Conform or Workaround? A Multilevel Analysis of the Effect of Group Cultural Tightness on Enterprise System Use

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2021.0417

References

  • Adamson G, Wang L, Moore P (2017) Feature-based control and information framework for adaptive and distributed manufacturing in cyber physical systems. J. Manufacturing Systems 43(Part 2):305–315.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alavi M, Kayworth TR, Leidner DE (2005) An empirical examination of the influence of organizational culture on knowledge management practices. J. Management Inform. Systems 22(3):191–224.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alter S (2014) Theory of workarounds. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems 34:1041–1066.Google Scholar
  • Azad B, King N (2008) Enacting computer workaround practices within a medication dispensing system. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 17(3):264–278.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bala H, Venkatesh V (2013) Changes in employees’ job characteristics during an enterprise system implementation: A latent growth modeling perspective. MIS Quart. 37(4):1113–1140.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bala H, Venkatesh V (2016) Adaptation to information technology: A holistic nomological network from implementation to job outcomes. Management Sci. 62(1):156–179.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bandura A (2001) Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Rev. Psych. 52:1–26.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barker JR (1993) Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38(3):408–437.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bartelheimer C, Wolf V, Beverungen D (2023) Workarounds as generative mechanisms for bottom‐up process innovation—Insights from a multiple case study. Inform. Systems J. 33(5):1085–1150.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beaudry A, Pinsonneault A (2005) Understanding user responses to information technology: A coping model of user adaptation. MIS Quart. 29(3):493–524.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beaudry A, Vaghefi I, Bagayogo F, Lapointe L (2020) Impact of IT user behavior: Observations through a new lens. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems 46(1):331–364.Google Scholar
  • Bendoly E, Cotteleer MJ (2008) Understanding behavioral sources of process variation following enterprise system deployment. J. Oper. Management 26(1):23–44.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bhattacherjee A, Davis CJ, Connolly AJ, Hikmet N (2018) User response to mandatory IT use: A coping theory perspective. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 27(4):395–414.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bjørn P, Burgoyne S, Crompton V, MacDonald T, Pickering B, Munro S (2009) Boundary factors and contextual contingencies: Configuring electronic templates for healthcare professionals. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 18(5):428–441.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bond MH (1997) Adding value to the cross-cultural study of organizational behavior: Reculer pour mieux sauter. Earley PC, Erez M, eds. New Perspectives in International Industrial/Organizational Psychology (New Lexington Press, San Francisco), 256–275.Google Scholar
  • Boudreau M-C, Robey D (2005) Enacting integrated information technology: A human agency perspective. Organ. Sci. 16(1):3–18.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bulgurcu B, Cavusoglu H, Benbasat I (2010) Information security policy compliance: An empirical study of rationality-based beliefs and information security awareness. MIS Quart. 34(3):523–548.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burton-Jones A, Grange C (2013) From use to effective use: A representation theory perspective. Inform. Systems Res. 24(3):632–658.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Carmines EG, Zeller RA (1979) Reliability and Validity Assessment (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carter M, Grover V (2015) Me, my self, and I(T): Conceptualizing information technology identity and its implications. MIS Quart. 39(4):931–958.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chan M, Woon I, Kankanhalli A (2005) Perceptions of information security in the workplace: Linking information security climate to compliant behavior. J. Inform. Privacy Security 1(3):18–41.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen H, Wang X, Zang H, Guinote A (2021) Being a tough person in a tight world: Cultural tightness leads to a desire for muscularity. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 96:104183.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen H, Wang X, Zang H, Guinote A (2024) We need tough brothers and sisters in a tight world: Cultural tightness leads to a preference for dominant and muscular leaders. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 50(11):1563–1580.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Choi Y, Ingram P, Han SW (2023) Cultural breadth and embeddedness: The individual adoption of organizational culture as a determinant of creativity. Admin. Sci. Quart. 68(2):429–464.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Choudrie J, Zamani ED (2016) Understanding individual user resistance and workarounds of enterprise social networks: The case of Service Ltd. J. Inform. Tech. 31(2):130–151.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chua RY, Huang KG, Jin M (2019) Mapping cultural tightness and its links to innovation, urbanization, and happiness across 31 provinces in China. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116(14):6720–6725.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chua RY, Roth Y, Lemoine J-F (2015) The impact of culture on creativity: How cultural tightness and cultural distance affect global innovation crowdsourcing work. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(2):189–227.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Colquitt JA, Zapata-Phelan CP (2007) Trends in theory building and theory testing: A five-decade study of the Academy of Management Journal. Acad. Management J. 50(6):1281–1303.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cram WA, Wiener M, Tarafdar M, Benlian A (2022) Examining the impact of algorithmic control on Uber drivers’ technostress. J. Management Inform. Systems 39(2):426–453.