Social Trading, Communication, and Networks

References

• Agarwal V, Daniel ND, Naik NY (2009) Role of managerial incentives and discretion in hedge fund performance. J. Finance 64(5):2221–2256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ammann M, Schaub N (2021) Do individual investors trade on investment-related Internet postings? Management Sci. 67(9):5679–5702.Link, Google Scholar
• Apesteguia J, Oechssler J, Weidenholzer S (2020) Copy trading. Management Sci. 66(12):5608–5622.Link, Google Scholar
• Baker M, Wurgler J (2007) Investor sentiment in the stock market. J. Econom. Perspect. 21(2):129–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baker WE, Faulkner RR, Fisher GA (1998) Hazards of the market: The continuity and dissolution of interorganizational market relationships. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 63(2):147–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bali TG, Hirshleifer D, Peng L, Tang Y (2021) Attention, social interaction, and investor attraction to lottery stocks. NBER Working Paper No. 29543, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Barber B, Huang X, Odean T (2016) Which factors matter to investors? Evidence from mutual fund flows. Rev. Financial Stud. 29(10):2600–2642.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barber BM, Odean T (2008) All that glitters: The effect of attention and news on the buying behavior of individual and institutional investors. Rev. Financial Stud. 21(2):785–818.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Birru J, Young T (2022) Sentiment and uncertainty. J. Financial Econom. 146(3):1148–1169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cao Q, Duan W, Gan Q (2011) Exploring determinants of voting for the “helpfulness” of online user reviews: A text mining approach. Decision Support Systems 50(2):511–521.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chamberlain G (1980) Analysis of covariance with qualitative data. Rev. Econom. Stud. 47(1):225–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chou WYS, Hunt YM, Beckjord EB, Moser RP, Hesse BW (2009) Social media use in the united states: Implications for health communication. J. Medical Internet Res. 11(4):e1249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coval JD, Moskowitz TJ (1999) Home bias at home: Local equity preference in domestic portfolios. J. Finance 54(6):2045–2073.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cvitanić J, Karatzas I (1999) On dynamic measures of risk. Finance Stochastics 3(4):451–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Melo Mendes BV, Lavrado RC (2017) Implementing and testing the maximum drawdown at risk. Finance Res. Lett. 22:95–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Devenow A, Welch I (1996) Rational herding in financial economics. Eur. Econom. Rev. 40(3–5):603–615.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doering P, Neumann S, Paul S (2015) A primer on social trading networks—Institutional aspects and empirical evidence. EFMA Annual Meetings (EFMA, Amsterdam).Google Scholar
• Dorfleitner G, Fischer L, Lung C, Willmertinger P, Stang N, Dietrich N (2018) To follow or not to follow—An empirical analysis of the returns of actors on social trading platforms. Quart. Rev. Econom. Finance 70:160–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dorn D, Huberman G, Sengmueller P (2008) Correlated trading and returns. J. Finance 63(2):885–920.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duarte J, Siegel S, Young L (2012) Trust and credit: The role of appearance in peer-to-peer lending. Rev. Financial Stud. 25(8):2455–2484.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gemayel R, Preda A (2018a) Does a scopic regime erode the disposition effect? Evidence from a social trading platform. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 154:175–190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gemayel R, Preda A (2018b) Does a scopic regime produce conformism? Herding behavior among trade leaders on social trading platforms. Eur. J. Finance 24(14):1144–1175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goetzmann WN, Ingersoll JE Jr, Ross SA (2003) High-water marks and hedge fund management contracts. J. Finance 58(4):1685–1718.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR, Baum JAC, Mitsuhashi H, Rowley TJ (2010) Built to last but falling apart: Cohesion, friction, and withdrawal from interfirm alliances. Acad. Management J. 53(2):302–322.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grinblatt M, Jostova G, Petrasek L, Philipov A (2020) Style and skill: Hedge funds, mutual funds, and momentum. Management Sci. 66(12):5505–5531.Link, Google Scholar
• Han B, Hirshleifer D, Walden J (2022) Social transmission bias and investor behavior. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 57(1):390–412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman J, Singer B (1984) A method for minimizing the impact of distributional assumptions in econometric models for duration data. Econometrica 52(2):271–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heimer RZ (2016) Peer pressure: Social interaction and the disposition effect. Rev. Financial Stud. 29(11):3177–3209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirshleifer D, Teoh SH (2003) Limited attention, information disclosure, and financial reporting. J. Accounting Econom. 36(1–3):337–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holland PW, Leinhardt S (1971) Transitivity in structural models of small groups. Comparative Group Stud. 2(2):107–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holzmeister F, Huber J, Kirchler M, Lindner F, Weitzel U, Zeisberger S (2020) What drives risk perception? A global survey with financial professionals and laypeople. Management Sci. 66(9):3977–4002.Link, Google Scholar
• Huang J, Wei KD, Yan H (2007) Participation costs and the sensitivity of fund flows to past performance. J. Finance 62(3):1273–1311.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hunter DR, Handcock MS, Butts CT, Goodreau SM, Morris M (2008) ERGM: A package to fit, simulate and diagnose exponential-family models for networks. J. Statist. Software 24(3):1–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hutto C, Gilbert E (2014) Vader: A parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text. Proc. Internat. AAAI Conf. Web Social Media (AAAI, Ann Arbor, MI), vol. 8, 216–225.Google Scholar
• Hwang EH, Guo X, Tan Y, Dang Y (2022) Delivering healthcare through teleconsultations: Implications for offline healthcare disparity. Inform. Systems Res. 33(2):515–539.Link, Google Scholar
