Overcoming Fear, Fostering Courage and Unleashing Candour (Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton, MA), 254–278.Crossref, Google Scholar
- eMarketer (2019) Level of privacy/security concern toward select social networks among US internet users, March 2019. eMarketer (April 29), https://www.emarketer.com/Chart/Level-of-PrivacySecurity-Concern-Toward-Select-Social-Networks-Among-US-Internet-Users-March-2019-of-respondents/228185.Google Scholar
- Facebook (2011) Creating a culture of respect. (March 10), https://www.facebook.com/notes/facebook-safety/creating-a-culture-of-respect/196123070408483/.Google Scholar
- Facebook (2019) Facebook community standards enforcement report. Accessed May 19, 2019, https://transparency.facebook.com/community-standards-enforcement#bullying-and-harassment.Google Scholar
- (2003) Reporting assaults against juveniles to the police barriers and catalysts. J. Interpersonal Violence 18(2):103–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) A survey of online harassment at a university campus. J. Interpersonal Violence . 19(4):468–483.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) The bystander-effect: A meta-analytic review on bystander intervention in dangerous and non-dangerous emergencies. Psych. Bull. 137(4):517–537.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1986) Dynamics of a stressful encounter: Cognitive appraisal, coping, and encounter outcomes. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 50(5):992–1003.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Marketing Res. 18(3):39–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Design and evaluation of survey questions. Bickman L, Rog DJ, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods, 2nd ed. (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA), 375–412.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Determinants of adolescents’ active defending and passive bystanding behavior in bullying. J. Adolescence 31(1):93–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
- GlobalWebIndex (2018) Social: Flagship report 2018. Accessed May 19, https://www.globalwebindex.com/hubfs/Downloads/Social-H2-2018-report.pdf.Google Scholar
- (2008) Police involvement in cases of intimate partner violence against women: The influence of perceived severity and personal responsibility. Violence Against Women 14(6):697–714.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Can this technology put an end to bullying? BBC (February 7), http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20190207-how-artificial-intelligence-can-help-stop-bullying.Google Scholar
- (2017) Detecting cyber bullying: But can it be stopped? WVTF/Radio IQ (March 2), https://www.wvtf.org/post/detecting-cyber-bullying-can-it-be-stopped#stream/0.Google Scholar
- (2009) Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Comm. Monographs 76(4):408–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide. Arch. Suicide Res. 14(3):206–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) The bystander dilemma and child abuse: Extending the Latane and Darley model to domestic violence. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 31(6):1158–1183.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria vs. new alternatives. Structural Equation Model. 6(1):1–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) An analysis of multiple factors of cyberbullying among junior high school students in Taiwan. Comput. Human Behav. 26(6):1581–1590.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Online harassment in context: Trends from three Youth Internet Safety Surveys (2000, 2005, 2010). Psych. Violence 3(1):53–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Victim reports of bystander reactions to in-person and online peer harassment: A national survey of adolescents. J. Youth Adolescence 44(12):2308–2320.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) The needs–affordances–features perspective for the use of social media. MIS Quart. 42(3):737–756.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Toward a theory of whistleblowing intentions: A benefit‐to‐cost differential perspective. Decision Sci. 41(4):787–812.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Optimistic bias and Facebook use: Self–other discrepancies about potential risks and benefits of Facebook use. Cyberpsych. Behav. Soc. Networks 18(4):214–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Individual power distance orientation and follower reactions to transformational leaders: A cross-level, cross-cultural examination. Acad. Management J. 52(4):744–764.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Facebook announces new safety measures but no panic button. Guardian (April 13), https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2010/apr/13/facebook-safety.Google Scholar
- (2007) Exploring the assistance dilemma in experiments with cognitive tutors. Ed. Psych. Rev. 19(3):239–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Cyberbullying: Bullying in the Digital Age (Blackwell, Malden, MA).Google Scholar
- (2015) Research note—Why following friends can hurt you: An exploratory investigation of the effects of envy on social networking sites among college-age users. Inform. Systems Res. 26(3):585–605.Link, Google Scholar
- (1998) Social anxiety among adolescents: Linkages with peer relations and friendships. J. Abnormal Child Psych. 26(2):83–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Dimensions of conscience in mid-adolescence: Links with social behavior, parenting, and temperament. J. Youth Adolescence 37(7):875–887.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1968) Group inhibition of bystander intervention in emergencies. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 10(3):215–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1970) The Unresponsive Bystander: Why Doesn’t He Help? (Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York).Google Scholar
- (1981) Ten years of research on group size and helping. Psych. Bull. 89(2):308–324.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Thinking About Social Theory and Philosophy for Information Systems , Mingers J , Willcocks L , eds. (John Wiley and Sons, England), 1–26.Google Scholar
- (2009) Threat or coping appraisal: Determinants of SMB executives’ decision to adopt anti-malware software. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 18(2):177–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Social media, knowledge sharing, and innovation: Toward a theory of communication visibility. Inform. Systems Res. 25(4):796–816.Link, Google Scholar