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davison RM, Ou CX, Ng E (2020) Inadequate information systems and organizational citizenship behavior. Inform. Management 57(6):103240.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Desouza KC, Awazu Y, Ramaprasad A (2007) Modifications and innovations to technology artifacts. Technovation 27(4):204–220.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeVellis RF (2016) Scale Development: Theory and Applications (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Durcikova A, Fadel KJ, Butler BS, Galletta DF (2011) Research note—Knowledge exploration and exploitation: The impacts of psychological climate and knowledge management system access. Inform. Systems Res. 22(4):855–866.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenberger R, Fasolo P, Davis-LaMastro V (1990) Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment, and innovation. J. Appl. Psych. 75(1):51–59.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt KM (1985) Control: Organizational and economic approaches. Management Sci. 31(2):134–149.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ejnefjäll T, Ågerfalk PJ (2019) Conceptualizing workarounds: Meanings and manifestations in information systems research. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems 45:340–363.Google Scholar
  • Ferneley EH, Sobreperez P (2006) Resist, comply or workaround? An examination of different facets of user engagement with information systems. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 15(4):345–356.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiol CM, Lyles MA (1985) Organizational learning. Acad. Management Rev. 10(4):803–813.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Marketing Res. 18(1):39–50.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gartner (2024) Market share: Enterprise resource planning, worldwide, 2023. Accessed May 28, 2024, https://www.gartner.com/en/documents/5467895.Google Scholar
  • Gasser L (1986) The integration of computing and routine work. ACM Trans. Inform. Systems 4(3):205–225.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gelfand MJ, Jackson JC (2016) From one mind to many: The emerging science of cultural norms. Current Opinion Psych. 8:175–181.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gelfand MJ, Harrington JR, Jackson JC (2017) The strength of social norms across human groups. Perspect. Psych. Sci. 12(5):800–809.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gelfand MJ, Lim B-C, Raver JL (2004) Culture and accountability in organizations: Variations in forms of social control across cultures. Human Resource Management Rev. 14(1):135–160.Google Scholar
  • Gelfand MJ, Nishii LH, Raver JL (2006) On the nature and importance of cultural tightness-looseness. J. Appl. Psych. 91(6):1225–1244.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gelfand MJ, Raver JL, Nishii L, Leslie LM, Lun J, Lim BC, Van de Vliert E (2011) Differences between tight and loose cultures: A 33-nation study. Science 332(6033):1100–1104.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ghasemaghaei M, Turel O (2022) Why do data analysts take it-mediated shortcuts? An ego-depletion perspective. J. Management Inform. Systems 39(2):483–512.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goh JM, Gao G, Agarwal R (2011) Evolving work routines: Adaptive routinization of information technology in healthcare. Inform. Systems Res. 22(3):565–585.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Goncalo JA, Duguid MM (2012) Follow the crowd in a new direction: When conformity pressure facilitates group creativity (and when it does not). Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 118(1):14–23.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenbaum RL, Bonner JM, Mawritz MB, Butts MM, Smith MB (2020) It is all about the bottom line: Group bottom‐line mentality, psychological safety, and group creativity. J. Organ. Behav. 41(6):503–517.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gwebu KL, Wang J, Hu MY (2020) Information security policy noncompliance: An integrative social influence model. Inform. Systems J. 30(2):220–269.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haag S, Eckhardt A, Venkatesh V (2022) Deviant affordances: When tensions, deadlocks and nonconformance generate performance. MIS Quart. 46(4):2111–2162CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harrington JR, Gelfand MJ (2014) Tightness–looseness across the 50 United States. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111(22):7990–7995.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Herath T, Rao HR (2009) Protection motivation and deterrence: A framework for security policy compliance in organisations. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 18(2):106–125.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Higgins ET (1996) The “self digest”: Self-knowledge serving self-regulatory functions. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 71(6):1062–1083.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hofstede GH, Hofstede GJ, Minkov M (2005) Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  • Hsu JS-C, Shih S-P, Hung YW, Lowry PB (2015) The role of extra-role behaviors and social controls in information security policy effectiveness. Inform. Systems Res. 26(2):282–300.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ignatiadis I, Nandhakumar J (2009) The effect of ERP system workarounds on organizational control: An interpretivist case study. Scandinavian J. Inform. Systems 21(2):59–90.Google Scholar
