Addressing Online Users’ Suspicion of Sponsored Search Results: Effects of Informational Cues

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2021.0364

References

  • Adomavicius G, Bockstedt JC, Curley SP, Jingjing Z (2019) Reducing recommender systems biases: An investigation of rating display designs. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 43(4):1321–1341.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Amiot CE, Sansfaçon S, Louis WR, Yelle M (2012) Can intergroup behaviors be emitted out of self-determined reasons? Testing the role of group norms and behavioral congruence in the internalization of discrimination and parity behaviors. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 38(1):63–76.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Animesh A, Ramachandran V, Viswanathan S (2010) Quality uncertainty and the performance of online sponsored search markets: An empirical investigation. Inform. Systems Res. 21(1):190–201.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Animesh A, Viswanathan S, Agarwal R (2011) Competing “creatively” in sponsored search markets: The effect of rank, differentiation strategy, and competition on performance. Inform. Systems Res. 22(1):153–169.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bhattacherjee A (2002) Individual trust in online firms: Scale development and initial test. J. Management Inform. Systems 19(1):211–241.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bloch PH, Richins ML (1983) Shopping without purchase: An investigation of consumer browsing behavior. Advances Consumer Res. 10(1):389–393.Google Scholar
  • Bobko P, Barelka AJ, Hirshfield LM (2014a) The construct of state-level suspicion: A model and research agenda for automated and information technology (IT) contexts. Human Factors 56(3):489–508.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bobko P, Barelka AJ, Hirshfield LM, Lyons JB (2014b) The construct of suspicion and how it can benefit theories and models in organizational science. J. Bus. Psych. 29(3):335–342.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bond GD (2012) Focus on basic cognitive mechanisms and strategies in deception research (and remand custody of ‘wizards’ to Harry Potter movies). J. Appl. Res. Memory Cognition 1(2):128–130.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boulding W, Kirmani A (1993) A consumer-side experimental examination of signaling theory: Do consumers perceive warranties as signals of quality? J. Consumer Res. 20(1):111–123.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown SA, Sias RW (2023) The fault in our stars: Molecular genetics and information technology use. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 47(2):483–510.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burke M, Hornof A, Nilsen E, Gorman N (2005) High-cost banner blindness: Ads increase perceived workload, hinder visual search, and are forgotten. ACM Trans. Comput. Human Interactions 12(4):423–445.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Campbell MC, Kirmani A (2000) Consumers’ use of persuasion knowledge: The effects of accessibility and cognitive capacity on perceptions of an influence agent. J. Consumer Res. 27(1):69–83.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Campbell MC, Kirmani A (2008) I know what you’re doing and why you’re doing it: The use of the persuasion knowledge model in consumer research. Hugvstedt C, Herr PM, Kardes FR, eds. The Handbook of Consumer Psychology (Psychology Press, Mahwah, NJ), 549–575.Google Scholar
  • Chaiken S, Maheswaran D (1994) Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 66(3):460–473.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cheng N, Zhiqiang Z, Sarkar S (2022) Competing with the sharing economy: Incumbents’ reaction on review manipulation. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 46(3):1573–1602.Google Scholar
  • Cho CH, Cheon HJ (2004) Why do people avoid advertising on the internet? J. Advertising 33(4):89–97.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen J (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Costello JP, Malkoc SA (2022) Why are donors more generous with time than money? The role of perceived control over donations on charitable giving. J. Consumer Res. 49(4):678–696.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Currim IS, Sarin RK (1984) A comparative evaluation of multiattribute consumer preference models. Management Sci. 30(5):543–561.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cyr D, Head M, Larios H, Pan B (2009) Exploring human images in website design: A multi-method approach. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 33(3):539–566.