Uncovering the Neural Processes of Privacy: A Neurally Informed Behavioral Intervention to Protect Information Privacy

References

• Ackerman M, Mainwaring S (2005) Privacy issues and human-computer interaction. Computer 27(5):19–26.Google Scholar
• Acquisti A, Gross R (2006) Imagined communities: Awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the Facebook. Danezis G, Golle P, eds. Privacy Enhancing Technologies, vol. 4258 (Springer, Berlin), 36–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acquisti A, Grossklags J (2005) Privacy and rationality in individual decision making. IEEE Security Privacy (1):26–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acquisti A, Brandimarte L, Loewenstein G (2015) Privacy and human behavior in the age of information. Science 347(6221):509–514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acquisti A, John LK, Loewenstein G (2013) What is privacy worth? J. Legal Stud. 42(2):249–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acquisti A, Adjerid I, Balebako R, Brandimarte L, Cranor LF, Komanduri S, Leon PG, et al. (2017) Nudges for privacy and security: Understanding and assisting users’ choices online. ACM Comput. Survey 50(3):1–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adjerid I, Acquisti A, Brandimarte L, Loewenstein G (2013) Sleights of privacy: Framing, disclosures, and the limits of transparency. Proc. 9th Sympos. on Usable Privacy and Security (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 1–11.Google Scholar
• Altman I (1975) The Environment and Social Behavior: Privacy, Personal Space, Territory, and Crowding (Brookes, Monterey, CA).Google Scholar
• Anderson BB, Kirwan CB, Eargle D, Jensen SR, Vance A (2015a) Neural correlates of gender differences and color in distinguishing security warnings and legitimate websites: A neurosecurity study. J. Cybersecurity 1(1):109–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson BB, Vance A, Kirwan CB, Jenkins JL, Eargle D (2016) From warning to wallpaper: Why the brain habituates to security warnings and what can be done about it. J. Management Inform. Systems 33(3):713–743.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson BB, Kirwan CB, Jenkins JL, Eargle D, Howard S, Vance A (2015b) How Polymorphic Warnings Reduce Habituation in the Brain—Insights from an fMRI Study (ACM, New York).Google Scholar
• Ashburner J, Friston KJ (2005) Unified segmentation. Neuroimage 26(3):839–851.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Awad NF, Krishnan MS (2006) The personalization privacy paradox: An empirical evaluation of information transparency and the willingness to be profiled online for personalization. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 30(1):13–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balebako R, Schaub F, Adjerid I, Acquisti A, Cranor L (2015) The impact of timing on the salience of smartphone app privacy notices. Proc. 5th Annual ACM CCS Workshop on Security and Privacy in Smartphones and Mobile Devices (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 63–74.Google Scholar
• Bansal G, Zahedi FM, Gefen D (2010) The impact of personal dispositions on information sensitivity, privacy concern and trust in disclosing health information online. Decision Support Systems 49(2):138–150.Google Scholar
• Barnes SB (2006) A privacy paradox: Social networking in the United States. First Monday 11(9).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumeister RF, Bratslavsky E, Finkenauer C, Vohs KD (2001) Bad is stronger than good. Rev. General Psych. 5(4):323–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bélanger F, Crossler RE (2011) Privacy in the digital age: A review of information privacy research in information systems. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 35(4):1017–1041.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benartzi S, Thaler RH (2004) Save more tomorrow: Using behavioral economics to increase employee savings. J. Political Econom. 112:S164–S187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blank G, Bolsover G, Dubois E (2014) A new privacy paradox: Young people and privacy on social network sites. Proc. Annual Meeting of the Amer. Sociol. Assoc. (Oxford Internet Institute, Oxford, UK), 1–34.Google Scholar
• Botvinick MM, Braver TS, Barch DM, Carter CS, Cohen JD (2001) Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psych. Rev. 108(3):624–652.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boyd D, Crawford K (2012) Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Inform. Comm. Soc. 15(5):662–679.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brough AR, Norton DA, Sciarappa SL, John LK (2022) The bulletproof glass effect: Unintended consequences of privacy notices. J. Marketing Res. 59(4):739–754.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buckman JR, Bockstedt JC, Hashim MJ (2019) Relative privacy valuations under varying disclosure characteristics. Inform. Systems Res. 30(2):375–388.Link, Google Scholar
• Chellappa RK, Sin RG (2005) Personalization vs. privacy: An empirical examination of the online consumer’s dilemma. Inform. Tech. Management 6(2–3):181–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corbetta M, Shulman GL (2002) Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 3(3):201–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corbetta M, Patel G, Shulman GL (2008) The reorienting system of the human brain: From environment to theory of mind. Neuron 58(3):306–324.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Costa-Gomes M, Crawford VP, Broseta B (2001) Cognition and behavior in normal-form games: An experimental study. Econometrica 69(5):1193–1235.Google Scholar
