How Information Technology Overcomes Deficiencies for Innovation in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: Closed Innovation vs. Open Innovation

References

• Afuah A (2002) Mapping technological capabilities into product markets and competitive advantage: The case of cholesterol drugs. Strategic Management J. 23(2):171–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Audretsch D (2001) Does entry size matter? The impact of the life cycle and technology on firm survival. J. Indust. Econom. 49(1):21–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G (2000) Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(3):425–455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G, Lampert CM, Tandon V (2008) Moving beyond Schumpeter: Management research on the determinants of technological innovation. Acad. Management Ann. 2(1):1–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aiken LS, West SG, Reno RR (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Almirall E, Masanell R (2010) Open versus closed innovation: A model of discovery and divergence. Acad. Management Rev. 35(1):27–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anand A, Sharma R, Kohli R (2020) The effects of operational and financial performance failure on BI&A-enabled search behaviors: A theory of performance-driven search. Inform. Systems Res. 31(4):1144–1163.Link, Google Scholar
• Anderson P, Tushman ML (1990) Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(4):604–633.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson EG Jr, Chandrasekaran A, Davis-Blake A, Parker GG (2018) Managing distributed product development projects: Integration strategies for time-zone and language barriers. Inform. Systems Res. 29(1):42–69.Link, Google Scholar
• Andrade Rojas M, Kathuria A (2014) Competitive brokerage: External resource endowment and information technology as antecedents. Acad. Management Proc. 2014(1):15643.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andrade-Rojas MG, Kathuria A, Konsynski BR (2021) Competitive brokerage: How information management capability and collaboration networks act as substitutes. J. Management Inform. Systems 38(3):667–703.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andrade-Rojas MG, Kathuria A, Lee H-H (2024) Multilevel synergy of IT for operational integration: Competition networks and operating performance. Production Oper. Management. Forthcoming.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arana D (2018) Pymes Mexicanas, un panorama para 2018. Forbes (January 31), https://www.forbes.com.mx/pymes-mexicanas-un-panorama-para-2018/.Google Scholar
• Arnold E, Thuriaux B (1997) Developing firms’ technological capabilities. Technopolis Group, Brighton, UK.Google Scholar
• Asociación de Internet de México (2017) Hábitos de usuarios de Internet en México 2017. Retrieved November 1, 2017, https://webmarketingtips.mx/local/habitos-de-usuarios-en-mexico-2017-7-258/.Google Scholar
• Atrostic BK, Nguyen SV (2005) IT and productivity in US manufacturing: Do computer networks matter? Econom. Inquiry 43(3):493–506.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bailey A, Carter M, Thatcher J, Urquhart C, Windeler J (2020) Special issue call for participation: Technology and social inclusion: Building a dialectic on the role of technology in inclusion and exclusion from societies, organizations, economies, and academe. Association for Information Systems. https://aisnet.org/news/510453/JAIS-Special-Issue-Call-for-Participation.htm.Google Scholar
• Banker RD, Bardhan I, Asdemir O (2006) Understanding the impact of collaboration software on product design and development. Inform. Systems Res. 17(4):352–373.Link, Google Scholar
• Bao Y, Chen X, Zhou KZ (2012) External learning, market dynamics, and radical innovation: Evidence from China’s high-tech firms. J. Bus. Res. 65(8):1226–1233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bardhan I, Krishnan V, Lin S (2013) Business value of information technology: Testing the interaction effect of IT and R&D on Tobin’s Q. Inform. Systems Res. 24(4):1147–1161.Link, Google Scholar
• Barla P (2007) ISO 14001 certification and environmental performance in Quebec’s pulp and paper industry. J. Environ. Econom. Management 53(3):291–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum CF (2006) An Introduction to Modern Econometrics Using Stata (Stata Press, College Station, TX).Google Scholar
