Standing Up or Standing By: Understanding Bystanders’ Proactive Reporting Responses to Social Media Harassment

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2020.0983

References

  • Aiken LS , West SG , Reno RR (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Allison KR , Bussey K (2016) Cyber-bystanding in context: A review of the literature on witnesses’ responses to cyberbullying. Children Youth Services Rev. 65(June):183–194.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anti-Defamation League (2019) More than one-third of Americans experience severe online hate and harassment, new ADL study finds. Accessed May 19, 2019, https://www.adl.org/news/press-releases/more-than-one-third-of-americans-experience-severe-online-hate-and-harassment.Google Scholar
  • Bala H , Venkatesh V (2015) Adaptation to information technology: A holistic nomological network from implementation to job outcomes. Management Sci. 62(1):156–179.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Banyard VL (2011) Who will help prevent sexual violence: Creating an ecological model of bystander intervention. Psych. Violence 1(3):216–229.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barchia K , Bussey K (2011) Individual and collective social cognitive influences on peer aggression: Exploring the contribution of aggression efficacy, moral disengagement, and collective efficacy. Aggressive Behav. 37(2):107–120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bostrom RP , Gupta S , Thomas D (2009) A meta-theory for understanding information systems within sociotechnical systems. J. Management Inform. Systems 26(1):17–48.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boyd D (2010) Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. Papacharissi Z, ed. A Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites (Routledge, New York), 47–66.Google Scholar
  • Brody N , Vangelisti AL (2016) Bystander intervention in cyberbullying. Comm. Monographs 83(1):94–119.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burn SM (2009) A situational model of sexual assault prevention through bystander intervention. Sex Roles 60(11–12):779–792.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Calvete E , Orue I , Estévez A , Villardón L , Padilla P (2010) Cyberbullying in adolescents: Modalities and aggressors’ profile. Comput. Human Behav. 26(5):1128–1135.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carmines EG , Zeller RA (1979) Reliability and Validity Assessment , vol. 17 (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cassidy W , Faucher C , Jackson M (2013) Cyberbullying among youth: A comprehensive review of current international research and its implications and application to policy and practice. School Psych. Internat. 34(6):575–612.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cenfetelli RT , Bassellier G (2009) Interpretation of formative measurement in information systems research. MIS Quart. 33(4):689–708.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chan TCH , Cheung CMK , Wong RYM (2019) Cyberbullying on social networking sites: The crime opportunity and affordance perspectives. J. Management Inform. Systems 36(2):574–609.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chan TCH , Cheung CMK , Lee ZWY (2021) Cyberbullying on social networking sites: A literature review and future research directions. Inform. Management 58(2):103411.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Compeau DR , Higgins CA (1995) Application of social cognitive theory to training for computer skills. Inform. Systems Res. 6(2):118–143.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Crawford K , Gillespie T (2016) What is a flag for? Social media reporting tools and the vocabulary of complaint. New Media Soc. 18(3):410–428.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Darley JM , Latané B (1968) Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 8(4):377–383.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeSmet A , Bastiaensens S , Van Cleemput K , Poels K , Vandebosch H , Cardon G , De Bourdeaudhuij I (2016) Deciding whether to look after them, to like it, or leave it: A multidimensional analysis of predictors of positive and negative bystander behavior in cyberbullying among adolescents. Comput. Human Behav. 57(April):398–415.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Diamantopoulos A , Siguaw JA (2006) Formative vs. reflective indicators in organizational measure development: A comparison and empirical illustration. British J. Management 17(4):263–282.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Diamantopoulos A , Winklhofer HM (2001) Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative to scale development. J. Marketing Res. 38(2):269–277.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dillon KP , Bushman BJ (2015) Unresponsive or un-noticed?: Cyberbystander intervention in an experimental cyberbullying context. Comput. Human Behav. 45(April):144–150.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dovidio JF , Piliavin JA , Schroeder DA , Penner L (2006) The Social Psychology of Prosocial Behavior (Psychology Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Dozier JB , Miceli MP (1985) Potential predictors of whistle-blowing: A prosocial behavior perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 10(4):823–836.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Duggan M (2017) Online harassment 2017. Pew Research Center (July 11), http://www.pewinternet.org/2017/07/11/online-harassment-2017/.Google Scholar
