Personal Achievement Goals, Learning Strategies, and Perceived IT Affordances

References

• Addas S, Pinsonneault A (2018) Email interruptions and individual performance: Is there a silver lining? MIS Quart. 42(2):381–406.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Karahanna E (2000) Time flies when you’re having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quart. 24(4):665–694.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ainley MD (1993) Styles of engagement with learning: Multidimensional assessment of their relationship with strategy use and school achievement. J. Ed. Psych. 85(3):395–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alvesson M, Sandberg J (2011) Generating research questions through problematization. Acad. Management Rev. 36(2):247–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amabile TM, Pratt MG (2016) The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning. Res. Organ. Behav. 36:157–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ames C (1992) Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. J. Ed. Psych. 84:261–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ames C, Archer J (1988) Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation processes. J. Ed. Psych. 80(3):260–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Austin JT, Vancouver JB (1996) Goal constructs in psychology: Structure, process, and content. Psych. Bull. 120(3):338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bærentsen KB, Trettvik J (2002) An activity theory approach to affordance. Bertelsen OW, ed. Proc. 2nd Nordic Conf. Human-Computer Interaction (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 51–60.Google Scholar
• Baranik LE, Stanley LJ, Bynum BH, Lance CE (2010) Examining the construct validity of mastery-avoidance achievement goals: A meta-analysis. Human Performance Approach 23:265–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barron KE, Harackiewicz JM (2001) Achievement goals and optimal motivation: Testing multiple goal models. Personality Soc. Psych. 80(5):706–722.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beaudry A, Pinsonneault A (2005) Understanding user responses to information technology: A coping model of user adaptation. MIS Quart. 29(3):493–524.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beaudry A, Pinsonneault A (2010) The other side of acceptance: studying the direct and indirect effects of emotions on information technology use. MIS Quart. 34(4):689–710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benbunan-Fich R (2019) An affordance lens for wearable information systems. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 28(3):256–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernardi R, Sarker S, Sahay S (2019) The role of affordances in the deinstitutionalization of a dysfunctional health management information system in Kenya: An identity work perspective. MIS Quart. 43(4):1177–1200.Google Scholar
• Biggs J, Kember D, Leung DY (2001) The revised two‐factor study process questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. British J. Ed. Psych. 71(1):133–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boud D, Cohen R, Sampson J (1999) Peer learning and assessment. Assessment Evaluation Higher Ed. 24(4):413–426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boudreau M-C, Robey D (2005) Enacting integrated information technology: A human agency perspective. Organ. Sci. 16(1):3–18.Link, Google Scholar
• Burgoon EM, Henderson MD, Markman AB (2013) There are many ways to see the forest for the trees: A tour guide for abstraction. Perspectives Psych. Sci. 8(5):501–520.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burton-Jones A, Volkoff O (2017) How can we develop contextualized theories of effective use? A demonstration in the context of community-care electronic health records. Inform. Systems Res. 28(3):468–489.Link, Google Scholar
• Butler BS, Gray PH (2006) Reliability, mindfulness, and information systems. MIS Quart. 30(2):211–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Button SB, Mathieu JE, Zajac DM (1996) Goal orientation in organizational research: A conceptual and empirical foundation. Organ. Behav. Human 67:26–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan TK, Cheung CM, Wong RY (2019) Cyberbullying on social networking sites: the crime opportunity and affordance perspectives. J. MIS 36(2):574–609.Google Scholar