• Baum J, Calabrese T, Silverman B (2000) Don’t go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups’ performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management J. 21(3):267–294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benitez J, Castillo A, Llorens J, Braojos J (2018) IT-enabled knowledge ambidexterity and innovation performance in small US firms: The moderator role of social media capability. Inform. Management 55(1):131–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj S, Bharadwaj A, Bendoly E (2007) The performance effects of complementarities between information systems, marketing, manufacturing, and supply chain processes. Inform. Systems Res. 18(4):437–453.Link, Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj AS, Bharadwaj SG, Konsynski BR (1999) Information technology effects on firm performance as measured by Tobin’s Q. Management Sci. 45(7):1008–1024.Link, Google Scholar
• Birhanu AG, Gambardella A, Valentini G (2016) Bribery and investment: Firm‐level evidence from Africa and Latin America. Strategic Management J. 37(9):1865–1877.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Black SE, Lynch LM (2001) How to compete: The impact of workplace practices and information technology on productivity. Rev. Econom. Statist. 83(3):434–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bound J, Brown C, Mathiowetz N (2001) Measurement error in survey data. Heckman JJ, Leamer E, eds. Handbook of Econometrics, vol. 5 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 3705–3843.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buisseret T, Cameron H, Georghiou L (1995) What difference does it make? Additionality in the public support of R&D in large firms. Internat. J. Tech. Management 10(4–6):587–600.Google Scholar
• Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (1986) Econometric models based on count data. Comparisons and applications of some estimators and tests. J. Appl. Econometrics 1(1):29–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carpenter MA, Fredrickson JW (2001) Top management teams, global strategic posture, and the moderating role of uncertainty. Acad. Management J. 44(3):533–545.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castilla y León Económica (2012) Los empresarios de Castilla y León piden más apoyo para innovar y expandir su negocio. http://www.castillayleoneconomica.es/noticia/los-empresarios-de-castilla-y-le%C3%B3n-piden-m%C3%A1s-apoyo-para-innovar-y-expandir-su-negocio.Google Scholar
• Chalmers DM, Balan-Vnuk E (2013) Innovating not-for-profit social ventures: Exploring the microfoundations of internal and external absorptive capacity routines. Internat. Small Bus. J. 31(7):785–810.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatterjee S, Moody G, Lowry PB, Chakraborty S, Hardin A (2015) Strategic relevance of organizational virtues enabled by information technology in organizational innovation. J. Management Inform. Systems 32(3):158–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Bharadwaj A (2009) An empirical analysis of contract structures in IT outsourcing. Inform. Systems Res. 20(4):484–506.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen A, Karahanna E (2018) Life interrupted: The effects of technology-mediated work interruptions on work and nonwork outcomes. MIS Quart. 42(4):1023–1042.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheng Z, Rai A, Tian F, Xu SX (2021) Social learning in information technology investment: The role of board interlocks. Management Sci. 67(1):547–576.Link, Google Scholar
• Chesbrough HW (2003) Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology (Harvard Business Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Choi I, Chung S, Han K, Pinsonneault A (2021) CEO risk-taking incentives and IT innovation: The moderating role of a CEO’s IT-related human capital. MIS Quart. 45(4):2175–2192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):128–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• De Miguel T (2022) La polémica por el Tren Maya escala con las críticas de la Fundación Cousteau. El País (March 29), https://elpais.com/mexico/2022-03-29/la-polemica-por-el-tren-maya-escala-con-las-criticas-de-la-fundacion-cousteau.html.Google Scholar
• Devaraj S, Kohli R (2003) Performance impacts of information technology: Is actual usage the missing link? Management Sci. 49(3):273–289.Link, Google Scholar
• Diamantopoulos A, Winklhofer H (2001) Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative to scale development. J. Marketing Res. 38(2):269–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doh S, Kim B (2014) Government support for SME innovations in the regional industries: The case of government financial support program in South Korea. Res. Policy 43(9):1557–1569.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dong JQ, Netten J (2017) Information technology and external search in the open innovation age: New findings from Germany. Tech. Forecasting Soc. Change 120(1):223–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dong JQ, McCarthy K, Schoenmakers W (2017) How central is too central? Organizing interorganizational collaboration networks for breakthrough innovation. J. Product Innovation Management 34(4):526–542.