An Onto-Epistemological Analysis of Information Privacy Research

References

• Acquisti A, Gross R (2006) Imagined communities: Awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the Facebook. Danezis G, Golle P, eds. Proc. Internat. Workshop on Privacy Enhancing Technologies (Springer, New York), 36–58.Google Scholar
• Acquisti A, Brandimarte L, Loewenstein G (2015) Privacy and human behavior in the age of information. Science 347(6221):509–514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acquisti A, Brandimarte L, Loewenstein G (2018) Privacy and human behavior in the information age. Selinger E, Polonetsky J, Tene O, eds. The Cambridge Handbook of Consumer Privacy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 184–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acquisti A, Brandimarte L, Loewenstein G (2020) Secrets and likes: The drive for privacy and the difficulty of achieving it in the digital age. J. Consumer Psych. 30(4):736–758.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adjerid I, Pe’er E, Acquisti A (2018) Beyond the privacy paradox: Objective vs. relative risk in privacy decision making. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 42(2):465–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Altman I (1975) The Environment and Social Behavior: Privacy, Personal Space, Territory, and Crowding (Brooks/Cole Publishing Company).Google Scholar
• Barth S, De Jong MD (2017) The privacy paradox–investigating discrepancies between expressed privacy concerns and actual online behavior: A systematic literature review. Telematics Inform. 34(7):1038–1058.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baruh L, Secinti E, Cemalcilar Z (2017) Online privacy concerns and privacy management: A meta-analytical review. J. Comm. 67(1):26–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bateson G (1979) Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity, vol. 255 (Bantam Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Bélanger F, James TL (2020) A theory of multilevel information privacy management for the digital era. Inform. Systems Res. 31(2):510–536.Link, Google Scholar
• Blattner W (2006) Heidegger’s’ Being and Time’: A Reader’s Guide (A&C Black).Google Scholar
• Bound J, Brown C, Mathiowetz N (2001) Measurement error in survey data. Handbook of Econometrics, vol. 5 (Elsevier, New York), 3705–3843.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boyd D (2014) It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
• Boyd D, Hargittai E (2010) Facebook privacy settings: Who cares? First Monday 15(8).Google Scholar
• Brunton F, Nissenbaum H (2011) Vernacular resistance to data collection and analysis: A political theory of obfuscation. First Monday 16(5).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cappuccio M, Wheeler M (2010) When the twain meet: Could the study of mind be a meeting of minds? Postanalytic and Metacontinental: Crossing Philosophical Divides, 125–144.Google Scholar
• Chia R, Rasche A (2010) Epistemological alternatives for researching strategy as practice: Building and dwelling worldviews. Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice, 34–46.Google Scholar
• Chow D (2014) Journal responds after controversial Facebook emotion study. Accessed September 1, 2021, https://www.cbsnews.com/news/controversial-facebook-emotion-study-journal-responds/.Google Scholar
• Cohen JE (1971) Casual Groups of Monkeys and Men: Stochastic Models of Elemental Social Systems, vol. 42 (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Colnago J, Cranor LF, Acquisti A, Stanton KH (2022) Is it a concern or a preference? An investigation into the ability of privacy scales to capture and distinguish granular privacy constructs. Proc. 18th Sympos. Usable Privacy and Security, 331–346.Google Scholar
• Culnan MJ, Armstrong PK (1999) Information privacy concerns, procedural fairness, and impersonal trust: An empirical investigation. Organ. Sci. 10(1):104–115.Link, Google Scholar
• Dey R, Ding Y, Ross KW (2013) Profiling high-school students with Facebook: How online privacy laws can actually increase minors’ risk. Proc. Conf. Internet Measurement, 405–416.Google Scholar
• Dinev T, McConnell A, Smith J (2015) Informing privacy research through information systems, psychology, and behavioral economics: Thinking outside the “APCO” box. Inform. Systems Res. 264(4):639–655.Link, Google Scholar
• Dreyfus HL (1991) Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger’s Being and Time, Division I (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Dreyfus HL, Dreyfus SE (1991) Making a mind vs. modelling the brain: Artificial intelligence back at the branchpoint. Understanding the Artificial: On the Future Shape of Artificial Intelligence (Springer, Berlin), 33–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fodor J (2006) How the mind works: What we still don’t know. Daedalus 135(3):86–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gates GW (2011) How uncertainty about privacy and confidentiality is hampering efforts to more effectively use administrative records in producing US national statistics. J. Privacy Confidentiality 3(2):3–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert DT, Malone PS (1995) The correspondence bias. Psych. Bull. 117(1):21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goel V (2014) As data overflows online, researchers grapple with ethics. New York Times (August 13), https://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/13/technology/the-boon-of-online-data-puts-social-science-in-a-quandary.html.Google Scholar
• Heidegger M (1962) Being and Time (Harper & Row, New York).Google Scholar
• Heidegger M (1985) History of the Concept of Time (Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN).Google Scholar
• Heidegger M (1993) Letter on humanism. Basic Writings 204:189–242.Google Scholar
• Hempel CG, Oppenheim P (1948) Studies in the logic of explanation. Philosophical Sci. 15(2):135–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoadley CM, Xu H, Lee JJ, Rosson MB (2010) Privacy as information access and illusory control: The case of the Facebook news feed privacy outcry. Electronic Commerce Res. Appl. 9(1):50–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jiang Z, Heng CS, Choi BC (2013) Privacy concerns and privacy-protective behavior in synchronous online social interactions. Inform. Systems Res. 24(3):579–595.Link, Google Scholar
• John LK, Acquisti A, Loewenstein G (2011) Strangers on a plane: Context-dependent willingness to divulge sensitive information. J. Consumer Res. 37(5):858–873.Crossref, Google Scholar
