Seeker Exemplars and Quantitative Ideation Outcomes in Crowdsourcing Contests

References

• Ajzen I (2002) Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 32(4):665–683.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alter AL, Oppenheimer DM (2009) Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 13(3):219–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amabile TM (1988) A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Cummings BS, ed. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 10 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 123–167.Google Scholar
• Amabile TM, Pratt MG (2016) The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning. Res. Organ. Behav. 36:157–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aydınoğlu NZ, Cian L (2014) Show me the product, show me the model: Effect of picture type on attitudes toward advertising. J. Consumer Psych. 24(4):506–519.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bayus BL (2013) Crowdsourcing new product ideas over time: An analysis of the Dell IdeaStorm community. Management Sci. 59(1):226–244.Link, Google Scholar
• Blohm I, Riedl C, Füller J, Leimeister JM (2016) Rate or trade? Identifying winning ideas in open idea sourcing. Inform. Systems Res. 27(1):27–48.Link, Google Scholar
• Bockstedt J, Druehl C, Mishra A (2015) Problem-solving effort and success in innovation contests: The role of national wealth and national culture. J. Oper. Management 36(May):187–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bockstedt J, Druehl C, Mishra A (2016) Heterogeneous submission behavior and its implications for success in innovation contests with public submissions. Production Oper. Management 25(7):1157–1176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brabham DC (2010) Moving the crowd at Threadless: Motivations for participation in a crowdsourcing application. Inform. Comm. Soc. 13(8):1122–1145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camacho N, Nam H, Kannan P, Stremersch S (2019) Tournaments to crowdsource innovation: The role of moderator feedback and participation intensity. J. Marketing 83(2):138–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen L, Xu P, Liu D (2020) Effect of crowd voting on participation in crowdsourcing contests. J. Management Inform. Systems 37(2):510–535.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen J (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ).Google Scholar
• Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS (2003) Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 3rd ed. (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London).Google Scholar
• Dennis AR, Aronson JE, Heninger WG, Walker ED (1999) Structuring time and task in electronic brainstorming. MIS Quart. 23(1):95–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Di Gangi PM, Wasko M, Hooker R (2010) Getting customers’ ideas to work for you: Learning from Dell how to succeed with online user innovation communities. MIS Quart. Executive 9(4):213–228.Google Scholar
• Diehl M, Stroebe W (1987) Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 53(3):497–509.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dreisbach G, Fischer R (2011) If it’s hard to read… try harder! Processing fluency as signal for effort adjustments. Psych. Res. 75(5):376–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erber R, Fiske ST (1984) Outcome dependency and attention to inconsistent information. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 47(4):709–726.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Franke N, Poetz MK, Schreier M (2014) Integrating problem solvers from analogous markets in new product ideation. Management Sci. 60(4):1063–1081.Link, Google Scholar
• Füller J, Hutter K, Hautz J, Matzler K (2014) User roles and contributions in innovation-contest communities. J. Management Inform. Systems 31(1):273–308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Girotra K, Terwiesch C, Ulrich KT (2010) Idea generation and the quality of the best idea. Management Sci. 56(4):591–605.Link, Google Scholar
• Goel PS, Singh N (1998) Creativity and innovation in durable product development. Comput. Indust. Engrg. 35(1):5–8.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayes AF (2013) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach (Guilford Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Hayes AF, Preacher KJ (2014) Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British J. Math. Statist. Psych. 67(3):451–470.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herring SR, Chang C-C, Krantzler J, Bailey BP (2009) Getting Inspired! Understanding How and Why Examples Are Used in Creative Design Practice (ACM, Boston).Google Scholar
• Horton JJ, Rand DG, Zeckhauser RJ (2011) The online laboratory: Conducting experiments in a real labor market. Experiment. Econom. 14(3):399–425.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang YF, Kuo FY (2011) An eye‐tracking investigation of internet consumers’ decision deliberateness. Internet Res. 21(5):541–561.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hutter K, Füller J, Hautz J, Bilgram V, Matzler K (2015) Machiavellianism or morality: Which behavior pays off in online innovation contests? J. Management Inform. Systems 32(3):197–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hwang EH, Singh PV, Argote L (2019) Jack of all, master of some: Information network and innovation in crowdsourcing communities. Inform. Systems Res. 30(2):389–410.Link, Google Scholar
• Jeppesen LB, Lakhani KR (2010) Marginality and problem-solving effectiveness in broadcast search. Organ. Sci. 21(5):1016–1033.Link, Google Scholar
