CEO Human Capital and Digital Product Innovation: A Dynamic Managerial Capabilities Perspective

References

• Adner R, Helfat CE (2003) Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities. Strategic Management J. 24(10):1011–1025.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aguinis H, Edwards JR, Bradley KJ (2017) Improving our understanding of moderation and mediation in strategic management research. Organ. Res. Methods 20(4):665–685.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahn JM, Minshall T, Mortara L (2017) Understanding the human side of openness: The fit between open innovation modes and CEO characteristics. R&D Management 47(5):727–740.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong CP, Sambamurthy V (1999) Information technology assimilation in firms: The influence of senior leadership and IT infrastructures. Inform. Systems Res. 10(4):304–327.Link, Google Scholar
• Augier M, Teece DJ (2009) Dynamic capabilities and the role of managers in business strategy and economic performance. Organ. Sci. 20(2):410–421.Link, Google Scholar
• Banker RD, (Qian) Feng C, Pavlou PA (2022) Businessperson or technologist: Stock market reaction to the alignment between CIO background and firm strategy. J. Management Inform. Systems 39(4):1006–1036.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barker VL, Mueller GC (2002) CEO characteristics and firm R&D spending. Management Sci. 48(6):782–801.Link, Google Scholar
• Bendig D, Wagner R, Jung C, Nüesch S (2022) When and why technology leadership enters the C-Suite: An antecedents perspective on CIO presence. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 31(1):101705.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bendig D, Wagner R, Piening EP, Foege JN (2023) Attention to digital innovation: Exploring the impact of a chief information officer in the top management team. MIS Quart. 47(4):1487–1516.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Schoar A (2003) Managing with style: The effect of managers on firm policies. Quart. J. Econom. 118(4):1169–1208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blau PM (1977) Inequality and Heterogeneity: A Primitive Theory of Social Structure (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Bowman EH, Hurry D (1993) Strategy through the option lens: An integrated view of resource investments and the incremental-choice process. Acad. Management Rev. 18(4):760–782.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bragaw NA, Misangyi VF (2017) The value of CEO mobility: Contextual factors that shape the impact of prior CEO experience on market performance and CEO compensation. Human Resource Management 56(2):243–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Busenbark JR, Graffin SD, Campbell RJ, Lee EY (2022) A marginal effects approach to interpreting main effects and moderation. Organ. Res. Methods 25(1):147–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buyl T, Boone C, Hendriks W, Matthyssens P (2011) Top management team functional diversity and firm performance: The moderating role of CEO characteristics. J. Management Stud. 48(1):151–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell JT, Bilgili H, Crossland C, Ajay B (2022) The background on executive background: An integrative review. J. Management 49(1):7–51.Google Scholar
• Chandy RK, Tellis GJ (2000) The incumbent’s curse? Incumbency, size, and radical product innovation. J. Marketing 64(7):1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chanias S, Myers MD, Hess T (2019) Digital transformation strategy making in pre-digital organizations: The case of a financial services provider. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 28(1):17–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen DQ, Zhang Y, Xiao J, Xie K (2021) Making digital innovation happen: A chief information officer issue selling perspective. Inform. Systems Res. 32(3):987–1008.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Tang G, Jin J, Xie Q, Li J (2014) CEOs’ transformational leadership and product innovation performance: The roles of corporate entrepreneurship and technology orientation. J. Production Innovation Management 31(S1):2–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cho TS, Hambrick DC (2006) Attention as the mediator between top management team characteristics and strategic change: The case of airline deregulation. Organ. Sci. 17(4):453–469.Link, Google Scholar
• Choi I, Chung S, Han K, Pinsonneault A (2021) CEO risk-taking incentives and IT innovation: The moderating role of a CEO’s IT-related human capital. MIS Quart. 45(4):2175–2192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Creswell JW (2014) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches, 4th ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Cummings T, Knott AM (2018) Outside CEOs and innovation. Strategic Management J. 39(8):2095–2119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daellenbach US, McCarthy AM, Schoenecker TS (1999) Commitment to innovation: The impact of top management team characteristics. R&D Management 29(3):199–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Massis A, Audretsch D, Uhlaner L, Kammerlander N (2018) Innovation with limited resources: Management lessons from the German Mittelstand. J. Production Innovation Management 35(1):125–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dess GG, Beard DW (1984) Dimensions of organizational task environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 29(1):52–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dixon WJ (1960) Simplified estimation from censored normal samples. Ann. Math. Statist. 31(2):385–391.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dong JQ (2021) Technological choices under uncertainty: Does organizational aspiration matter? Strategic Management J. 42(5):898–916.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eggers JP, Kaplan S (2008) Cognition and renewal: Comparing CEO and organizational effects on incumbent adaptation to technical change. Organ. Sci. 20(2):461–477.Link, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Martin JA (2000) Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management J. 21(10/11):1105–1121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• El Sawy OA, Amsinck H, Kræmmergaard P, Vinther AL (2016) How LEGO built the foundations and enterprise capabilities for digital leadership. MIS Quart. Executive 15(2):141–166.Google Scholar
