And the Winner Is …? The Desirable and Undesirable Effects of Platform Awards

References

• Anand N, Watson MR (2004) Tournament rituals in the evolution of fields: The case of the Grammy Awards. Acad. Management J. 47(1):59–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson EG, Parker GG, Tan B (2014) Platform performance investment in the presence of network externalities. Inform. Systems Res. 25(1):152–172.Link, Google Scholar
• Android Developers (2020) Android versioning. Retrieved January 1, 2020, https://developerandroid.com/studio/publish/versioning.Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Pischke JS (2009) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bakos Y, Halaburda H (2020) Platform competition with multi-homing on both sides: Subsidize or not? Management Sci. 66(12):5599–5607.Link, Google Scholar
• Banker RD, Davis GB, Slaughter SA (1998) Software development practices, software complexity, and software maintenance performance: A field study. Management Sci 44(4):433–450.Link, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S (2004) How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Quart. J. Econom. 119(1):249–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhargava HK, Kim BC, Sun D (2013) Commercialization of platform technologies: Launch timing and versioning strategy. Production Oper. Management 22(6):1374–1388.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhargava HK, Csapó G, Müller R (2020) On optimal auctions for mixing exclusive and shared matching in platforms. Management Sci. 66(6):2653–2676. Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ, Hagiu A (2009) Platform rules: Multi-sided platforms as regulators. Gawer A, ed. Platforms, Markets and Innovation (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK), 163–191.Google Scholar
• Boudreau K (2010) Open platform strategies and innovation: Granting access vs. devolving control. Management Sci. 56(10):1849–1872.Link, Google Scholar
• Boudreau K (2012) Let a thousand flowers bloom? An early look at large numbers of software app developers and patterns of innovation. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1409–1427.Link, Google Scholar
• Brandenburger AM, Nalebuff BJ (1996) Co-Opetition (Doubleday, New York).Google Scholar
• Brown SL, Eisenhardt KM (1995) Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions. Acad. Management Rev. 20(2):343–378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown SL, Eisenhardt KM (1997) The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart 42(1):1–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burtch G, Hong Y, Bapna R, Griskevicius V (2018) Stimulating online reviews by combining financial incentives and social norms. Management Sci. 64(5):2065–2082.Link, Google Scholar
• Burtch G, He Q, Hong Y, Lee D (2021) How do peer awards motivate creative content? Experimental evidence from Reddit. Management Sci. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Caillaud B, Jullien B (2003) Chicken & egg: Competition among intermediation service providers. RAND J. Econom. 34(2):309–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cavusoglu H, Cavusoglu H, Zhang J (2008) Security patch management: Share the burden or share the damage? Management Sci. 54(4):657–670.Google Scholar
• Ceccagnoli M, Forman C, Huang P, Wu DJ (2012) Cocreation of value in a platform ecosystem: The case of enterprise software. MIS Quart. 36(1):263–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cennamo C, Ozalp H, Kretschmer T (2018) Platform architecture, multihoming and complement quality: Evidence from the U.S. video game industry. Inform. Systems Res. 29(2):461–478.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen H, De P, Hu YJ (2015) IT-enabled broadcasting in social media: An empirical study of artists’ activities and music sales. Inform. Systems Res. 26(3):513–531.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen IJ, Hsu PH, Officer MS, Wang Y (2020) The Oscar goes to…: High-tech firms’ acquisitions in response to rivals’ technology breakthroughs. Res. Policy 49(7)104078.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen L, Zhan MS, Raghu TS (2019) The Spillover of Spotlight: Platform recommendation in the mobile app market. Inform. Systems Res 30(4):1296–1318.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Harper FM, Konstan J, Xin Li SX (2010) Social comparisons and contributions to online communities: A feld experiment on MovieLens. Amer. Econom. Rev 100(4):1658–1698.Google Scholar
• Claussen J, Kretschmer T, Mayrhofer P (2013) The effects of rewarding user engagement: The case of facebook apps. Inform. Systems Res 24(1):186–200.Link, Google Scholar
• Clements MT, Ohashi H (2005) Indirect network effects and the product cycle: Video games in the US, 1994–2002. J. Indust. Econom. 53(4):515–542.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Connelly BL, Certo ST, Ireland RD, Reutzel CR (2011) Signaling theory: A review and assessment. J. Management 37(1):39–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Constantinides P, Henfridsson O, Parker GG (2018) Introduction—Platforms and infrastructures in the digital age. Inform. Systems Res. 29(2):381–400.Link, Google Scholar
• Corts KS, Lederman M (2009) Software exclusivity and the scope of indirect network effects in the US home video game market. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 27(2):121–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dimoka A, Hong Y, Pavlou PA (2012) On product uncertainty in online markets: Theory and evidence. MIS Quart. 36(2):395–426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Economist, The (2012) You’ve been sherlocked. The Economist (July 13) https://www.economist.com/babbage/2012/07/13/youve-been-sherlocked.Google Scholar
