When Variety Seeking Meets Unexpectedness: Incorporating Variety-Seeking Behaviors into Design of Unexpected Recommender Systems

References

• Adamopoulos P, Tuzhilin A (2014) On unexpectedness in recommender systems: Or how to better expect the unexpected. ACM Trans. Intelligent Systems Tech. 5(4):1–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adomavicius G, Kwon Y (2011) Improving aggregate recommendation diversity using ranking-based techniques. IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Engrg. 24(5):896–911.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adomavicius G, Tuzhilin A (2005) Toward the next generation of recommender systems: A survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Engrg. 17(6):734–749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ailawadi K, Neslin S, Gedenk K (2001) Pursuing the value-conscious consumer: Store brands vs. national brand promotions. J. Marketing 65(1):71–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alba JW, Marmorstein H, Chattopadhyay A (1992) Transitions in preference over time: The effects of memory on message persuasiveness. J. Marketing Res. 29(4):406–416.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumgartner H, Steenkamp J (1996) Exploratory consumer buying behavior: Conceptualization and measurement. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 13(2):121–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bawa K (1990) Modeling inertia and variety seeking tendencies in brand choice behavior. Marketing Sci. 9(3):263–278.Link, Google Scholar
• Bench SW, Lench HC (2019) Boredom as a seeking state: Boredom prompts the pursuit of novel (even negative) experiences. Emotion 19(2):242–254.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boatwright P, Kalra A, Zhang W (2008) Research note—Should consumers use the halo to form product evaluations? Management Sci. 54(1):217–223.Link, Google Scholar
• Braun M, Moe WW (2013) Online display advertising: Modeling the effects of multiple creatives and individual impression histories. Marketing Sci. 32(5):753–767.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen L, Zhang G, Zhou H (2018) Fast greedy map inference for determinantal point process to improve recommendation diversity. NeurIPS 2018 (NIPS, San Diego), 5627–5638.Google Scholar
• Chen L, Yang Y, Wang N, Yang K, Yuan Q (2019) How serendipity improves user satisfaction with recommendations? A large-scale user evaluation. WWW Conf. (ACM, New York), 240–250.Google Scholar
• Cheng Y, Jiang ZJ, Benbasat I (2017) Designing for diagnosticity and serendipity: An investigation of social product-search mechanisms. Inform. Systems Res. 28(2):413–429.Link, Google Scholar
• Chintagunta PK (1998) Inertia and variety seeking in a model of brand-purchase timing. Marketing Sci. 17(3):253–270.Link, Google Scholar
• Covington P, Adams J, Sargin E (2016) Deep neural networks for YouTube recommendations. Proc. 10th ACM Conf. Recommender Systems (ACM, New York), 191–198.Google Scholar
• Dickey DA, Fuller WA (1979) Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 74(366):427–431.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faison EW (1977) The neglected variety drive: A useful concept for consumer behavior. J. Consumer Res. 4(3):172–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feinberg FM, Kahn BE, McAlister L (1992) Market share response when consumers seek variety. J. Marketing Res. 29(2):227–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feurer M, Springenberg J, Hutter F (2015) Initializing Bayesian hyperparameter optimization via meta-learning. AAAI Conf. Artificial Intelligence (AAAI, Palo Alto, CA), 1128–1135.Google Scholar
• Fishbach A, Ratner RK, Zhang Y (2011) Inherently loyal or easily bored? Nonconscious activation of consistency vs. variety-seeking behavior. J. Consumer Psych. 21(1):38–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiske DW, Maddi SR (1961) Functions of Varied Experience (Dorsey, Belmont CA).Google Scholar
• Fong NM (2017) How targeting affects customer search: A field experiment. Management Sci. 63(7):2353–2364.Link, Google Scholar
• Givon M (1984) Variety seeking through brand switching. Marketing Sci. 3(1):1–22.Link, Google Scholar
• Gorgoglione M, Panniello U, Tuzhilin A (2019) Recommendation strategies in personalization applications. Inform. Management 56(6):103143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gullo K, Berger J, Etkin J, Bollinger B (2019) Does time of day affect variety-seeking? J. Consumer Res. 46(1):20–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guo H, Tang R, Ye Y, Li Z, He X (2017) DeepFM: A factorization-machine based neural network for CTR prediction Proc. 26th Internat. Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence (AAAI Press, Palo Alto, CA), 1725–1731.Google Scholar
• Hardesty L (2022) The history of Amazon’s recommendation algorithm—Amazon Science. Amazon Science (December 2022), www.amazon.science/the-history-of-amazons-recommendation-algorithm.Google Scholar