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dooley L, Kenny B, Cronin M (2016) Interorganizational innovation across geographic and cognitive boundaries: Does firm size matter? R&D Management 46(S1):227–243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duran P, Kammerlander N, Van Essen M, Zellweger T (2016) Doing more with less: Innovation input and output in family firms. Acad. Management J. 59(4):1224–1264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ebben J, Johnson A (2005) Efficiency, flexibility, or both? Evidence linking strategy to performance in small firms. Strategic Management J. 26(13):1249–1259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ettlie J, Pavlou P (2006) Technology‐based new product development partnerships. Decision Sci. 37(2):117–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS, Pentland BT (2003) Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(1):94–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Felin T, Zenger TR (2014) Closed or open innovation? Problem solving and the governance choice. Res. Policy 43(5):914–925.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foss NJ, Laursen K, Pedersen T (2011) Linking customer interaction and innovation: The mediating role of new organizational practices. Organ. Sci. 22(4):980–999.Link, Google Scholar
• Freedom House (2023) Freedom in the world 2020. https://freedomhouse.org/country/mexico/freedom-world/2020.Google Scholar
• Freeman J, Carroll GR, Hannan MT (1983) The liability of newness: Age dependence in organizational death rates. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 48(5):692–710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Furr N, Dyer J (2015) How Godrej became an innovation star. Forbes (May 13), https://www.forbes.com/sites/innovatorsdna/2015/05/13/how-godrej-became-an-innovation-star/?sh=520af1627fd3.Google Scholar
• Gatignon H, Xuereb J-M (1997) Strategic orientation of the firm and new product performance. J. Marketing Res. 34(1):77–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gnyawali DR, Park B-JR (2011) Co-opetition between giants: Collaboration with competitors for technological innovation. Res. Policy 40(5):650–663.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gómez J, Salazar I, Vargas P (2017) Does information technology improve open innovation performance? An examination of manufacturers in Spain. Inform. Systems Res. 28(3):661–675.Link, Google Scholar
• Green KM, Stuart EA (2014) Examining moderation analyses in propensity score methods: Application to depression and substance use. J. Consult. Clin. Psych. 82(5):773–783.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greene W (2003) Econometrics Analysis (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Greenstein SM (1992) Invisible hands and visible advisors: An economic interpretation of standardization. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. 43(8):538–549.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guo D, Guo Y, Jiang K (2016) Government-subsidized R&D and firm innovation: Evidence from China. Res. Policy 45(6):1129–1144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guo F, Li Y, Maruping LM, Masli A (2023) Complementarity between investment in information technology (IT) and IT human resources: Implications for different types of firm innovation. Inform. Systems Res. 34(3):1259–1275.Link, Google Scholar
• Hadjimanolis A (1999) Barriers to innovation for SMEs in a small less developed country (Cyprus). Technovation 19(9):561–570.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hagedoorn J (1995) A note on international market leaders and networks of strategic technology partnering. Strategic Management J. 16(3):241–250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hair J, Hult GT, Ringle C, Sarstedt M (2021) A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hardin JW, Schmiediche H, Carroll RJ (2003) The regression-calibration method for fitting generalized linear models with additive measurement error. Stata J. 3(4):361–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hausman JA (1978) Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica 46(6):1251–1271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• He Z-L, Wong P-K (2004) Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organ. Sci. 15(4):481–494.Link, Google Scholar
• Heckman JJ (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1):153–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hippel E (2005) Democratizing Innovation: Users Take Center Stage (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoegl M, Gibbert M, Mazursky D (2008) Financial constraints in innovation projects: When is less more? Res. Policy 37(8):1382–1391.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsieh M-H, Tsai K-H (2007) Technological capability, social capital and the launch strategy for innovative products. Indust. Marketing Management 36(4):493–502.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsieh JP-A, Rai A, Xu SX (2011) Extracting business value from IT: A sensemaking perspective of post-adoptive use. Management Sci. 57(11):2018–2039.Link, Google Scholar