• Elenkov D, Manev I (2005) Top management leadership and influence on innovation: The role of sociocultural context. J. Management 31(3):381–402.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fainshmidt S, Pezeshkan A, Lance Frazier M, Nair A, Markowski E (2016) Dynamic capabilities and organizational performance: A meta-analytic evaluation and extension. J. Management Stud. 53(8):1348–1380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finkelstein S, Hambrick DC (1990) Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(3):484–503.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Firk S, Gehrke Y, Hanelt A, Wolff M (2022) Top management team characteristics and digital innovation: Exploring digital knowledge and TMT interfaces. Long Range Planning 55(3):102166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Furr N, Gaarlandt J, Shipilov A (2019) Don’t put a digital expert in charge of your digital transformation. Harvard Bus. Rev. (August 5), https://hbr.org/2019/08/dont-put-a-digital-expert-in-charge-of-your-digital-transformation.Google Scholar
• Gal U, Berente N, Chasin F (2022) Technology lifecycles and digital technologies: Patterns of discourse across levels of materiality. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 23(5):1102–1149.Google Scholar
• Garms FP, Engelen A (2019) Innovation and R&D in the upper echelons: The association between the CTO’s power depth and breadth and the TMT’s commitment to innovation. J. Production Innovation Management 36(1):87–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gioia DA, Corley KG, Hamilton AL (2013) Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organ. Res. Methods 16(1):15–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gonzalez PA, Ashworth L, McKeen J (2019) The CIO stereotype: Content, bias, and impact. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 28(1):83–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC, Finkelstein S, Mooney AC (2005) Executive job demands: New insights for explaining strategic decisions and leader behaviors. Acad. Management Rev. 30(3):472–491.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanelt A, Bohnsack R, Marz D (2021) A systematic review of the literature on digital transformation: Insights and implications for strategy and organizational change. J. Management Stud. 58(5):1159–1197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanelt A, Firk S, Hildebrandt B, Kolbe LM (2020) Digital M&A, digital innovation, and firm performance: An empirical investigation. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 30(1):3–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison DA, Klein KJ (2007) What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 32(4):1199–1228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Havakhor T, Sabherwal R, Steelman ZR, Sabherwal S (2019) Relationships between information technology and other investments: A contingent interaction model. Inform. Systems Res. 30(1):291–305.Link, Google Scholar
• Helfat CE, Martin JA (2015) Dynamic managerial capabilities: Review and assessment of managerial impact on strategic change. J. Management 41(5):1281–1312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat CE, Peteraf MA (2015) Managerial cognitive capabilities and the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management J. 36(6):831–850.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat CE, Finkelstein S, Mitchell W, Peteraf M, Singh H, Teece D, Winter SG (2007) Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations (Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Hinings B, Gegenhuber T, Greenwood R (2018) Digital innovation and transformation: An institutional perspective. Inform. Organ. 28(1):52–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson RB, Onwuegbuzie AJ, Turner LA (2007) Toward a definition of mixed methods research. J. Mixed Methods Res. 1(2):112–133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jung J, Shin T (2019) Learning not to diversify: The transformation of graduate business education and the decline of diversifying acquisitions. Admin. Sci. Quart. 64(2):337–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaganer E, Gregory RW, Sarker S (2023) A process for managing digital transformation: An organizational inertia perspective. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 24(4):1005–1030.Google Scholar
• Kalnins A (2018) Multicollinearity: How common factors cause type 1 errors in multivariate regression. Strategic Management J. 39(8):2362–2385.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kane GC, Phillips N, Copulsky JR, Andrus GR (2019) The Technology Fallacy: How People Are the Real Thing to Digital Transformation (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S (2008) Framing contests: Strategy making under uncertainty. Organ. Sci. 19(5):729–752.Link, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S, Tripsas M (2008) Thinking about technology: Applying a cognitive lens to technical change. Res. Policy 37(5):790–805.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim J, Lee CY, Cho Y (2016) Technological diversification, core-technology competence, and firm growth. Res. Policy 45(1):113–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King T, Srivastav A, Williams J (2016) What’s in an education? Implications of CEO education for bank performance. J. Corporate Finance 37:287–308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleis L, Chwelos P, Ramirez RV, Cockburn I (2011) Information technology and intangible output: The impact of IT investment on innovation productivity. Inform. Systems Res. 23(1):42–59.Link, Google Scholar