• Cheikh-Ammar M (2018) The IT artifact and its spirit: A nexus of human values, affordances, symbolic expressions, and IT features. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 27(3):278–294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chemero A, Turvey MT (2007) Complexity, hypersets, and the ecological perspective on perception-action. Biology Theory 2(1):23–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen L, Baird A, Straub D (2019) Why do participants continue to contribute? Evaluation of usefulness voting and commenting motivational affordances within an online knowledge community. Decision Support Systems 118:21–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper RB (2000) Information technology development creativity: A case study of attempted radical change. MIS Quart. 24(2):245–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cousins K, Robey D (2015) Managing work-life boundaries with mobile technologies: An interpretive study of mobile work practices. Inform. Tech. People 28(1):34–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Darnon C, Butera F, Harackiewicz JM (2007) Achievement goals in social interactions: Learning with mastery vs. performance goals. Motivation Emotion 31(1):61–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diamantopoulos A, Siguaw JA (2006) Formative vs. reflective indicators in organizational measure development: A comparison and empirical illustration. British J. Management 17(4):263–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dweck CS (1986) Motivational processes affecting learning. Amer. Psych. 41(10):1040.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elliot AJ (1999) Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Ed. Psych. 34(3):169–189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elliot AJ, Church MA (1997) A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 72(1):218–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elliot AJ, Murayama K (2008) On the measurement of achievement goals: Critique, illustration, and application. J. Ed. Psych. 100(3):613–628.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elliot AJ, McGregor HA, Gable S (1999) Achievement goals, study strategies, and exam performance: A mediational analysis. J. Ed. Psych. 91(3):549–563.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elliot AJ, Shell MM, Henry KB, Maier MA (2005) Achievement goals, performance contingencies, and performance attainment: An experimental test. J. Ed. Psych. 97(4):630–640.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Entwistle N, McCune V (2004) The conceptual bases of study strategy inventories. Ed. Psych. Rev. 16(4):325–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fayard AL, Weeks J (2007) Photocopiers and water-coolers: The affordances of informal interaction. Organ. Stud. 28(5):605–634.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Marketing Res. 18(1):39–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fryer JW, Elliot AJ (2007) Stability and change in achievement goals. J. Ed. Psych. 99:700–714.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gal U, Blegind Jensen T, Lyytinen K (2014) Identity orientation, social exchange, and information technology use in interorganizational collaborations. Organ. Sci. 25(5):1372–1390.Link, Google Scholar
• Gaskin J, Lyytinen K (2012) Psychological ownership and the individual appropriation of technology. Information Systems Theory (Springer, New York), 25–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gaver WW (1991) Technology affordances. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems, 79–84.Google Scholar
• Gibson JJ (1986) The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception (Psychology Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Goel L, Johnson NA, Junglas I, Ives B (2013) How cues of what can be done in a virtual world influence learning: An affordance perspective. Inform. Management 50(5):197–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goh JM, Gao G, Agarwal R (2011) Evolving work routines: Adaptive routinization of information technology in healthcare. Inform. Systems Res. 22(3):565–585.Link, Google Scholar
• Grant H, Dweck CS (2003) Clarifying achievement goals and their impact. Personality Soc. Psych. 85(3):541–553.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greeno JG (1994) Gibson’s affordances. Psych. Rev. 101(2):336–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffith TL, Northcraft GB (1996) Cognitive elements in the implementation of new technology: Can less information provide more benefits? MIS Quart. 20(1):99–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grossberg ST (2012) Studies of Mind and Brain: Neural Principles of Learning, Perception, Development, Cognition, and Motor Control, vol. 70 (Springer Science and Business Media, New York).Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Bostrom R (2013) An investigation of the appropriation of technology-mediated training methods incorporating enactive and collaborative learning. Inform. Systems Res. 24(2):454–469.Link, Google Scholar
• Hair JF Jr, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, Gudergan SP (2017) Advanced Issues in Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (Sage Publications, Philadelphia).Google Scholar