- (2015) Ambient awareness and knowledge acquisition: Using social media to learn” who knows what” and” who knows whom. MIS Quart. 39(4):747–762.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Social media and their affordances for organizing: A review and agenda for research. Acad. Management Ann. 11(1):150–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) You are what you read: The belief systems of cyber-bystanders on social networking sites. Frontiers Psych. 9(April):1–11. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00365/full.Google Scholar
- (2011) Whistleblowing in a changing legal climate: Is it time to revisit our approach to trust and loyalty at the workplace? Bus. Ethics Eur. Rev. 20(1):71–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Understanding security behaviors in personal computer usage: A threat avoidance Perspective. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 11(7):394–413.Google Scholar
- (2016) Experiences of online harassment among emerging adults emotional reactions and the mediating role of fear. J. Interpersonal Violence 31(19):3174–3195.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) The Scarecrow and the Tin Man: The vicissitudes of human sympathy and caring. Rev. General Psych. 11(2):112–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016a) “Cargo Cult” science in traditional organization and information systems survey research: A case for using nontraditional methods of data collection, including Mechanical Turk and online panels. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 25(3):232–240.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) The drivers in the use of online whistle-blowing reporting systems. J. Management Inform. Systems 30(1):153–190.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016b) Why do adults engage in cyberbullying on social media? An integration of online disinhibition and deindividuation effects with the social structure and social learning model. Inform. Systems Res. 27(4):962–986.Link, Google Scholar
- (2013) Bystanders’ support of cyberbullied schoolmates. J. Community Appl. Soc. Psych. 23(1):25–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Construct measurement and validation procedures in MIS and behavioral research: Integrating new and existing techniques. MIS Quart. 35(2):293–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Social appraisal: The social world as object of and influence on appraisal processes. Scherer KR, Schorr A, Johnstone T, eds. Appraisal Processes in Emotion: Theory, Methods, Research (Oxford University Press, New York), 221–232.Google Scholar
- (2012) Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Behav. Res. Methods 44(1):1–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Are you feeling lonely? The impact of relationship characteristics and online social network features on loneliness. J. Management Inform. Systems 31(4):278–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Social media: A contextual framework to guide research and practice. J. Appl. Psych. 100(6):1653–1677.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Trust in a specific technology: An investigation of its components and measures. ACM Trans. Inform. Systems 2(2):1–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1985) Characteristics of organizational climate and perceived wrongdoing associated with whistle‐blowing decisions. Personnel Psych. 38(3):525–544.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1992) Blowing the Whistle: The Organizational and Legal Implications for Companies and Employees (Lexington Books, New York).Google Scholar
- (2012) Risk factors for involvement in cyber bullying: Victims, bullies and bully–victims. Children Youth Services Rev. 34(1):63–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Anonymity and roles associated with aggressive posts in an online forum. Comput. Human Behav. 28(3):861–867.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1995) Effective-whistle blowing. Acad. Management Rev. 20(3):679–708.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Measurement of the bystander intervention model for bullying and sexual harassment. J. Adolescence 37(4):391–400.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Bystanding or standing by? How the number of bystanders affects the intention to intervene in cyberbullying. New Media Soc. 18(8):1491–1507.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Overcoming the mum effect in IT project reporting: Impacts of fault responsibility and time urgency. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 9(7):409–431.Google Scholar
- (2009) Organizational silence and whistle‐blowing on IT projects: An integrated model. Decision Sci. 40(4):901–918.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Comparing student perceptions of coping strategies and school interventions in managing bullying and cyberbullying incidents. Pastoral Care Ed. 30(2):127–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1993) Whistleblowing, Organizational Performance, and Organizational Control (M. E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY).Google Scholar
- (2007) Specifying formative constructs in information systems research. MIS Quart. 31(4):623–656.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Plan International UK (2017) Almost half of girls aged 11–18 have experienced harassment or bullying online. Accessed August 18, https://plan-uk.org/media-centre/almost-half-of-girls-aged-11-18-have-experienced-harassment-or-bullying-online.Google Scholar
- (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. 88(5):879–903.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Conceptualizing models using multidimensional constructs: A review and guidelines for their use. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 21(1):22–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Standing up for the victim, siding with the bully or standing by? Bystander responses in bullying situations. Soc. Development 21(4):722–741.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013a) Friend similarity in attitudes toward bullying and sense of responsibility to intervene. Soc. Influence 8(2–3):161–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013b) Why do bystanders of bullying help or not? A multidimensional model. J. Early Adolescence 33(3):315–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1993) Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: Some consequences of misperceiving the social norm. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 64(2):243–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Cyberbullying: Experiences, impacts and coping strategies as described by Australian young people. Youth Stud. Australia 29(2):51–59.Google Scholar