• John LK, Loewenstein G, Acquisti A, Vosgerau J (2018) When and why randomized response techniques (fail to) elicit the truth. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 148(C):101–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karegar F, Pettersson JS, Fischer-Hübner S (2020) The dilemma of user engagement in privacy notices: Effects of interaction modes and habituation on user attention. ACM Trans. Privacy Security 23(1):1–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kehr F, Kowatsch T, Wentzel D, Fleisch E (2015) Blissfully ignorant: The effects of general privacy concerns, general institutional trust, and affect in the privacy calculus. Inform. Systems J. 25(6):607–635.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kramer AD, Guillory JE, Hancock JT (2014) Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proc. National Acad. Sci. USA 111(24):8788–8790.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krishna A (2020) Privacy is a concern: An introduction to the dialogue on privacy. J. Consumer Psych. 30(4):733–735.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leyden J (2006) Users protest over ‘creepy’ Facebook update. Register 7(09):6.Google Scholar
• Lü YH (2005) Privacy and data privacy issues in contemporary China. Ethics Inform. Tech. 7(1):7–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lwin MO, Williams JD (2003) A model integrating the multidimensional developmental theory of privacy and theory of planned behavior to examine fabrication of information online. Marketing Lett. 14(4):257–272.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marcus G (2008) Kluge: The Haphazard Construction of the Human Mind (Houghton Mifflin, Boston).Google Scholar
• Marreiros H, Tonin M, Vlassopoulos M, Schraefel M (2017) “now that you mention it”: A survey experiment on information, inattention and online privacy. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 140:1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayhew BH (1980) Structuralism vs. individualism: Part 1, shadowboxing in the dark. Soc. Forces 59(2):335–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCarthy J, Hayes PJ (1981) Some philosophical problems from the standpoint of artificial intelligence. Readings in Artificial Intelligence (Elsevier, New York), 431–450.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nissenbaum H (2009) Privacy in Context: Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social Life (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Norberg PA, Horne DR, Horne DA (2007) The privacy paradox: Personal information disclosure intentions vs. behaviors. J. Consumer Affairs 41(1):100–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Popovič A, Thong JYL, Wattal S (2017) Information privacy. Bush A, Rai A, eds. MIS Quarterly Research Curations (Management Information Systems Research Center). https://www.misqresearchcurations.org/blog/2017/6/30/information-privacy.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Riemer K, Johnston RB (2017) Clarifying ontological inseparabiilty with Heidegger’s analysis of equipment. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 41(4):1059–1081.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Riemer K, Johnston R, Horvoka D, Indulska M (2013) Challenging the philosophical foundations of modeling organizational reality: The case of process modeling. Proc. 34th Internat. Conf. on Inform. Systems.Google Scholar
• Rosenbush S (2014) Facebook furor is overblown, says calpoly ethicist. https://www.wsj.com/articles/BL-CIOB-4853.Google Scholar
• Sandberg J, Tsoukas H (2011) Grasping the logic of practice: Theorizing through practical rationality. Acad. Management Rev. 36(2):338–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schatzki TR (2005) Peripheral vision: The sites of organizations. Organ. Stud. 26(3):465–484.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith HJ, Dinev T, Xu H (2011) Information privacy research: An interdisciplinary review. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 35(4):989–1015.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith HJ, Milberg SJ, Burke SJ (1996) Information privacy: Measuring individuals’ concerns about organizational practices. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 20(2):167–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Solove DJ (2021) The myth of the privacy paradox. George Washington Law Rev. 89(1):1–51.Google Scholar
• Spiekermann S, Grossklags J, Berendt B (2001) E-privacy in 2nd generation e-commerce: Privacy preferences vs. actual behavior. Proc. 3rd ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce, 38–47.Google Scholar
• Sutton J, McIlwain D, Christensen W, Geeves A (2011) Applying intelligence to the reflexes: Embodied skills and habits between Dreyfus and Descartes. J. Br. Soc. Phenomenol. 42(1):78–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor C (1985) Human Agency and Language: Philosophical Papers, vols. 1 and 2 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Warzel C (2019) Privacy is too big to understand. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/16/opinion/privacy-technology.html.Google Scholar
• Watts DJ (2014) Common sense and sociological explanations. Amer. J. Sociol. 120(2):313–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber M, Secher HP (1962) Basic Concepts in Sociology (Citadel Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Weber M, Tribe K (2019) Economy and Society: A New Translation (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick KE (2007) The generative properties of richness. Acad. Management J. 50(1):14–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whittington R (1996) Strategy as practice. Long Range Planning 29(5):731–735.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wittes B, Liu JC (2015) The privacy paradox: The privacy benefits of privacy threats. Center for Technology Innovation at Brookings, 1–21.Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein L (1980) Remarks on the Philosophy of Psychology, vol. 2 (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Xu H, Dinev T (2022) Reflections on the 2021 impact award: Why privacy still matters. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 46(4):xx–xxxii.Google Scholar
• Xu H, Zhang N (2022) From contextualizing to context theorizing: Assessing context effects in privacy research. Management Sci. 68(10):7383–7401.Link, Google Scholar
• Zahavi D (1997) Horizontal Intentionality and Transcendental Intersubjectivity (Tijdschrift voor Filosofie, Leuven, Belgium).Google Scholar