Learning to Be Creative: A Mutually Exciting Spatiotemporal Point Process Model for Idea Generation in Open Innovation

References

• Ales L, Cho SH, Korpeoglu E (2017) Optimal award scheme in innovation tournaments. Oper. Res. 65(3):693–702.Link, Google Scholar
• Ales L, Cho SH, Korpeoglu E (2021) Innovation tournaments with multiple contributors. Production Oper. Management Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Allen R (1983) Collective invention. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 4(1):1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amabile TM (1988) A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Res. Organ. Behav. 10:123–167.Google Scholar
• Arrow KJ (1962) The economic implications of learning by doing. Rev. Econom. Stud. 29(3):155–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bacry E, Mastromatteo I, Muzy JF (2015) Hawkes processes in finance. Market Microstructure Liquidity 1(01):1550005.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cer D, Yang Y, Kong S-y, Hua N, Limtiaco N, St. John R, Constant N, et al. (2018) Universal sentence encoder. Preprint, submitted March 29, https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.11175v1.Google Scholar
• Chan J, Dow SP, Schunn CD (2015) Do the best design ideas (really) come from conceptually distant sources of inspiration? Design Stud. 36:31–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chase W, Simon H (1973) Skill in chess. Amer. Scientist 61(4):394–403.Google Scholar
• Chesbrough HW (2003) Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology (Harvard Business Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Chesbrough H, Bogers M (2014) Explicating open innovation: Clarifying an emerging paradigm for understanding innovation. Chesbrough H, Vanhaverbeke W, West J, eds. New Frontiers in Open Innovation (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 3–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen BT, Schunn CD (2007) The relationship of analogical distance to analogical function and preinventive structure: The case of engineering design. Memory Cognition 35(1):29–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahl DW, Moreau P (2002) The influence and value of analogical thinking during new product ideation. J. Marketing Res. 39(1):47–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahlander L, Piezunka H (2014) Open to suggestions: How organizations elicit suggestions through proactive and reactive attention. Res. Policy 43(5):812–827.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dai AM, Olah C, Le QV (2015) Document embedding with paragraph vectors. Preprint, submitted July 29, https://arxiv.org/abs/1507.07998.Google Scholar
• Daley DJ, Vere-Jones D (2003) An Introduction to the Theory of Point Processes (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
• Dunbar K (1995) How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. Sternberg RJ, Davidson JE, eds. The Nature of Insight (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 365–395.Google Scholar
• Enkel E, Gassmann O (2010) Creative imitation: Exploring the case of cross-industry innovation. R&D Management 40(3):256–270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fichter K (2009) Innovation communities: The role of networks of promotors in open innovation. R&D Management 39(4):357–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finke RA, Ward TB, Smith SM (1992) Creative Cognition: Theory, Research, and Applications (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Fleming L (2001) Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Sci. 47(1):117–132.Link, Google Scholar
• Forrester (2014) Does creativity matter? Adobe research shows dramatic impact on business results. Accessed April 20, 2019, https://news.adobe.com/news/news-details/2014/Media-Alert-Does-Creativity-Matter-Adobe-Research-Shows-Dramatic-Impact-on-Business-Results/default.aspx.Google Scholar
• Franke N, Shah S (2003) How communities support innovative activities: An exploration of assistance and sharing among end-users. Res. Policy 32(1):157–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fu K, Chan J, Cagan J, Kotovsky K, Schunn C, Wood K (2013) The meaning of “near” and far: The impact of structuring design databases and the effect of distance of analogy on design output. J. Mechanical Design 135(2):021007.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gassmann O, Enkel E (2004) Toward a theory of open innovation: Three core process archetypes. R&D Management Conf. (RADMA), Lissabon.Google Scholar
• Gentner D, Brem S, Ferguson R, Wolff P (1997) Analogy and creativity in the works of Johannes Kepler. Ward TB, Smith SM, Vaid J, eds. Creative Thought: An Investigation of Conceptual Structures and Processes (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC), 403–459.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Girotra K, Terwiesch C, Ulrich KT (2010) Idea generation and the quality of the best idea. Management Sci. 56(4):591–605.Link, Google Scholar