• He X, Liao L, Zhang H, Nie L, Hu X, Chua TS (2017) Neural collaborative filtering. Proc. 26th Internat. Conf. World Wide Web (International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, Geneva), 173–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helsen K, Schmittlein DC (1993) Analyzing duration times in marketing: Evidence for the effectiveness of hazard rate models. Marketing Sci. 12(4):395–414.Link, Google Scholar
• Hinton GE, Salakhutdinov RR (2006) Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks. Science 313(5786):504–507.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hosanagar K, Fleder D, Lee D, Buja A (2014) Will the global village fracture into tribes? Recommender systems and their effects on consumer fragmentation. Management Sci. 60(4):805–823.Link, Google Scholar
• Hoyer WD, Ridgway NM (1984) Variety seeking as an explanation for exploratory purchase behavior: A theoretical model. Adv. Consumer Res. 11:114–119.Google Scholar
• Huang ZT, Wyer RS Jr (2015) Diverging effects of mortality salience on variety seeking: The different roles of death anxiety and semantic concept activation. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 58:112–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahn BE (1995) Consumer variety-seeking among goods and services: An integrative review. J. Retailing Consumer Services 2(3):139–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahn B, Wansink B (2004) The influence of assortment structure on perceived variety and consumption quantities. J. Consumer Res. 30(4):519–533.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahn BE, Isen AM (1993) The influence of positive affect on variety seeking among safe, enjoyable products. J. Consumer Res. 20(2):257–270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahn BE, Kalwani MU, Morrison DG (1986) Measuring variety-seeking and reinforcement behaviors using panel data. J. Marketing Res. 23(2):89–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaminskas M, Bridge D (2016) Diversity, serendipity, novelty, and coverage: A survey and empirical analysis of beyond-accuracy objectives in recommender systems. ACM Trans. Interactive Intelligent Systems 7(1):1–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kashdan TB, Gallagher MW, Silvia PJ, Winterstein BP, Breen WE, Terhar D, Steger MF (2009) The curiosity and exploration inventory-II: Development, factor structure, and psychometrics. J. Res. Personality 43(6):987–998.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim J, Allenby GM, Rossi PE (2002) Modeling consumer demand for variety. Marketing Sci. 21(3):229–250.Link, Google Scholar
• Kohavi R, Longbotham R, Sommerfield D, Henne RM (2009) Controlled experiments on the web: Survey and practical guide. Data Mining Knowledge Discovery 18:140–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• LaBarbera PA, Mazursky D (1983) A longitudinal assessment of consumer satisfaction/dissatisfaction: The dynamic aspect of the cognitive process. J. Marketing Res. 20(4):393–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laibson D (1997) Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Quart. J. Econom. 112(2):443–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee GM, He S, Lee J, Whinston AB (2020) Matching mobile applications for cross-promotion. Inform. Systems Res. 31(3):865–891.Link, Google Scholar
• Levav J, Zhu RJ (2009) Seeking freedom through variety. J. Consumer Res. 36(4):600–610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li J, Abbasi A, Cheema A, Abraham LB (2020a) Path to purpose? How online customer journeys differ for hedonic vs. utilitarian purchases. J. Marketing 84(4):127–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li L, Chu W, Langford J, Schapire RE (2010) A contextual-bandit approach to personalized news article recommendation. 19th Conf. World Wide Web (ACM, New York), 661–670.Google Scholar
• Li P, Tuzhilin A (2020) Latent unexpected recommendations. ACM Trans. Intelligent Systems Tech. 11(6):1–25.Google Scholar
• Li P, Que M, Jiang Z, Hu Y, Tuzhilin A (2020b) PURS: Personalized unexpected recommender system for improving user satisfaction. 14th ACM Conf. RecSys (ACM, New York), 279–288.Google Scholar
• Li S, Karatzoglou A, Gentile C (2016) Collaborative filtering bandits. Proc. 39th Internat. ACM SIGIR Conf. (ACM, New York), 539–548.Google Scholar
• Machado FS, Sinha RK (2007) Smoking cessation: A model of planned vs. actual behavior for time-inconsistent consumers. Marketing Sci. 26(6):834–850.Link, Google Scholar
• Maimaran M, Wheeler SC (2008) Circles, squares, and choice: The effect of shape arrays on uniqueness and variety seeking. J. Marketing Res. 45(6):731–740.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McAlister L, Pessemier E (1982) Variety seeking behavior: An interdisciplinary review. J. Consumer Res. 9(3):311–322.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Menon S, Kahn BE (1995) The impact of context on variety seeking in product choices. J. Consumer Res. 22(3):285–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Padmanabhan B, Tuzhilin A (1998) A belief-driven method for discovering unexpected patterns. KDD, vol. 98, 94–100.Google Scholar