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Jans S, Van de Sompel D, De Veirman M, Hudders L (2020) #Sponsored! How the recognition of sponsoring on Instagram posts affects adolescents’ brand evaluations through source evaluations. Comput. Human Behav. 109:106342.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeCarlo TE (2005) The effects of sales message and suspicion of ulterior motives on salesperson evaluation. J. Consumer Psych. 15(3):238–249.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deng H, Wang W, Lim KH (2022a) Repairing integrity-based trust violations in ascription disputes for potential customers in e-commerce. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 46(4):1983–2013.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deng H, Wang W, Li S, Lim KH (2022b) Can positive online cues always reduce user avoidance of sponsored research results? Management Inform. Systems Quart. 46(1):35–70.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dimoka A, Hong Y, Pavlou PA (2012) On product uncertainty in online markets: Theory and evidence. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 36(2):395–426.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dou W, Lim KH, Su C, Zhou N, Cui N (2010) Brand positioning strategy using search engine marketing. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 34(2):261–279.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elliott RH, Rosenbaum-Elliott R, Percy L, Pervan S (2015) Strategic Brand Management (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
  • Erdem T, Swait J (2004) Brand credibility, brand consideration, and choice. J. Consumer Res. 31(1):191–198.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman JM, Lynch JG (1988) Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. J. Appl. Psych. 73(3):421–435.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ferran C, Watts S (2008) Videoconferencing in the field: A heuristic processing model. Management Sci. 54(9):1565–1578.Google Scholar
  • Ford GT, Smith DB, Swasy JL (1990) Consumer skepticism of advertising claims: Testing hypotheses from economics of information. J. Consumer Res. 16(4):433–441.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Geng X, Lin L, Whinston AB (2009) Effects of organizational learning and knowledge transfer on investment decisions under uncertainty. J. Management Inform. Systems 26(2):123–145.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gifford WE, Bobbitt HR, John W, Slocum J (1979) Message characteristics and perceptions of uncertainty by organizational decision makers. Acad. Management J. 22(3):458–481.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Golman R, Hagmann D, Loewenstein G (2017) Information avoidance. J. Econom. Lit. 55(1):96–135.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hardisty DJ, Pfeffer J (2017) Intertemporal uncertainty avoidance: When the future is uncertain, people prefer the present, and when the present is uncertain, people prefer the future. Management Sci. 63(2):519–527.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hayes AF, Rockwood NJ (2017) Regression-based statistical mediation and moderation analysis in clinical research: Observations, recommendations, and implementation. Behav. Res. Therapy 98:39–57.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hess MF, Cottrell JH (2016) Fraud risk management: A small business perspective. Bus. Horizons 59(1):13–18.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hilton JL, Fein S, Miller DT (1993) Suspicion and dispositional inference. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 19(5):501–512.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hou J-R, Zhang J, Zhang K (2023) Pictures that are worth a thousand donations: How emotions in project images drive the success of online charity fundraising campaigns? An image design perspective. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 47(2):535–583.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hubbard TD, Pollock TG, Pfarrer MD, Rindova VP (2018) Safe bets or hot hands? How status and celebrity influence strategic alliance formations by newly public firms. Acad. Management J. 61(5):1976–1999.Google Scholar
  • Im I, Dunn BK, Lee DI, Galletta DF, Jeong S-O (2019) Predicting the intent of sponsored search users: An exploratory user session-level analysis. Decision Support Systems 121:25–36.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Isaac MS, Grayson K (2017) Beyond skepticism: Can accessing persuasion knowledge bolster credibility? J. Consumer Res. 43(6):895–912.Google Scholar
  • Kelman HC (1961) Processes of opinion change. Public Opinion Quart. 25(1):57–78.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kent RJ, Allen CT (1994) Competitive interference effects in consumer memory for advertising: The role of brand familiarity. J. Marketing 58(3):97–105.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim K, Siva V (2019) The experts in the crowd: The role of reputable investors in a crowdfunding market. MIS Quart. 43(2):347–372.Google Scholar