• Harackiewicz JM, Barron KE, Tauer JM, Elliot AJ (2002) Predicting success in college: A longitudinal study of achievement goals and ability measures as predictors of interest and performance from freshman year through graduation. J. Ed. Psych. 94(3):562–575.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harackiewicz JM, Barron KE, Tauer JM, Carter SM, Elliot AJ (2000) Short-term and long-term consequences of achievement goals: Predicting interest and performance over time. J. Ed. Psych. 92(2):316–330.Google Scholar
• Hayes AF (2009) Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Comm. Monographs 76(4):408–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayes AF (2017) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach (Guilford publications).Google Scholar
• Hsu JSC, Shih SP, Hung YW, Lowry PB (2015) The role of extra-role behaviors and social controls in information security policy effectiveness. Inform. Systems Res. 26(2):282–300.Link, Google Scholar
• Hulleman CS, Senko C (2010) Up around the bend: Forecasts for achievement goal theory and research in 2020. Urdan TC, Karabenick SA, eds. Advances in Motivation and Achievement (Emerald, Bingley, UK), 71–104.Google Scholar
• Hutchby I (2001) Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology 35(2):441–456.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Janssen O, Van Yperen NW (2004) Employees’ goal orientations, the quality of leader-member exchange, and the outcomes of job performance and job satisfaction. Acad. Management J. 47(3):368–384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jasperson J, Carter PE, Zmud RW (2005) A comprehensive conceptualization of the post-adoptive behaviors associated with IT-enabled work systems. MIS Quart. 29(3):525–557.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jung JH, Schneider C, Valacich J (2010) Enhancing the motivational affordance of information systems: The effects of real-time performance feedback and goal setting in group collaboration environments. Management Sci. 56(4):724–742.Link, Google Scholar
• Kaptelinin V, Nardi B (2012) Affordances in HCI: toward a mediated action perspective. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems, 967–976.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karahanna E, Xu SX, Xu Y, Zhang NA (2018) The needs–affordances–features perspective for the use of social media. MIS Quart. 26(2):298–310.Google Scholar
• Katz D (1964) The motivational basis of organizational behavior. Behav. Sci. 9(2):131–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim SS, Malhotra NK, Narasimham S (2005) Two competing perspectives on automatic use: A theoretical and empirical comparison. Inform. Systems Res. 16(4):418–432.Link, Google Scholar
• Kock N (2011) Using WarpPLS in e-collaboration studies: Mediating effects, control and second order variables, and algorithm choices. Internat. J. e-Collaboration 7(3):1–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kock N (2015) A note on how to conduct a factor-based PLS-SEM analysis. Internat. J. e-Collaboration 11(3):1–9.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kock N (2017) Structural equation modeling with factors and composites: A comparison of four methods. Internat. J. e-Collaboration 13(1):1–9.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kock N (2020) WarpPLS User Manual: Version 7.0 (ScriptWarp Systems, Laredo, TX).Google Scholar
• Kock N, Hadaya P (2018) Minimum sample size estimation in PLS‐SEM: The inverse square root and gamma‐exponential methods. Inform. Systems J. 28(1):227–261.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krancher O, Luther P, Jost M (2018) Key affordances of platform-as-a-service: Self-organization and continuous feedback. J. MIS 35(3):776–812.Google Scholar
• Kristof-Brown AL, Stevens CK (2001) Goal congruence in project teams: Does the fit between members’ personal mastery and performance goals matter? J. Appl. Psych. 86(6):1083–1095.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lehrer C, Wieneke A, Vom Brocke J, Jung R, Seidel S (2018) How big data analytics enables service innovation: Materiality, affordance, and the individualization of service. J. MIS 35(2):424–460.Google Scholar
• Leidner DE, Kayworth T (2006) A review of culture in information systems research: Toward a theory of information technology culture conflict. MIS Quart. 30(2):357–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leidner DE, Gonzalez E, Koch H (2018) An affordance perspective of enterprise social media and organizational socialization. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 27(2):117–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonardi PM (2011) When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: Affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. MIS Quart. 35(1):147–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonardi PM (2013) When does technology use enable network change in organizations? A comparative study of feature use and shared affordances. MIS Quart. 37(3):749–775.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonardi PM, Bailey DE, Pierce CS (2019) The coevolution of objects and boundaries over time: Materiality, affordances, and boundary salience. Inform. Systems Res. 32(2):665–686.Link, Google Scholar