- (2015) On standby? A comparison of online and offline witnesses to bullying and their bystander behaviour. Ed. Psych. 35(4):430–448.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Conceptualizing and testing formative constructs: tutorial and annotated example. ACM SIGMIS Database: DATABASE Adv. Inform. Systems 40(3):9–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Cyber-aggression and victimization and social information processing: Integrating the medium and the message. Psych. Violence 3(1):9–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Bullying and the peer group: A review. Aggression Violent Behav. 15(2):112–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) The sociotechnical axis of cohesion for the IS discipline: Its historical legacy and its continued relevance. MIS Quart. 43(3):695–719.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Who’s to blame?: The effects of victim disclosure on bystander reactions to cyberbullying. Comput. Human Behav. 57(April):115–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Examining the impact and detection of the urban legend of common method bias. ACM SIGMIS Database: DATABASE Adv. Inform. Systems 48(1):93–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Cyber-bullying: An exploration of bystander behavior and motivation. Cyberpsych.: J. Psychosocial Res. Cyberspace 8(4):53–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1997) A social learning theory analysis of computer crime among college students. J. Res. Crime Delinquency 34(4):495–518.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) The nature of cyberbullying, and strategies for prevention. Comput. Human Behav. 29(1):26–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) The reluctance to report bad news on troubled software projects: A theoretical model. Inform. Systems J. 13(1):69–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Factors influencing bystanders’ behavioral reactions in cyberbullying situations. Comput. Human Behav. 78(January):273–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsych. Behav. 7(3):321–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) An investigation of students’ willingness to report threats of violence in campus communities. Psych. Violence 1(1):53–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Developmental trajectories of peer victimization: Off-line and online experiences during adolescence. J. Adolescent Health 50(6):607–613.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Choosing a fit technology: Understanding mindfulness in technology adoption and continuance. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 17(6):377–411.Google Scholar
- (2018) How and why trust matters in post-adoptive usage: The mediating roles of internal and external self-efficacy. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 27(2):170–190.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Reporting crime to the police. British J. Criminology 50(3):474–490.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Culture and whistleblowing an empirical study of Croatian and United States managers utilizing Hofstede’s cultural dimensions. J. Bus. Ethics 43(1–2):49–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Mindfulness in information technology use: Definitions, distinctions, and a new measure. MIS Quart. 42(3):831–847.Crossref, Google Scholar
- The Children’s Society, YoungMinds (2018) Safety net: The impact of cyberbullying on children and young people’s mental health. Accessed February 1, https://youngminds.org.uk/media/2189/pcr144b_social_media_cyberbullying_inquiry_full_report.pdf.Google Scholar
- (2007) A classmate in distress: Schoolchildren as bystanders and their reasons for how they act. Soc. Psych. Ed. 10(1):5–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Learning to cope with information security risks regarding mobile device loss or theft: An empirical examination. Inform. Management 52(4):506–517.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Panel report: The dark side of the digitization of the individual. Internet Res. 29(2):274–288.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) The role of the bystander in the social architecture of bullying and violence in schools and communities. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1036(1):215–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Personal characteristics and contextual factors that determine “helping,” “joining in,” and “doing nothing” when witnessing cyberbullying. Aggressive Behav. 40(5):383–396.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) “Thinking before posting?” Reducing cyber harassment on social networking sites through a reflective message. Comput. Human Behav. 66(January):345–352.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) A new approach to the problem of access policy violations: Increasing perceptions of accountability through the user interface. MIS Quart. 39(2):345–366.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Women scholars’ experiences with online harassment and abuse: Self-protection, resistance, acceptance, and self-blame. New Media Soc. 20(12):4689–4708.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) It’s not me, it’s you: How gift giving creates giver identity threat as a function of social closeness. J. Consumer Res. 38(1):164–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) I will speak up if my voice is socially desirable: A moderated mediating process of promotive vs. prohibitive voice. J. Appl. Psych. 100(5):1641–1652.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Understanding the role of social networking sites in the subjective well-being of users: A diary study. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 28(2):126–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Does online harassment constitute bullying? An exploration of online harassment by known peers and online-only contacts. J. Adolescent Health 41(6):S51–S58.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Does gender matter in cyberbullying perpetration? An empirical investigation. Comput. Human Behav. 79(February):247–257.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Digital metamorphosis: Examination of the bystander culture in cyberbullying. Aggression Violent Behav. 19(4):418–422.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Operationalizing multidimensional constructs in structural equation modeling: Recommendations for IS research. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems 30(23):367–412.Google Scholar
- (2007) The co-occurrence of Internet harassment and unwanted sexual solicitation victimization and perpetration: Associations with psychosocial indicators. J. Adolescent Health 41(6):S31–S41.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Comparing twitter and traditional media using topic models. Clough P, Foley C, Gurrin C, Jones G, Kraaij W, Lee H, Murdock V, eds. Advances in Information Retrieval (Springer, Berlin), 338–349.Crossref, Google Scholar