  • Edwards MS , Lawrence SA , Ashkanasy NM (2013) The role of perceptions, appraisals and anticipated emotions in shaping reporting behavior in response to wrongdoing. Burke RJ, Cooper CL, eds. Voice and Whistleblowing in Organizations: Overcoming Fear, Fostering Courage and Unleashing Candour (Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton, MA), 254–278.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • eMarketer (2019) Level of privacy/security concern toward select social networks among US internet users, March 2019. eMarketer (April 29), https://www.emarketer.com/Chart/Level-of-PrivacySecurity-Concern-Toward-Select-Social-Networks-Among-US-Internet-Users-March-2019-of-respondents/228185.Google Scholar
  • Facebook (2011) Creating a culture of respect. (March 10), https://www.facebook.com/notes/facebook-safety/creating-a-culture-of-respect/196123070408483/.Google Scholar
  • Facebook (2019) Facebook community standards enforcement report. Accessed May 19, 2019, https://transparency.facebook.com/community-standards-enforcement#bullying-and-harassment.Google Scholar
  • Finkelhor D , Wolak J (2003) Reporting assaults against juveniles to the police barriers and catalysts. J. Interpersonal Violence 18(2):103–128.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Finn J (2004) A survey of online harassment at a university campus. J. Interpersonal Violence . 19(4):468–483.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fischer P , Krueger JI , Greitemeyer T , Vogrincic C , Kastenmüller A , Frey D , Heene M , Wicher M , Kainbacher M (2011) The bystander-effect: A meta-analytic review on bystander intervention in dangerous and non-dangerous emergencies. Psych. Bull. 137(4):517–537.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Folkman S , Lazarus RS , Dunkel-Schetter C , DeLongis A , Gruen RJ (1986) Dynamics of a stressful encounter: Cognitive appraisal, coping, and encounter outcomes. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 50(5):992–1003.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fornell C , Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Marketing Res. 18(3):39–50.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fowler F Jr , Cosenza C (2009) Design and evaluation of survey questions. Bickman L, Rog DJ, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods, 2nd ed. (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA), 375–412.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gini G , Albiero P , Benelli B , Altoe G (2008) Determinants of adolescents’ active defending and passive bystanding behavior in bullying. J. Adolescence 31(1):93–105.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • GlobalWebIndex (2018) Social: Flagship report 2018. Accessed May 19, https://www.globalwebindex.com/hubfs/Downloads/Social-H2-2018-report.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Gracia E , Garcia F , Lila M (2008) Police involvement in cases of intimate partner violence against women: The influence of perceived severity and personal responsibility. Violence Against Women 14(6):697–714.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Griffiths S (2019) Can this technology put an end to bullying? BBC (February 7), http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20190207-how-artificial-intelligence-can-help-stop-bullying.Google Scholar
  • Harris R (2017) Detecting cyber bullying: But can it be stopped? WVTF/Radio IQ (March 2), https://www.wvtf.org/post/detecting-cyber-bullying-can-it-be-stopped#stream/0.Google Scholar
  • Hayes AF (2009) Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Comm. Monographs 76(4):408–420.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hinduja S , Patchin JW (2010) Bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide. Arch. Suicide Res. 14(3):206–221.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoefnagels C , Zwikker M (2001) The bystander dilemma and child abuse: Extending the Latane and Darley model to domestic violence. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 31(6):1158–1183.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hu L , Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria vs. new alternatives. Structural Equation Model. 6(1):1–55.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huang Y , Chou C (2010) An analysis of multiple factors of cyberbullying among junior high school students in Taiwan. Comput. Human Behav. 26(6):1581–1590.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jones LM , Mitchell KJ , Finkelhor D (2013) Online harassment in context: Trends from three Youth Internet Safety Surveys (2000, 2005, 2010). Psych. Violence 3(1):53–69.