• Farrell J, Shapiro C (1988) Dynamic competition with switching costs. RAND J. Econom. 19(1):123–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foerderer J (2020) Interfirm exchange and innovation in platform ecosystems: Evidence from Apple’s worldwide developers conference. Management Sci. 66(10):4772–4787.Link, Google Scholar
• Foerderer J, Kude T, Schuetz SW, Heinzl A (2019) Knowledge boundaries in enterprise software platform development: Antecedents and consequences for platform governance. Inform. Systems J. 29(1):119–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foerderer J, Mithas S, Kude T, Heinzl A (2018) Does platform owner’s entry crowd out innovation? Evidence from Google photos. Inform. Systems Res. 29(2):444–460.Link, Google Scholar
• Frey BS, Gallus J (2017) Towards an economics of awards. J. Econom. Survey 31(1):190–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gallus J (2016) Fostering public good contributions with symbolic awards: A large-scale natural field experiment at Wikipedia. Management Sci. 63(12):3999–4015.Link, Google Scholar
• Gallus J, Frey BS (2016) Awards: A strategic management perspective. Strategic Management J. 37(8):1699–1714.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gallus J, Frey BS (2017) Honours versus money: The economics of awards. J. Econom. Surveys (Oxford University Press, Oxford).Google Scholar
• Garg R, Telang R (2013) Inferring app demand from publicly available data. MIS Quart. 37(4):1253–1264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghazawneh A, Henfridsson O (2013) Balancing platform control and external contribution in third-party development: The boundary resources model. Inform. Systems J. 23(2):173–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghose A, Ipeirotis PG, Li B (2012) Designing ranking systems for hotels on travel search engines by mining user-generated and crowdsourced content. Marketing Sci. 31(3):493–520.Google Scholar
• Google (2016) The Google Play Awards coming to Google I/O. Accessed January 1, 2020, https://android-developers.googleblog.com/2016/04/the-google-play-awards-coming-to-google.html.Google Scholar
• Google (2019) And the 2019 Google Play Award nominees are….” Retrieved January 1, 2020, https://android-developers.googleblog.com/2019/04/and-2019-google-play-award-nominees-are.html.Google Scholar
• Goolsbee A, Syverson C (2008) How do incumbents respond to the threat of entry? Evidence from the major airlines. Quart. J. Econom. 123(4):1611–1633.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greene WH (2003) Econometric Analysis (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Greenwood BN, Wattal S (2017) Show me the way to go home: An empirical investigation of ride-sharing and alcohol related motor vehicle fatalities. MIS Quart. 41(1):163–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gubler T, Larkin I, Pierce L (2016) Motivational spillovers from awards: Crowding out in a multitasking environment. Organ. Sci. 27(2):286–303.Link, Google Scholar
• Gubler T, Larkin I, Pierce L (2018) Doing well by making well: The impact of corporate wellness programs on employee productivity. Management Sci. 64(11):4967–4987.Link, Google Scholar
• Hagiu A (2006) Pricing and commitment in two-sided platforms. RAND J. Econom 37(3):720–737.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hagiu A, Spulber D (2013) First-party content and coordination in two-sided markets. Management Sci. 59(4):933–949.Link, Google Scholar
• Halaburda H, Jan Piskorski M, Yıldırım P (2018) Competing by restricting choice: The case of matching platforms. Management Sci. 64(8):3574–3594.Link, Google Scholar
• Hendricks KB, Singhal VR (1996) Quality awards and the market value of the firm: An empirical investigation. Management Sci. 42(3):415–436.Link, Google Scholar
• Ho-Dac NN, Kumar M, Slotegraaf RJ (2020) Using product development information to spur the adoption of continuous improvement products. J. Acad. Marketing Sci 48(6):1156–1173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang P, Mithas S, Tafti A (2018) Platform sponsor’s investments and user contributions in knowledge communities: The role of knowledge seeding. MIS Quart. 42(1):213–240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huber T, Kude T, Dibbern J (2017) Governance practices in platform ecosystems: Navigating tensions between co-created value and governance costs. Inform. Systems Res. 28(3):563–584.Link, Google Scholar
• Hukal P, Henfridsson O, Shaikh M, Parker G (2020) Platform signaling for generating platform content. MIS Quart. 44(3):1177–1205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iacus SM, King G, Porro G, Katz JN (2012) Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. Political Anal. 20(1):1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen MC, Meckling WH (1976) Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J. Financial Econom. 3(4):305–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jullien B, Pavan A (2019) Information management and pricing in platform markets. Rev. Econom. Stud 86(4):1666–1703.Google Scholar
• Kang C, Aaltonen A, Henfridsson O (2019) The impact of platform entry strategies on the quality of complements in multihoming. Proc. 40th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (ICIS, Munich, Germary).Google Scholar