  • Johnson BM, Rice RE (1987) Managing Organizational Innovation: The Evolution from Word Processing to Office Information Systems (Columbia University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Kang S, Lim KH, Kim MS, Yang H-D (2012) Research note—A multilevel analysis of the effect of group appropriation on collaborative technologies use and performance. Inform. Systems Res. 23(1):214–230.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kc DS, Staats BR, Kouchaki M, Gino F (2020) Task selection and workload: A focus on completing easy tasks hurts performance. Management Sci. 66(10):4397–4416.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ke W, Kang L, Tan C-H, Peng C-H (2021) User competence with enterprise systems: The effects of work environment factors. Inform. Systems Res. 32(3):860–875.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keppler SM (2024) Little’s law and educational inequality: A comparative case study of teacher workaround productivity. Management Sci. 70(5)2756–2778.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kim YJ, Toh SM (2019) Stuck in the past? The influence of a leader’s past cultural experience on group culture and positive and negative group deviance. Acad. Management J. 62(3):944–969.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koppel R, Wetterneck T, Telles JL, Karsh B-T (2008) Workarounds to barcode medication administration systems: Their occurrences, causes, and threats to patient safety. J. Amer. Medical Informatics Assoc. 15(4):408–423.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kozlowski SWJ, Bell BS (2013) Work groups and teams in organizations. Weiner IB, ed. Handbook of Psychology, 2nd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ), 333–375.Google Scholar
  • Laumer S, Maier C, Weitzel T (2017) Information quality, user satisfaction, and the manifestation of workarounds: A qualitative and quantitative study of enterprise content management system users. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 26(4):333–360.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • LeBreton JM, Senter JL (2008) Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organ. Res. Methods 11(4):815–852.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li R, Gordon S, Gelfand MJ (2017) Tightness–looseness: A new framework to understand consumer behavior. J. Consumer Psych. 27(3):377–391.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li XX, Hsieh JJPA, Rai A (2013) Motivational differences across post-acceptance information system usage behaviors: An investigation in the business intelligence systems context. Inform. Systems Res. 24(3):659–682.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Liang H, Xue Y, Wu L (2013) Ensuring employees’ IT compliance: Carrot or stick? Inform. Systems Res. 24(2):279–294.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lindell MK, Whitney DJ (2001) Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. J. Appl. Psych. 86(1):114–121.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liu C-W, Gao G, Agarwal R (2019) Unraveling the “social” in social norms: The conditioning effect of user connectivity. Inform. Systems Res. 30(4):1272–1295.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ma A, Savani K, Liu F, Tai K, Kay AC (2023) The mutual constitution of culture and psyche: The bidirectional relationship between individuals’ perceived control and cultural tightness–looseness. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 124(5):901–916.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff PM, Podsakoff NP (2011) Construct measurement and validation procedures in MIS and behavioral research: Integrating new and existing techniques. MIS Quart. 35(2):293–334.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Malaurent J, Avison D (2016) Reconciling global and local needs: A canonical action research project to deal with workarounds. Inform. Systems J. 26(3):227–257.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Malaurent J, Karanasios S (2020) Learning from workaround practices: The challenge of enterprise system implementations in multinational corporations. Inform. Systems J. 30(4):639–663.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maruping LM, Venkatesh V, Thong JY, Zhang X (2019) A risk mitigation framework for information technology projects: A cultural contingency perspective. J. Management Inform. Systems 36(1):120–157.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mason CH, Perreault WD (1991) Collinearity, power, and interpretation of multiple regression analysis. J. Marketing Res. 28(3):268–280.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morris MG, Venkatesh V (2010) Job characteristics and job satisfaction: Understanding the role of enterprise resource planning system implementation. MIS Quart. 34(1):143–161.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morrison B (2015) The problem with workarounds is that they work: The persistence of resource shortages. J. Oper. Management 39(40):79–91.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oliva R, Sterman JD (2001) Cutting corners and working overtime: Quality erosion in the service industry. Management Sci. 47(7):894–914.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski WJ (2000) Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. 11(4):404–428.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski WJ, Barley SR (2001) Technology and institutions: What can research on information technology and research on organizations learn from each other? MIS Quart. 25(2):145–165.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski WJ, Robey D (1991) Information technology and the structuring of organizations. Inform. Systems Res. 2(2):143–169.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Park S, Mathieu JE, Grosser TJ (2020) A network conceptualization of team conflict. Acad. Management Rev. 45(2):352–375.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pavlou PA, Gefen D (2004) Building effective online marketplaces with institution-based trust. Inform. Systems Res. 15(1):37–59.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Peng Z, Guo X (2019) A multilevel investigation on antecedents for employees’ exploration of enterprise systems. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 28(4):439–456.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Petrides LA, McClelland SI, Nodine TR (2004) Costs and benefits of the workaround: Inventive solution or costly alternative. Internat. J. Ed. Management 18(2):100–108.Google Scholar
