Focus Within or On Others: The Impact of Reviewers’ Attentional Focus on Review Helpfulness

References

• Aguinis H, Edwards JR, Bradley KJ (2017) Improving our understanding of moderation and mediation in strategic management research. Organ. Res. Methods 20(4):665–685.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aiken LS, West SG, Reno RR (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (Sage, Newbury Park, CA).Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Pischke J-S (2008) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aron A, Aron EN, Smollan D (1992) Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 63(4):596–612.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arriaga XB, Rusbult CE (1998) Standing in my partner’s shoes: Partner perspective taking and reactions to accommodative dilemmas. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 24(9):927–948.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baek H, Ahn J, Choi Y (2012) Helpfulness of online consumer reviews: Readers’ objectives and review cues. Internat. J. Electr. Commerce 17(2):99–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 51(6):1173–1182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Batson CD (1987) Prosocial motivation: Is it ever truly altruistic? Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 20:65–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Batson CD (1991) The Altruism Question: Toward a Social-Psychological Answer (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ).Google Scholar
• Batson CD (1998) Altruism and prosocial behavior. Fiske ST, Gilbert DT, Lindzey G, eds. The Handbook of Social Psychology (Boston, McGraw-Hill), 282–316.Google Scholar
• Batson CD (2009) These Things Called Empathy: Eight Related but Distinct Phenomona (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 3–15.Google Scholar
• Batson CD, Batson JG, Slingsby JK, Harrell KL, Peekna HM, Todd RM (1991) Empathic joy and the empathy-altruism hypothesis. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 61(3):413–426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Batson CD, Sager K, Garst E, Kang M, Rubchinsky K, Dawson K (1997) Is empathy-induced helping due to self-other merging? J. Personality Soc. Psych. 73(3):495–509.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Batson CD, Sympson SC, Hindman JL, Decruz P, Todd RM, Weeks JL, Jennings G, Burns CT (1996) “I’ve been there, too”: Effect on empathy of prior experience with a need. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 22(5):474–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum CF (2008) Stata tip 63: Modeling proportions. Stata J. 8(2):299–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berscheid E, Snyder M, Omoto AM (1989) The relationship closeness inventory: Assessing the closeness of interpersonal relationships. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 57(5):792–807.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bollen KA, Stine R (1990) Direct and indirect effects: Classical and bootstrap estimates of variability. Sociol. Methodology 20(1):115–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brehm SS, Brehm JW (2013) Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Burton-Jones A (2009) Minimizing method bias through programmatic research. MIS Quart. 33(3):445–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell MC, Kirmani A (2000) Consumers’ use of persuasion knowledge: The effects of accessibility and cognitive capacity on perceptions of an influence agent. J. Consumer Res. 27(1):69–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell RS, Pennebaker JW (2003) The secret life of pronouns: Flexibility in writing style and physical health. Psych. Sci. 14(1):60–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Gneezy U, Kuhn MA (2012) Experimental methods: Between-subject and within-subject design. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 81(1):1–8.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Lurie NH (2013) Temporal contiguity and negativity bias in the impact of online word of mouth. J. Marketing Res. 50(4):463–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheung CM-Y, Sia C-L, Kuan KK (2012) Is this review believable? A study of factors affecting the credibility of online consumer reviews from an ELM perspective. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 13(8):2.Google Scholar
• Chung C, Pennebaker JW (2007) The psychological functions of function words. Fiedler K, ed. Social Communication (Psychology Press, New York), 343–359.Google Scholar
• Clee MA, Wicklund RA (1980) Consumer behavior and psychological reactance. J. Consumer Res. 6(4):389–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coke JS, Batson CD, McDavis K (1978) Empathic mediation of helping: A two-stage model. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 36(7):752–766.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crowley AE, Hoyer WD (1994) An integrative framework for understanding two-sided persuasion. J. Consumer Res. 20(4):561–574.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis MH (1983) Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 44(1):113–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Escalas JE, Stern BB (2003) Sympathy and empathy: Emotional responses to advertising dramas. J. Consumer Res. 29(4):566–578.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forman C, Ghose A, Wiesenfeld B (2008) Examining the relationship between reviews and sales: The role of reviewer identity disclosure in electronic markets. Inform. Systems Res. 19(3):291–313.Link, Google Scholar