• Panniello U, Gorgoglione M, Tuzhilin A (2016) In CARSs we trust: How context-aware recommendations affect customers’ trust and other business performance measures of recommender systems. Inform. Systems Res. 27(1):182–196.Link, Google Scholar
• Raju PS (1980) Optimum stimulation level: Its relationship to personality, demographics, and exploratory behavior. J. Consumer Res. 7(3):272–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ratner RK, Kahn BE (2002) The impact of private versus public consumption on variety-seeking behavior. J. Consumer Res. 29(2):246–257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ratner RK, Kahn BE, Kahneman D (1999) Choosing less-preferred experiences for the sake of variety. J. Consumer Res. 26(1):1–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Read D, Loewenstein G (1995) Diversification bias: Explaining the discrepancy in variety seeking between combined and separated choices. J. Experiment. Psych. Appl. 1(1):34–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sahoo N, Krishnan R, Duncan G, Callan J (2012) Research note—The halo effect in multicomponent ratings and its implications for recommender systems: The case of Yahoo! movies. Inform. Systems Res. 23(1):231–246.Link, Google Scholar
• Sajeesh S, Raju JS (2010) Positioning and pricing in a variety seeking market. Management Sci. 56(6):949–961.Link, Google Scholar
• Salakhutdinov R, Hinton G (2009) Semantic hashing. Internat. J. Approximate Reasoning 50(7):969–978.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwartz EM, Bradlow ET, Fader PS (2017) Customer acquisition via display advertising using multi-armed bandit experiments. Marketing Sci. 36(4):500–522.Link, Google Scholar
• Seetharaman PB (2004) The additive risk model for purchase timing. Marketing Sci. 23(2):234–242.Link, Google Scholar
• Seetharaman PB, Che H (2009) Price competition in markets with consumer variety seeking. Marketing Sci. 28(3):516–525.Link, Google Scholar
• Senecal S, Nantel J (2004) The influence of online product recommendations on consumers’ online choices. J. Retailing 80(2):159–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shani G, Gunawardana A (2011) Evaluating recommendation systems. Recommender Systems Handbook (Springer, Boston), 257–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Silberschatz A, Tuzhilin A (1996) What makes patterns interesting in knowledge discovery systems. IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Engrg. 8(6):970–974.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singh PV, Sahoo N, Mukhopadhyay T (2014) How to attract and retain readers in enterprise blogging? Inform. Systems Res. 25(1):35–52.Link, Google Scholar
• Steenkamp JBEM, Baumgartner H (1992) The role of optimum stimulation level in exploratory consumer behavior. J. Consumer Res. 19(3):434–448.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tan TF, Netessine S, Hitt L (2017) Is Tom Cruise threatened? An empirical study of the impact of product variety on demand concentration. Inform. Systems Res. 28(3):643–660.Link, Google Scholar
• Van Trijp HC, Steenkamp JBE (1992) Consumers’ variety seeking tendency with respect to foods: Measurement and managerial implications. Eur. Rev. Agricultural Econom. 19(2):181–195.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Trijp HCM, Hoyer WD, Inman J (1996) Why switch? Product category level explanations for true variety-seeking behavior. J. Marketing Res. 33(3):281–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang C, Huang Y (2018) “I want to know the answer! Give me fish’n’chips!”: The impact of curiosity on indulgent choice. J. Consumer Res. 44(5):1052–1067.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woratschek H, Horbel C (2006) Are variety-seekers bad customers? An analysis of the role of recommendations in the service profit chain. J. Relationship Marketing 4(3–4):43–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xu L, Duan JA, Whinston A (2014) Path to purchase: A mutually exciting point process model for online advertising and conversion. Management Sci. 60(6):1392–1412.Link, Google Scholar
• Yoon S, Kim HC (2018) Feeling economically stuck: The effect of perceived economic mobility and socioeconomic status on variety seeking. J. Consumer Res. 44(5):1141–1156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zeithammer R, Thomadsen R (2013) Vertical differentiation with variety-seeking consumers. Management Sci. 59(2):390–401.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Adomavicius G, Gupta A, Ketter W (2020) Consumption and performance: Understanding longitudinal dynamics of recommender systems via an agent-based simulation framework. Inform. Systems Res. 31(1):76–101.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Yao L, Sun A, Tay Y (2019) Deep learning based recommender system: A survey and new perspectives. ACM Comput. Surveys 52(1):1–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhou G, Zhu X, Song C, Fan Y, Zhu H, Ma Y, Yan Y, Jin J, Li H, Gai K (2018) Deep interest network for click-through rate prediction. Proc. 24th ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining (ACM, New York), 1059–1068.Google Scholar