The Power of Conversation: Analyzing the Impact of Starter Response on Backer Accumulation in Crowdfunding

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2021.0612

References

  • Agrawal A, Catalini C, Goldfarb A (2015) Crowdfunding: Geography, social networks, and the timing of investment decisions. J. Econom. Management Strategy 24(2):253–274.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Al Balawi R, Hu Y, Qiu L (2023) Brand crisis and customer relationship management on social media: Evidence from a natural experiment from the airline industry. Inform. Systems Res. 34(2):442–462.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Allison TH, Davis BC, Webb JW, Short JC (2017) Persuasion in crowdfunding: An elaboration likelihood model of crowdfunding performance. J. Bus. Venturing 32(6):707–725.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Andreoni J (1990) Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving. Econom. J. 100:464–477.Google Scholar
  • Anglin AH, Short JC, Drover W, Stevenson RM, McKenny AF, Allison TH (2018) The power of positivity? The influence of positive psychological capital language on crowdfunding performance. J. Bus. Venturing 33(4):470–492.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Angrist JD, Imbens GW (1995) Two-stage least squares estimation of average causal effects in models with variable treatment intensity. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 90(430):431–442.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aung KZ, Myo NN (2017) Sentiment analysis of students’ comment using lexicon based approach. 2017 IEEE/ACIS 16th Internat. Conf. Comput. Inform. Sci. (ICIS) (Wuhan), 149–154.Google Scholar
  • Bai X, Marsden JR, Ross WT Jr, Wang G (2020) A note on the impact of daily deals on local retailers’ online reputation: Mediation effects of the consumer experience. Inform. Systems Res. 31(4):1132–1143.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Banerjee AV (1992) A simple model of herd behavior get access arrow. Quart. J. Econom. 107(3):797–817.Google Scholar
  • Baum JA, Silverman BS (2004) Picking winners or building them? Alliance, intellectual, and human capital as selection criteria in venture financing and performance of biotechnology startups. J. Bus. Venturing 19:411–436.Google Scholar
  • Bernstein S, Korteweg A, Laws K (2017) Attracting early-stage investors: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. J. Finance 72(2):509–538.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bikhchandani S, Hirshleifer D, Welch I (1992) A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades. J. Political Econom. 100(5):992–1026.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bikhchandani S, Hirshleifer D, Welch I (1998) Learning from the behavior of others: Conformity, fads, and informational cascades. J. Econom. Perspect. 12(3):151–170.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brooks AW, Huang L, Kearney SW, Murray FE (2014) Investors prefer entrepreneurial ventures pitched by attractive men. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111(12):4427–4431.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burtch G, Ghose A, Wattal S (2013) An empirical examination of the antecedents and consequences of contribution patterns in crowd-funded markets. Inform. Systems Res. 24(3):499–519.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Burtch G, Ghose A, Wattal S (2016) Secret admirers: An empirical examination of information hiding and contribution dynamics in online crowdfunding. Inform. Systems Res. 27(3):478–496.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Burtch G, Hong Y, Liu D (2018) The role of provision points in online crowdfunding. J. Management Inform. Systems 35(1):117–144.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burton MD, Sørensen JB, Beckman CM (2002) 7. Coming from good stock: Career history and new venture formation. Res. Sociol. Organ. 19:229–262.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cai H, Chen Y, Fang H (2009) Observational learning: Evidence from a randomized natural field experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(3):864–882.Google Scholar
  • Chan CSR, Parhankangas A, Sahaym A, Oo P (2020) Bellwether and the herd? Unpacking the u-shaped relationship between prior funding and subsequent contributions in reward-based crowdfunding. J. Bus. Venturing 35(2):105934.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chakraborty S, Swinney R (2020) Signaling to the crowd: Private quality information and rewards-based crowdfunding. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(2):305–322.Google Scholar
  • Chakraborty S, Ma A, Swinney R (2023) Designing rewards-based crowdfunding campaigns for strategic (but distracted) contributors. Naval Res. Logist. 70(1):3–20.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen H, De P, Hu YJ, Hwang BH (2014) Wisdom of crowds: The value of stock opinions transmitted through social media. Rev. Financial Stud. 27(5):1367–1403.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Colombo MG, Franzoni C, Rossi–Lamastra C (2015) Internal social capital and the attraction of early contributions in crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 39(1):75–100.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Courtney C, Dutta S, Li Y (2017) Resolving information asymmetry: Signaling, endorsement, and crowdfunding success. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 41(2):265–290.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cryder CE, Loewenstein G, Seltman H (2013) Goal gradient in helping behavior. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 49(6):1078–1083.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dai H, Zhang DJ (2019) Prosocial goal pursuit in crowdfunding: Evidence from Kickstarter. J. Marketing Res. 56(3):498–517.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Devlin J, Chang M-W, Lee K, Toutanova K (2019) BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. Preprint, submitted May 24, https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.04805.Google Scholar