• Kohli R, Melville NP (2019) Digital innovation: A review and synthesis. Inform. Systems J. 29(1):200–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee J, Berente N (2012) Digital innovation and the division of innovative labor: Digital controls in the automotive industry. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1428–1447.Link, Google Scholar
• Li L, Su F, Zhang W, Mao JY (2018) Digital transformation by SME entrepreneurs: A capability perspective. Inform. Systems J. 28(6):1129–1157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu Q (2006) How good is good news? Technology depth, book-to-market ratio, and innovative events. J. Accounting Auditing Finance 21(3):293–321.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lyytinen K (2021) Innovation logics in the digital era: A systemic review of the emerging digital innovation regime. Innovation 24(1):13–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lyytinen K, Yoo Y, Boland RJ (2016) Digital product innovation within four classes of innovation networks. Inform. Systems J. 26(1):47–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McMullan WE, Long WA (1987) Entrepreneurship education in the nineties. J. Bus. Ventures 2(3):261–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Menz M (2012) Functional top management team members. J. Management 38(1):45–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mithas S, Tafti A, Mitchell W (2013) How a firm’s competitive environment and digital strategic posture influence digital business strategy. MIS Quart. 37(2):511–536.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morse JM (2007) Sampling in grounded theory. Bryant A, Charmaz K, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory (SAGE Publications, London), 229–244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mudambi R, Swift T (2014) Knowing when to leap: Transitioning between exploitative and explorative R&D. Strategic Management J. 35(1):126–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Myers CG (2017) Coactive vicarious learning: Toward a relational theory of vicarious learning in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 43(4):610–634.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nadkarni S, Chen J (2014) Bridging yesterday, today, and tomorrow: CEO temporal focus, environmental dynamism, and rate of new product introduction. Acad. Management J. 57(6):1810–1833.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nadler DA, Heilpern J (1998) The CEO in the context of discontinuous change. Hambrick DC, Nadler DA, Tushman M, eds. Navigating Change: How CEOs, Top Teams, and Boards Steer Transformation (Harvard Business School Press, Boston), 3–27.Google Scholar
• Nambisan S, Lyytinen K, Majchrzak A, Song M (2017) Digital innovation management: Reinventing innovation management research in a digital world. MIS Quart. 41(1):223–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nath P, Bharadwaj N (2020) Chief marketing officer presence and firm performance: Assessing conditions under which the presence of other C-level functional executives matters. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 48(4):670–694.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Olie R, Van Iterson A, Simsek Z (2012) When do CEOs versus top management teams matter in explaining strategic decision-making processes? Toward an institutional view of strategic leadership effects. Internat. Stud. Management Organ. 42(4):86–105.Google Scholar
• Peppard J, Edwards C, Lambert R (2011) Clarifying the ambiguous role of the CIO. MIS Quart. Executive 10(1):31–44.Google Scholar
• Porter ME, Heppelmann JE (2015) How smart, connected products are transforming companies. Harvard Bus. Rev. 93(10):97–114.Google Scholar
• Priem RL, Rosenstein J (2000) Is organization theory obvious to practitioners? A test of one established theory. Organ. Sci. 11(5):509–524.Link, Google Scholar
• Reichertz J (2007) Abduction: The logic of discovery of grounded theory. Bryant A, Charmaz KC, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory (SAGE Publications, London), 214–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Richard OC, Wu J, Markoczy LA, Chung Y (2019) Top management team demographic-faultline strength and strategic change: What role does environmental dynamism play? Strategic Management J. 40(6):987–1009.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts N, Campbell DE, Vijayasarathy LR (2016) Using information systems to sense opportunities for innovation: Integrating postadoptive use behaviors with the dynamic managerial capability perspective. J. Management Inform. Systems 33(1):45–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rolland KH, Mathiassen L, Rai A (2018) Managing digital platforms in user organizations: The interactions between digital options and digital debt. Inform. Systems Res. 29(2):419–443.Link, Google Scholar
• Saldanha TJV, Sahaym A, Mithas S, Andrade-Rojas MG, Kathuria A, Lee HH (2020) Turning liabilities of global operations into assets: IT-enabled social integration capacity and exploratory innovation. Inform. Systems Res. 31(2):361–382.Link, Google Scholar