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jones LM , Mitchell KJ , Turner HA (2015) Victim reports of bystander reactions to in-person and online peer harassment: A national survey of adolescents. J. Youth Adolescence 44(12):2308–2320.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Karahanna E , Xu SX , Xu Y , Zhang NA (2018) The needs–affordances–features perspective for the use of social media. MIS Quart. 42(3):737–756.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keil M , Tiwana A , Sainsbury R , Sneha S (2010) Toward a theory of whistleblowing intentions: A benefit‐to‐cost differential perspective. Decision Sci. 41(4):787–812.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim SJ , Hancock JT (2015) Optimistic bias and Facebook use: Self–other discrepancies about potential risks and benefits of Facebook use. Cyberpsych. Behav. Soc. Networks 18(4):214–220.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kirkman BL , Chen G , Farh JL , Chen ZX , Lowe KB (2009) Individual power distance orientation and follower reactions to transformational leaders: A cross-level, cross-cultural examination. Acad. Management J. 52(4):744–764.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kiss J (2010) Facebook announces new safety measures but no panic button. Guardian (April 13), https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2010/apr/13/facebook-safety.Google Scholar
  • Koedinger KR , Aleven V (2007) Exploring the assistance dilemma in experiments with cognitive tutors. Ed. Psych. Rev. 19(3):239–264.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kowalski RM , Limber SP , Agatston PW (2008) Cyberbullying: Bullying in the Digital Age (Blackwell, Malden, MA).Google Scholar
  • Krasnova H , Widjaja T , Buxmann P , Wenninger H , Benbasat I (2015) Research note—Why following friends can hurt you: An exploratory investigation of the effects of envy on social networking sites among college-age users. Inform. Systems Res. 26(3):585–605.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • La Greca AM , Lopez N (1998) Social anxiety among adolescents: Linkages with peer relations and friendships. J. Abnormal Child Psych. 26(2):83–94.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Laible D , Eye J , Carlo G (2008) Dimensions of conscience in mid-adolescence: Links with social behavior, parenting, and temperament. J. Youth Adolescence 37(7):875–887.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Latané B , Darley JM (1968) Group inhibition of bystander intervention in emergencies. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 10(3):215–221.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Latané B , Darley JM (1970) The Unresponsive Bystander: Why Doesn’t He Help? (Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York).Google Scholar
  • Latané B , Nida S (1981) Ten years of research on group size and helping. Psych. Bull. 89(2):308–324.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee AS (2004) Thinking About Social Theory and Philosophy for Information Systems , Mingers J , Willcocks L , eds. (John Wiley and Sons, England), 1–26.Google Scholar
  • Lee Y , Larsen KR (2009) Threat or coping appraisal: Determinants of SMB executives’ decision to adopt anti-malware software. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 18(2):177–187.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leonardi PM (2014) Social media, knowledge sharing, and innovation: Toward a theory of communication visibility. Inform. Systems Res. 25(4):796–816.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Leonardi PM (2015) Ambient awareness and knowledge acquisition: Using social media to learn” who knows what” and” who knows whom. MIS Quart. 39(4):747–762.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leonardi PM , Vaast E (2017) Social media and their affordances for organizing: A review and agenda for research. Acad. Management Ann. 11(1):150–188.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leung AN , Wong N , Farver JM (2018) You are what you read: The belief systems of cyber-bystanders on social networking sites. Frontiers Psych. 9(April):1–11. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00365/full.Google Scholar
  • Lewis D (2011) Whistleblowing in a changing legal climate: Is it time to revisit our approach to trust and loyalty at the workplace? Bus. Ethics Eur. Rev. 20(1):71–87.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liang H , Xue Y (2010) Understanding security behaviors in personal computer usage: A threat avoidance Perspective. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 11(7):394–413.Google Scholar