• Human S, Provan K (1997) An emergent theory of structure and outcomes in small-firm strategic manufacturing networks. Acad. Management J. 40(2):368–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• IBP (2015) Mexico Internet, E-commerce, Investment and Business Guide (IBP, Inc., Denison, IA).Google Scholar
• Im G, Rai A (2014) IT-enabled coordination for ambidextrous interorganizational relationships. Inform. Systems Res. 25(1):72–92.Link, Google Scholar
• Jansen JJP, Van Den Bosch FAJ, Volberda HW (2006) Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Sci. 52(11):1661–1674.Link, Google Scholar
• Joshi KD, Chi L, Datta A, Han S (2010) Changing the competitive landscape: Continuous innovation through IT-enabled knowledge capabilities. Inform. Systems Res. 21(3):472–495.Link, Google Scholar
• Jugend D, Jabbour CJC, Scaliza JAA, Rocha RS, Junior JAG, Latan H, Salgado MH (2018) Relationships among open innovation, innovative performance, government support and firm size: Comparing Brazilian firms embracing different levels of radicalism in innovation. Technovation 74:54–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karhade PP, Dong JQ (2021a) Information technology investment and commercialized innovation performance: Dynamic adjustment costs and curvilinear impacts. MIS Quart. 45(3):1007–1024.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karhade PP, Dong JQ (2021b) Innovation outcomes of digitally enabled collaborative problemistic search capability. MIS Quart. 45(2):693–718.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karhade P, Kathuria A (2020) Missing impact of ratings on platform participation in India: A call for research in great domains. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems 47(1):364–381.Google Scholar
• Kathuria A, Mann A, Khuntia J, Saldanha TJ, Kauffman RJ (2018) A strategic value appropriation path for cloud computing. J. Management Inform. Systems 35(3):740–775.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khuntia J, Kathuria A, Saldanha TJ, Konsynski BR (2019) Benefits of IT-enabled flexibilities for foreign versus local firms in emerging economies. J. Management Inform. Systems 36(3):855–892.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khuntia J, Kathuria A, Andrade-Rojas MG, Saldanha T, Celly N (2021) How foreign and domestic firms differ in leveraging IT-enabled supply chain information integration in BOP markets: The role of supplier and client business collaboration. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 22(3):695–738.Google Scholar
• Kleis L, Chwelos P, Ramirez RV, Cockburn I (2012) Information technology and intangible output: The impact of IT investment on innovation productivity. Inform. Systems Res. 23(1):42–59.Link, Google Scholar
• Kline RB (2015) Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (Guilford Publications, New York).Google Scholar
• Kohli R, Melville NP (2009) Learning to build an IT innovation platform. Comm. ACM 52(8):122–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kohli R, Melville NP (2019) Digital innovation: A review and synthesis. Inform. Systems J. 29(1):200–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee SH, Weng DH (2013) Does bribery in the home country promote or dampen firm exports? Strategic Management J. 34(12):1472–1487.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leiponen A, Drejer I (2007) What exactly are technological regimes?: Intra-industry heterogeneity in the organization of innovation activities. Res. Policy 36(8):1221–1238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewin AY, Massini S (2004) Knowledge creation and organizational capabilities of innovating and imitating firms. Tsoukas H, Mylonopoulos N, eds. Organizations as Knowledge Systems (Palgrave Macmillan, London), 209–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewin AY, Massini S, Peeters C (2011) Microfoundations of internal and external absorptive capacity routines. Organ. Sci. 22(1):81–98.Link, Google Scholar
• Li H, Atuahene-Gima K (2001) Product innovation strategy and the performance of new technology ventures in China. Acad. Management J. 44(6):1123–1134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li H, Yi X, Cui G (2017) Emerging market firms’ internationalization: How do firms’ inward activities affect their outward activities? Strategic Management J. 38(13):2704–2725.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liang H, Wang N, Xue Y, Ge S (2017) Unraveling the alignment paradox: How does business-IT alignment shape organizational agility? Inform. Systems Res. 28(4):863–879.Link, Google Scholar