• Fraley B, Aron A (2004) The effect of a shared humorous experience on closeness in initial encounters. Personal Relationships 11(1):61–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frank MG, Gilovich T (1989) Effect of memory perspective on retrospective causal attributions. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 57(3):399–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friestad M, Wright P (1994) The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. J. Consumer Res. 21(1):1–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galinsky AD, Moskowitz GB (2000) Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 78(4):708–724.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galinsky AD, Maddux WW, Gilin D, White JB (2008) Why it pays to get inside the head of your opponent the differential effects of perspective taking and empathy in negotiations. Psych. Sci. 19(4):378–384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gino F, Galinsky AD (2012) Vicarious dishonesty: When psychological closeness creates distance from one’s moral compass. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 119(1):15–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldstein NJ, Vezich IS, Shapiro JR (2014) Perceived perspective taking: When others walk in our shoes. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 106(6):941–960.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant AM, Berry JW (2011) The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity. Acad. Management J. 54(1):73–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gunning R (1969) The fog index after twenty years. Internat. J. Bus. Comm. 6(2):3–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gutt D, Neumann J, Zimmermann S, Kundisch D, Chen J (2019) Design of review systems—a strategic instrument to shape online reviewing behavior and economic outcomes. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 28(2):104–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayes AF (2009) Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Comm. Monographs 76(4):408–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayes AF (2013) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach (Guilford Publications, New York).Google Scholar
• Heckman JJ (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1):153–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hill B, Ide S, Ikuta S, Kawasaki A, Ogino T (1986) Universals of linguistic politeness: Quantitative evidence from Japanese and American English. J. Pragmatics 10(3):347–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hodges SD, Clark BAM, Myers MW (2011) Better living through perspective taking. Biswas-Diener R, ed. Positive Psychology as Social Change (Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands), 193–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hodges SD, Kiel KJ, Kramer ADI, Veach D, Villanueva BR (2010) Giving birth to empathy: The effects of similar experience on empathic accuracy, empathic concern, and perceived empathy. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 36(3):398–409.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoffman ML (2001) Empathy and Moral Development: Implications for Caring and Justice (Cambridge University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Huang AH, Chen K, Yen DC, Tran TP (2015) A study of factors that contribute to online review helpfulness. Comput. Human Behavior 48:17–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ickes W, Reidhead S, Patterson M (1986) Machiavellianism and self-monitoring: As different as “me” and “you”. Soc. Cognition 4(1):58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ingram RE (1990) Self-focused attention in clinical disorders: Review and a conceptual model. Psych. Bull. 107(2):156–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen ML, Averbeck JM, Zhang Z, Wright KB (2013) Credibility of anonymous online product reviews: A language expectancy perspective. J. Management Inform. Systems 30(1):293–324.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson JL, Cullen JB, Sakano T, Takenouchi H (1996) Setting the stage for trust and strategic integration in Japanese-US cooperative alliances. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 27(5):981–1004.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones Q, Ravid G, Rafaeli S (2004) Information overload and the message dynamics of online interaction spaces: A theoretical model and empirical exploration. Inform. Systems Res. 15(2):194–210.Link, Google Scholar
• Judd CM, Kenny DA, McClelland GH (2001) Estimating and testing mediation and moderation in within-subject designs. Psych. Methods. 6(2):115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim S-M, Pantel P, Chklovski T, Pennacchiotti M (2006) Automatically assessing review helpfulness. Proc. 2006 Conf. Empirical Methods Natural Language Processing (Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA), 423–430.Google Scholar
• Kirmani A, Campbell MC (2009) Taking the target’s perspective: The persuasion knowledge model. Wänke M, ed. Social Psychology of Consumer Behavior (Psychology Press, New York), 297–316.Google Scholar
• Korfiatis N, Rodriguez D, Sicilia MA (2008) The impact of readability on the usefulness of online product reviews: A case study on an online bookstore. Lytras MD, Carroll JM, Damiani E, Tennyson RD, eds. Emerging Technologies and Information Systems for the Knowledge Society (Springer, Berlin), 423–432.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krishnamoorthy S (2015) Linguistic features for review helpfulness prediction. Expert Systems Appl. 42(7):3751–3759.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kronmal RA (1993) Spurious correlation and the fallacy of the ratio standard revisited. J. Royal Statist. Soc. Ser. A 156(3):379–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuan KKY, Hui K-L, Prasarnphanich P, Lai H-Y (2015) What makes a review voted? An empirical investigation of review voting in online review systems. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 16(1):48–71.Google Scholar
• Kumar N, Benbasat I (2006) The influence of recommendations and consumer reviews on evaluations of websites. Inform. Systems Res. 17(4):425–439.Link, Google Scholar
• Laran J, Dalton AN, Andrade EB (2011) The curious case of behavioral backlash: Why brands produce priming effects and slogans produce reverse priming effects. J. Consumer Res. 37(6):999–1014.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin M, Lucas HC Jr, Shmueli G (2013) Too big to fail: Large samples and the p-value problem. Inform. Systems Res. 24(4):906–917.Link, Google Scholar
• Luca M, Zervas G (2016) Fake it till you make it: Reputation, competition, and Yelp review fraud. Management Sci. 62(12):3412–3427.Link, Google Scholar
