Ontology-Based Intelligent Interface Personalization for Protection Against Phishing Attacks

References

• Abbasi A, Chen H (2009) A comparison of tools for detecting fake websites. Computer 42(10):78–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abbasi A, Zahedi F, Chen Y (2012) Impact of anti-phishing tool performance on attack success rates. Zeng D, Zhou L, Cukic B, Alan Wang G, Yang CC, eds. Proc. IEEE Internat. Conf. on Intelligence and Security Informatics (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 12–17.Google Scholar
• Abbasi A, Dobolyi D, Vance A, Zahedi FM (2021) The phishing funnel model: A design artifact to predict user susceptibility to phishing websites. Inform. Systems Res. 32(2):410–436.Link, Google Scholar
• Abbasi A, Zhang Z, Zimbra D, Chen H, Nunamaker JF (2010) Detecting fake websites: The contribution of statistical learning theory. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 34(3):435–461.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abbasi A, Zahedi F, Zeng D, Chen Y, Chen HC, Nunamaker JF (2015) Enhancing predictive analytics for anti-phishing by exploiting website genre information. J. Management Inform. Systems 31(4):109–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abdelghany A, Darwish NR, Hefni HA (2019) An agile methodology for ontology development. Internat. J. Intelligent Engrg. Systems 12(2):170–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akhawe D, Felt AP (2013) Alice in warningland: A large-scale field study of browser security warning effectiveness. Proc. USENIX Security Sympos. (USENIX, Berkeley, CA), 257–272.Google Scholar
• Alam SL (2020) Many hands make light work: Toward a framework of digital co-production to co-creation on social platforms. Inform. Tech. People 34(3):1087–1118.Google Scholar
• Alimamy S, Kuhail MA (2023) I will be with you alexa! The impact of intelligent virtual assistant’s authenticity and personalization on user reusage intentions. Comput. Human Behav. 143:107711.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amer T, Maris JMB (2007) Signal words and signal icons in application control and information technology exception messages—Hazard matching and habituation effects. J. Inform. Systems 21(2):1–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson BB, Jenkins JL, Vance A, Kirwan CB, Eargle D (2016a) Your memory is working against you: How eye tracking and memory explain habituation to security warnings. Decision Support Systems 92:3–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson BB, Vance A, Kirwan CB, Jenkins JL, Eargle D (2016b) From warning to wallpaper: Why the brain habituates to security warnings and what can be done about it. J. Management Inform. Systems 33(3):713–743.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Attiq S, Rasool H, Iqbal S (2017) The impact of supportive work environment, trust, and self-efficacy on organizational learning and its effectiveness: A stimulus-organism response approach. Bus. Econom. Rev. 9(2):73–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Avey JB, Avolio BJ, Crossley CD, Luthans F (2009) Psychological ownership: Theoretical extensions, measurement and relation to work outcomes. J. Organ. Behav. 30(2):173–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bai X, Arapakis I, Cambazoglu BB, Freire A (2017) Understanding and leveraging the impact of response latency on user behaviour in web search. ACM Trans. Inform. Systems 36(2):1–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balan UM, Mathew SK (2019) An experimental study on the swaying effect of web-personalization. ACM SIGMIS Database 50(4):71–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benlian A (2015) Web personalization cues and their differential effects on user assessments of website value. J. Management Inform. Systems 32(1):225–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bera D, Ogbanufe O, Kim DJ (2023) Toward a thematic dimensional framework of online fraud: An exploration of fraudulent email attack tactics and intentions. Decision Support Systems 171:113977.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brank J, Grobelnik M, Mladenic D (2005) A survey of ontology evaluation techniques. Proc. Conf. on Data Mining and Data Warehouses (Citeseer, Princeton, NJ), 166–170.Google Scholar
• Bunt A, Conati C, McGrenere J (2009) Mixed-initiative interface personalization as a case study in usable AI. AI Magazine 30(4):58–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bzostek JA, Wogalter MS (1999) Measuring visual search time for a product warning label as a function of icon, color, column and vertical placement. Proc. Human Factors and Ergonomics Soc. Annual Meeting (Sage Publications, Los Angeles, CA), 888–892.Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Zahedi FM (2016) Individuals’ Internet security perceptions and behaviors: Polycontextual contrasts between the United States and China. Management. Inform. Systems Quart. 40(1):205–222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Galletta D, Lowry PB, Luo XR, Moody GD, Willison R (2021) Understanding inconsistent employee compliance with information security policies through the lens of the extended parallel process model. Inform. Systems Res. 32(3):1043–1065.Link, Google Scholar