• Salvato C, Vassolo R (2018) The sources of dynamism in dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management J. 39(6):1728–1752.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schäper T, Bendig D, Foege JN, Wagner R (2025) Shaping innovation outcomes: The role of CIOs for firms’ digital exploration. J. Inform. Tech. 40(1):35–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilke O, Hu S, Helfat CE (2018) Quo vadis, dynamic capabilities? A content-analytic review of the current state of knowledge and recommendations for future research. Acad. Management Ann. 12(1):390–439.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schryen G (2013) Growing with smart products: Why customization capabilities matter for manufacturing firms. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 22(2):139–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schulz C, Kortmann S, Piller FT, Pollok P (2023) Growing with smart products: Why customization capabilities matter for manufacturing firms. J. Production Innovation Management 40(6):794–816.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Soluk J, Kammerlander N (2021) Digital transformation in family-owned Mittelstand firms: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 30(6):676–711.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srivastava SC, Chandra S (2018) Social presence in virtual world collaboration: An uncertainty reduction perspective using a mixed methods approach. MIS Quart. 42(3):779–803.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steininger D, Mikalef P, Pateli A, Guinea A (2022) Dynamic capabilities in information systems research: A critical review, synthesis of current knowledge, and recommendations for future research. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 23(2):447–490.Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin JM (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (SAGE Publications, London).Google Scholar
• Svahn F, Kristensson M (2023) Unpacking digital options thinking for innovation renewal: A Clinical inquiry into car connectivity. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 32(1):23–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Svahn F, Mathiassen L, Lindgren R (2017) Embracing digital innovation in incumbent firms: How Volvo cars managed competing concerns. MIS Quart. 41(1):239–253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Talke K, Salomo S, Kock A (2011) Top management team diversity and strategic innovation orientation: The relationship and consequences for innovativeness and performance. J. Production Innovation Management 28(6):819–832.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece DJ (2007) Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management J. 28(13):1319–1350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece DJ, Pisano G (1994) The dynamic capabilities of firms: An introduction. Indust. Corporate Change 3(3):537–556.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. 18(7):509–533.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomas P (2020) Elon Musk decries ‘M.B.A.-ization’ of America. Wall Street J. (December 9) https://www.wsj.com/articles/elon-musk-decries-m-b-a-ization-of-america-11607548589.Google Scholar
• Van Angeren J, Karunakaran A (2022) Anchored inferential learning: Platform-specific uncertainty, venture capital investments by the platform owner, and the impact on complementors. Organ. Sci. 34(3):1027–1050.Link, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Brown S, Bala H (2013) Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide: Guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems. MIS Quart. 37(1):21–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Brown SA, Sullivan YW (2016) Guidelines for conducting mixed-methods research: An extension and illustration. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 17(7):435–495.Google Scholar
• Verhoef PC, Broekhuizen T, Bart Y, Bhattacharya A, Qi Dong J, Fabian N, Haenlein M (2021) Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. J. Bus. Res. 122:889–901.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vial G (2019) Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 28(2):118–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Volberda HW, Khanagha S, Baden-Fuller C, Mihalache OR, Birkinshaw J (2021) Strategizing in a digital world: Overcoming cognitive barriers, reconfiguring routines and introducing new organizational forms. Long Range Planning 54(5):102110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vuori TO, Huy QN (2015) Distributed attention and shared emotions in the innovation process: How Nokia lost the smartphone battle. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61(1):9–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Warner KSR, Wäger M (2019) Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: An ongoing process of strategic renewal. Long Range Planning 52(3):326–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wessel L, Baiyere A, Ologeanu-Taddei R, Cha J, Blegind Jensen T (2021) Unpacking the difference between digital transformation and IT-enabled organizational transformation. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 22(1):102–129.Google Scholar
• Wu S, Levitas E, Priem RL (2005) CEO tenure and company invention under differing levels of technological dynamism. Acad. Management J. 48(5):859–873.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yoo Y, Henfridsson O, Lyytinen K (2010) Research commentary—The new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):724–735.Link, Google Scholar
• Yoo Y, Boland RJ, Lyytinen K, Majchrzak A (2012) Organizing for innovation in the digitized world. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1398–1408.Link, Google Scholar
• You Y, Srinivasan S, Pauwels K, Joshi A (2020) How CEO/CMO characteristics affect innovation and stock returns: Findings and future directions. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 48(6):1229–1253.Crossref, Google Scholar