• Liedtka JM (1996) Collaborating across lines of business for competitive advantage. Acad. Management Perspect. 10(2):20–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lindell MK, Whitney DJ (2001) Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. J. Appl. Psych. 86(1):114–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Little TD (1997) Mean and covariance structures (MACS) analyses of cross-cultural data: Practical and theoretical issues. Multivariate Behav. Res. 32(1):53–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lockwood J, McCaffrey DF (2020) Recommendations about estimating errors-in-variables regression in Stata. Stata J. 20(1):116–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Madrid‐Guijarro A, Garcia D, Van Auken H (2009) Barriers to innovation among Spanish manufacturing SMEs. J. Small Bus. Management 47(4):465–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A, Malhotra A (2013) Towards an information systems perspective and research agenda on crowdsourcing for innovation. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 22(4):257–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mani D, Srikanth K, Bharadwaj A (2014) Efficacy of R&D work in offshore captive centers: An empirical study of task characteristics, coordination mechanisms, and performance. Inform. Systems Res. 25(4):846–864.Link, Google Scholar
• Marchand DA, Kettinger WJ, Rollins JD (2000) Information orientation: People, technology and the bottom line. Sloan Management Rev. 41(4):69–80.Google Scholar
• Massini S, Lewin A, Greve H (2005) Innovators and imitators: Organizational reference groups and adoption of organizational routines. Res. Policy 34(10):1550–1569.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Melville N, Kraemer K, Gurbaxani V (2004) Information technology and organizational performance: An integrative model of IT business value. MIS Quart. 28(2):283–322.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Michael D, Aggarwal N, Kennedy D, Wenstrup J, Rüßmann M, Ruba B, Chen J (2013) Lessons on Technology and Growth from Small-Business Leaders (Boston Consulting Group, Boston).Google Scholar
• Mithas S, Ramasubbu N, Sambamurthy V (2011) How information management capability influences firm performance. MIS Quart. 35(1):237–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mithas S, Chen Y, Liu C-W, Han K (2022) Are foreign and domestic information technology professionals complements or substitutes? MIS Quart. 46(4):2351–2366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mithas S, Tafti A, Bardhan I, Goh JM (2012) Information technology and firm profitability: Mechanisms and empirical evidence. MIS Quart. 36(1):205–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Müller J, Stocker A (2011) Enterprise microblogging for advanced knowledge sharing: The References@BT case study. J. Universal Comput. Sci. 17(4):532–547.Google Scholar
• Nahapiet J, Ghoshal S (1998) Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad. Management Rev. 23(2):242–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nambisan S (2003) Information systems as a reference discipline for new product development. MIS Quart. 27(1):1–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson RR, Winter S (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Parmigiani A, Howard-Grenville J (2011) Routines revisited: Exploring the capabilities and practice perspectives. Acad. Management Ann. 5(1):413–453.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Patel P, Pavitt K (1997) The technological competencies of the world’s largest firms: Complex and path-dependent, but not much variety. Res. Policy 26(2):141–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pervan S, Al-Ansaari Y, Xu J (2015) Environmental determinants of open innovation in Dubai SMEs. Indust. Marketing Management 50:60–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petter S, Straub D, Rai A (2007) Specifying formative constructs in information systems research. MIS Quart. 31(4):623–656.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, Organ DW (1986) Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. J. Management 12(4):531–544.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff P, MacKenzie S, Lee J-Y, Podsakoff N (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. 88(5):879–903.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polites GL, Karahanna E (2013) The embeddedness of information systems habits in organizational and individual level routines: Development and disruption. MIS Quart. 37(1):221–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poppo L, Zhou KZ, Li JJ (2016) When can you trust “trust”? Calculative trust, relational trust, and supplier performance. Strategic Management J. 37(4):724–741.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powell W, Koput K, Smith-Doerr L (1996) Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(1):116–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prasanna R, Jayasundara J, Naradda Gamage S, Ekanayake E, Rajapakshe P, Abeyrathne G (2019) Sustainability of SMEs in the competition: A systemic review on technological challenges and SME performance. J. Open Innovation Tech. Market Complexity 5(4):100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Qian G, Li L (2003) Profitability of small‐and medium‐sized enterprises in high‐tech industries: The case of the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management J. 24(9):881–887.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rai A (2016) Editor’s comments: The MIS Quarterly trifecta: Impact, range, speed. MIS Quart. 40(1):iii–x.Google Scholar