  • Lindsay M , Booth JM , Messing JT , Thaller J (2016) Experiences of online harassment among emerging adults emotional reactions and the mediating role of fear. J. Interpersonal Violence 31(19):3174–3195.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Loewenstein G , Small DA (2007) The Scarecrow and the Tin Man: The vicissitudes of human sympathy and caring. Rev. General Psych. 11(2):112–126.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lowry PB , D’Arcy J , Hammer B , Moody GD (2016a) “Cargo Cult” science in traditional organization and information systems survey research: A case for using nontraditional methods of data collection, including Mechanical Turk and online panels. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 25(3):232–240.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lowry PB , Moody GD , Galletta DF , Vance A (2013) The drivers in the use of online whistle-blowing reporting systems. J. Management Inform. Systems 30(1):153–190.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lowry PB , Zhang J , Wang C , Siponen M (2016b) Why do adults engage in cyberbullying on social media? An integration of online disinhibition and deindividuation effects with the social structure and social learning model. Inform. Systems Res. 27(4):962–986.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Macháčková H , Dedkova L , Sevcikova A , Cerna A (2013) Bystanders’ support of cyberbullied schoolmates. J. Community Appl. Soc. Psych. 23(1):25–36.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • MacKenzie SB , Podsakoff PM , Podsakoff NP (2011) Construct measurement and validation procedures in MIS and behavioral research: Integrating new and existing techniques. MIS Quart. 35(2):293–334.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Manstead ASR , Fischer AH (2001) Social appraisal: The social world as object of and influence on appraisal processes. Scherer KR, Schorr A, Johnstone T, eds. Appraisal Processes in Emotion: Theory, Methods, Research (Oxford University Press, New York), 221–232.Google Scholar
  • Mason W , Suri S (2012) Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Behav. Res. Methods 44(1):1–23.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Matook S , Cummings J , Bala H (2015) Are you feeling lonely? The impact of relationship characteristics and online social network features on loneliness. J. Management Inform. Systems 31(4):278–310.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McFarland LA , Ployhart RE (2015) Social media: A contextual framework to guide research and practice. J. Appl. Psych. 100(6):1653–1677.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McKnight DH , Carter M , Thatcher JB , Clay PF (2011) Trust in a specific technology: An investigation of its components and measures. ACM Trans. Inform. Systems 2(2):1–25.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miceli MP , Near JP (1985) Characteristics of organizational climate and perceived wrongdoing associated with whistle‐blowing decisions. Personnel Psych. 38(3):525–544.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miceli MP , Near JP (1992) Blowing the Whistle: The Organizational and Legal Implications for Companies and Employees (Lexington Books, New York).Google Scholar
  • Mishna F , Khoury-Kassabri M , Gadalla T , Daciuk J (2012) Risk factors for involvement in cyber bullying: Victims, bullies and bully–victims. Children Youth Services Rev. 34(1):63–70.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moore MJ , Nakano T , Enomoto A , Suda T (2012) Anonymity and roles associated with aggressive posts in an online forum. Comput. Human Behav. 28(3):861–867.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Near JP , Miceli MP (1995) Effective-whistle blowing. Acad. Management Rev. 20(3):679–708.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nickerson AB , Aloe AM , Livingston JA , Feeley TH (2014) Measurement of the bystander intervention model for bullying and sexual harassment. J. Adolescence 37(4):391–400.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Obermaier M , Fawzi N , Koch T (2016) Bystanding or standing by? How the number of bystanders affects the intention to intervene in cyberbullying. New Media Soc. 18(8):1491–1507.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Park C , Im G , Keil M (2008) Overcoming the mum effect in IT project reporting: Impacts of fault responsibility and time urgency. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 9(7):409–431.Google Scholar
  • Park C , Keil M (2009) Organizational silence and whistle‐blowing on IT projects: An integrated model. Decision Sci. 40(4):901–918.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Paul S , Smith PK , Blumberg HH (2012) Comparing student perceptions of coping strategies and school interventions in managing bullying and cyberbullying incidents. Pastoral Care Ed. 30(2):127–146.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perry JL (1993) Whistleblowing, Organizational Performance, and Organizational Control (M. E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY).Google Scholar
  • Petter S , Straub D , Rai A (2007) Specifying formative constructs in information systems research. MIS Quart. 31(4):623–656.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Plan International UK (2017) Almost half of girls aged 11–18 have experienced harassment or bullying online. Accessed August 18, https://plan-uk.org/media-centre/almost-half-of-girls-aged-11-18-have-experienced-harassment-or-bullying-online.Google Scholar