• Koh TK, Fichman M (2014) Multihoming users’ preferences for two-sided exchange networks. MIS Quart. 38(4):977–996.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kosfeld M, Neckermann S (2011) Getting more work for nothing? Symbolic awards and worker performance. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 3(3):86–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kovács B, Sharkey AJ (2014) The paradox of publicity: How awards can negatively affect the evaluation of quality. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59(1):1–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krishnan V, Ramachandran K (2011) Integrated product architecture and pricing for managing sequential innovation. Management Sci. 57(11):2040–2053.Link, Google Scholar
• Landsman V, Stremersch S (2011) Multihoming in two-sided markets: An empirical inquiry in the video game console industry. J. Marketing 75(6):39–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee RS (2013) Vertical integration and exclusivity in platform and two-sided markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(7):2960–3000.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee G, Raghu TS (2014) Determinants of mobile apps’ success: Evidence from the app store market. J. Management Inform. Systems 31(2):133–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li H, Zhu F (2020) Information transparency, multi-homing, and platform competition: A natural experiment in the daily deals market. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print October 7, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3718.Link, Google Scholar
• Li J, Shi W, Connelly B, Yi X, Qin X (2020) CEO awards and financial misconduct. J. Management, ePub ahead of print, https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320921438.Google Scholar
• Luca M, Zervas G (2016) Fake it till you make it: Reputation, competition, and Yelp review fraud. Management Sci. 62(12):3412–3427.Link, Google Scholar
• Nowlis SM, Simonson I (1996) The effect of new product features on brand choice. J. Marketing Res. 33(1):36–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park Y, Mithas S (2020) Organized complexity of digital business strategy: A configurational perspective. MIS Quart. 44(1):85–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parker G, Van Alstyne MW (2005) Two-sided network effects: A theory of information product design. Management Sci. 51(10):1494–1504.Link, Google Scholar
• Parker G, Van Alstyne MW (2018) Innovation, openness, and platform control. Management Sci. 64(7):3015–3032.Link, Google Scholar
• Parker G, Van Alstyne MW, Jiang X (2017) Platform ecosystems: How developers invert the firm. MIS Quart. 41(1):255–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rietveld J, Eggers JP (2018) Demand heterogeneity in platform markets: Implications for complementors. Organ. Sci 29(2):304–322.Link, Google Scholar
• Rietveld J, Schilling MA, Bellavitis C (2019) Platform strategy: Managing ecosystem value through selective promotion of complements. Organ. Sci. 30(6):1232–1251.Link, Google Scholar
• Robinson CD, Gallus J, Lee MG, Rogers T (2021) The demotivating effect (and unintended message) of awards. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes. 32(1):iii–vi.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70(1):41–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothaermel FT, Deeds DL (2004) Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: A system of new product development. Strategic Management J 25(3):201–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Song W, Chen J, Li W (2020) Spillover effect of consumer awareness on third parties’ selling strategies and retailers’ platform openness. Inform. Systems Res. 32(1):iii–vi.Link, Google Scholar
• Sorenson O (2000) Letting the market work for you: An evolutionary perspective on product strategy. Strategic Management J. 21(5):577–592.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spence M (1973) Job market signaling. Quart. J. Econom. 87(3):355–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stiglitz JE (2000) The contributions of the economics of information to twentieth century economics. Quart. J. Econom 115(4):1441–1478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tanriverdi Hn, Lee CH (2008) Within-industry diversification and firm performance in the presence of network externalities: Evidence from the software industry. Acad. Management J. 51(2):381–397.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tiwana A (2015) Evolutionary competition in platform ecosystems. Inform. Systems Res. 26(2):266–281.Link, Google Scholar
• Tiwana A, Konsynski B, Bush AA (2010) Platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):675–687.Link, Google Scholar
• Venkataraman V, Ceccagnoli M, Forman C (2018) Multihoming within platform ecosystems: The strategic role of human capital. Research Paper No. 18-8, Scheller College of Business, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.Google Scholar
• Voss GB, Sirdeshmukh D, Voss ZG (2008) The effects of slack resources and environmental threat on product exploration and exploitation. Acad. Management J. 51(1):147–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Li B, Singh PV (2018) Copycats vs. original mobile apps: A machine learning copycat-detection method and empirical analysis. Inform. Systems Res. 29(2):273–291.Link, Google Scholar
• Wareham J, Fox PB, Cano Giner JL (2014) Technology ecosystem governance. Organ. Sci. 25(4):1195–1215.Link, Google Scholar
• Xue L, Song P, Rai A, Zhang C, Zhao X (2019) Implications of application programming interfaces for third‐party new app development and copycatting. Production Oper. Management 28(8):1887–1902.Crossref, Google Scholar