Trial-Period Technostress: A Conceptual Definition and Mixed-Methods Investigation

References

• Agarwal R, Karahanna E (2000) Time flies when you’re having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 24(4):665–694.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Prasad J (1997) The role of innovation characteristics and perceived voluntariness in the acceptance of information technologies. Decision Sci. 28(3):557–582.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Prasad J (1998) A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Inform. Systems Res. 9(2):204–215.Link, Google Scholar
• Ahuja M, Thatcher JB (2005) Moving beyond intentions and toward theory of trying: Effects of work environment and gender on post-adoption information technology use. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 29(3):427–459.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ayyagari R, Grover V, Purvis R (2011) Technostress: Technological antecedents and implications. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 35(4):831–858.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bagozzi RP (1979) The role of measurement in theory construction and hypothesis testing: Toward a holistic model. Ferrell OC, Brown SW, Lamb CW, eds. Conceptual and Theoretical Developments in Marketing (American Marketing Association, Chicago), 15–32.Google Scholar
• Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR (1990) Trying to consume. J. Consumer Res. 17(2):127–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bagozzi RP, Davis FD, Warshaw PR (1992) Development and test of a theory of technological learning and usage. Human Relations 45(7):659–686.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bala H, Venkatesh V (2015) Adaptation to information technology: A holistic nomological network from implementation to job outcomes. Management Sci. 62(1):156–179.Link, Google Scholar
• Baumeister RF, Bratslavsky E, Finkenauer C, Vohs KD (2001) Bad is stronger than good. Rev. General Psych. 5(4):323–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beaudry A, Pinsonneault A (2005) Understanding user responses to information technology: A coping model of user adaptation. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 29(3):493–524.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beaudry A, Pinsonneault A (2010) The other side of acceptance: Studying the direct and indirect effects of emotions on information technology use. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 34(4):689–710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker J-M, Klein K, Wetzels M (2012) Hierarchical latent variable models in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for using reflective-formative type models. Long Range Planning 45(5–6):359–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhattacherjee A, Limayem M, Cheung CM (2012) User switching of information technology: A theoretical synthesis and empirical test. Inform. Management 49(7–8):327–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blaker A (2018) How retailers can minimize return impact with remarketing. https://www.twice.com/blog/how-retailers-can-make-more-money-on-retur.Google Scholar
• Bower GH (1981) Mood and memory. Amer. Psych. 36(2):129–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown SA, Massey AP, Montoya-Weiss MM, Burkman JR (2002) Do I really have to? User acceptance of mandated technology. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 11(4):283–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Califf CB, Sarker S, Sarker S (2020) The bright and dark sides of technostress: A mixed-methods study involving healthcare IT. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 44(2):809–856.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell DT, Fiske DW (1959) Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psych. Bull. 56(2):81–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carmines EG, Zeller RA (2008) Reliability and Validity Assessment (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA).Google Scholar
• Cenfetelli RT (2004) Inhibitors and enablers as dual factor concepts in technology usage. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 5(11–12):472–492.Google Scholar
• Cenfetelli RT, Schwarz A (2011) Identifying and testing the inhibitors of technology usage intentions. Inform. Systems Res. 22(4):808–823.Link, Google Scholar
• Charlton G (2020) Ecommerce returns: 2020 Stats and trends. https://www.salecycle.com/blog/featured/ecommerce-returns-2018-stats-trends/.Google Scholar
• Chin W, Thatcher JB, Wright RT (2012) Assessing common method bias: Problems with the ULMC technique. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 36(3):1003–1019.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Colquitt JA, Simmering MJ (1998) Conscientiousness, goal orientation, and motivation to learn during the learning process: A longitudinal study. J. Appl. Psych. 83(4):654–665.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cui G, Bao W, Chan T-S (2009) Consumers’ adoption of new technology products: The role of coping strategies. J. Consumer Marketing 26(2):110–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dalrymple J (2011) Galaxy Tab return rate at 13%; iPad 2%. http://www.cnet.com/news/galaxy-tab-return-rate-at-13-ipad-2/.Google Scholar
• de Guinea AO, Webster J (2013) An investigation of information systems use patterns: Technological events as triggers, the effect of time, and consequences for performance. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 37(4):1165–1188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Djordjevic M (2021a) 18 ecommerce return rate statistics for an enhanced shopping experience in 2021. https://savemycent.com/ecommerce-return-rate-statistics/.Google Scholar
