The Unknowability of Autonomous Tools and the Liminal Experience of Their Use

References

• Archer MS, Bhaskar R, Collier A, Lawson T, Norrie A (1998) Critical Realism: Essential Readings (Psychology Press, London).Google Scholar
• Banerjee D, Cronan TP, Jones TW (1998) Modeling IT ethics: A study in situational ethics. MIS Quart. 22(1):31–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barad K (2003) Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs 28(3):801–831.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beane M, Orlikowski WJ (2015) What difference does a robot make? The material enactment of distributed coordination. Organ. Sci. 26(6):1553–1573.Link, Google Scholar
• Berente N, Yoo Y (2012) Institutional contradictions and loose coupling: Postimplementation of NASA’s enterprise information system. Inform. Systems Res. 23(2):376–396.Link, Google Scholar
• Bijker WE, Hughes TP, Pinch TJ (1987) The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Boehm BW (1988) A spiral model of software development and enhancement. Comput. 21(5):61–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boland RJ, Tenkasi RV, Te’eni D (1994) Designing information technology to support distributed cognition. Organ. Sci. 5(3):456–475.Link, Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P (1998) Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Google Scholar
• Brown C, Linden G (2009) Chips and Change: How Crisis Reshapes the Semiconductor Industry (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burrell J (2016) How the machine “thinks”: Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms. Big Data Soc. 3(1):1–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Callon M, Muniesa FJOs (2005) Peripheral vision: Economic markets as calculative collective devices. Organ. Stud. 26(8):1229–1250.Google Scholar
• Corbin JM, Strauss A (1990) Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qual. Sociol. 13(1):3–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• David PA (1994) Why are institutions the “carriers of history”? Path dependence and the evolution of conventions, organizations and institutions. Structural Change Econom. Dynamics 5(2):205–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• David PA (2001) Path dependence, its critics and the quest for “historical economics.” Garrouste P, Ioannides S, eds. Evolution and Path Dependence in Economic Ideas: Past and Present (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK), 15–40.Google Scholar
• DeLanda M (2013) Intensive Science and Virtual Philosophy (Bloomsbury Publishing, London, UK).Google Scholar
• DeLanda M (2016) Assemblage Theory (Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, UK).Google Scholar
• Dodgson M, Gann DM, Salter A (2007) “In case of fire, please use the elevator”: Simulation technology and organization in fire engineering. Organ. Sci. 18(5):849–864.Link, Google Scholar
• Eisenberg EM (1990) Jamming: Transcendence through organizing. Comm. Res. 17(2):139–164.Google Scholar
• Emirbayer M, Mische A (1998) What is agency? Amer. J. Sociol. 103(4):962–1023.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faraj S, Kwon D, Watts S (2004) Contested artifact: Technology sensemaking, actor networks, and the shaping of the web browser. Inform. Tech. People 17(2):186–209Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faraj S, Pachidi S, Sayegh K (2018) Working and organizing in the age of the learning algorithm. Inform. Organ. 28(1):62–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fayard A-L, Weeks J (2007) Photocopiers and water-coolers: The affordances of informal interaction. Organ. Stud. 28(5):605–634.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garsten C (1999) Betwixt and between: Temporary employees as liminal subjects in flexible organizations. Organ. Stud. 20(4):601–617.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gaskin JE, Berente N, Lyytinen K, Yoo Y (2014) Toward generalizable sociomaterial inquiry: A computational approach for zooming in and out of sociomaterial routines. MIS Quart. (38)(3):849–871.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson JJ (1977) The theory of affordances. Shaw R, Bransford J, eds. Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing: Toward an Ecological Psychology. (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ), 67–82.Google Scholar
• Gibson JJ (1979) The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception (Psychology Press).Google Scholar
• Giddens A (1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration (University of California Press, Berkeley).Google Scholar
• Gregor S, Jones D (2007) The anatomy of a design theory. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 8(5):19.Google Scholar
• Hagras H (2018) Toward human-understandable, explainable AI. Comput. 51(9):28–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanseth O, Monteiro E (1997) Inscribing behaviour in information infrastructure standards. Accounting Management Inform. Tech. 7(4):183–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heidegger M (1962) Being and Time (Harper & Row, New York).Google Scholar
