How to Sell a Data Set? Pricing Policies for Data Monetization

References

• Agarwal A, Dahleh M, Sarkar T (2019) A marketplace for data: An algorithmic solution. Proc. 2019 ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 701–726.Google Scholar
• ANA (2018) The continued rise of the in-house agency. (October 15), https://www.ana.net/miccontent/show/id/rr-2018-in-house-agency.Google Scholar
• Bakos Y, Brynjolfsson E (1999) Bundling information goods: Pricing, profits, and efficiency. Management Sci. 45(12):1613–1630.Link, Google Scholar
• Bergemann D, Bonatti A, Smolin A (2018) The design and price of information. Amer. Econom. Rev. 108(1):1–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhargava HK, Csapó G, Müller R (2020) On optimal auctions for mixing exclusive and shared matching in platforms. Management Sci. 66(6):2653–2676.Link, Google Scholar
• Bimpikis K, Crapis D, Tahbaz-Salehi A (2019) Information sale and competition. Management Sci. 65(6):2646–2664.Link, Google Scholar
• Cai Y, Daskalakis C, Weinberg SM (2011) On optimal multidimensional mechanism design. ACM SIGecom Exchanges 10(2):29–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cai H, Ye F, Yang Y, Zhu Y, Li J (2019) Toward privacy-preserving data trading for web browsing history. Chen Y, ed. 2019 IEEE/ACM 27th Internat. Symp. Quality Service (IWQoS) (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 1–10.Google Scholar
• Chawla S, Hartline JD, Kleinberg R (2007) Algorithmic pricing via virtual valuations. MacKie-Mason J, ed. Proc. 8th ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 243–251.Google Scholar
• Chawla S, Hartline JD, Malec DL, Sivan B (2010) Multi-parameter mechanism design and sequential posted pricing. Proc. 42nd ACM Symp. Theory Comput. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 311–320.Google Scholar
• Chen Y-J, Huang K-W (2016) Pricing data services: Pricing by minutes, by gigs, or by megabytes per second? Inform. Systems Res. 27(3):596–617.Link, Google Scholar
• Choudhary V (2010) Use of pricing schemes for differentiating information goods. Inform. Systems Res. 21(1):78–92.Link, Google Scholar
• Daskalakis C, Deckelbaum A, Tzamos C (2014) The complexity of optimal mechanism design. Chekuri C, ed. Proc. 25th Annual ACM-SIAM Symp. Discrete Algorithms (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia), 1302–1318.Google Scholar
• Garfinkel R, Gopal RD, Nunez M, Rice DO (2006) Secure electronic markets for private information. IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernetics A Systems Humans 36(3):461–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geng X, Stinchcombe MB, Whinston AB (2005) Bundling information goods of decreasing value. Management Sci. 51(4):662–667.Link, Google Scholar
• Krishna, V (2009) Auction Theory (Academic Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Kushal, A, Moorthy S, Kumar V (2012) Pricing for data markets. Technical report, Washington University.Google Scholar
• Lavi R, Swamy C (2011) Truthful and near-optimal mechanism design via linear programming. J. ACM 58(6):1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee D, Hosanagar K, Nair HS (2018) Advertising content and consumer engagement on social media: Evidence from Facebook. Management Sci. 64(11):5105–5131.Link, Google Scholar
• Li C, Li DY, Miklau G, Suciu D (2014) A theory of pricing private data. ACM Trans. Database Systems 39(4):1–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maskin E, Riley J (1984) Monopoly with incomplete information. RAND J. Econom. 15(2):171–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P, Segal I (2002) Envelope theorems for arbitrary choice sets. Econometrica 70(2):583–601.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muschalle A, Stahl F, Löser A, Vossen G (2012) Pricing approaches for data markets. Castellanos MC, Umeshwar D, Rundensteiner EA, eds. Internat. Workshop Bus. Intelligence Real-Time Enterprise (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg), 129–144.Google Scholar
• Mussa M, Rosen S (1978) Monopoly and product quality. J. Econom. Theory 18(2):301–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Myerson RB (1981) Optimal auction design. Math. Oper. Res. 6(1):58–73.Link, Google Scholar
• Spence AM (1980) Multi-product quantity-dependent prices and profitability constraints. Rev. Econom. Stud. 47(5):821–841.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sundararajan A (2004) Nonlinear pricing of information goods. Management Sci. 50(12):1660–1673.Link, Google Scholar
• Wu JF, Tawarmalani M, Kannan KN (2018) Cardinality bundling with Spence–Mirrlees reservation prices. Management Sci. 65(4):1891–1908.Link, Google Scholar
• Wu S, Hitt LM, Chen P, Anandalingam G (2008) Customized bundle pricing for information goods: A nonlinear mixed-integer programming approach. Management Sci. 54(3):608–622.Link, Google Scholar