  • Podsakoff PM , MacKenzie SB , Lee JY , Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. 88(5):879–903.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Polites GL , Roberts N , Thatcher J (2012) Conceptualizing models using multidimensional constructs: A review and guidelines for their use. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 21(1):22–48.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pöyhönen V , Juvonen J , Salmivalli C (2012) Standing up for the victim, siding with the bully or standing by? Bystander responses in bullying situations. Soc. Development 21(4):722–741.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pozzoli T , Gini G (2013a) Friend similarity in attitudes toward bullying and sense of responsibility to intervene. Soc. Influence 8(2–3):161–176.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pozzoli T , Gini G (2013b) Why do bystanders of bullying help or not? A multidimensional model. J. Early Adolescence 33(3):315–340.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Prentice DA , Miller DT (1993) Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: Some consequences of misperceiving the social norm. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 64(2):243–256.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Price M , Dalgleish J (2010) Cyberbullying: Experiences, impacts and coping strategies as described by Australian young people. Youth Stud. Australia 29(2):51–59.Google Scholar
  • Quirk R , Campbell M (2015) On standby? A comparison of online and offline witnesses to bullying and their bystander behaviour. Ed. Psych. 35(4):430–448.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roberts N , Thatcher J (2009) Conceptualizing and testing formative constructs: tutorial and annotated example. ACM SIGMIS Database: DATABASE Adv. Inform. Systems 40(3):9–39.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Runions K , Shapka JD , Dooley J , Modecki K (2013) Cyber-aggression and victimization and social information processing: Integrating the medium and the message. Psych. Violence 3(1):9–26.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Salmivalli C (2010) Bullying and the peer group: A review. Aggression Violent Behav. 15(2):112–120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sarker S , Chatterjee S , Xiao X , Elbanna A (2019) The sociotechnical axis of cohesion for the IS discipline: Its historical legacy and its continued relevance. MIS Quart. 43(3):695–719.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schacter HL , Greenberg S , Juvonen J (2016) Who’s to blame?: The effects of victim disclosure on bystander reactions to cyberbullying. Comput. Human Behav. 57(April):115–121.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schwarz A , Rizzuto T , Carraher-Wolverton C , Roldán JL , Barrera-Barrera R (2017) Examining the impact and detection of the urban legend of common method bias. ACM SIGMIS Database: DATABASE Adv. Inform. Systems 48(1):93–119.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shultz E , Heilman R , Hart KJ (2014) Cyber-bullying: An exploration of bystander behavior and motivation. Cyberpsych.: J. Psychosocial Res. Cyberspace 8(4):53–70.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Skinner WF , Fream AM (1997) A social learning theory analysis of computer crime among college students. J. Res. Crime Delinquency 34(4):495–518.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Slonje R , Smith PK , Frisén A (2013) The nature of cyberbullying, and strategies for prevention. Comput. Human Behav. 29(1):26–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith HJ , Keil M (2003) The reluctance to report bad news on troubled software projects: A theoretical model. Inform. Systems J. 13(1):69–95.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Song J , Oh I (2018) Factors influencing bystanders’ behavioral reactions in cyberbullying situations. Comput. Human Behav. 78(January):273–282.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Suler J (2004) The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsych. Behav. 7(3):321–326.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sulkowski ML (2011) An investigation of students’ willingness to report threats of violence in campus communities. Psych. Violence 1(1):53–65.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sumter SR , Baumgartner SE , Valkenburg PM , Peter J (2012) Developmental trajectories of peer victimization: Off-line and online experiences during adolescence. J. Adolescent Health 50(6):607–613.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sun H , Fang Y (2016) Choosing a fit technology: Understanding mindfulness in technology adoption and continuance. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 17(6):377–411.Google Scholar