• Cho W-C, Lee KY, Yang S-B (2019) What makes you feel attached to smartwatches? The stimulus–organism–response (S–O–R) perspectives. Inform. Tech. People 32(2):319–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chou C-H, Zahedi FM, Zhao H (2011) Ontology for developing web sites for natural disaster management: Methodology and implementation. IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernetics A Systems Human 41(1):50–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chou C-H, Zahedi FM, Zhao H (2014) Ontology-based evaluation of natural disaster management websites. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 38(4):997–1016.Crossref, Google Scholar
• CISA (2021) National cybersecurity awareness month (ncsam). Accessed July 28, 2021, https://www.cisa.gov/national-cyber-security-awareness-month.Google Scholar
• Cranefield S, Purvis M (1999) UML as an ontology modelling language. Dean T, ed. Proc.16th Internat. Joint Conf. on Articial Intelligence (Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco), 6–23.Google Scholar
• Cranor L, Egelman S, Hong J, Zhang Y (2007) Phinding phish: Evaluating anti-phishing tools. 14th Annual Network Distributed System Security Sympos. (NDSS ’07) (Internet Society, Reston, VA).Google Scholar
• Cui X, Lai VS, Lowry PB (2016) How do bidders’ organism reactions mediate auction stimuli and bidder loyalty in online auctions? The case of Taobao in China. Inform. Management 53(5):609–624.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Curcio CA, Allen KA (1990) Topography of ganglion cells in human retina. J. Comparative Neurology 300(1):5–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis J (2019) Hackers exploit urgency, personalization in phishing attacks. Accessed June 8, 2023, https://healthitsecurity.com/news/hackers-exploit-urgency-personalization-in-phishing-attacks.Google Scholar
• Deng LQ, Poole MS (2010) Affect in web interfaces: A study of the impacts of web page visual complexity and order. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 34(4):711–730.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Desolda G, Di Nocera F, Ferro L, Lanzilotti R, Maggi P, Marrella A (2019) Alerting users about phishing attacks. Moallem A, ed. Proc. Internat. Conf. on Human-Computer Interaction (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 134–148.Google Scholar
• Eroglu SA, Machleit KA, Davis LM (2001) Atmospheric qualities of online retailing: A conceptual model and implications. J. Bus. Res. 54(2):177–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeze M, Baumgartner M, Bruno P, Gunderson JR, Olin J, Ross MQ, Szafran J (2021) Fake claims of fake news: Political misinformation, warnings, and the tainted truth effect. Political Behav. 43:1433–1465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gregor S, Hevner AR (2013) Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 37(2):337–355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hancock P, Kaplan A, MacArthur K, Szalma J (2020) How effective are warnings? A meta-analysis. Safety Sci. 130:104876.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hevner AR, March ST, Park J, Ram S (2004) Design science in information systems research. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 28(1):75–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ho SY, Bodoff D (2014) The effects of web personalization on user attitude and behavior: An integration of the elaboration likelihood model and consumer search theory. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 38(2):497–520.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong J (2012) The state of phishing attacks. Comm. ACM 55(1):74–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsieh SH, Lee CT, Tseng TH (2021) Branded app atmospherics: Examining the effect of pleasure–arousal–dominance in brand relationship building. J. Retailing Consumer Services 60:102482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iivari J (2020) A critical look at theories in design science research. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 21(3):10.Google Scholar
• Islam JU, Shahid S, Rasool A, Rahman Z, Khan I, Rather RA (2020) Impact of website attributes on customer engagement in banking: A solicitation of stimulus-organism-response theory. Internat. J. Bank Marketing 38(6):1279–1303.Google Scholar
• Jacoby J (2002) Stimulus‐organism‐response reconsidered: An evolutionary step in modeling (consumer) behavior. J. Consumer Psych. 12(1):51–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johar M, Mookerjee V, Sarkar S (2014) Selling vs. profiling: Optimizing the offer set in web-based personalization. Inform. Systems Res. 25(2):285–306.Link, Google Scholar
• Kamis A, Koufaris M, Stern T (2008) Using an attribute-based decision support system for user-customized products online: An experimental investigation. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 32(1):159–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kanagaretnam K, Mestelman S, Nainar SK, Shehata M (2010) Trust and reciprocity with transparency and repeated interactions. J. Bus. Res. 63(3):241–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karjalainen M, Sarker S, Siponen M (2019) Toward a theory of information systems security behaviors of organizational employees: A dialectical process perspective. Inform. Systems Res. 30(2):687–704.Link, Google Scholar
