Sponsored Tasks and Solver Participation in Crowdsourcing Contests

References

• Allison PD, Christakis NA (1994) Logit models for sets of ranked items. Sociol. Methodology 24:199–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Araujo RM (2013) 99designs: An analysis of creative competition in crowdsourced design. Proc. First AAAI Conf. Human Comput. Crowdsourcing (AAAI Press, Washington, DC), 17–24.Google Scholar
• Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 51(6):1173–1182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blake T, Nosko C, Tadelis S (2015) Consumer heterogeneity and paid search effectiveness: A large-scale field experiment. Econometrica 83(1):155–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bockstedt J, Goh KH (2011) Seller strategies for differentiation in highly competitive online auction markets. J. Management Inform. Systems 28(3):235–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bockstedt J, Druehl C, Mishra A (2016) Heterogeneous submission behavior and its implications for success in innovation contests with public submissions. Production Oper. Management 25(7):1157–1176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ, Lacetera N, Lakhani KR (2011) Incentives and problem uncertainty in innovation contests: An empirical analysis. Management Sci. 57(5):843–863.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen PY, Pavlou PA, Wu S, Yang Y (2021) Attracting high-quality contestants to contests in the context of crowdsourcing contest platform. Production Oper. Management 30(6):1751–1771.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chilton LB, Horton JJ, Miller RC, Azenkot S (2010) Task search in a human computation market. Proc. ACM SIGKDD Workshop Human Comput. (ACM, Washington, DC), 1–9.Google Scholar
• Dahan E, Mendelson H (2001) An extreme-value model of concept testing. Management Sci. 47(1):102–116.Link, Google Scholar
• Ge H, Teo HH, Lee TSY (2002) Additional listing options on eBay: Are they worth the money. Proc. Eur. Conf. Inform. Systems (ECIS 2002) (Association for Information Systems, Atlanta, GA) 29.Google Scholar
• Ghose A, Yang S (2009) An empirical analysis of sponsored search in online advertising. Management Sci. 55(10):1605–1622.Link, Google Scholar
• Glazer A, Hassin R (1988) Optimal contests. Econom. Inquiry 26(1):133–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greene W (2011) Econometric Analysis: International Edition (Prentice Hall, Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Hahn J (2001) The dynamics of mass online marketplaces: A case study of an online auction. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 317–324.Google Scholar
• Jian L, Yang S, Ba S, Lu L, Jiang L (2019) Managing the crowds: The effect of prize guarantees and in-process feedback on participation in crowdsourcing contests. MIS Quart. 43(1):97–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jiang Z, Huang Y, Beil DR (2021) The role of problem specification in crowdsourcing contests for design problems: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 23(3):637–656.Link, Google Scholar
• Jin Y, Lee B, Ba S, Stallaert J (2021) Winning by learning? Effect and design of knowledge sharing in crowdsourcing contests. Inform. Systems Res. 32(3):836–859.Link, Google Scholar
• Koh TK (2019) Adopting seekers’ solution exemplars in crowdsourcing ideation contests: Antecedents and consequences. Inform. Systems Res. 30(2):486–506.Link, Google Scholar
• Koh TK, Cheung M (2022) Seeker exemplars and quantitative ideation outcomes in crowdsourcing contests. Inform. Systems Res. 33(1):265–284.Link, Google Scholar
• Korpeoglu CG, Körpeoğlu E, Tunç S (2021) Optimal duration of innovation contests. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 23(3):657–675.Link, Google Scholar
• Liu D, Geng X, Whinston AB (2007) Optimal design of consumer contests. J. Marketing 71(4):140–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu TX, Yang J, Adamic LA, Chen Y, Liu TX (2014) Crowdsourcing with all-pay auctions: A field experiment on Taskcn. Management Sci. 60(8):2020–2037.Link, Google Scholar
• Mo J, Sarkar S, Menon S (2021) Competing tasks and task quality: An empirical study of crowdsourcing contests. MIS Quart. 45(4):1921–1948.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moldovanu B, Sela A (2001) The optimal allocation of prizes in contests. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(3):542–558.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70(1):41–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sun H, Fan M, Tan Y (2020) An empirical analysis of seller advertising strategies in an online marketplace. Inform. Systems Res. 31(1):37–56.Link, Google Scholar
• Tan CH, Teo HH, Lee SY, Hui KL (2002) Effects of visual cues on buyer information acquisition: An empirical investigation at Yahoo! auction: What attracts auction buyers. Proc. Pacific Asia Conf. Inform. Systems (PACIS 2002) (Tokyo, Japan), 18.Google Scholar
• Terwiesch C, Xu Y (2008) Innovation contests, open innovation, and multiagent problem solving. Management Sci. 54(9):1529–1543.Link, Google Scholar
• Woolridge JM (2013) Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach, 5th ed. (South-Western CENGAGE Learning, Mason, OH).Google Scholar
• Yang J, Adamic LA, Ackerman MS (2008) Crowdsourcing and knowledge sharing: Strategic user behavior on Taskcn. Proc. 9th ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 246–255.Google Scholar