• Djordjevic M (2021b) 50+ essential ecommerce statistics to help you keep up with the latest trends. https://savemycent.com/ecommerce-statistics/.Google Scholar
• Douthit D, Flach M, Agarwal V (2011) A “returning problem”: Reducing the quantity and cost of product returns in consumer electronics (Accenture Communications & High Tech, Accenture).Google Scholar
• Duhachek A, Iacobucci D (2005) Consumer personality and coping: Testing rival theories of process. J. Consumer Psych. 15(1):52–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eckhardt A, Maier C, Hsieh JJ, Chuk T, Chan A, Hsiao J, Buettner R (2013) Objective measures of IS usage behavior under conditions of experience and pressure using eye fixation data. Proc. 34th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems.Google Scholar
• Evanschitzky H, Iyer GR, Pillai KG, Kenning P, Schütte R (2015) Consumer trial, continuous use, and economic benefits of a retail service innovation: The case of the personal shopping assistant. J. Production Innovation Management 32(3):459–475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fielding N, Schreier M (2001) Introduction: On the compatibility between qualitative and quantitative research methods. Forum: Qualitative social research. Accessed May 3, 2011, http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/965/2107.Google Scholar
• Flanagan JC (1954) The critical incident technique. Psych. Bull. 51(4):327–359.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Marketing Res. 18(1):39–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galluch PS, Grover V, Thatcher JB (2015) Interrupting the workplace: Examining stressors in an information technology context. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 16(1):1–47.Google Scholar
• Gasson S (2004) Rigor in grounded theory research. Whitman M, Woszczynski A, eds. The Handbook of Information Systems Research (IGI Global), 79–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gould SJ, Houston FS, Mundt J (1997) Failing to try to consume: A reversal of the usual consumer research perspective. Adv. Consumer Res. 24(1):211–216.Google Scholar
• Gremler DD (2004) The critical incident technique in service research. J. Service Res. 7(1):65–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamilton K, Hassan L (2010) Self‐concept, emotions and consumer coping. Eur. J. Marketing 44(7/8):1101–1120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hay I (2000) Qualitative Research Methods in Human Geography (Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York).Google Scholar
• Hayes AF (2012) PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable moderation, mediation, and conditional process modeling. White paper. http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf.Google Scholar
• Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2015) A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 43(1):115–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hogarth R, Einhorn HJ (1992) Order effects in belief updating: The belief adjustment model. Cognitive Psych. 24(1):1–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hulland JS (1999) Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic Management J. 20(2):195–204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson RD, Veltri N, Thatcher JB (2015) Beliefs and attributions toward computing technology. J. Organ. End User Comput. 27(3):27–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karahanna E, Straub DW, Chervany NL (1999) Information technology adoption across time: A cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 23(2):183–213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim KH (2005) The relation among fit indexes, power, and sample size in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Model. 12(3):368–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klonglan G, Coward E (1970) The concept of symbolic adoption: A suggested interpretation. Rural Sociol. 35(1):77–83.Google Scholar
• Lankton NK, McKnight HD (2012) Examining two expectation disconfirmation theory models: Assimilation and asymmetry effects. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 13(2):88–115.Google Scholar
• Laumer S, Maier C, Weitzel T (2016) The influence of change-related stress on user resistance when an enterprise system is implemented: A longitudinal field study. Proc. 37th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems.Google Scholar
• Lazarus RS, Folkman S (1984) Stress, Appraisal, and Coping (Springer Publishing Co., New York).Google Scholar
• Lewis W, Agarwal R, Sambamurthy V (2003) Sources of influence of beliefs about information technology use: An empirical study of knowledge workers. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 27(4):657–678.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lu J, Yao JE, Yu CS (2005) Personal innovativeness, social influences and adoption of wireless internet services via mobile technology. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 14(3):245–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luce MF, Payne JW, and Bettman JR (2000) Coping with unfavorable attribute values in choice. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 81(2):274–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maier C, Laumer S, Weinert C, Weitzel T (2015) The effects of technostress and switching stress on discontinued use of social networking services: A study of Facebook use. Inform. Systems J. 25(3):275–308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maier C, Laumer S, Wirth J, Weitzel T (2019) Technostress and the hierarchical levels of personality: A two-wave study with multiple data samples. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 28(5):496–522.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maier C, Laumer S, Tarafdar M, Mattke J, Reis L, Weitzel T (2021a) Challenge and hindrance IS use stressors and appraisals: Explaining contrarian associations in post-acceptance IS use behavior. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 22(6):1590–1624.Google Scholar