• Jian L, Yang S, Ba S, Liu L, Jiang LC (2019) Managing the crowds: The effect of prize guarantees and in-process feedback on participation in crowdsourcing contests. MIS Quart. 43(1):97–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jiang J, Wang Y (2020) A theoretical and empirical investigation of feedback in ideation contests. Production Oper. Management 29(2):481–500.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jiang Z, Huang Y, Beil DR (2021) The role of problem specification in crowdsourcing contests for design problems: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 23(3):637–656.Link, Google Scholar
• Johar GV, Holbrook MB, Stern BB (2001) The role of myth in creative advertising design: Theory, process and outcome. J. Advertising 30(2):1–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jonas E, Schulz-Hardt S, Frey D, Thelen N (2001) Confirmation bias in sequential information search after preliminary decisions: An expansion of dissonance theoretical research on selective exposure to information. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 80(4):557–571.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D (2003) Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(5):1449–1475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kardes FR, Cronley ML, Kellaris JJ, Posavac SS (2004) The role of selective information processing in price-quality inference. J. Consumer Res. 31(2):368–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koh TK (2019) Adopting seekers’ solution exemplars in crowdsourcing ideation contests: Antecedents and consequences. Inform. Systems Res. 30(2):486–506.Link, Google Scholar
• Korpeoglu CG, Körpeoğlu E, Tunç S (2021) Optimal duration of innovation contests. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 23(3):657–675.Link, Google Scholar
• Kruglanski AW, Webster DM (1996) Motivated closing of the mind: “Seizing” and “freezing.” Psych. Rev. 103(2):263–283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kudrowitz BM, Wallace D (2013) Assessing the quality of ideas from prolific, early-stage product ideation. J. Engrg. Design 24(2):120–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee AY, Labroo AA (2004) The effect of conceptual and perceptual fluency on brand evaluation. J. Marketing Res. 41(2):151–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee HCB, Ba S, Li X, Stallaert J (2018) Salience bias in crowdsourcing contests. Inform. Systems Res. 29(2):401–418.Link, Google Scholar
• Leimeister JM, Huber M, Bretschneider U, Krcmar H (2009) Leveraging crowdsourcing—Theory-driven design, implementation and evaluation of activation-supporting components for IT-based idea competitions. J. Management Inform. Systems 26(1):1–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li D, Hu L (2017) Exploring the effects of reward and competition intensity on participation in crowdsourcing contests. Electronic Marketing 27(3):199–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li Y, Xie Y, Zheng ZE (2019) Modeling multichannel advertising attribution across competitors. MIS Quart. 43(1):263–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liedtka J (2015) Perspective: Linking design thinking with innovation outcomes through cognitive bias reduction. J. Production Innovation Management 32(6):925–938.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu TX, Yang J, Adamic LA, Chen Y (2014) Crowdsourcing with all-pay auctions: A field experiment on Taskcn. Management Sci. 60(8):2020–2037.Link, Google Scholar
• Loch CH (2017) Creativity and risk taking aren’t rational: Behavioral operations in MOT. Production Oper. Management 26(4):591–604.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A, Malhotra A (2013) Toward an information systems perspective and research agenda on crowdsourcing for innovation. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 22(4):257–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A, Cooper LP, Neece OE (2004) Knowledge reuse for innovation. Management Sci. 50(2):174–188.Link, Google Scholar
• Menon N, Mishra A, Ye S (2020) Beyond related experience: Upstream vs. downstream experience in innovation contest platforms with interdependent problem domains. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(5):1045–1065.Link, Google Scholar
• Merz AB, Seeber I, Maier R, Richter A, Schimpf R, Füller J (2016) Exploring the effects of contest mechanisms on idea shortlisting in an open idea competition. Proc. 37th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (Association for Information Systems, Atlanta), 132–149.Google Scholar
• Mihm J, Schlapp J (2019) Sourcing innovation: On feedback in contests. Management Sci. 65(2):559–576.Link, Google Scholar
• Mo J, Sarkar S, Menon S (2018) Know when to run: Recommendations in crowdsourcing contests. MIS Quart. 42(3):919–944.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moreau CP, Dahl DW (2005) Designing the solution: The impact of constraints on consumers’ creativity. J. Consumer Res. 32(1):13–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morgan J, Wang R (2010) Tournaments for ideas. Calif. Management Rev. 52(2):77–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Belknap Press of Harvard University, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Nickerson RS (1998) Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Rev. General Psych. 2(2):175–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nishikawa H, Schreier M, Ogawa S (2013) User-generated vs. designer-generated products: A performance assessment at Muji. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 30(2):160–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Leary DE (2019) An empirical analysis of information search and information sharing in crowdsourcing data analytic contests. Decision Support Systems 120(May):1–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Osborn AF (1993) Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Problem-Solving (Creative Education Foundation, Buffalo, NY).Google Scholar
