Platform Competition Under Network Effects: Piggybacking and Optimal Subsidization

References

• Anderson E, Parker G, Tan B (2014) Platform performance investment in the presence of network externalities. Inform. Systems Res. 25(1):152–172.Link, Google Scholar
• Armstrong M (2006) Competition in two-sided markets. RAND J. Econom. 37(3):668–691.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhargava H, Sundaresan S (2004) Computing as utility: Managing availability, commitment, and pricing through contingent bid auctions. J. Management Inform. Systems 21(2):201–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhuiyan J (2016) The global anti-Uber alliance just launched its newest international product. Vox (June 1), https://www.vox.com/2016/6/1/11820682/lyft-grab-antiuber-alliance-crossbooking-southeastasia-us-uber.Google Scholar
• Bolt W, Tieman A (2008) Heavily skewed pricing in two-sided markets. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 26(5):1250–1255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boudreau K (2010) Open platform strategies and innovation: Granting access vs. devolving control. Management Sci. 56(10):1849–1872.Link, Google Scholar
• Chellappa RK, Mukherjee R (2021) Platform preannouncement strategies: The strategic role of information in two-sided markets competition. Management Sci. 67(3):1527–1545.Google Scholar
• Economides N, Tåg J (2012) Network neutrality on the internet: A two-sided market analysis. Inform. Econom. Policy 24(2):91–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenmann T, Parker G, Van Alstyne M (2006) Strategies for two-sided markets. Harvard Bus. Rev. 84(10):92–102.Google Scholar
• Eisenmann T, Parker G, Van Alstyne M (2011) Platform envelopment. Strategic Management J. 32(12):1270–1285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fang TP, Wu A, Clough DR (2019) Hatching the platform ecosystem: Mobilizing complementors by creating social foci. Working paper, Wharton Business School, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
• Gawer A, Cusumano M (2008) How companies become platform leaders. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 49(2):28–35.Google Scholar
• Hagiu A (2009) Two-sided platforms: Product variety and pricing structures. J. Econom. Management Strategy 18(4):1011–1043.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hagiu A, Eisenmann T (2007) A staged solution to the catch-22. Harvard Bus. Rev. 85(11):25–26.Google Scholar
• Hagiu A, Hałaburda H (2014) Information and two-sided platform profits. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 34:25–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hagiu A, Spulber D (2013) First-party content and coordination in two-sided markets. Management Sci. 59(4):933–949.Link, Google Scholar
• Katz ML, Shapiro C (1992) Product introduction with network externalities. J. Indust. Econom. 40(1):55–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee D, Mendelson H (2007) Adoption of information technology under network effects. Inform. Systems Res. 18(4):395–413.Link, Google Scholar
• Li Z, Agarwal A (2016) Platform integration and demand spillovers in complementary markets: Evidence from Facebook’s integration of Instagram. Management Sci. 63(10):3438–3458.Link, Google Scholar
• Parker G, Van Alstyne M (2005) Two-sided network effects: A theory of information product design. Management Sci. 51(10):1494–1504.Link, Google Scholar
• Parker G, Van Alstyne M, Choudhary S (2016) Platform Revolution: How Network Markets Are Transforming the Economy and How to Make Them Work for You (W. W. Norton & Company, New York).Google Scholar
• Rochet J, Tirole J (2003) Platform competition in two-sided markets. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 1(4):990–1029.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rochet J, Tirole J (2006) Two-sided markets: A progress report. RAND J. Econom. 37(3):645–667.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Hui K (2017) Technology mergers and acquisitions in the presence of an installed base: A strategic analysis. Inform. Systems Res. 28(1):46–63.Link, Google Scholar
• Wright J (2004) One-sided logic in two-sided markets. Rev. Network Econom. 3(1):44–64.Google Scholar