Seller Organization and Percentage Fee Design in the Daily Deal Market
References
- (2016) Agency selling or reselling? Channel structures in electronic retailing. Management Sci. 62(8):2259–2280.Link, Google Scholar
- (2007) Interacting supply chain distortions: The pricing of internal transfers and external procurement. Accounting Rev. 82(3):551–580.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) How e-WOM and local competition drive local retailers’ decisions about daily deal offerings. Decis. Support Syst. 101:82–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Strategic revenue sharing with daily deal sites: A competitive analysis. Decision Sci. 48(6):1228–1261.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1985) Multimarket oligopoly: Strategic substitutes and complements. J. Political Econom. 93(3):488–511.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Daily deals: Prediction, social diffusion, and reputational ramifications. Proc. 5th ACM WSDM Conf, Web Search Data Mining (ACM, New York), 543–552.Google Scholar
- (2018) When discounts hurt sales: The case of daily-deal markets. Inform. Systems Res. 29(3):567–591.Link, Google Scholar
- (2011a) A startup’s experience with running a Groupon promotion. Working paper, Rice University, Houston, TX.Google Scholar
- (2011b) How businesses fare with daily deals: A multisite analysis of Groupon, LivingSocial, OpenTable, Travel zoo, and Buy With Me promotions. Working paper, Rice University, Houston, TX.Google Scholar
- (2011c). What makes Groupon promotions profitable for businesses. Working paper, Rice University, Houston, TX.Google Scholar
- (2012). How businesses fare with daily deals as they gain experience: A multi-time period study of daily deal performance. Working paper, Rice University, Houston, TX.Google Scholar
- (2016) To Groupon or not to Groupon: The profitability of deep discounts. Marketing Lett. 27(1):39–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) Strategic transfer pricing, absorption costing, and observability. Management Accounting Res. 11(3):327–348.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) An analysis of pricing models in the electronic book market. MIS Quart. 38(4):1017–1032.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Search and learning at a daily deals website. Marketing Sci. 38(4):609–642.Link, Google Scholar
- (2013) Simultaneous vs. sequential group-buying mechanisms. Management Sci. 59(12):2805–2822.Link, Google Scholar
- (2020) Consumer search and filtering on online retail platforms. J. Marketing Res. 57(5):900–916.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Firm strategies in the “Mid Tail” of platform-based retailing. Marketing Sci. 30(5):757–775.Link, Google Scholar
- (2011) Group buying: A new mechanism for selling through social interactions. Management Sci. 57(8):1354–1372.Link, Google Scholar
- (2020) Segmentation vs. agglomeration: Competition between platforms with competitive sellers. J. Political Econom. 128(6):2329–2374.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Electronic markets and geographic competition among small, local firms. Inform. Systems Res. 29(4):928–946.Link, Google Scholar
- (2012) Social coupons as a marketing strategy: A multifaceted perspective. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 40(1):120–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Herding and social media word-of-mouth: Evidence from Groupon. MIS Quart. 42(4):1331–1351.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Local market characteristics and online-to-offline commerce: An empirical analysis of Groupon. Management Sci. 64(4):1860–1878.Link, Google Scholar
- (2012) Buyers’ purchasing time and herd behavior on deal-of-the-day group-buying websites. Electronic Marketing 22(2):83–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Group-buying deal popularity. J. Marketing 78(2):20–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Why do platforms charge proportional fees? Commitment and seller participation. Working paper, University of Wuerzburg, Wurzburg, Germany.Google Scholar
- (2013) Regulatory focus and daily-deal message framing: Are we saving or gaining with Groupon? J. Interactive Advertising 13(2):67–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Helping merchants to assess the profitability of deal-of-the-day promotions. Interfaces 48(3):247–259.Link, Google Scholar
- (2013) Economics of daily-deal website: Advertising and sampling effects. Working paper, University of California, Irvine.Google Scholar
- (2016) Is the daily deal social shopping? An empirical analysis of customer panel data. J. Interactive Marketing 33(1):57–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Deriving value from social commerce networks. J. Marketing Res. 47(2):215–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Leveraging experienced consumers to attract new consumers: An equilibrium analysis of displaying deal sales by daily deal websites. Management Sci. 62(12):3555–3575.Link, Google Scholar
- (2018) Marketplace, reseller, or hybrid: Strategic analysis of an emerging e-commerce model. Production Oper. Management 27(8):1595–1610.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Ad valorem platform fees, indirect taxes, and efficient price discrimination. RAND J. Econom. 48(2):467–484.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Should platforms be allowed to charge ad valorem fees. J. Industry Econom. 66(3):739–760.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Price bargaining and competition in online platforms: An empirical analysis of the daily deal market. Marketing Sci. 39(4):687–706.Link, Google Scholar
- (2016) Signaling effect of daily deal promotion for a start-up service provider. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 67(2):280–293.Crossref, Google Scholar