• Halpin PF (2013) A scalable EM algorithm for Hawkes processes. Millsap RE, van der Ark LA, Bolt DM, Woods CM, eds. New Developments in Quantitative Psychology (Springer, New York), 403–414.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Halpin PF, De Boeck P (2013) Modelling dyadic interaction with Hawkes processes. Psychometrika 78(4):793–814.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hawkes AG (1971a) Point spectra of some mutually exciting point processes. J. Royal Statist. Soc. B (Methodological) 33(3):438–443.Google Scholar
• Hawkes AG (1971b) Spectra of some self-exciting and mutually exciting point processes. Biometrika 58(1):83–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayes JR (1989) Cognitive processes in creativity. Glover JA, Ronning RR, Reynolds CR, eds. Handbook of Creativity (Springer US, Boston), 135–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayes JR, Flower L, Schriver KA, Stratman J, Carey L (1987) Cognitive processes in revision. Rosenberg S, ed. Reading, Writing, and Language Processes (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 176–240.Google Scholar
• Higgins ET (1996) Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. Higgins ET, Kruglanski AW, eds. Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles (Guilford Press, New York), 133–168.Google Scholar
• History.com (2009) Ford’s assembly line starts rolling. Accessed April 20, 2019, https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/fords-assembly-line-starts-rolling.Google Scholar
• Howe J (2006) The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired 14(6), https://www.wired.com/2006/06/crowds/.Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Vir Singh P, Srinivasan K (2014) Crowdsourcing new product ideas under consumer learning. Management Sci. 60(9):2138–2159.Link, Google Scholar
• Hwang EH, Singh PV, Argote L (2019) Jack of all, master of some: Information network and innovation in crowdsourcing communities. Inform. Systems Res. 30(2):389–410.Link, Google Scholar
• Jamshidian M, Jennrich RI (2000) Standard errors for EM estimation. J. Royal Statist. Soc. B. Statist. Methodology 62(2):257–270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jeppesen LB, Frederiksen L (2006) Why do users contribute to firm-hosted user communities? The case of computer-controlled music instruments. Organ. Sci. 17(1):45–63.Link, Google Scholar
• Jeppesen LB, Lakhani KR (2010) Marginality and problem-solving effectiveness in broadcast search. Organ. Sci. 21(5):1016–1033.Link, Google Scholar
• Kandybin A, Kihn M (2004) The innovator’s prescription: Raising your return on innovation investment. Strategy + Bus. (June 1), https://www.strategy-business.com/article/04205?gko=538fe.Google Scholar
• Karabash D (2012) On stability of Hawkes process. Preprint, submitted January 7, https://arxiv.org/abs/1201.1573.Google Scholar
• Korpeoglu E, Cho SH (2017) Incentives in contests with heterogeneous solvers. Management Sci. 64(6):2709–2715.Link, Google Scholar
• Kuhn TS (2012) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lakhani KR, Jeppesen LB, Lohse PA, Panetta JA (2007) The value of openess in scientific problem solving. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Laub PJ, Taimre T, Pollett PK (2015) Hawkes processes. Preprint, submitted July 10, https://arxiv.org/abs/1507.02822.Google Scholar
• Laursen K, Salter A (2006) Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management J. 27(2):131–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Le Q, Mikolov T (2014) Distributed representations of sentences and documents. Preprint, revised May 22, https://arxiv.org/abs/1405.4053.Google Scholar
• Lthje C, Herstatt C, von Hippel E (2005) User-innovators and local information: The case of mountain biking. Res. Policy 34(6):951–965.Google Scholar
• Malaga RA (2000) The effect of stimulus modes and associative distance in individual creativity support systems. Decision Support Systems 29(2):125–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mishra S, Rizoiu MA, Xie L (2016) Feature driven and point process approaches for popularity prediction. Proc. 25th ACM Internat. Conf. Inform. Knowledge Management (CIKM) (ACM, New York), 1069–1078.Google Scholar
• Morrison PD, Roberts JH, von Hippel E (2000) Determinants of user innovation and innovation sharing in a local market. Management Sci. 46(12):1513–1527.Google Scholar