• Liem AD, Lau S, Nie Y (2008) The role of self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals in predicting learning strategies, task disengagement, peer relationship, and achievement outcome. Contempory Ed. Psych. 33(4):486–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lindell MK, Whitney DJ (2001) Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. J. Appl. Psych. 86(1):114–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Locke K, Golden-Biddle K (1997) Constructing opportunities for contribution: Structuring intertextual coherence and “problematizing” in organizational studies. Acad. Management J. 40(5):1023–1062.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff PM, Podsakoff NP (2011) Construct measurement and validation procedures in MIS and behavioral research: integrating new and existing techniques. MIS Quart. 35(2):293–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A, Markus ML, Kessler E, eds. (2014) Technology affordances and constraints theory (of MIS). Encyclopedia of Management Theory (SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA), 832–836.Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A, Faraj S, Kane GC, Azad B (2013) The contradictory influence of social media affordances on online communal knowledge sharing. J. Comput. Mediated Comm. 19(1):38–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Makri S, Blandford A, Woods M, Sharples S, Maxwell D (2014) “Making my own luck”: Serendipity strategies and how to support them in digital information environments. J. Assoc. Inform. Sci. Tech. 65(11):2179–2194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malhotra A, Majchrzak A (2012) How virtual teams use their virtual workspace to coordinate knowledge. ACM Trans. Management Inform. Systems 3(1):1–14.Google Scholar
• Mansour O, Askenäs L, Ghazawneh A (2013) Social media and organizing?An empirical analysis of the role of wiki affordances in organizing practices. The 34th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (ICIS), Milan, Italy.Google Scholar
• Markus ML, Silver MS (2008) A foundation for the study of IT effects: A new look at DeSanctis and Poole’s concepts of structural features and spirit. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 9(10/11):609–632.Google Scholar
• Martin AJ, Elliot AJ (2016) The role of personal best (PB) goal setting in students’ academic achievement gains. Learning Individual Differences 45:222–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maruping LM, Magni M (2015) Motivating employees to explore collaboration technology in team contexts. MIS Quart. 39(1):1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mesgari M, Faraj S (2012) Technology a?ordances: The case of Wikipedia. Proc. 18th Americas Conf. Inform. Systems (AMCIS) Proc., Seattle, Washington.Google Scholar
• Mettler T, Wulf J (2019) Physiolytics at the workplace: Affordances and constraints of wearables use from an employee’s perspective. Inform. Systems J. 29(1):245–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mettler T, Sprenger M, Winter R (2017) Service robots in hospitals: new perspectives on niche evolution and technology affordances. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 26(5):451–468.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Midgley C, Kaplan A, Middleton M (2001) Performance-approach goals: Good for what, for whom, under what circumstances, and at what cost? J. Ed. Psych. 93(1):77–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore GC, Benbasat I (1991) Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inform. Systems Res. 2(3):192–222.Link, Google Scholar
• Nambisan S, Agarwal R, Tanniru M (1999) Organizational mechanisms for enhancing user innovation in information technology. MIS Quart. 23(3):365–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nambisan S, Lyytinen K, Majchrzak A, Song M (2017) Digital innovation management: Reinventing innovation management research in a digital world. MIS Quart. 41(1):223–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nevo S, Nevo D, Ein-Dor P (2009) Thirty years of IS research: Core artifacts and academic identity. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems 25(1):24.Google Scholar
• Nevo S, Nevo D, Pinsonneault A (2016) A temporally situated self-agency theory of information technology reinvention. MIS Quart. 40(1):157–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nov O, Laut J, Porfiri M (2016) Using targeted design interventions to encourage extra‐role crowdsourcing behavior. J. Assoc. Inform. Sci. Tech. 67(2):483–489.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ (1996) Improvising organizational transformation over time: A situated change perspective. Inform. Systems Res. 7(1):63–92.Link, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ (2000) Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. 11(4):404–428.Link, Google Scholar