• MacKinnon DP, Krull JL, Lockwood CM (2000) Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect. Prevention Sci. 1(4):173–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayer RC, Davis JH, Schoorman FD (1995) An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad. Management Rev. 20(3):709–734.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montoya AK, Hayes AF (2017) Two condition within-participant statistical mediation analysis: A path-analytic framework. Psych. Methods 22(1):6–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mor N, Winquist J (2002) Self-focused attention and negative affect: A meta-analysis. Psych. Bull. 128(4):638.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mudambi SM, Schuff D (2010) What makes a helpful review? A study of customer reviews on Amazon.com. MIS Quart. 34(1):185–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newcomb TM (1956) The prediction of interpersonal attraction. Amer. Psychologist 11(11):575.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pennebaker JW (2011) The Secret Life of Pronouns: What Our Words Say About Us (Bloomsbury Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pennebaker JW, Booth RJ, Francis ME (2007) Linguistic inquiry and word count: LIWC2007. Operator’s manual, LIWC.net, Austin, TX.Google Scholar
• Pennebaker JW, Mehl MR, Niederhoffer KG (2003) Psychological aspects of natural language use: Our words, our selves. Annual Rev. Psych. 54(1):547–577.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pornpitakpan C (2004) The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades’ evidence. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 34(2):243–281.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Preacher K, Hayes A (2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav. Res. Methods 40(3):879–891.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogers TB, Kuiper NA, Kirker WS (1977) Self-reference and the encoding of personal information. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 35(9):677.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenthal R (1976) Experimenter Effects in Behavioral Research, 2nd ed. (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Sagarin BJ, Cialdini RB, Rice WE, Serna SB (2002) Dispelling the illusion of invulnerability: The motivations and mechanisms of resistance to persuasion. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 83(3):526–541.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sassenrath C, Hodges SD, Pfattheicher S (2016) It’s all about the self: When perspective taking backfires. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 25(6):405–410.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schindler RM, Bickart B (2012) Perceived helpfulness of online consumer reviews: The role of message content and style. J. Consumer Behav. 11(3):234–243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schlosser AE (2011) Can including pros and cons increase the helpfulness and persuasiveness of online reviews? The interactive effects of ratings and arguments. J. Consumer Psych. 21(3):226–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sen S, Lerman D (2007) Why are you telling me this? An examination into negative consumer reviews on the web. J. Interactive Marketing 21(4):76–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shrout PE, Bolger N (2002) Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psych. Methods 7(4):422–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simmons RA, Gordon PC, Chambless DL (2005) Pronouns in marital interaction what do “you” and “I” say about marital health? Psych. Sci. 16(12):932–936.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sparks BA, Perkins HE, Buckley R (2013) Online travel reviews as persuasive communication: The effects of content type, source, and certification logos on consumer behavior. Tourism Management 39:1–9.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toi M, Batson CD (1982) More evidence that empathy is a source of altruistic motivation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 43(2):281–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vorauer J (2013) The case for and against perspective-taking. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 48:59–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang F, Karimi S (2019) This product works well (for me): The impact of first-person singular pronouns on online review helpfulness. J. Bus. Res. 104:283–294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watson LA, Dritschel B, Jentzsch I, Obonsawin M (2008) Changes in the relationship between self‐reference and emotional valence as a function of dysphoria. British J. Psych. 99(1):143–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• White RA (1977) The influence of experimenter motivation, attitudes, and methods of handling subjects on psi test results. Wolman BB, ed. Handbook of Parapsychology (Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York), 273–304.Google Scholar
• Williams P, Fitzsimons GJ, Block LG (2004) When consumers do not recognize “benign” intention questions as persuasion attempts. J. Consumer Res. 31(3):540–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wispé L (1986) The distinction between sympathy and empathy: To call forth a concept, a word is needed. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 50(2):314.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yin D, Bond SD, Zhang H (2014) Anxious or angry? Effects of discrete emotions on the perceived helpfulness of online reviews. MIS Quart. 38(2):539–560.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yin D, Bond SD, Zhang H (2017) Keep your cool or let it out: Nonlinear effects of expressed arousal on perceptions of consumer reviews. J. Marketing Res. 54(3):447–463.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yin D, Bond SD, Zhang H (2021) Anger in consumer reviews: Unhelpful but persuasive? MIS Quart. Forthcoming.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yin D, Mitra S, Zhang H (2016) When do consumers value positive vs. negative reviews? An empirical investigation of confirmation bias in online word of mouth. Inform. Systems Res. 27(1):131–144.Link, Google Scholar