Reporting Technologies and Textual Readability: Evidence from the XBRL Mandate

References

• Allee KD, Deangelis MD (2015) The structure of voluntary disclosure narratives: Evidence from tone dispersion. J. Accounting Res. 53(2):241–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Pischke J-S (2008) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bai X, Nunez M, Kalagnanam JR (2012) Managing data quality risk in accounting information systems. Inform. Systems Res. 23(2):453–473.Link, Google Scholar
• Ballou D, Wang R, Pazer H, Tayi GK (1998) Modeling information manufacturing systems to determine information product quality. Management Sci. 44(4):462–484.Link, Google Scholar
• Barth ME, Clinch G (2009) Scale effects in capital markets-based accounting research. J. Bus. Finance Accounting 36(3-4):253–288.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S (2004) How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Quart. J. Econom. 119(1):249–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blankespoor EA (2019) The impact of information processing costs on firm disclosure choice: Evidence from the XBRL mandate. J. Accounting Res. 57(4):919–967.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blankespoor E, deHaan E, Marinovic I (2020) Disclosure processing costs, investors’ information choice, and equity market outcomes: A review. J. Accounting Econom. 70(2):101344.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blankespoor E, Miller BP, White HD (2014) Initial evidence on the market impact of the XBRL mandate. Rev. Accounting Stud. 19(4):1468–1503.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloomfield RJ (2012) A pragmatic approach to more efficient corporate disclosure. Accounting Horizons 26(2):357–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonsall SB, Leone AJ, Miller BP, Rennekamp K (2017) A plain English measure of financial reporting readability. J. Accounting Econom. 63(2):329–357.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boritz JE, No WG (2008) The SEC’s XBRL voluntary filing program on EDGAR: A case for quality assurance. Current Issues Auditing 2(2):A36–A50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bovee M, Ettredge ML, Srivastava RP, Vasarhelyi MA (2002) Does the year 2000 XBRL taxonomy accommodate current business financial-reporting practice? J. Inform. Systems 16(2):165–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caliendo M, Kopeinig S (2008) Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. J. Econom. Survey 22(1):31–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen H, De P, Hu YJ, Hwang B-H (2014) Wisdom of crowds: The value of stock opinions transmitted through social media. Rev. Financial Stud. 27(5):1367–1403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Debreceny R, Farewell S, Piechocki M, Felden C, Gräning A (2010) Does it add up? Early evidence on the data quality of XBRL filings to the SEC. J. Accounting Public Policy 29(3):296–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dehejia RH, Wahba S (2002) Propensity score-matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies. Rev. Econom. Statist. 84(1):151–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dranove D, Jin GZ (2010) Quality disclosure and certification: Theory and practice. J. Econom. Literature 48(4):935–963.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dranove D, Kessler D, McClellan M, Satterthwaite M (2003) Is more information better? The effects of “report cards” on healthcare providers. J. Political Econom. 111(3):555–588.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Du H, Vasarhelyi MA, Zheng X (2013) XBRL mandate: Thousands of filing errors and so what? J. Inform. Systems 27(1):61–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghose A, Ipeirotis PG (2011) Estimating the helpfulness and economic impact of product reviews: Mining text and reviewer characteristics. IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Engrg. 23(10):1498–1512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gillette J, Pündrich G (2020) Grammatical violations and financial reporting quality. Preprint, submitted June 2, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3496434.Google Scholar
• Greenwood BN, Agarwal R (2016) Matching platforms and HIV incidence: An empirical investigation of race, gender, and socioeconomic status. Management Sci. 62(8):2281–2303.Link, Google Scholar
• Guay W, Samuels D, Taylor D (2016) Guiding through the Fog: Financial statement complexity and voluntary disclosure. J. Accounting Econom. 62(2):234–269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harris TS, Morsfield SG (2012) An evaluation of the current state and future of XBRL and interactive data for investors and analysts. Working paper, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
• Hoitash R, Hoitash U (2018) Measuring accounting reporting complexity with XBRL. Accounting Rev. 93(1):259–287.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmstrom B, Milgrom P (1991) Multitask principal-agent analyses: Incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design. J. Law Econom. Organ. 7:24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iacus SM, King G, Porro G (2012) Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. Political Anal. 20(1):1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kasznik R, Lev B (1995) To warn or not to warn: Management disclosures in the face of an earnings surprise. Accounting Rev. 70(1):113–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim JW, Lim J-H, No WG (2012) The effect of first wave mandatory XBRL reporting across the financial information environment. J. Inform. Systems 26(1):127–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim CF, Wang K, Zhang L (2019) Readability of 10-K reports and stock price crash risk. Contemporary Accounting Res. 36(2):1184–1216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krishnan R, Peters J, Padman R, Kaplan D (2005) On data reliability assessment in accounting information systems. Inform. Systems Res. 16(3):307–326.Link, Google Scholar