  • Tams S , Thatcher JB , Craig K (2018) How and why trust matters in post-adoptive usage: The mediating roles of internal and external self-efficacy. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 27(2):170–190.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tarling R , Morris K (2010) Reporting crime to the police. British J. Criminology 50(3):474–490.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tavakoli AA , Keenan JP , Cranjak-Karanovic B (2003) Culture and whistleblowing an empirical study of Croatian and United States managers utilizing Hofstede’s cultural dimensions. J. Bus. Ethics 43(1–2):49–64.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thatcher J , Wright R , Sun H , Zagenczyk T , Klein R (2018) Mindfulness in information technology use: Definitions, distinctions, and a new measure. MIS Quart. 42(3):831–847.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • The Children’s Society, YoungMinds (2018) Safety net: The impact of cyberbullying on children and young people’s mental health. Accessed February 1, https://youngminds.org.uk/media/2189/pcr144b_social_media_cyberbullying_inquiry_full_report.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Thornberg R (2007) A classmate in distress: Schoolchildren as bystanders and their reasons for how they act. Soc. Psych. Ed. 10(1):5–28.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tu Z , Turel O , Yuan Y , Archer N (2015) Learning to cope with information security risks regarding mobile device loss or theft: An empirical examination. Inform. Management 52(4):506–517.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Turel O , Matt C , Trenz M , Cheung CM , D’Arcy J , Qahri-Saremi H , Tarafdar M (2019) Panel report: The dark side of the digitization of the individual. Internet Res. 29(2):274–288.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Twemlow SW , Fonagy P , Sacco FC (2004) The role of the bystander in the social architecture of bullying and violence in schools and communities. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1036(1):215–232.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Cleemput K , Vandebosch H , Pabian S (2014) Personal characteristics and contextual factors that determine “helping,” “joining in,” and “doing nothing” when witnessing cyberbullying. Aggressive Behav. 40(5):383–396.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Royen K , Poels K , Vandebosch H , Adam P (2017) “Thinking before posting?” Reducing cyber harassment on social networking sites through a reflective message. Comput. Human Behav. 66(January):345–352.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vance A , Lowry P , Eggett D (2015) A new approach to the problem of access policy violations: Increasing perceptions of accountability through the user interface. MIS Quart. 39(2):345–366.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Veletsianos G , Houlden S , Hodson J , Gosse C (2018) Women scholars’ experiences with online harassment and abuse: Self-protection, resistance, acceptance, and self-blame. New Media Soc. 20(12):4689–4708.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ward MK , Broniarczyk SM (2011) It’s not me, it’s you: How gift giving creates giver identity threat as a function of social closeness. J. Consumer Res. 38(1):164–181.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wei X , Zhang ZX , Chen XP (2015) I will speak up if my voice is socially desirable: A moderated mediating process of promotive vs. prohibitive voice. J. Appl. Psych. 100(5):1641–1652.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wenninger H , Krasnova H , Buxmann P (2019) Understanding the role of social networking sites in the subjective well-being of users: A diary study. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 28(2):126–148.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wolak J , Mitchell KJ , Finkelhor D (2007) Does online harassment constitute bullying? An exploration of online harassment by known peers and online-only contacts. J. Adolescent Health 41(6):S51–S58.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wong RYM , Cheung CMK , Xiao B (2018) Does gender matter in cyberbullying perpetration? An empirical investigation. Comput. Human Behav. 79(February):247–257.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wong-Lo M , Bullock LM (2014) Digital metamorphosis: Examination of the bystander culture in cyberbullying. Aggression Violent Behav. 19(4):418–422.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wright RT , Campbell DE , Thatcher JB , Roberts NH (2012) Operationalizing multidimensional constructs in structural equation modeling: Recommendations for IS research. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems 30(23):367–412.Google Scholar
  • Ybarra ML , Espelage DL , Mitchell KJ (2007) The co-occurrence of Internet harassment and unwanted sexual solicitation victimization and perpetration: Associations with psychosocial indicators. J. Adolescent Health 41(6):S31–S41.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhao WX , Jiang J , Weng J , He J , Lim EP , Yan H , Li X (2011) Comparing twitter and traditional media using topic models. Clough P, Foley C, Gurrin C, Jones G, Kraaij W, Lee H, Murdock V, eds. Advances in Information Retrieval (Springer, Berlin), 338–349.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.