  • Pine KH, Mazmanian M (2017) Artful and contorted coordinating: The ramifications of imposing formal logics of task jurisdiction on situated practice. Acad. Management J. 60(2):720–742.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J-Y, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. 88(5):879–903.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Qin X, Yam KC, Chen C, Li W, Dong X (2021) Talking about COVID-19 is positively associated with team cultural tightness: Implications for team deviance and creativity. J. Appl. Psych. 106(4):530–541.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rice RE, Cooper SD (2010) Organizations and Unusual Routines: A Systems Analysis of Dysfunctional Feedback Processes (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Salvador F, Alba C, Madiedo JP, Tenhiälä A, Bendoly E (2021) Project managers’ breadth of experience, project complexity, and project performance. J. Oper. Management 67(6):729–754.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sasidharan S, Santhanam R, Brass DJ, Sambamurthy V (2012) The effects of social network structure on enterprise systems success: A longitudinal multilevel analysis. Inform. Systems Res. 23(3):658–678.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schwartz SH (1994) Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. Kim U, Triandis HC, Kagiticibasi C, Choi S, Yoon G, eds. Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method, and Applications (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 85–119.Google Scholar
  • Six F, Sorge A (2008) Creating a high‐trust organization: An exploration into organizational policies that stimulate interpersonal trust building. J. Management Stud. 45(5):857–884.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spierings A, Kerr D, Houghton L (2017) Issues that support the creation of ICT workarounds: Towards a theoretical understanding of feral information systems. Inform. Systems J. 27(6):775–794.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Srite M, Karahanna E (2006) The role of espoused national cultural values in technology acceptance. MIS Quart. 30(3):679–704.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sun H (2012) Understanding user revisions when using information system features: Adaptive system use and triggers. MIS Quart. 36(2):453–478.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sun Y, Fang Y, Lim KH, Straub DW (2012) User satisfaction with information technology service delivery: A social capital perspective. Inform. Systems Res. 23(4):1195–1211.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sykes TA (2020) Enterprise system implementation and employee job outcomes: Understanding the role of formal and informal support structures using the job strain model. MIS Quart. 44(4):2055–2086.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sykes T, Venkatesh V (2017) Explaining post-implementation employee system use and job performance: Impacts of the content and source of social network ties. MIS Quart. 41(3):917–936.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sykes TA, Venkatesh V, Johnson JL (2014) Enterprise system implementation and employee job performance: Understanding the role of advice networks. MIS Quart. 38(1):51–72.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Talhelm T, English AS (2020) Historically rice-farming societies have tighter social norms in China and worldwide. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117(33):19816–19824.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tenhiälä A, Helkiö P (2015) Performance effects of using an ERP system for manufacturing planning and control under dynamic market requirements. J. Oper. Management 36(1):147–164.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tong Y, Tan SS-L, Teo H-H (2015) The road to early success: Impact of system use in the swift response phase. Inform. Systems Res. 26(2):418–436.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Trieu V-H, Burton-Jones A, Green P, Cockcroft S (2022) Applying and extending the theory of effective use in a business intelligence context. MIS Quart. 46(1):645–678.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tucker AL (2004) The impact of operational failures on hospital nurses and their patients. J. Oper. Management 22(2):151–169.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tucker AL (2016) The impact of workaround difficulty on frontline employees’ response to operational failures: A laboratory experiment on medication administration. Management Sci. 62(4):1124–1144.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tucker AL, Zheng S, Gardner JW, Bohn RE (2020) When do workarounds help or hurt patient outcomes? The moderating role of operational failures. J. Oper. Management 66(1–2):67–90.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uz I (2015) The index of cultural tightness and looseness among 68 countries. J. Cross-Cultural Psych. 46(3):319–335.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van Beijsterveld JA, Van Groenendaal WJ (2016) Solving misfits in ERP implementations by SMEs. Inform. Systems J. 26(4):369–393.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V, Davis FD (2000) A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Sci. 46(2):186–204.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V, Brown SA, Sullivan Y (2016) Guidelines for conducting mixed-methods research: An extension and illustration. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 17(7):435–495.Google Scholar
  • Venkatesh V, Davis F, Cheung C, Lee Z (2023) Cyberslacking in the workplace: Antecedents and effects on job performance. MIS Quart. 47(1):281–316.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD (2003) User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quart. 27(3):425–478.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wand Y, Weber R (1995) On the deep structure of information systems. Inform. Systems J. 5(3):203–223.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wiesche M, Böhm N, Schermann M (2024) Digital desire paths: Exploring the role of computer workarounds in emergent information systems design. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 33(2):145–160.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Xue Y, Liang H, Wu L (2011) Punishment, justice, and compliance in mandatory it settings. Inform. Systems Res. 22(2):400–414.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang X (2017) Knowledge management system use and job performance: A multilevel contingency model. MIS Quart. 41(3):811–840.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang X, Venkatesh V (2017) A nomological network of knowledge management system use: Antecedents and consequences. MIS Quart. 41(4):1275–1306.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhou J, Fang Y, Grover V (2022) Managing collective enterprise information systems compliance: A social and performance management context perspective. MIS Quart. 46(1):71–99.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.