• Maier C, Laumer S, Thatcher JB, Sun H, Weinert C, Weitzel T (2021b) Social networking site use resumption: A model of return migration. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 22(4):1037–1075.Google Scholar
• Mani Z, Chouk I (2017) Drivers of consumers’ resistance to smart products. J. Marketing Management 33(1–2):76–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marsh HW, Hocevar D (1985) Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First- and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psych. Bull. 97(3):562–582.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mathur A, Moschis GP, Lee E (1999) Stress and consumer behavior. J. Marketing Practice Appl. Marketing Sci. 5(6–8):233–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mattke J, Maier C, Müller L, Weitzel T (2018) Bitcoin resistance behavior: A QCA study explaining why individuals resist bitcoin as a means of payment. Proc. 39th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (ICIS, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Merritt J (2011) Galaxy tab sales “smooth” not “small” but high return rate is bumpy ride. http://www.androidheadlines.com/2011/02/galaxy-tab-sales-"smooth"-not-"small"-but-high-return-rate-is-bumpy-ride.html.Google Scholar
• Mick DG, Fournier S (1998) Paradoxes of technology: Consumer cognizance, emotions, and coping strategies. J. Consumer Res. 25(2):123–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miles MB, Huberman AM, Saldaña J (2018) Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (Sage Publications, Los Angeles).Google Scholar
• Moore GC, Benbasat I (1991) Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inform. Systems Res. 2(3):192–222.Link, Google Scholar
• Myers MD (2009) Qualitative Research in Business and Management (Sage, Los Angeles).Google Scholar
• Oreg S (2003) Resistance to change: Developing an individual differences measure. J. Appl. Psych. 88(4):680–693.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parthasarathy M, Bhattacherjee A (1998) Understanding post-adoption behavior in the context of online services. Inform. Systems Res. 9(4):362–379.Link, Google Scholar
• Paunonen SV, Ashton MC (2001) Big five factors and facets and the prediction of behavior. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 81(3):524–539.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pavia TM, Mason MJ (2004) The reflexive relationship between consumer behavior and adaptive coping. J. Consumer Res. 31(2):441–454.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pflügner K, Maier C, Weitzel T (2021a) The direct and indirect influence of mindfulness on techno-stressors and job burnout: A quantitative study of white-collar workers. Comput. Human Behav. 115:106566.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pflügner K, Maier C, Mattke J, Weitzel T (2021b) Personality profiles that put users at risk of perceiving technostress. Bus. Inform. Systems Engrg. 63(4):389–402.Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J-Y, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. 83(5):879–903.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polites GL, Karahanna E (2012) Shackled to the status quo: The inhibiting effects of incumbent system habit, switching costs, and inertia on new system acceptance. Management Inform. Systems Q. 36(1):21–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polites GL, Roberts N, Thatcher J (2012) Conceptualizing models using multidimensional constructs: A review and guidelines for their use. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 21(1):22–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ragu-Nathan TS, Tarafdar M, Ragu-Nathan BS, Qiang T (2008) The consequences of technostress for end users in organizations: Conceptual development and empirical validation. Inform. Systems Res. 1(4):417–433.Link, Google Scholar
• Riedl R, Kindermann H, Auinger A, Javor A (2012) Technostress from a neurobiological perspective—System breakdown increases the stress hormone cortisol in computer users. Bus. Inform. Systems Engrg. 4(2):61–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ringle CM, Sarstedt M, Straub DW (2012) Editor’s comments: A critical look at the use of PLS-SEM in MIS Quarterly. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 36(1):iii–xiv.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ringle CM, Wende S, Becker J-M (2014) SmartPLS3 (Hamburg, Germany).Google Scholar
• Rogers EM (2003) Diffusion of Innovations (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Sarker S, Ahuja M, Sarker S (2018) Work–life conflict of globally distributed software development personnel: An empirical investigation using border theory. Inform. Systems Res. 29(1):103–126.Link, Google Scholar
• Sarker S, Xiao X, Beaulieu T (2013) Qualitative studies in information systems: A critical review and some guiding principles. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 37(4):iii–xvii.Google Scholar