• Paolacci G, Chandler J, Ipeirotis PG (2010) Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment Decision Making 5(5):411–419.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paulus PB, Kohn NW, Arditti LE (2011) Effects of quantity and quality instructions on brainstorming. J. Creative Behav. 45(1):38–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poetz MK, Schreier M (2012) The value of crowdsourcing: Can users really compete with professionals in generating new product ideas? J. Production Innovation Management 29(2):245–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pollok P, Lüttgens D, Piller FT (2019) Attracting solutions in crowdsourcing contests: The role of knowledge distance, identity disclosure, and seeker status. Res. Policy 48(1):98–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Potter RE, Balthazard P (2004) The role of individual memory and attention processes during electronic brainstorming. MIS Quart. 28(4):621–643.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Potts J (2010) Can behavioural biases in choice under novelty explain innovation failures? Prometheus 28(2):133–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Hayes AF (2004) SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behav. Res. Methods Instruments Comput. 36(4):717–731.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Qi Y, Teng H (2008) An information-based time sequential approach to online incident duration prediction. J. Intelligent Transportation Systems 12(1):1–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reber R, Schwarz N, Winkielman P (2004) Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience? Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 8(4):364–382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Riedl C, Seidel VP (2018) Learning from mixed signals in online innovation communities. Organ. Sci. 29(6):1010–1032.Link, Google Scholar
• Roth Y, Brabham DC, Lemoine J-F (2015) Recruiting individuals to a crowdsourcing community: Applying motivational categories to an ad copy test. Garrigos-Simon FJ, Gil-Pechuán I, Estelles-Miguel S, eds. Advances in Crowdsourcing (Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland), 15–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schemmann B, Herrmann AM, Chappin MMH, Heimeriks GJ (2016) Crowdsourcing ideas: Involving ordinary users in the ideation phase of new product development. Res. Policy 45(6):1145–1154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwarz N (2004) Metacognitive experiences in consumer judgment and decision making. J. Consumer Psych. 14(4):332–348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith SM, Ward TB, Schumacher JS (1993) Constraining effects of examples in a creative generation task. Memory Cognition 21(6):837–845.Crossref, Google Scholar
• So C, Joo J (2017) Does a persona improve creativity? Design J. 20(4):459–475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stevens GA, Burley J (1997) 3,000 raw ideas = 1 commercial success! Res. Tech. Management 40(3):16–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sun Y, Fang Y, Lim KH (2012) Understanding sustained participation in transactional virtual communities. Decision Support Systems 53(1):12–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Terwiesch C, Xu Y (2008) Innovation contests, open innovation, and multiagent problem solving. Management Sci. 54(9):1529–1543.Link, Google Scholar
• Toh CA, Miller SR (2014) The impact of example modality and physical interactions on design creativity. J. Mech. Design 136(9):Article 091004.Google Scholar
• Vaughn LA, Dubovi AS-Y, Niño NP (2013) Processing fluency affects behavior more strongly among people higher in trait mindfulness. J. Res. Personality 47(6):782–788.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang K, Nickerson J, Sakamoto Y (2018) Crowdsourced idea generation: The effect of exposure to an original idea. Creativity Innovation Management 27(2):196–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ward TB (1994) Structured imagination: The role of category structure in exemplar generation. Cognitive Psych. 27(1):1–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooten JO, Ulrich KT (2017) Idea generation and the role of feedback: Evidence from field experiments with innovation tournaments. Production Oper. Management 26(1):80–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wyer RS, Srull TK (1989) Memory and Cognition in Its Social Context (Psychology Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Ye H, Kankanhalli A (2017) Solvers’ participation in crowdsourcing platforms: Examining the impacts of trust, and benefit and cost factors. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 26(2):101–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Singh PV, Ghose A (2019) a structural analysis of the role of superstars in crowdsourcing contests. Inform. Systems Res. 30(1):15–33.Link, Google Scholar
• Zheng H, Li D, Hou W (2011) Task design, motivation, and participation in crowdsourcing contests. Internat. J. Electronic Commerce 15(4):57–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zheng H, Xie Z, Hou W, Li D (2014) Antecedents of solution quality in crowdsourcing: The sponsor’s perspective. J. Electronic Commerce Res. 15(3):212–224.Google Scholar