• Lambrecht A, Seim K, Tucker C (2011) Stuck in the adoption funnel: The effect of interruptions in the adoption process on usage. Marketing Sci. 30(2):355–367.Link, Google Scholar
• Lawrence A (2013) Individual investors and financial disclosure. J. Accounting Econom. 56(1):130–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lehavy R, Li F, Merkley K (2011) The effect of annual report readability on analyst following and the properties of their earnings forecasts. Accounting Rev. 86(3):1087–1115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leuz C, Wysocki PD (2016) The economics of disclosure and financial reporting regulation: Evidence and suggestions for future research. J. Accounting Res. 54(2):525–622.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li F (2008) Annual report readability, current earnings, and earnings persistence. J. Accounting Econom. 45(2):221–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li S, Nwaeze ET (2015) The association between extensions in XBRL disclosures and financial information environment. J. Inform. Systems 29(3):73–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu C (2013) XBRL: A new global paradigm for business financial reporting. J. Global Inform. Management. 21(3):60–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu C, Wang T, Yao LJ (2014) XBRL’s impact on analyst forecast behavior: An empirical study. J. Accounting Public Policy 33(1):69–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loughran T, McDonald B (2014a) Measuring readability in financial disclosures. J. Finance 69(4):1643–1671.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loughran T, McDonald B (2014b) Regulation and financial disclosure: The impact of plain English. J. Regulatory Econom. 45(1):94–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loughran T, McDonald B (2016) Textual analysis in accounting and finance: A survey. J. Accounting Res. 54(4):1187–1230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loughran T, McDonald B (2020) Textual analysis in finance. Annual Rev. Financial Econom. 12:357–375.Google Scholar
• Lu SF (2012) Multitasking, information disclosure, and product quality: Evidence from nursing homes. J. Econom. Management Strategy 21(3):673–705.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Madnick SE, Wang RY, Lee YW, Zhu H (2009) Overview and framework for data and information quality research. J. Data Inform. Quality 1(1):2.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller BP (2010) The effects of reporting complexity on small and large investor trading. Accounting Rev. 85(6):2107–2143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oh H, Animesh A, Pinsonneault A (2016) Free vs. for a fee: The impact of paywall on the pattern and effectiveness of word-of-mouth via social media. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 40(1):31–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perdana A, Robb A, Rohde F (2015) An integrative review and synthesis of XBRL research in academic journals. J. Inform. Systems 29(1):115–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rishika R, Kumar A, Janakiraman R, Bezawada R (2013) The effect of customers’ social media participation on customer visit frequency and profitability: An empirical investigation. Inform. Systems Res. 24(1):108–127.Link, Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70(1):41–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1973) Applying information technology to organization design. Public Admin. Rev. 33(3):268–278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sinnett WM (2011) SEC reporting and the impact of XBRL: 2011 survey. Accessed July 19, 2021, https://www.workiva.com/resources/sec-reporting-and-impact-xbrl-2011-ferf-survey.Google Scholar
• Stocken PC, Verrecchia RE (2004) Financial reporting system choice and disclosure management. Accounting Rev. 79(4):1181–1203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Subramanian R, Insley RG, Blackwell RD (1993) Performance and readability: A comparison of annual reports of profitable and unprofitable corporations. J. Bus. Comm. 30(1):49–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (1998) A Plain English Handbook: How to Create Clear SEC Disclosure Documents (DIANE Publishing).Google Scholar
• Wang RY (1998) A product perspective on total data quality management. Comm. ACM 41(2):58–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang RY, Strong DM (1996) Beyond accuracy: What data quality means to data consumers. J. Management Inform. Systems 12(4):5–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watts RL, Zimmerman JL (1986) Positive Accounting Theory (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Wu J, Vasarhelyi M (2004) XBRL: A New Tool for Electronic Financial Reporting (Springer, Berlin).Google Scholar
• Xu SX, Zhang XM (2013) Impact of Wikipedia on market information environment: Evidence on management disclosure and investor reaction. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 37(4):1043–1068.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhao K, Xia M (2014) Forming interoperability through interorganizational systems standards. J. Management Inform. Systems 30(4):269–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhu H, Wu H (2011a) Interoperability of XBRL financial statements in the U.S. Internat. J. E-Bus. Res. 7(2):19–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhu H, Wu H (2011b) Quality of data standards: Framework and illustration using XBRL taxonomy and instances. Electronic Marketing 21(2):129–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhu H, Wu H (2014) Assessing the quality of large-scale data standards: A case of XBRL GAAP taxonomy. Decision Support Systems 59:351–360.Crossref, Google Scholar