• Rai A (2019) Engaged scholarship: Research with practice for impact. MIS Quart. 43(2):iii–viii.Google Scholar
• Rai A, Tang X (2010) Leveraging IT capabilities and competitive process capabilities for the management of interorganizational relationship portfolios. Inform. Systems Res. 21(3):516–542.Link, Google Scholar
• Rai A, Arikan I, Pye J, Tiwana A (2015) Fit and misfit of plural sourcing strategies and IT-enabled process integration capabilities. MIS Quart. 39(4):865–886.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ravichandran T, Han S, Mithas S (2017) Mitigating diminishing returns to R&D: The role of information technology in innovation. Inform. Systems Res. 28(4):812–827.Link, Google Scholar
• Riquelme R (2018) México reprueba en innovación y desarrollo dentro de la OCDE. El Economista (September 18), https://www.eleconomista.com.mx/tecnologia/Mexico-reprueba-en-innovacion-y-desarrollo-dentro-de-la-OCDE-20180918-0089.html.Google Scholar
• Roberts N, Galluch P, Dinger M, Grover V (2012) Absorptive capacity and information systems research: Review, synthesis, and directions for future research. MIS Quart. 36(2):625–648.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rojas M, Solis E, Zhu J (2018) Innovation and network multiplexity: R&D and the concurrent effects of two collaboration networks in an emerging economy. Res. Policy 47(6):1111–1124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Romo P (2020) Jalisco instalará centros regionales de innovación. El Economista (February 5), https://www.eleconomista.com.mx/estados/Jalisco-instalara-centros-regionales-de-innovacion-20200204-0090.html.Google Scholar
• Rosales Ávalos E (2019) La marcha fifí. El Economista (May 6), https://www.eleconomista.com.mx/opinion/La-marcha-fifi-20190506-0012.html.Google Scholar
• Sabherwal R, Sabherwal S, Havakhor T, Steelman Z (2019) How does strategic alignment affect firm performance? The roles of information technology investment and environmental uncertainty. MIS Quart. 43(2):453–474.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saldanha T, Lee D, Mithas S (2020a) Aligning information technology and business: The differential effects of alignment during investment planning, delivery, and change. Inform. Systems Res. 31(4):1260–1281.Link, Google Scholar
• Saldanha T, Mithas S, Krishnan MS (2017) Leveraging customer involvement for fueling innovation: The role of relational and analytical information processing capabilities. MIS Quart. 41(1):267–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saldanha TJ, John-Mariadoss B, Wu MX, Mithas S (2021) How information and communication technology shapes the influence of culture on innovation: A country-level analysis. J. Management Inform. Systems 38(1):108–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saldanha TJ, Melville NP, Ramirez R, Richardson VJ (2013) Information systems for collaborating versus transacting: Impact on manufacturing plant performance in the presence of demand volatility. J. Oper. Management 31(6):313–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saldanha TJV, Andrade-Rojas MG, Kathuria A, Khuntia J, Krishnan MS (2024) How the locus of uncertainty shapes the influence of CEO long-term compensation on IT capital investments. MIS Quart. Forthcoming.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saldanha TJV, Mithas S, Khuntia J, Whitaker J, Melville NP (2022) How green information technology standards and strategies influence performance: Role of environment, cost, and dual focus. MIS Quart. 46(4):2367–2386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saldanha TJ, Sahaym A, Mithas S, Andrade-Rojas MG, Kathuria A, Lee H-H (2020b) Turning liabilities of global operations into assets: IT-enabled social integration capacity and exploratory innovation. Inform. Systems Res. 31(2):361–382.Link, Google Scholar