  • Kim PH, Ferrin DL, Cooper CD, Dirks KT (2004) Removing the shadow of suspicion: The effects of apology versus denial for repairing competence-versus integrity-based trust violations. J. Appl. Psych. 89(1):104–118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim J, Lee HW, Gao H, Johnson RE (2021) When ceos are all about themselves: Perceived ceo narcissism and middle managers’ workplace behaviors amid the Covid-19 pandemic. J. Appl. Psych. 106(9):1283–1298.Google Scholar
  • Kirmani A (1997) Advertising repetition as a signal of quality: If it’s advertised so much, something must be wrong. J. Advertising 26(3):77–86.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kirmani A, Rao AR (2000) No pain, no gain: A critical review of the literature on signaling unobservable product quality. J. Marketing 64(2):66–79.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kirmani A, Zhu R (2007) Vigilant against manipulation: The effect of regulatory focus on the use of persuasion knowledge. J. Marketing Res. 44(4):688–701.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krosgaard MA, Brodt SE, Whitener EM (2002) Trust in the face of conflict: The role of managerial trustworthy behavior and organizational context. J. Appl. Psych. 87(2):312–319.Google Scholar
  • Kuan KK, Zhong Y, Chau PY (2014) Informational and normative social influence in group-buying: Evidence from self-reported and EEG data. J. Management Inform. Systems 30(4):151–178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lam CK, Huang X, Janssen O (2010) Contextualizing emotional exhaustion and positive emotional display: The signaling effects of supervisors’ emotional exhaustion and service climate. J. Appl. Psych. 95(2):368–376.Google Scholar
  • Lee J, Britt BC, Kanthawala S (2023) Taking the lead in misinformation-related conversations in social media networks during a mass shooting crisis. Internet Res. 33(2):638–663.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lei Z, Yin D, Zhang H (2021) Focus within or on others: The impact of reviewers’ attentional focus on review helpfulness. Inform. Systems Res. 32(3):801–819.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levine TR, McCornack SA (1991) The dark side of trust: Conceptualizing and measuring types of communicative suspicion. Comm. Quart. 39(4):325–340.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li X, Hitt LM (2010) Price effects in online product reviews: An analytical model and empirical analysis. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 34(4):809–831.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liang C, Hong Y, Chen P-Y, Shao BBM (2022) The screening role of design parameters for service procurement auctions in online service outsourcing platforms. Inform. Systems Res. 33(4):1324–1343.Google Scholar
  • Lim KH, Sia CL, Lee MKO, Benbasat I (2006) Do I trust you online, and if so, will I buy? An empirical study of two trust-building strategies. J. Management Inform. Systems 23(2):233–266.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liu BQ, Goodhue DL (2012) Two worlds of trust for potential e-commerce users: Humans as cognitive misers. Inform. Systems Res. 23(4):1246–1262.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Long F, Jerath K, Sarvary M (2022) Designing an online retail marketplace: Leveraging information from sponsored advertising. Marketing Sci. 41(1):115–138.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Main KJ, Dahl DW, Darke PR (2007) Deliberative and automatic bases of suspicion: Empirical evidence of the sinister attribution error. J. Consumer Psych. 17(1):59–69.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mishra S, Umesh U, Stem DE Jr (1993) Antecedents of the attraction effect: An information-processing approach. J. Marketing Res. 30(3):331–349.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moravec PL, Kim A, Dennis AR (2020) Appealing to sense and sensibility: System 1 and system 2 interventions for fake news on social media. Inform. Systems Res. 31(3):987–1006.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nadkarni S, Gupta R (2007) A task-based model of perceived website complexity. MIS Quart. 31(3):501–524.Google Scholar
  • Netemeyer RG, Krishnan B, Pullig C, Wang G, Yagci M, Dean D, Ricks J, Wirth F (2004) Developing and validating measures of facets of customer-based brand equity. J. Bus. Res. 57(2):209–224.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Newell SJ, Goldsmith RE (2001) The development of a scale to measure perceived corporate credibility. J. Bus. Res. 52(3):235–247.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Porck JP, Matta FK, Hollenbeck JR, Oh JK, Lanaj K, Lee SM (2019) Social identification in multiteam systems: The role of depletion and task complexity. Acad. Management J. 62(4):1137–1162.Google Scholar