• Nijstad BA, Stroebe W (2006) How the group affects the mind: A cognitive model of idea generation in groups. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 10(3):186–213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ogata Y (1978) The asymptotic behaviour of maximum likelihood estimators for stationary point processes. Ann. Inst. Statist. Math. 30(1):243–261.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ogata Y (1988) Statistical models for earthquake occurrences and residual analysis for point processes. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 83(401):9–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ogata Y (1998) Space-time point-process models for earthquake occurrences. Ann. Inst. Statist. Math. 50(2):379–402.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ozaki T (1979) Maximum likelihood estimation of Hawkes’ self-exciting point processes. Ann. Inst. Statist. Math. 31(1):145–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piezunka H, Dahlander L (2015) Distant search, narrow attention: How crowding alters organizations filtering of suggestions in crowdsourcing. Acad. Management J. 58(3):856–880.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ransbotham S, Kane GC, Lurie NH (2012) Network characteristics and the value of collaborative user-generated content. Marketing Sci. 31(3):387–405.Google Scholar
• Rasmussen JG (2013) Bayesian inference for Hawkes processes. Methodology Comput. Appl. Probab. 15(3):623–642.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reynaud-Bouret P, Rivoirard V, Tuleau-Malot C (2013) Inference of functional connectivity in neurosciences via Hawkes processes. 2013 IEEE Global Conf. Signal Inform. Processing, Austin, TX (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 317–320.Google Scholar
• Schumpeter JA (1934) The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Seldon T (2011) Beyond patents: Effective intellectual property strategy in biotechnology. Innovation 13(1):55–61.Google Scholar
• Shah SK, Tripsas M (2007) The accidental entrepreneur: The emergent and collective process of user entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 1(12):123–140.Google Scholar
• Sims P (2012) The no. 1 enemy of creativity: Fear of failure. Harvard Bus. Rev. (October 5), https://hbr.org/2012/10/the-no-1-enemy-of-creativity-f.Google Scholar
• Singh PV, Tan Y, Youn N (2011) A hidden Markov model of developer learning dynamics in open source software projects. Inform. Systems Res. 22(4):790–807.Google Scholar
• Smith SM, Ward TB, Finke RA (1995) The Creative Cognition Approach (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Srijith PK, Lukasik M, Bontcheva K, Cohn T (2017) Longitudinal modeling of social media with Hawkes process based on users and networks. Proc. 2017 IEEE/ACM Internat. Conf. Adv. Soc. Networks Anal. Mining (ASONAM) (ACM, Sydney), 195–202.Google Scholar
• Thorley M (2018) The role of failure in developing creativity in professional music recording and production. Thinking Skills Creativity 30:160–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toubia O, Netzer O (2017) Idea generation, creativity, and prototypicality. Marketing Sci. 36(1):1–20.Link, Google Scholar
• Vanhaverbeke W, Van de Vrande V, Chesbrough H (2008) Understanding the advantages of open innovation practices in corporate venturing in terms of real options. Creativity Innovation Management 17(4):251–258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Veen A, Schoenberg FP (2008) Estimation of space–time branching process models in seismology using an EM–type algorithm. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 103(482):614–624.Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E (1986) Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Management Sci. 32(7):791–805.Google Scholar
• von Hippel E (1988) The Sources of Innovation (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Weisberg RW (1998) Creativity and knowledge: A challenge to theories. Sternberg R, ed. Handbook of Creativity (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 226–250.Google Scholar
• Weisberg RW (2009) On Out-of-the-Box Thinking in Creativity. Tools for Innovation (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• West J, Lakhani KR (2008) Getting clear about communities in open innovation. Indust. Innovation 15(2):223–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• West J, O’mahony S (2008) The role of participation architecture in growing sponsored open source communities. Indust. Innov. 15(2):145–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wishbow N (1988) Creativity in poets. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
• Xu L, Duan JA, Whinston A (2014) Path to purchase: A mutually exciting point process model for online advertising and conversion. Management Sci. 60(6):1392–1412.Link, Google Scholar
• Yang SH, Zha H (2013) Mixture of mutually exciting processes for viral diffuion. Dasgupta S, McAllester D, eds. Proc. 30th Internat. Conf. Internat. Machine Learn. (PMLR, Atlanta), 1–9.Google Scholar
• Yu L, Kittur A, Kraut RE (2014) Distributed analogical idea generation: Inventing with crowds. Proc. 32nd Annual ACM Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (CHI) (ACM Press, Toronto), 1245–1254.Google Scholar