• Crossler RE, Belanger F (2019) Why would i use location-protective settings on my smartphone? Motivating protective behaviors and the existence of the privacy knowledge–belief gap. Inform. Systems Res. 30(3):995–1006.Link, Google Scholar
• Culnan MJ (1995) Consumer awareness of name removal procedures: Implications for direct marketing. J. Direct Marketing 9(2):10–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Culnan MJ, Armstrong PK (1999) Information privacy concerns, procedural fairness, and impersonal trust: An empirical investigation. Organ. Sci. 10(1):104–115.Link, Google Scholar
• Culnan MJ, Bies RJ (2003) Consumer privacy: Balancing economic and justice considerations. J. Soc. Issues 59(2):323–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daw ND, O’Doherty JP, Dayan P, Seymour B, Dolan RJ (2006) Cortical substrates for exploratory decisions in humans. Nature 441(7095):876–879.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Debatin B, Lovejoy JP, Horn A-K, Hughes BN (2009) Facebook and online privacy: Attitudes, behaviors, and unintended consequences. J. Comput. Mediated Comm. 15(1):83–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dimoka A (2010) What does the brain tell us about trust and distrust? Evidence from a functional neuroimaging study. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 34(2):373–396.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dimoka A (2012) How to conduct a functional magnetic resonance (fMRI) study in social science research. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 36(3):811–840.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dimoka A, Pavlou PA, Davis FD (2011) Research commentary: NeuroIS: The potential of cognitive neuroscience for information systems research. Inform. Systems Res. 22(4):687–702.Link, Google Scholar
• Dimoka A, Davis FD, Gupta A, Pavlou PA, Banker RD, Dennis AR, Ischebeck A, et al. (2012) On the use of neurophysiological tools in IS research: Developing a research agenda for NeuroIS. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 36(3):679–702.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dinev T, Hart P (2006) An extended privacy calculus model for e-commerce transactions. Inform. Systems Res. 17(1):61–80.Link, Google Scholar
• Dinner I, Johnson EJ, Goldstein DG, Liu KY (2011) Partitioning default effects: Why people choose not to choose. J. Experiment. Psych. Appl. 17(4):332–341.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eastlick MA, Lotz SL, Warrington P (2006) Understanding online B-to-C relationships: An integrated model of privacy concerns, trust, and commitment. J. Bus. Res. 59(8):877–886.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Featherman MS, Pavlou PA (2003) Predicting e-services adoption: A perceived risk facets perspective. Internat. J. Human Comput. Stud. 59(4):451–474.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friston KJ, Holmes AP, Poline JB, Grasby PJ, Williams SCR, Frackowiak RSJ, Turner R (1995) Analysis of fMRI time-series revisted. Neuroimage 2(1):45–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Good NS, Grossklags J, Mulligan DK, Konstan JA (2007) Noticing notice: A large-scale experiment on the timing of software license agreements. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. on Human Factors in Comput. Systems (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 607–616.Google Scholar
• Gopal RD, Hidaji H, Patterson RA, Rolland E, Zhdanov D (2018) How much to share with third parties? User privacy concerns and website dilemmas. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 42(1):143–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gross R, Acquisti A (2005) Information revelation and privacy in online social networks. Proc. ACM Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 71–80.Google Scholar
• Grossklags J, Acquisti A (2007) When 25 Cents Is Too Much: An Experiment on Willingness-to-Sell and Willingness-To-Protect Personal Information (WEIS).Google Scholar
• Hann I-H, Hui K-L, Lee S-YT, Png IP (2007) Overcoming online information privacy concerns: An information-processing theory approach. J. Management Inform. Systems 24(2):13–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong W, Thong JY (2013) Internet privacy concerns: An integrated conceptualization and four empirical studies. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 37(1):275–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoy MG, Milne G (2010) Gender differences in privacy-related measures for young adult Facebook users. J. Interactive Advertising 10(2):28–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hui K-L, Teo HH, Lee S-YT (2007) The value of privacy assurance: An exploratory field experiment. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 31(1):19–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hutcherson CA, Montaser-Kouhsari L, Woodward J, Rangel A (2015) Emotional and utilitarian appraisals of moral dilemmas are encoded in separate areas and integrated in ventromedial prefrontal cortex. J. Neurosci. 35(36):12593.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jahangir N, Begum N (2007) Effect of Perceived usefulness, ease of use, security and privacy on customer attitude and adaptation in the context of e-banking. J. Management Res. 7(3):147–157.Google Scholar
• Jiang Z, Heng CS, Choi BC (2013) Research note—Privacy concerns and privacy-protective behavior in synchronous online social interactions. Inform. Systems Res. 24(3):579–595.Link, Google Scholar
• Johnson EJ (2022) The Elements of Choice: Why the Way We Decide Matters (Simon & Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