• Ortiz de Guinea A, Markus WLM (2009) Why break the habit of a lifetime? Rethinking the roles of intention, habit, and emotion in continuing information technology use. MIS Quart. 33(3):433–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pekrun R, Elliot AJ, Maier MA (2009) Achievement goals and achievement emotions: Testing a model of their joint relations with academic performance. J. Ed. Psych. 101:115–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petter S, Straub D, Rai A (2007) Specifying formative constructs in information systems research. MIS Quart. 31(4):623–656.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pintrich PR (2000) Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. J. Ed. Psych. 92(3):544–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pintrich PR (2003) A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. J. Ed. Psych. 95(4):667.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pintrich PR, De Groot EV (1990) Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. J. Ed. Psych. 82(1):33–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pintrich PR, Smith DA, Garcia T, McKeachie WJ (1991) A Manual for the Use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor).Google Scholar
• Poortvliet PM, Janssen O, Van Yperen NW, Van de Vliert E (2007) Achievement goals and interpersonal behavior: How mastery and performance goals shape information exchange. Personality Soc. Psych. 33(10):1435–1447.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Hayes AF (2008) Assessing mediation in communication research. The Sage Sourcebook of Advanced Data Analysis Methods for Communication Research (London), 13-54.Google Scholar
• Rawsthorne LJ, Elliot AJ (1999) Achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A meta-analytic review. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 3(4):326–344.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rigdon EE (2016) Choosing PLS path modeling as analytical method in European management research: A realist perspective. Eur. Management J. 34(6):598–605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ryan RM, Deci EL (2000) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Ed. Psych. 25(1):54–67.Google Scholar
• Savoli A, Barki H (2013) Functional affordance archetypes: A new perspective for examining the impact of IT use on desirable outcomes. ICIS 2013 Proc. Retrieved from http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2013/proceedings/ResearchInProgress/110.Google Scholar
• Seidel S, Recker J, Vom Brocke J (2013) Sensemaking and sustainable practicing: Functional affordances of information systems in green transformations. MIS Quart. 37(4):1275–1299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shah SK (2006) Motivation, governance, and the viability of hybrid forms in open source software development. Management Sci. 52(7):1000–1014.Link, Google Scholar
• Shane S, Locke EA, Collins CJ (2003) Entrepreneurial motivation. Human Resources Management Rev. 13(2):257–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shantz A, Latham G (2011) The effect of primed goals on employee performance: Implications for human resource management. Human Resources Management 50(2):289–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sharma R, Yetton P (2007) The contingent effects of training, technical complexity, and task interdependence on successful information systems implementation. MIS Quart. 31(2):219–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sharma P, Sarstedt M, Shmueli G, Kim KH, Thiele KO (2019) PLS-based model selection: The role of alternative explanations in information systems research. J. Assoc. Inform Systems 20(4):4.Google Scholar
• Shmueli G, Sarstedt M, Hair JF, Cheah J-H, Ting H, Vaithilingam S, Ringle CM (2019) Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for using PLSpredict. Eur. J. Marketing 53(11):2322–2347.Google Scholar
• Steffen JH, Gaskin JE, Meservy TO, Jenkins JL, Wolman I (2019) Framework of affordances for virtual reality and augmented reality. J. MIS 36(3):683–729.Google Scholar
• Stein MK, Newell S, Wagner EL, Galliers RD (2015) Coping with information technology: Mixed emotions, vacillation, and nonconforming use patterns. MIS Quart. 39(2):367–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stoffregen TA (2003) Affordances as properties of the animal-environment system. Ecology Psych. 15(2):115–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Straub D, Boudreau MC, Gefen D (2004) Validation guidelines for IS positivist research. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems 13(1):24.Google Scholar
• Strong DM, Volkoff O, Johnson SA, Pelletier LR, Tulu B, Bar-On I, Trudel J, Garber L (2014) A theory of organization-EHR affordance actualization. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 15(2):53–85.Google Scholar