• Ivković Z, Weisbenner S (2009) Individual investor mutual fund flows. J. Financial Econom. 92(2):223–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaiser M, Berger ESC (2021) Trust in the investor relationship marketing of startups: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Management Rev. Quart. 71(2):491–517.Google Scholar
• Kane GC, Labianca GJ, Borgatti SP (2014) What’s different about social media networks? A framework and research agenda. MIS Quart. 38(1):275–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khern-am-nuai W, Kannan K, Ghasemkhani H (2018) Extrinsic vs. intrinsic rewards for contributing reviews in an online platform. Inform. Systems Res. 29(4):871–892.Link, Google Scholar
• Kim H, Kankanhalli A, Lee S (2018) Examining gifting through social network services: A social exchange theory perspective. Inform. Systems Res. 29(4):805–828.Link, Google Scholar
• Krivitsky PN, Handcock MS (2014) A separable model for dynamic networks. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B Statist. Methodology 76(1):29–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumar A (2009) Who gambles in the stock market? J. Finance 64(4):1889–1933.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee GM, Qiu L, Whinston AB (2016) A friend like me: Modeling network formation in a location-based social network. J. Management Inform. Systems 33(4):1008–1033.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee W, Ma Q (2015) Whom to follow on social trading services? A system to support discovering expert traders. Tenth Internat. Conf. Digital Inform. Management (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 188–193.Google Scholar
• Li Z, Fang X, Bai X, Sheng ORL (2017) Utility-based link recommendation for online social networks. Management Sci. 63(6):1938–1952.Link, Google Scholar
• Liberti JM, Petersen MA (2019) Information: Hard and soft. Rev. Corporate Finance Stud. 8(1):1–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin M, Viswanathan S (2016) Home bias in online investments: An empirical study of an online crowdfunding market. Management Sci. 62(5):1393–1414.Link, Google Scholar
• Markowitz H (1952) Portfolio selection. J. Finance 7(1):77–91.Google Scholar
• Mayer RC, Davis JH, Schoorman FD (1995) An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad. Management Rev. 20(3):709–734.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM (2001) Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Rev. Sociol. 27(1):415–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mundlak Y (1978) On the pooling of time series and cross section data. Econometrica 46(1):69–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neyman J, Scott EL (1948) Consistent estimates based on partially consistent observations. Econometrica 16(1):1–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oehler A, Horn M, Wendt S (2016) Benefits from social trading? Empirical evidence for certificates on Wiki folios. Internat. Rev. Financial Anal. 46:202–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oliver RL (1980) A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. J. Marketing Res. 17(4):460–469.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pan W, Altschuler Y, Pentland AS (2012) Decoding social influence and the wisdom of the crowd in financial trading network. Internat. Conf. Privacy Security Risk Trust Internat. Conf. Social Comput. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 203–209.Google Scholar
• Pedersen LH (2022) Game on: Social networks and markets. J. Financial Econom. 146(3):1097–1119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pelster M (2017) I’ll have what s/he’s having: A case study of a social trading network. Proc. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems 2017 (AIS, Atlanta).Google Scholar
• Pelster M, Hofmann A (2018) About the fear of reputational loss: Social trading and the disposition effect. J. Banking Finance 94:75–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polidoro F, Ahuja G, Mitchell W (2011) When the social structure overshadows competitive incentives: The effects of network embeddedness on joint venture dissolution. Acad. Management J. 54(1):203–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robins G, Pattison P, Kalish Y, Lusher D (2007) An introduction to exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Soc. Networks 29(2):173–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Röder F, Walter A (2019) What drives investment flows into social trading portfolios? J. Financial Res. 42(2):383–411.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shafi K, Mohammadi A, Johan SA (2020) Investment ties gone awry. Acad. Management J. 63(1):295–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shefrin H, Statman M (1985) The disposition to sell winners too early and ride losers too long: Theory and evidence. J. Finance 40(3):777–790.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sirri ER, Tufano P (1998) Costly search and mutual fund flows. J. Finance 53(5):1589–1622.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snijders TA, Pattison PE, Robins GL, Handcock MS (2006) New specifications for exponential random graph models. Sociol. Methodology 36(1):99–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strauss D, Ikeda M (1990) Pseudolikelihood estimation for social networks. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 85(409):204–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tirunillai S, Tellis GJ (2012) Does chatter really matter? Dynamics of user-generated content and stock performance. Marketing Sci. 31(2):198–215.Link, Google Scholar
• Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wohlgemuth V, Berger ES, Wenzel M (2016) More than just financial performance: Trusting investors in social trading. J. Bus. Res. 69(11):4970–4974.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2010) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Xu J, Chau M (2018) Cheap talk? The impact of lender-borrower communication on peer-to-peer lending outcomes. J. Management Inform. Systems 35(1):53–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yan L, Peng J, Tan Y (2015) Network dynamics: How can we find patients like us? Inform. Systems Res. 26(3):496–512.Link, Google Scholar
• Yang M, Zheng Z, Mookerjee V (2022) How much is financial advice worth? The transparency-revenue tension in social trading. Management Sci. 68(7):5252–5268.Link, Google Scholar