• Johnson EJ, Goldstein D (2003) Medicine: Do defaults save lives? Science 302(5649):1338–1339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kelly MP, Barker M (2016) Why is changing health-related behaviour so difficult? Public Health 136:109–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kluver H, Bucy PC (1937) “Psychic blindness” and other symptoms following bilateral temporal lobectomy in rhesus monkeys. Amer. J. Physiology 119:352–353.Google Scholar
• Knutson B, Fong GW, Adams CM, Varner JL, Hommer D (2001) Dissociation of reward anticipation and outcome with event-related fMRI. Neuroreport 12(17):3683–3687.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knutson B, Rick S, Wirnmer GE, Prelec D, Loewenstein G (2007) Neural predictors of purchases. Neuron 53(1):147–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kokolakis S (2017) Privacy attitudes and privacy behaviour: A review of current research on the privacy paradox phenomenon. Comput. Security 64:122–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumar N, Mohan K, Holowczak R (2008) Locking the door but leaving the computer vulnerable: Factors inhibiting home users’ adoption of software firewalls. Decision Support Systems 46(1):254–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• LeDoux JE (2000) Emotion circuits in the brain. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 23:155–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leon P, Ur B, Shay R, Wang Y, Balebako R, Cranor L (2012) Why Johnny can’t opt out: A usability evaluation of tools to limit online behavioral advertising. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. on Human Factors in Comput. Systems (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 589–598.Google Scholar
• Lu Y, Tan B, Hui K-L (2004) Inducing customers to disclose personal information to internet businesses with social adjustment benefits. Proc. 25th Internat. Conf. Information Systems (Association for Information Systems, Atlanta), 45.Google Scholar
• MacDonald AW, Cohen JD, Stenger VA, Carter CS (2000) Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. Science 288(5472):1835–1838.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malhotra NK, Kim SS, Agarwal J (2004) Internet users’ information privacy concerns (IUIPC): The construct, the scale, and a causal model. Inform. Systems Res. 15(4):336–355.Link, Google Scholar
• Mather M, Cacioppo JT, Kanwisher N (2013) How fMRI can inform cognitive theories. Perspective Psych. Sci. 8(1):108–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meservy TO, Fadel KJ, Kirwan CB, Meservy RD (2019) An fMRI exploration of information processing in electronic networks of practice. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 43(3):851–872.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milne GR, Culnan MJ (2004) Strategies for reducing online privacy risks: Why consumers read (or don’t read) online privacy notices. J. Interactive Marketing 18(3):15–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mobbs D, Petrovic P, Marchant JL, Hassabis D, Weiskopf N, Seymour B, Dolan RJ, Frith CD (2007) When fear is near: Threat imminence elicits prefrontal-periaqueductal gray shifts in humans. Science 317(5841):1079–1083.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mobbs D, Marchant JL, Hassabis D, Seymour B, Tan G, Gray M, Petrovic P, et al. (2009) From threat to fear: The neural organization of defensive fear systems in humans. J. Neurosci. 29(39):12236–12243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nichols JL (1994) Changing public behavior for better health: Is education enough? Amer. J. Preventive Medicine 10(3, suppl): 19–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pavlou PA (2003) Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. Internat. J. Electronic Commerce 7(3):101–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pavlou PA, Gefen D (2004) Building effective online marketplaces with institution-based trust. Inform. Systems Res. 15(1):37–59.Link, Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center (2021) Social Media Use in 2021. Report, Pew Research Center, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Phelps EA (2006) Emotion and cognition: Insights from studies of the human amygdala. Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 57 (Annual Reviews, Palo Alto, CA), 27–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phelps EA, LeDoux JE (2005) Contributions of the amygdala to emotion processing: From animal models to human behavior. Neuron.48(2):175–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Posner MI, DiGirolamo GJ (2000) Cognitive neuroscience: Origins and promise. Psych. Bull. 126(6):873–889.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Preuschoff K, Quartz SR, Bossaerts P (2008) Human Insula activation reflects risk prediction errors as well as risk. J. Neurosci. 28(11):2745–2752.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Randolph A, Karmakar S, Jackson M (2006) Towards predicting control of a Brain-computer interface. Proc. 26th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (Association for Information Systems, Atlanta), 53.Google Scholar
• Randolph AB, Pierquet S (2015) Bringing advertising closer to mind: Using neurophysiological tools to understand student responses to Super Bowl commercials. Proc. IEEE 48th Internat. Conf. on System Sci. (IEEE, New York), 517–522.Google Scholar
• Rangel A, Camerer C, Montague PR (2008) A framework for studying the neurobiology of value-based decision making. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 9(7):545–556.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Riedl R, Randolph A, vom Brocke J, Léger P-M, Dimoka A (2010) The potential of neuroscience for human-computer interaction research. Proc. 9th Annual Pre-ICIS Workshop on HCI Res. in MIS (Association for Information Systems, Atlanta), 1–5.Google Scholar