• Kawasaki M, Yamaguchi Y (2012) Effects of subjective preference of colors on attention-related occipital theta oscillations. Neuroimage 59(1):808–814.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Komiak SYX, Benbasat I (2006) The effects of personalization and familiarity on trust and adoption of recommendation agents. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 30(4):941–960.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krueger LE (1975) Familiarity effects in visual information processing. Psych. Bull. 82(6):949.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee Y, Chen ANK (2011) Usability design and psychological ownership of a virtual world. J. Management Inform. Systems 28(3):269–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Linstone HA, Turoff M (1975) The Delphi Method (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• Liu DP, Sarkar S, Sriskandarajah C (2010) Resource allocation policies for personalization in content delivery sites. Inform. Systems Res. 21(2):227–248.Link, Google Scholar
• Mandviwalla M (2015) Generating and justifying design theory. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 16(5):314–344.Google Scholar
• Mao S, Dewan S, Ho Y-J (2022) Personalized ranking at a mobile app distribution platform. Inform. Systems Res. 34(3):811–827.Google Scholar
• Marforio C, Jayaram Masti R, Soriente C, Kostiainen K, Čapkun S (2016) Evaluation of personalized security indicators as an anti-phishing mechanism for smartphone applications. Proc. CHI Conf. on Human Factors in Comput. Systems (ACM, New York), 540–551.Google Scholar
• Mehrabian A, Russell JA (1974) An Approach to Environmental Psychology (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Norton MI, Mochon D, Ariely D (2012) The IKEA effect: When labor leads to love. J. Consumer Psych. 22(3):453–460.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nunamaker JF, Briggs RO, Derrick DC, Schwabe G (2015) The last research mile: Achieving both rigor and relevance in information systems research. J. Management Inform. Systems 32(3):10–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parboteeah DV, Valacich JS, Wells JD (2009) The influence of website characteristics on a consumer’s urge to buy impulsively. Inform. Systems Res. 20(1):60–78.Link, Google Scholar
• Parsons J, Wand Y (2008) Using cognitive principles to guide classification in information systems modeling. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 32(4):839–868.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pavlou PA, Liang H, Xue Y (2007) Understanding and mitigating uncertainty in online exchange relationships: A principal-agent perspective. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 31(1):105–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peffers K, Tuunanen T, Rothenberger MA, Chatterjee S (2007) A design science research methodology for information systems research. J. Management Inform. Systems 24(3):45–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• ProofPoint (2020) 2020 state of the phish. Accessed February 22, 2020, https://www.proofpoint.com/sites/default/files/gtd-pfpt-us-tr-state-of-the-phish-2020.pdf.Google Scholar
• Qu L, Xiao R, Shi W, Huang K, Qin B, Liang B (2022) Your behaviors reveal what you need: A practical scheme based on user behaviors for personalized security nudges. Comput. Security 122:102891.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Qureshi I, Compeau D (2009) Assessing between-group differences in information systems research: A comparison of covariance- and component-based sem. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 33(1):197–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Renaud K, Warkentin M, Westerman G (2023) From chatgpt to hackgpt: Meeting the cybersecurity threat of generative ai. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 64(3):1–4.Google Scholar
• Roorda A, Williams DR (1999) The arrangement of the three cone classes in the living human eye. Nature 397(6719):520–522.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Samsudin NF, Zaaba ZF, Singh MM, Samsudin A (2016) Symbolism in computer security warnings: Signal icons and signal words. Internat. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 7(10):148–153.Google Scholar
• Schaefer KE, Chen JY, Szalma JL, Hancock PA (2016) A meta-analysis of factors influencing the development of trust in automation: Implications for understanding autonomy in future systems. Human Factors 58(3):377–400.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schiaffino S, Amandi A (2004) User – interface agent interaction: Personalization issues. Internat. J. Human-Comput. Stud. 60(1):129–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schlager T, Hildebrand C, Haubl G, Franke N, Herrmann A (2018) Social product-customization systems: Peer input, conformity, and consumers’ evaluation of customized products. J. Management Inform. Systems 35(1):319–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sharma H, Meenakshi E, Bhatia SK (2017) A comparative analysis and awareness survey of phishing detection tools. Proc. 2nd IEEE Internat. Conf. on Recent Trends in Electronics, Inform. Comm. Tech. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 1437–1442.Google Scholar
• Sheng H, Nah FFH, Siau K (2008) An experimental study on ubiquitous commerce adoption: Impact of personalization and privacy concerns. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 9(6):344–377.Google Scholar