• Henderson MK (1991) Flexible sketches and inflexible data bases: Visual communication, conscription devices, and boundary objects in design engineering. Sci Tech Human Values 16(4):448–473.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henfridsson O, Yoo Y (2014) The liminality of trajectory shifts in institutional entrepreneurship. Organ. Sci. 25(3):932–950.Link, Google Scholar
• High R (2012) The Era of Cognitive Systems: An Inside Look at IBM Watson and How It Works (IBM Corporation, Redbooks).Google Scholar
• Hirschheim R (1985) Information systems epistemology: An historical perspective. Research Methods in Information Systems, 9:13–35.Google Scholar
• Holland JH, Holyoak KJ, Nisbett RE, Thagard PR (1989) Induction: Processes of Inference, Learning, and Discovery (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hutchins E (1995) Cognition in the Wild (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hutchins E, Klausen T (1996) Distributed cognition in an airline cockpit. Engeström Y, Middleton D, eds. Cognition and Communication at Work (Cambridge University Press, New York), 15–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Introna LD (2011) The enframing of code: Agency, originality and the plagiarist. Theory Culture Soc. 28(6):113–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa SL, Leidner DE (1999) Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organ. Sci. 10(6):791–815.Link, Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa SL, Knoll K, Leidner DE (1998) Is anybody out there? Antecedents of trust in global virtual teams. J. Management Inform. Systems 14(4):29–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jung Y, Lyytinen K (2014) Towards an ecological account of media choice: A case study on pluralistic reasoning while choosing email. Inform. Systems J. 24(3):271–293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kallinikos J, Aaltonen A, Marton A (2013) The ambivalent ontology of digital artifacts. MIS Quart. 37(2):357–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kavanagh D, Araujo L (1995) Chronigami: Folding and unfolding time. Accounting Management Inform. Tech. 5(2):103–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kling R, Scacchi W (1982) The web of computing: Computer technology as social organization. Adv. Comput. 21:1–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kroll JA (2018) The fallacy of inscrutability. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. A 376:1–14.Google Scholar
• Kvale S, Brinkmann S (2009) Interviews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing (Sage).Google Scholar
• Latour B (1987) Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society (Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
• Latour B (2005) Reassembling the Social. Política Soc. 43(3):127–130.Google Scholar
• Latour B (2012) We Have Never Been Modern (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Latour B, Mauguin P, Teil G (1992) A note on socio-technical graphs. Soc Stud Sci. 22(1):33–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leavitt HJ, March JG, March JG (1962) Applied Organizational Change in Industry: Structural, Technological and Humanistic Approaches (Carnegie Institute of Technology, Graduate School of Industrial Administration, Pittsburgh, PA).Google Scholar
• Lee AS, Baskerville RL (2003) Generalizing generalizability in information systems research. Inform. Systems Res. 14(3):221–243.Link, Google Scholar
• Leonardi PM (2011) When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: Affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. MIS Quart. 35(1):147–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonardi P (2013) Theoretical foundations for the study of sociomateriality. Inform. Organ. 23(2):59–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levina N, Arriaga M (2014) Distinction and status production on user-generated content platforms: Using Bourdieu’s theory of cultural production to understand social dynamics in online fields. Inform. Systems Res. 25(3):468–488.Link, Google Scholar
• Liebowitz SJ, Margolis SE (1995) Path dependence, lock-in, and history. J. Law Econom. Organ. 11(1):205–226.Google Scholar
• Lindberg A, Berente N, Gaskin J, Lyytinen K (2016) Coordinating interdependencies in online communities: A study of an open source software project. Inform. Systems Res. 27(4):751–772.Link, Google Scholar
• Lyytinen K, Berente N (2017) Iteration in systems analysis and design: Cognitive processes and representational artifacts. Chiang RHL, Siau K, Hardgrave BC, eds. Systems Analysis and Design: Techniques, Methodologies, Approaches, and Architecture, vol. 15, Advances in Management Information System (M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY), 118–138.Google Scholar