• Safi R, Walden E, Cogo G, Lucus D, Moradiabadi E (2015) An evolutionary explanation of graph comprehension using fMRI. Information Systems and Neuroscience (Springer, Berlin), 117–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Science and Technology Committee (2011) Behaviour change – second report. Report, Authority of the House of Lords.Google Scholar
• Sheehan KB (1999) An investigation of gender differences in on-line privacy concerns and resultant behaviors. J. Interactive Marketing 13(4):24–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shin D-H (2010) The effects of trust, security and privacy in social networking: A security-based approach to understand the pattern of adoption. Interactive Comput. 22(5):428–438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1955) A behavioral model of rational choice. Quart. J. Econom. 69(1):99–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith HJ, Dinev T, Xu H (2011) Information privacy reserach: An interdisciplinary review. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 35(4):989–1015.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith HJ, Milberg SJ, Burke SJ (1996) Information privacy: Measuring individuals’ concerns about organizational practices. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 20(2):167–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutanto J, Palme E, Tan C-H, Phang CW (2013) Addressing the personalization-privacy paradox: An empirical assessment from a field experiment on smartphone users. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 37(4):1141–1164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sweeney L, von Loewenfeldt M, Perry M (2018) Saying it’s anonymous doesn?t make it so: Re-identifications of “anonymized” law school data. Technology Science (November 12), https://techscience.org/a/2018111301/.Google Scholar
• Tene O, Polonetsky J (2012) Privacy in the age of big data: A time for big decisions. Stanford Law Rev. Online 64:63.Google Scholar
• Thaler RH, Sunstein CR (2008) Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
• Tsai JY, Egelman S, Cranor L, Acquisti A (2011) The effect of online privacy information on purchasing behavior: An experimental study. Inform. Systems Res. 22(2):254–268.Link, Google Scholar
• Turel O, He Q, Xue G, Xiao L, Bechara A (2014) Examination of neural systems sub-serving Facebook “addition”. Psych. Rep. 115(3):675–695.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vance A, Anderson BB, Kirwan CB, Eargle D (2014) Using measures of risk perception to predict information security behavior: Insights from electroencephalography (EEG). J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 15(10):679–722.Google Scholar
• Vance A, Jenkins JL, Anderson BB, Bjornn DK, Kirwan CB (2018) Tuning out security warnings: A longitudinal examination of habituation through fMRI, eye tracking, and field experiments. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 42(2):355–380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatraman V, Dimoka A, Pavlou PA, Vo K, Hampton W, Bollinger B, Hershfield HE, et al. (2015) Predicting advertising success beyond traditional measures: New insights from neurophysiological methods and market response modeling. J. Marketing Res. 52(4):436–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Leon PG, Acquisti A, Cranor LF, Forget A, Sadeh N (2014) A field trial of privacy nudges for facebook. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. on Human Factors in Comput. Systems (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 2367–2376.Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Leon PG, Scott K, Chen X, Acquisti A, Cranor LF (2013) Privacy nudges for social media: An exploratory Facebook study. Proc. 22nd Internat. Conf. on World Wide Web Companion (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 763–770.Google Scholar
• Warkentin M, Walden EA, Johnston AC, Straub DW (2015) Neural correlates of protection motivation for secure IT behaviors: An fMRI exploration. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 13(7):194–215.Google Scholar
• Westin AF (1968) Privacy and freedom. Washington Lee Law Rev. 25(1):166.Google Scholar
• White House (2014a) Big data: Seizing opportunities, preserving values. Report. USA: Executive Office of the President, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• White House (2014b) Report to the president, big data and privacy: A technology perspective. Report. USA: Executive Office of the President, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Winkler AM, Ridgway GR, Webster MA, Smith SM, Nichols TE (2014) Permutation inference for the general linear model. Neuroimage 92:381–397.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wirth J, Maier C, Laumer S, Weitzel T (2021) Laziness as an explanation for the privacy paradox: A longitudinal empirical investigation. Internet Res. 32(1):24–54.Google Scholar
• Xu H (2007) The effects of self-construal and perceived control on privacy concerns. Proc. 28th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (Association for Information Systems, Atlanta), 125.Google Scholar
• Xu H, Crossler RE, BéLanger F (2012) A value sensitive design investigation of privacy enhancing tools in web browsers. Decision Support Systems 54(1):424–433.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xu H, Dinev T, Smith HJ, Hart P (2008) Examining the formation of individual’s privacy concerns: Toward an integrative view. Proc. 29th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (Association for Information Systems, Atlanta), 6.Google Scholar
• Youn S, Hall K (2008) Gender and online privacy among teens: Risk perception, privacy concerns, and protection behaviors. Cyberpsych. Behav. 11(6):763–765.Crossref, Google Scholar