• Salge TO, Kohli R, Barrett M (2015) Investing in information systems: On the behavioral and institutional search mechanisms underpinning hospitals’ IS investment decisions. MIS Quart. 39(1):61–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sambamurthy V, Bharadwaj A, Grover V (2003) Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Quart. 27(2):237–263.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sampson RC (2007) R&D alliances and firm performance: The impact of technological diversity and alliance organization on innovation. Acad. Management J. 50(2):364–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sawhney M, Verona G, Prandelli E (2005) Collaborating to create: The Internet as a platform for customer engagement in product innovation. J. Interactive Marketing 19(4):4–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Segarra A, Callejón M (2002) New firms’ survival and market turbulence: New evidence from Spain. Rev. Indust. Organ. 20(1):1–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sethi R, Pant S, Sethi A (2003) Web‐based product development systems integration and new product outcomes: A conceptual framework. J. Product Innovation Management 20(1):37–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaver JM (1998) Accounting for endogeneity when assessing strategy performance: Does entry mode choice affect FDI survival? Management Sci. 44(4):571–585.Link, Google Scholar
• Shu C, Zhou K, Xiao Y, Gao S (2016) How green management influences product innovation in China: The role of institutional benefits. J. Bus. Ethics 133(3):471–485.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Song M, Di Benedetto C (2008) Supplier’s involvement and success of radical new product development in new ventures. J. Oper. Management 26(1):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Song M, Droge C, Hanvanich S, Calantone R (2005) Marketing and technology resource complementarity: An analysis of their interaction effect in two environmental contexts. Strategic Management J. 26(3):259–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sun Y, Fang Y, Lim KH, Straub D (2012) User satisfaction with information technology service delivery: A social capital perspective. Inform. Systems Res. 23(4):1195–1211.Link, Google Scholar
• Tafti A, Mithas S, Krishnan MS (2013) The effect of information technology-enabled flexibility on formation and market value of alliances. Management Sci. 59(1):207–225.Link, Google Scholar
• Tam KY (1998) The impact of information technology investments on firm performance and evaluation: Evidence from newly industrialized economies. Inform. Systems Res. 9(1):85–98.Link, Google Scholar
• Tambe P, Hitt LM, Brynjolfsson E (2012) The extroverted firm: How external information practices affect innovation and productivity. Management Sci. 58(5):843–859.Link, Google Scholar
• Tarafdar M, Tanriverdi H (2018) Impact of the information technology unit on information technology-embedded product innovation. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 19(8):672–688.Google Scholar
• Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. 18(7):509–533.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teo TS, Ranganathan C, Srivastava SC, Loo JW (2007) Fostering IT-enabled business innovation at YCH Group. MIS Quart. Executive 6(4):211–223.Google Scholar
• Terziovski M (2010) Innovation practice and its performance implications in small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in the manufacturing sector: A resource‐based view. Strategic Management J. 31(8):892–902.Google Scholar
• Thornhill S, Amit R (2003) Learning about failure: Bankruptcy, firm age, and the resource-based view. Organ. Sci. 14(5):497–509.Link, Google Scholar
• Trantopoulos K, von Krogh G, Wallin M, Woerter M (2017) External knowledge and information technology: Implications for process innovation performance. MIS Quart. 41(1):287–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Un CA (2011) The advantage of foreignness in innovation. Strategic Management J. 32(11):1232–1242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Unión CDMX (2016) Sugus, el legendario caramelo chilango que se extinguió. Unión CDMX (December 8), https://www.unioncdmx.mx/articulo/2016/12/08/cultura/sugus-el-legendario-caramelo-chilango-que-se-extinguio.Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau (2020) Definitions and instructions for the annual survey of manufactures, MA-10000. Retrieved June 28, 2021, https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/asm/technical-documentation/questionnaire/2020/instructions/2020-MA-10000-Instructions.pdf.Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau (2021) About the annual survey of manufactures. Retrieved June 28, 2021, https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/asm/about.html.Google Scholar
• Uzzi B, Lancaster R (2003) Relational embeddedness and learning: The case of bank loan managers and their clients. Management Sci. 49(4):383–399.Link, Google Scholar