• Lyytinen K, Nickerson JV, King JL (2020) Metahuman systems = humans + machines that learn. J. Inform. Tech. 1–19.Google Scholar
• Mackenzie A (2006) Cutting Code: Software and Sociality (Peter Lang, New York).Google Scholar
• MacKenzie D (2018) Material signals: A historical sociology of high-frequency trading. Amer. J. Sociol. 123(6):1635–1683.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacKenzie D (2019) How algorithms interact: Goffman’s “interaction order” in automated trading. Theory Culture Soc. 36(2):39–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A, Chang T-C, Barfield W, Eberts R, Salvendy G (1987) Human Aspects of Computer-Aided Design (Taylor & Francis/Hemisphere, Bristol, PA).Google Scholar
• Mangalaraj G, Nerur S, Mahapatra R, Price KH (2014) Distributed cognition in software design: An experimental investigation of the role of design patterns and collaboration. MIS Quart. 38(1):249–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marx K (2007) On violence. Lawrence BB, Karim A, eds. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy (Duke University Press, New York), 63–77.Google Scholar
• Mazmanian M (2012) Avoiding the trap of constant connectivity: When congruent frames allow for heterogeneous practices. Acad. Management J. 56(5):1225–1250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGrath JE, Kelly JR (1986) Time and Human Interaction: Toward a Social Psychology of Time (Guilford Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Morse JM (2007) Sampling in grounded theory. Bryant A, Charmaz K, eds. The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory (SAGE Publications Ltd., New York), 229–244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Müller M (2015) Assemblages and actor‐networks: Rethinking socio‐material power, politics and space. Geography Compass 9(1):27–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mutch A (2013) Sociomateriality—Taking the wrong turning? Inform. Organ. 23(1):28–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Myers MD (1997) Qualitative research in information systems. MIS Quart. 21:241–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Myers MD, Newman M (2007) The qualitative interview in is research: Examining the craft. Inform. Organ. 17(1):2–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nan N, Lu Y (2014) Harnessing the power of self-organization in an online community during organizational crisis. MIS Quart. 38(4):1135–1158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Norman DA (1990) The Design of Everyday Things (Doubleday, New York).Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ (2007) Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organ. Stud. 28(9):1435–1448.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ, Scott SV (2014) What happens when evaluation goes online? Exploring apparatuses of valuation in the travel sector. Organ. Sci. 25(3):868–891.Link, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W, Scott SV (2015) The algorithm and the crowd: Considering the materiality of service innovation. MIS Quart. 39(1):201–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paavola S (2005) Peircean abduction: Instinct or inference? Semiotica 153(1/4):131–154.Google Scholar
• Pasquale F (2015) The Black Box Society (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pickering A (1993) The mangle of practice: Agency and emergence in the sociology of science. Amer. J. Sociol. 99(3):559–589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pinch TJ, Bijker WE (1984) The social construction of facts and artefacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Soc. Stud. Sci. 14(3):399–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Alexy O, Reitzig M (2014) What’s “new” about new forms of organizing? Acad. Management Rev. 39(2):162–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reed R, DeFillippi RJ (1990) Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage. Acad. Management Rev. 15(1):88–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Royce WW (1970) Managing the development of large software systems: Concepts and techniques. Riddle WE, ed. Proc. 9th Internat. Conf. Software Engrg. (IEEE Computer Society Press, Washington, DC), 328–338.Google Scholar
• Sarker S, Chatterjee S, Xiao X, Elbanna A (2019) The sociotechnical axis of cohesion for the IS discipline: Its historical legacy and its continued relevance. MIS Quart. 43(3):695–720.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seidel S, Berente N, Lindberg A, Lyytinen K, Nickerson JV (2018a) Autonomous tools and design: A triple-loop approach to human-machine learning. Comm. ACM. 62(1):50–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seidel S, Berente N, Martinez B, Lindberg A, Lyytinen K, Nickerson JV (2018b) Autonomous tools in system design: Reflective practice in Ubisofts Ghost Recon Wildlands project. Comput. 51(10):16–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sennett R (2008) The Craftsman (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