  • Evans DC, Oviatt J, Slaymaker J, Topado C, Doherty P, Ball A, Sáenz D, Wiley E (2012) An experimental study of how restaurant owners’ responses to negative reviews affect readers’ intention to visit. Four Peaks Rev. 2:1–12.Google Scholar
  • Gallagher C, Furey E, Curran K (2019) The application of sentiment analysis and text analytics to customer experience reviews to understand what customers are really saying. Internat. J. Data Warehousing Mining (IJDWM) 15(4):21–47.Google Scholar
  • Gao Q, Lin M, Sias R (2023) Words matter: The role of readability, tone, and deception cues in online credit markets. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 58(1):1–28.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenberg J, Mollick E (2017) Activist choice homophily and the crowdfunding of female founders. Admin. Sci. Quart. 62(2):341–374.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gu B, Ye Q (2014) First step in social media: Measuring the influence of online management responses on customer satisfaction. Production Oper. Management 23(4):570–582.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gunarathne P, Rui H, Seidmann A (2017) Whose and what social media complaints have happier resolutions? Evidence from Twitter. J. Management Inform. Systems 34(2):314–340.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gunarathne P, Rui H, Seidmann A (2018) When social media delivers customer service. MIS Quart. 42(2):489–520.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gunarathne P, Rui H, Seidmann A (2022) Racial bias in customer service: Evidence from Twitter. Inform. Systems Res. 33(1):43–54.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Guzman J, Kacperczyk A(O) (2019) Gender gap in entrepreneurship. Res. Policy 48(7):1666–1680.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heath C, Larrick RP, Wu G (1999) Goals as reference points. Cognitive Psych. 38(1):79–109.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • He S, Lee S-Y, Rui H (2024) Open voice or private message? The hidden tug-of-war on social media customer service. Production Oper. Management, ePub ahead of print February 8, https://doi.org/10.1177/10591478231224933.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Herzenstein M, Dholakia UM, Andrews RL (2011) Strategic herding behavior in peer-to-peer loan auctions. J. Interactive Marketing 25(1):27–36.Google Scholar
  • Higgins ET, Brendl CM (1995) Accessibility and applicability: Some “activation rules” influencing judgment. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 31(3):218–243.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ho T, Su X (2009) Peer-induced fairness in games. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(5):2022–2049.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hsu DH (2007) Experienced entrepreneurial founders, organizational capital, and venture capital funding. Res. Policy 36(5):722–741.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jiang Y, Ho YC, Yan X, Tan Y (2022) What’s in a “username”? The effect of perceived anonymity on herding in crowdfunding. Inform. Systems Res. 33(1):1–17.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kanze D, Huang L, Conley MA, Higgins ET (2018) We ask men to win and women not to lose: Closing the gender gap in startup funding. Acad. Management J. 61(2):586–614.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Khurana S, Qiu L, Kumar S (2019) When a doctor knows, it shows: An empirical analysis of doctors’ responses in a Q&A forum of an online healthcare portal. Inform. Systems Res. 30(3):872–891.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kim JH, Newberry P, Qiu C (2022) The role of information signals in determining crowdfunding outcomes. J. Empirical Finance 67:168–181.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kumar S, Qiu L (2022) Social Media Analytics and Practical Applications: The Change to the Competition Landscape (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL).Google Scholar
  • Kumar N, Qiu L, Kumar S (2018) Exit, voice, and response in digital platforms: An empirical investigation of online management response strategies. Inform. Systems Res. 29(4):849–870.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kuppuswamy V, Bayus B (2017) Does my contribution to your crowdfunding project matter? J. Bus. Venturing 32(1):72–89.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kuppuswamy V, Bayus BL (2018) Crowdfunding creative ideas: The dynamics of project backers. Cumming D, Hornuf L, eds. The Economics of Crowdfunding (Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, Switzerland).Google Scholar
  • Lagazio C, Querci F (2018) Exploring the multi-sided nature of crowdfunding campaign success. J. Bus. Res. 90:318–324.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics 33(2):363–374.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee CM, Zhong Q (2022) Shall we talk? The role of interactive investor platforms in corporate communication. J. Accounting Econom. 74(2–3):101524.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li G, Wang J (2019) Threshold effects on backer motivations in reward-based crowdfunding. J. Management Inform. Systems 36(2):546–573.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li J, Chen X, Kotha S, Fisher G (2017) Catching fire and spreading it: A glimpse into displayed entrepreneurial passion in crowdfunding campaigns. J. Appl. Psych. 102(7):1075–1090.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li R, Tobey M, Mayorga ME, Caltagirone S, Özaltın OY (2023) Detecting human trafficking: Automated classification of online customer reviews of massage businesses. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 25(3):1051–1065.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lin YK, Rai A, Yang Y (2022) Information control for creator brand management in subscription-based crowdfunding. Inform. Systems Res. 33(3):846–866.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lu SF, Rui H, Seidmann A (2017) Does technology substitute for nurses? Staffing decisions in nursing homes. Management Sci. 64(4):1842–1859.