• Silic M, Lowry PB (2020) Using design-science based gamification to improve organizational security training and compliance. J. Management Inform. Systems 37(1):129–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Söllner M, Benbasat I, Gefen D, Leimeister JM, Pavlou PA (2016) Trust. Bush A, Rai A, eds. MIS Quarterly Research Curations. http://misq.org/research-curations.Google Scholar
• Sunikka A, Bragge J (2012) Applying text-mining to personalization and customization research literature: Who, what and where? Expert Systems Appl. 39(11):10049–10058.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutanto J, Palme E, Tan CH, Phang CW (2013) Addressing the personalization-privacy paradox: An empirical assessment from a field experiment on smartphone users. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 37(4):1141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tam KY, Ho SY (2005) Web personalization as a persuasion strategy: An elaboration likelihood model perspective. Inform. Systems Res. 16(3):271–291.Link, Google Scholar
• Vance A, Siponen MT, Straub DW (2019) Effects of sanctions, moral beliefs, and neutralization on information security policy violations across cultures. Inform. Management 57(4):103212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vance A, Jenkins JL, Anderson BB, Bjornn DK, Kirwan CB (2018) Tuning out security warnings: A longitudinal examination of habituation through fMRI, eye tracking, and field experiments. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 42(2):355–380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Verizon (2020) 2020 data breach investigations report. Accessed January 20, 2020, https://enterprise.verizon.com/resources/reports/2020-data-breach-investigations-report.pdf.Google Scholar
• Verizon (2022) 2022 data breach investigations report. Accessed June 28, 2018, https://www.verizon.com/business/en-gb/resources/2022-data-breach-investigations-report-dbir.pdf.Google Scholar
• Wand Y, Storey VC, Weber R (1999) An ontological analysis of the relationship construct in conceptual modeling. ACM Trans. Database Systems 24(4):494–528.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wandell BA (1995) Foundations of Vision (Sinauer Associates).Google Scholar
• Wang JG, Li Y, Rao HR (2017) Coping responses in phishing detection: An investigation of antecedents and consequences. Inform. Systems Res. 28(2):378–396.Link, Google Scholar
• Wogalter MS (2006) Handbook of Warnings (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wogalter MS, Mayhorn CB, Black A, Luna P, Lund O, Walker S (2017) Warning design. Black A, Luna P, Lund O, Walker S, eds. Information Design: Research and Practice (Taylor & Francis, London), 331–348.Google Scholar
• Wombot (2017) 2017 user risk report: Results of an international cybersecurity awareness survey. Accessed February 22, 2020, https://info.wombatsecurity.com/hubfs/2017%20End%20User%20Risk%20Report/Wombat%202017%20User%20Risk%20Report.pdf.Google Scholar
• Wu M, Miller RC, Garfinkel SL (2006) Do security toolbars actually prevent phishing attacks? Grinter R, Rodden T, Aoki P, Cutrell E, Jeffries R, Olson G, eds. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. on Human Factors in Comput. Systems (ACM, New York), 601–610.Google Scholar
• Xiong A, Proctor RW, Yang W, Li N (2019) Embedding training within warnings improves skills of identifying phishing webpages. Human Factors 61(4):577–595.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xu J, Benbasat I, Cenfetelli RT (2014) Research note—The influences of online service technologies and task complexity on efficiency and personalization. Inform. Systems Res. 25(2):420–436.Link, Google Scholar
• Yadav R, Mahara T (2020) Exploring the role of e-servicescape dimensions on customer online shopping: A stimulus-organism-response paradigm. J. Electronic Commerce Organ. 18(3):53–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yoon M, Lai MH (2018) Testing factorial invariance with unbalanced samples. Structural Equations Modeling 25(2):201–213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zahedi F, Lu Y (2003) Website personalization for relationship building: A conceptual framework. Proc. AMCIS (AIS, Atlanta), 2256–2264.Google Scholar
• Zahedi FM, Abbasi A, Chen Y (2011) Trust calibration of security IT artifacts—The case of fake website detection tools. Proc. AIS SIGSEC Workshop on Inform. Security & Privacy (AIS, Atlanta), 1–15.Google Scholar
• Zahedi FM, Abbasi A, Chen Y (2015) Fake-website detection tools: Identifying elements that promote individuals’ use and enhance their performance. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 16(6):448–484.Google Scholar
• Zhang KZ, Benyoucef M (2016) Consumer behavior in social commerce: A literature review. Decision Support Systems 86:95–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhou T, Wang Y, Yan L, Tan Y (2023) Spoiled for choice? Personalized recommendation for healthcare decisions: A multiarmed bandit approach. Inform. Systems Res., ePub ahead of print January 19, https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2022.1191.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhu L, Ma Q, Bai X, Hu L (2020) Mechanisms behind hazard perception of warning signs: An EEG study. Transportaion Res. Part F Traffic Psych. Behav. 69:362–374.Crossref, Google Scholar