• Van de Ven AH (2007) Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van de Vrande V, De Jong J, Vanhaverbeke W, De Rochemont M (2009) Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges. Technovation 29(6–7):423–437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vanhaverbeke W, Roijakkers N, Usman M, Frattini F, eds. (2018) Researching Open Innovation in SMEs (World Scientific, Singapore).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Thong J, Chan F, Hu P (2016) Managing citizens’ uncertainty in E-government services: The mediating and moderating roles of transparency and trust. Inform. Systems Res. 27(1):87–111.Link, Google Scholar
• Volberda HW, Foss NJ, Lyles MA (2010) Perspective—Absorbing the concept of absorptive capacity: How to realize its potential in the organization field. Organ. Sci. 21(4):931–951.Link, Google Scholar
• Voss G, Voss Z (2013) Strategic ambidexterity in small and medium-sized enterprises: Implementing exploration and exploitation in product and market domains. Organ. Sci. 24(5):1459–1477.Link, Google Scholar
• Wadhwa A, Kotha S (2006) Knowledge creation through external venturing: Evidence from the telecommunications equipment manufacturing industry. Acad. Management J. 49(4):819–835.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wagner M (2007) On the relationship between environmental management, environmental innovation and patenting: Evidence from German manufacturing firms. Res. Policy 36(10):1587–1602.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wales WJ, Patel PC, Parida V, Kreiser PM (2013) Nonlinear effects of entrepreneurial orientation on small firm performance: The moderating role of resource orchestration capabilities. Strategic Entrep. J. 7(2):93–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Chen Y, Nevo S, Jin J, Tang G, Chow W (2013) IT capabilities and innovation performance: The mediating role of market orientation. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems 33(1):129–148.Google Scholar
• Weick K (1974) Amendments to organizational theorizing. Acad. Management J. 17(3):487–502.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick KE, Roberts KH (1993) Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38(3):357–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whelan E, Conboy K, Crowston K, Morgan L, Rossi M (2014) The role of information systems in enabling open innovation. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 15(11):xx–xxx.Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2010) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• World Bank (2020) Improving SMEs’ access to finance and finding innovative solutions to unlock sources of capital. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/smefinance.Google Scholar
• World Bank Group (2022) Survey methodology. Retrieved July 1, 2022, https://www.enterprisesurveys.org/en/methodology.Google Scholar
• Xie YH, Suh T (2014) Perceived resource deficiency and internationalization of small-and medium-sized firms. J. Internat. Entrep. 12(3):207–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xue L, Ray G, Sambamurthy V (2012) Efficiency or innovation: How do industry environments moderate the effects of firms’ IT asset portfolios? MIS Quart. 36(2):509–528.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang M-L, Wang AM-L, Cheng K-C (2009) The impact of quality of IS information and budget slack on innovation performance. Technovation 29(8):527–536.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang H, Zheng Y, Zhao X (2014) Exploration or exploitation? Small firms’ alliance strategies with large firms. Strategic Management J. 35(1):146–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yeow A, Goh K (2015) Work harder or work smarter? Information technology and resource allocation in healthcare processes. MIS Quart. 39(4):763–786.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yoo Y, Henfridsson O, Lyytinen K (2010) The new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):724–735.Link, Google Scholar
• Zahra SA, George G (2002) Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Acad. Management Rev. 27(2):185–203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zárraga-Rodríguez M, Alvarez MJ (2013) Exploring the links between information capability and the EFQM business excellence model: The case of Basque Country quality award winners. Total Quality Management Bus. Excellence 24(5–6):539–560.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhao E, Wry T (2016) Not all inequality is equal: Deconstructing the societal logic of patriarchy to understand microfinance lending to women. Acad. Management J. 59(6):1994–2020.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhou KZ, Wu F (2010) Technological capability, strategic flexibility, and product innovation. Strategic Management J. 31(5):547–561.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhou KZ, Li JJ, Zhou N, Su C (2008) Market orientation, job satisfaction, product quality, and firm performance: Evidence from China. Strategic Management J. 29(9):985–1000.Crossref, Google Scholar