  • Preacher KJ (2015) Advances in mediation analysis: A survey and synthesis of new developments. Annual Rev. Psych. 66(1):825–852.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • PriceWaterhouseCoopers (2022) Internet advertising revenue report: Full year 2021. https://www.iab.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/IAB_Internet_Advertising_Revenue_Report_Full_Year_2021.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Roth PL, Bobko P, Shan G, Roth R, Ferrise E, Thatcher JB (2024) Doxing, political affiliation, and type of information: Effects on suspicion, perceived similarity, and hiring related judgements. J. Appl. Psych. 109(5):730–754.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Salovaara A, Lyytinen K, Penttinen E (2019) High reliability in digital organizing: Mindlessness, the frame problem, and digital operations. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 43(2):555–578.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shadish WR, Cook TD, Campbell DT (2002) Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference (Houghton Mifflin, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Sinaceur M (2010) Suspending judgment to create value: Suspicion and trust in negotiation. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 46(3):543–550.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sundar SS, Xu Q, Oeldorf-Hirsch A (2009) Authority vs. peer: How interface cues influence users. CHI ‘09 Extended Abstracts Human Factors Comput. Systems (ACM, New York), 4231–4236.Google Scholar
  • Tan X, Wang Y, Tan Y (2019) Impact of live chat on purchase in electronic markets: The moderating role of information cues. Inform. Systems Res. 30(4):1248–1271.Google Scholar
  • Turel O, Osatuyi B (2021) Biased credibility and sharing of fake news on social media: Considering peer context and self-objectivity state. J. Management Inform. Systems 38(4):931–958.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Urbany JE, Dickson PR, Wilkie WL (1989) Buyer uncertainty and information search. J. Consumer Res. 16(2):208–215.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V, Thong JYL, Chan FKY, Hu PJH (2016) Managing citizens’ uncertainty in e-government services: The mediating and moderating roles of transparency and trust. Inform. Systems Res. 27(1):87–111.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Walker HJ, Feild HS, Bernerth JB, Becton JB (2012) Diversity cues on recruitment websites: Investigating the effects on job seekers’ information processing. J. Appl. Psych. 97(1):214–224.Google Scholar
  • Wang W, Wang M (2019) Effects of sponsorship disclosure on perceived integrity of biased recommendation agents: Psychological contract violation and knowledge-based trust perspectives. Inform. Systems Res. 30(2):507–522.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wang W, Xu J, Wang M (2018a) Effects of recommendation neutrality and sponsorship disclosure on trust vs. distrust in online recommendation agents: Moderating role of explanations for organic recommendations. Management Sci. 64(11):5198–5219.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wang A, Zhang M, Hann I-H (2018b) Socially nudged: A quasi-experimental study of friends’ social influence in online product ratings. Inform. Systems Res. 29(3):641–655.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wang H, Du R, Shen W, Qiu L, Fan W (2022) Product reviews: A benefit, a burden, or a trifle? How seller reputation affects the role of product reviews. MIS Quart. 46(2):1243–1272.Google Scholar
  • Wells JD, Valacich JS, Hess TJ (2011) What signals are you sending? How website quality influences perceptions of product quality and purchase intentions. MIS Quart. 35(2):373–396.Google Scholar
  • Xiao B, Benbasat I (2011) Product-related deception in e-commerce: A theoretical perspective. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 35(1):169–196.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yi C, Jiang Z, Benbasat I (2017) Designing for diagnosticity and serendipity: An investigation of social product search mechanisms. Inform. Systems Res. 28(2):413–429.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Yi C, Jiang Z, Li X, Lu X (2019) Leveraging user-generated content for product promotion: The effects of firm-highlighted reviews. Inform. Systems Res. 30(3):711–725.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Yu T, Marakas G (2019) How people perceive sponsored search ads: Toward a unified research model. Proc. 25th Americas Conf. Inform. Systems (Association for Information Systems, Atlanta).Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.