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McColl-Kennedy JR, Sparks BA (2003) Application of fairness theory to service failures and service recovery. J. Service Res. 5(3):251–266.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McHugh ML (2012) Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochem. Med. 22(3):276–282.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mejia J, Urrea G, Pedraza‐Martinez AJ (2019) Operational transparency on crowdfunding platforms: Effect on donations for emergency response. Production Oper. Management 28(7):1773–1791.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mollick E (2014) The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. J. Bus. Venturing 29(1):1–16.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mousavi R, Johar M, Mookerjee VS (2020) The voice of the customer: Managing customer care in Twitter. Inform. Systems Res. 31(2):340–360.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Peng CH, Yin D, Zhang H (2020) More than words in medical question-and-answer sites: A content-context congruence perspective. Inform. Systems Res. 31(3):913–928.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Petty RE, Cacioppo JT (1981) Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches (Westview Press, Boulder, CO).Google Scholar
  • Petty RE, Cacioppo JT (1986) The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion (Springer, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Proserpio D, Zervas G (2017) Online reputation management: Estimating the impact of management responses on consumer reviews. Marketing Sci. 36(5):645–665.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pu J, Liu Y, Chen Y, Qiu L, Cheng HK (2022) What questions are you inclined to answer? Effects of hierarchy in corporate Q&A communities. Inform. Systems Res. 33(1):244–264.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rubin DB (2001) Using propensity scores to help design observational studies: Application to the tobacco litigation. Health Services Outcomes Res. Methodology 2(3):169–188.Google Scholar
  • Saifee DH, Zheng Z(E), Bardhan IR, Lahiri A (2020) Are online reviews of physicians reliable indicators of clinical outcomes? A focus on chronic disease management. Inform. Systems Res. 31(4):1282–1300.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schwienbacher A, Larralde B (2010) Crowdfunding of small entrepreneurial ventures. Preprint, submitted September 28, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1699183.Google Scholar
  • Shane S, Stuart T (2002) Organizational endowments and the performance of university start-ups. Management Sci. 48(1):154–170.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Simonsohn U, Ariely D (2008) When rational sellers face nonrational buyers: Evidence from herding on eBay. Management Sci. 54(9):1624–1637.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Stock J, Yogo M, Wright J (2002) A survey of weak instruments and weak identification in generalized method of moments. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 20:518–529.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sun H, Chen J, Fan M (2021) Effect of live chat on traffic-to-sales conversion: Evidence from an online marketplace. Production Oper. Management 30(5):1201–1219.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tan X, Wang Y, Tan Y (2019) Impact of live chat on purchase in electronic markets: The moderating role of information cues. Inform. Systems Res. 30(4):1248–1271.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Thies F, Wessel M, Benlian A (2016) Effects of social interaction dynamics on platforms. J. Management Inform. Systems 33(3):843–873.Google Scholar
  • Touré-Tillery M, Fishbach A (2017) Too far to help: The effect of perceived distance on the expected impact and likelihood of charitable action. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 112(6):860–876.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tucker C, Zhang J (2011) How does popularity information affect choices? A field experiment. Management Sci. 57(5):828–842.Google Scholar
  • Unger JM, Rauch A, Frese M, Rosenbusch N (2011) Human capital and entrepreneurial success: A meta-analytical review. J. Bus. Venturing 26(3):341–358.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vismara S (2016) Equity retention and social network theory in equity crowdfunding. Small Bus. Econom. 46:579–590.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang S-M, Ku L-W (2016) ANTUSD: A large Chinese sentiment dictionary. Proc. Tenth Internat. Conf. Language Resources Evaluation (LREC’16) (European Language Resources Association (ELRA), Paris), 2697–2702.Google Scholar
  • Wang T, Lu K, Chow K, Zhu Q (2020) COVID-19 sensing: Negative sentiment analysis on social media in China via BERT model. IEEE Access 8:138162–138169.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Xiao S, Ho YC, Che H (2021) Building the momentum: Information disclosure and herding in online crowdfunding. Production Oper. Management 30(9):3213–3230.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Xu JJ, Chau M (2018) Cheap talk? The impact of lender-borrower communication on peer-to-peer lending outcomes. J. Management Inform. Systems 35(1):53–85.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yang K, Lau R, Abbasi A (2023) Getting personal: A deep learning artifact for text-based measurement of personality. Inform. Systems Res. 34(1):194–222.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Yin C, Liu L, Mirkovski K (2019) Does more crowd participation bring more value to crowdfunding projects? The perspective of crowd capital. Internet Res. 29(5):1149–1170.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Younkin P, Kuppuswamy V (2018) The colorblind crowd? Founder race and performance in crowdfunding. Management Sci. 64(7):3269–3287.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang J, Liu P (2012) Rational herding in microloan markets. Management Sci. 58(5):892–912.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang J, Savin S, Veeraraghavan S (2023) Revenue management in crowdfunding. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 25(1):200–217.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.