• Sykes TA, Venkatesh V (2017) Explaining post-implementation employee system use and job performance: impacts of the content and source of social network ties. MIS Quart. 41(3):917–936.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sykes TA, Venkatesh V, Gosain S (2009) Model of acceptance with peer support: A social network perspective to understand employees’ system use. MIS Quart. 33(2):371–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thapa D, Sein MK (2018) Trajectory of affordances: Insights from a case of telemedicine in Nepal. Inform. Systems J. 28(5):796–817.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tim Y, Pan SL, Bahri S, Fauzi A (2018) Digitally enabled affordances for community‐driven environmental movement in rural Malaysia. Informs. Systems J. 28(1):48–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Topping KJ (2005) Trends in peer learning. Ed. Psych. 25(6):631–645.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Treem JW, Leonardi PM (2012) Social media use in organizations: Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Comm. Yearbook 36:143–189.Google Scholar
• Urdan T (2004) Predictors of academic self-handicapping and achievement: Examining achievement goals, classroom goal structures, and culture. J. Ed. Psych. 96(2):251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vaast E, Safadi H, Lapointe L, Negoita B (2017) Social media affordances for connective action: An examination of microblogging use during the Gulf of Mexico oil spill. MIS Quart. 41(4):1179–1206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Dyne L, LePine JA (1998) Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Acad. Management J. 41(1):108–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Osch W, Mendelson O (2011) A typology of affordances: Untangling sociomaterial interactions through video analysis. 32nd Internat. Conf. Inform. System 2011, ICIS 2011, Shanghai, China, 132–149.Google Scholar
• Vancouver JB, Schmitt NW (1991) An exploratory examination of person‐organization fit: Organizational goal congruence. Personality Psych. 44(2):333–352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• VandeWalle D (1997) Development and validation of a work domain goal orientation instrument. Ed. Psych. Measures 57(6):995–1015.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Speier C (1999) Computer technology training in the workplace: A longitudinal investigation of the effect of mood. Organ. Behav. Human 79(1):1–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Verplanken B, Orbell S (2003) Reflections on past behavior: A self-report index of habit strength. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 33(6):1313–1330.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Volkoff O, Strong DM (2013) Critical realism and affordances: Theorizing IT-associated organizational change processes. MIS Quart. 37(3):819–834.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Volkoff O, Strong DM (2017) Affordance theory and how to use it in IS research. The Routledge Companion to Management Information Systems (Routledge), 232–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vrugt A, Oort FJ (2008) Metacognition, achievement goals, study strategies and academic achievement: Pathways to achievement. Metacognition Learning 3(2):123–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wagner E, Newell S (2007) Exploring the importance of participation in the post-implementation period of an information system project: A neglected area. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 8(10):508–524.Google Scholar
• Wakslak CJ, Nussbaum S, Liberman N, Trope Y (2008) Representations of the self in the near and distant future. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 95(4):757–773.Google Scholar
• Wasko MM, Faraj S (2005) Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quart. 29(1):35–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Webster J, Watson RT (2002) Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quart. 26(2):xiii–xxiii.Google Scholar
• Yukl GA, Latham GP (1978) Interrelationships among employee participation, individual differences, goal difficulty, goal acceptance, goal instrumentality, and performance. Personality Psych. 31(2):305–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zheng Y, Yu A (2016) Affordances of social media in collective action: The case of Free Lunch for Children in China. Inform. Systems J. 26(3):289–313.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zimmerman BJ, Risemberg R (1997) Self-regulatory dimensions of academic learning and motivation. Handbook of Academic Learning (Academic Press, New York), 105–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zweig D, Webster J (2004) Validation of a multidimensional measure of goal orientation. Canadian J. Behav. Sci. 36(3):232–243.Crossref, Google Scholar