• Smith HJ, Dinev T, Xu H (2011) Information privacy research: An interdisciplinary review. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 35(4):989–1016.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Son J-Y, Kim S, Riggins F (2006) Consumer adoption of net-enabled infomediaries: Theoretical explanations and an empirical test. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 7(7):473–508.Google Scholar
• Srivastava SC, Chandra S, Shirish A (2015) Technostress creators and job outcomes: Theorising the moderating influence of personality traits. Inform. Systems J. 25(4):355–401.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stein M-K, Newell S, Wagner EL, Galliers RD (2015) Coping with information technology: Mixed emotions, vacillation and non-conforming use patterns. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 39(2):367–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sun H, Zhang P (2006) The role of moderating factors in user technology acceptance. Internat. J. Human Comput. Stud. 64(2):53–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tams S, Hill K, Ortiz de Guinea A, Thatcher J, Grover V (2014) NeuroIS—Alternative or complement to existing methods? Illustrating the holistic effects of neuroscience and self-reported data in the context of technostress research. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 15(10).Google Scholar
• Tarafdar M, Tu Q, Ragu-Nathan TS (2010) Impact of technostress on end-user satisfaction and performance. J. Management Inform. Systems 27(3):303–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tarafdar M, Maier C, Laumer S, Weitzel T (2020) Explaining the link between technostress and technology addiction for social networking sites: A study of distraction as a coping behavior. Inform. Systems J. 30(1):96–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tashakkori A, Teddlie C, eds. (2003) Sage Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research (Sage Publications, Los Angeles).Google Scholar
• Tett RP, Simonet DV, Walser B, Brown C (2014) Trait activation theory: Applications, developments, and implications for person-workplace fit. Christiansen N, Tett R, eds. Handbook of Personality at Work (Brunner-Routledge, New York), 71–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thatcher JB, Perrewé PL (2002) An empirical examination of individual traits as antecedents to computer anxiety and computer self-efficacy. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 26(4):381–396.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thatcher JB, Wright RT, Zagenczyk TJ, Klein R (2018) Mindfulness in information technology use: Definitions, distinctions, and a new measure. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 42(3):831–847.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Valdellon L (2020) Why app uninstalls aren’t forever. Accessed July 6, 2021, https://clevertap.com/blog/app-uninstalls-arent-forever/.Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Brown SA, Bala H (2013) Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide: Guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 37(1):21–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Sykes TA, Venkatraman S (2014) Understanding e-Government portal use in rural India: Role of demographic and personality characteristics. Inform. Systems J. 24(3):249–269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Thong JYL, Xu X (2012) Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 36(1):157–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD (2003) User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 27(3):425–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Windeler JB, Bartol KM, Williamson IO (2017) Person-organization and person-job fit perceptions of new IT employees: Work outcomes and gender differences. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 41(2):525–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watkins PC, Vache K, Verney SP, Mathews A (1996) Unconscious mood-congruent memory bias in depression. J. Abnormal Psych. 105(1):34–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weinert C, Maier C, Laumer S, Weitzel T (2020) Technostress mitigation: An experimental study of social support during a computer freeze. J. Bus. Econom. 90:1199–1249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Windeler JB, Chudoba KM, Sundrup RZ (2017) Getting away from them all: Managing exhaustion from social interaction with telework. J. Organ. Behav. 38(7):977–995.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wolverton CC, Cenfetelli R (2019) An exploration of the drivers of non-adoption behavior. ACM SIGMIS Database 50(3):38–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wright RT, Campbell DE, Thatcher JB, Roberts N (2012) Operationalizing multidimensional constructs in structural equation modeling: Recommendations for IS research. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems 30(23):367–412.Google Scholar
• Xu J, Benbasat I, Cenfetelli RT (2014) Research note—The influences of online service technologies and task complexity on efficiency and personalization. Inform. Systems Res. 25(2):420–436.Link, Google Scholar
• Yi S, Baumgartner H (2004) Coping with negative emotions in purchase-related situations. J. Consumer Psych. 14(3):303–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yi MY, Davis FD (2003) Developing and validating an observational learning model of computer software training and skill acquisition. Inform. Systems Res. 14(2):146–169.Link, Google Scholar
• Yin RK (2009) Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Sage, Los Angeles).Google Scholar