• Shaft TM, Vessey I (2006) The role of cognitive fit in the relationship between software comprehension and modification. MIS Quart. 30(1):29–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shen Z, Lyytinen K, Yoo Y (2015) Time and information technology in teams: A review of empirical research and future research directions. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 24(5):492–518.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Silver D, Huang A, Maddison CJ, Guez A, Sifre L, Van Den Driessche G, Schrittwieser J, et al. (2016) Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search. Nature 529(7587):484–489.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1996) The Sciences of the Artificial (MIT Press, Boston, MA).Google Scholar
• Smith HJ, Hasnas J (1999) Ethics and information systems: The corporate domain. MIS Quart. 23(1):109–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin J (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 2nd ed. (Sage Publications, New York).Google Scholar
• Suchman LA (2006) Human-Machine Reconfigurations, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomas DE, Hitchcock CY III, Kowalski TJ, Rajan JV, Walker RA (1983) Automatic data path synthesis. IEEE Comput. 16(12):59–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tilson D, Lyytinen K, Sørensen C (2010) Research commentary—Digital infrastructures: The missing IS research agenda. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):748–759.Link, Google Scholar
• Tong C, Sriram D (1992) Artificial Intelligence in Engineering Design: Volume III: Knowledge Acquisition, Commercial Systems, and Integrated Environments (Academic Press, San Diego).Google Scholar
• Trist E (1981) The evolution of socio-technical systems as a conceptual framework and as an action research program. Van de Ven A, Joyce W, eds. Perspectives on Organization Design & Behavior (John Wiley & Sons, New York), 19–75.Google Scholar
• Trist EL, Bamforth KW (1951) Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall method of coal-getting: An examination of the psychological situation and defences of a work group in relation to the social structure and technological content of the work system. Human Relations 4(1):3–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turkle S (1997) Seeing through computers. Amer. Prospect. 8(31):76–82.Google Scholar
• Turner V (1987) Betwixt and between: The liminal period in rites of passage. Mahdi LC, Foster S, Little M, eds. Betwixt and Between: Patterns of Masculine and Feminine Initiation (Open Court, La Salle IL), 3–19.Google Scholar
• Van Driel H, Dolfsma W (2009) Path dependence, initial conditions, and routines in organizations: The Toyota production system re-examined. J. Organ. Change Management 22(1):49–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wagner EL, Newell S, Kay W (2012) Enterprise systems projects: The role of liminal space in enterprise systems implementation. J. Inform. Tech. 27(4):259–269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walls JG, Widmeyer GR, El Sawy OA (1992) Building an information system design theory for vigilant EIS. Inform Systems Res. 3(1):36–59.Link, Google Scholar
• Walsham G (1995) Interpretive case studies in IS research: Nature and method. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 4(2):74–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang L-T, Chang Y-W, Cheng K-TT (2009) Electronic Design Automation: Synthesis, Verification, and Test (Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington, MA).Google Scholar
• Winograd T, Flores F (1986) Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design (Ablex Publishing, Norwood, NJ).Google Scholar
• Xiao X, Lindberg A, Hansen S, Lyytinen K (2018) “Computing” requirements for open source software: A distributed cognitive approach. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 19(12):1217–1252.Google Scholar
• Yin RK (2003) Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Sage, New York).Google Scholar
• Yoo Y (2010) Computing in everyday life: A call for research on experiential computing. MIS Quart. 34(2):213–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yoo Y, Henfridsson O, Lyytinen K (2010) Research commentary—The new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):724–735.Link, Google Scholar
• Yoo Y, Boland RJ Jr, Lyytinen K, Majchrzak A (2012) Organizing for innovation in the digitized world. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1398–1408.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhu J, Liapis A, Risi S, Bidarra R, Youngblood GM (2018) Explainable AI for designers: A human-centered perspective on mixed-initiative co-creation. Browne C, ed. 2018 IEEE Conf. Comput. Intelligence Games (IEEE, New York), 1–8.Google Scholar
• Zittrain JL (2006) The generative internet. Harvard Law Rev. 119:1974–2040.Google Scholar