IT Knowledge Spillovers, Absorptive Capacity, and Productivity: Evidence from Enterprise Software

References

• Aiken LS, West SG, Reno RR (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (Sage Publications, New York).Google Scholar
• Alcácer J, Chung W (2007) Location strategies and knowledge spillovers. Management Sci. 53(5):760–776.Link, Google Scholar
• Anderson MC, Banker RD, Ravindran S (2003) The new productivity paradox. Comm. ACM 46(3):91–94. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Weill P (2007) IT assets, organizational capabilities, and firm performance: How resource allocations and organizational differences explain performance variation. Organ. Sci. 18(5):763–780.Link, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Brynjolfsson E, Wu L (2012) Three-way complementarities: Performance pay, human resource analytics, and information technology. Management Sci. 58(5):913–931.Link, Google Scholar
• Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev. Econom. Stud. 58(2):277–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong CP, Sambamurthy V (1999) Information technology assimilation in firms: The influence of senior leadership and IT infrastructures. Inform. Systems Res. 10(4):304–327.Link, Google Scholar
• Attewell P (1992) Technology diffusion and organizational learning: The case of business computing. Organ. Sci. 3(1):1–19.Link, Google Scholar
• Audretsch DB, Feldman MP (1996) Innovative clusters and the industry life cycle. Rev. Indust. Organ. 11(2):253–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ba S, Nault BR (2017) Emergent themes in the interface between economics of information systems and management of technology. Production Oper. Management 26(4):652–666.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balli HO, Sørensen BE (2013) Interaction effects in econometrics. Empirical Econom. 45(1):583–603.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartel A, Ichniowski C, Shaw K (2007) How does information technology affect productivity? Plant-level comparisons of product innovation, process improvement, and worker skills. Quart. J. Econom. 122(4):1721–1758.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker GS (2008) Human capital. The concise encyclopedia of economics. The Library of Economics and Liberty. Accessed December 22, 2021, http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/HumanCapital.html.Google Scholar
• Benkard CL (2000) Learning and forgetting: The dynamics of aircraft production. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(4):1034–1054.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Sadun R, Van Reenen J (2012) Americans do IT better: US multinationals and the productivity miracle. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(1):167–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blundell R, Bond S (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J. Econometrics 87(1):115–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boudreau K, Lakhani K (2009) How to manage outside innovation: Building communities or markets of external innovators? MIT Sloan Management Rev. 50(5):69–76.Google Scholar
• Bresnahan T, Greenstein S (1996) Technical progress and co-invention in computing and in the uses of computers. Brookings Papers Econom. Activity Microeconomics 1996:1–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bresnahan TF, Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM (2002) Information technology, workplace organization, and the demand for skilled labor: Firm-level evidence. Quart. J. Econom. 117(1):339–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Hitt L (1995) Information technology as a factor of production: The role of differences among firms. Econom. Innovation New Tech. 3(3–4):183–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Hitt L (1996) Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending. Management Sci. 42(4):541–558.Link, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM (2003) Computing productivity: Firm-level evidence. Rev. Econom. Statist. 85(4):793–808.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Milgrom P (2012) Complementarity in organizations. Gibbons R, Roberts J, eds. The Handbook of Organizational Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 11–55.Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Fitoussi D, Hitt L (2005) The information technology iceberg. MIT Center for Digital Business Working Paper, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM, Yang S (2002) Intangible assets: Computers and organizational capital. Brookings Papers Econom. Activity 2002(1):137–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caselli F, Coleman WJ (2001) Cross-country technology diffusion: The case of computers. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(2):328–335.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chang YB, Gurbaxani V (2012a) The impact of IT-related spillovers on long-run productivity: An empirical analysis. Inform. Systems Res. 23(3):868–886.Link, Google Scholar
• Chang YB, Gurbaxani V (2012b) Information technology outsourcing, knowledge transfer, and firm productivity: An empirical analysis. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 36(4):1043–1063.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheng Z, Nault BR (2007) Industry level supplier-driven IT spillovers. Management Sci. 53(8):1199–1216.Link, Google Scholar
• Cheng Z, Nault BR (2012) Relative industry concentration and customer-driven IT spillovers. Inform. Systems Res. 23(2):340–355.Link, Google Scholar
• Chwelos P, Ramirez R, Kraemer KL, Melville NP (2010) Does technological progress alter the nature of information technology as a production input? New evidence and new results. Inform. Systems Res. 21(2):392–408.Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM (2010) Fifty years of empirical studies of innovative activity and performance. Hall BH, Rosenberg N, eds. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation (Chapter 4), vol. 1 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 129–213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1989) Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. Econom. J. (London) 99(397):569–596.Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):128–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cowan R, David PA, Foray D (2000) The explicit economics of knowledge codification and tacitness. Indust. Corporate Change 9(2):211–253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davenport TH (2000) Mission Critical: Realizing the Promise of Enterprise Systems (Harvard Business Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Dewan S, Min C-K (1997) The substitution of information technology for other factors of production: A firm level analysis. Management Sci. 43(12):1660–1675.Link, Google Scholar
• Dewan S, Shi C, Gurbaxani V (2007) Investigating the risk return relationship of information technology investment: Firm-level empirical analysis. Management Sci. 53(12):1829–1842.Link, Google Scholar
• Dranove D, Forman C, Goldfarb A, Greenstein S (2014) The trillion dollar conundrum: Complementarities and health information technology. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 6(4):239–270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fahey R, Vasconcelos AC, Ellis D (2007) The impact of rewards within communities of practice: A study of the SAP online global community. Knowledge Management Res. Practice 5:186–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foerderer J (2020) Interfirm exchange and innovation in platform ecosystems: Evidence from Apple’s world wide developers conference. Management Sci. 66(10):4772–4787.Link, Google Scholar
• Foerderer J, Kude T, Mithas S, Heinzl A (2018) Does platform owner’s entry crowd out innovation? Evidence from Google photos. Inform. Systems Res. 29(2):444–460.Link, Google Scholar
• Gao S, Yeoh W, Wong SF, Scheepers R (2017) A literature analysis of the use of absorptive capacity construct in IS research. Internat. J. Inform. Management 37(2):36–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenstein S, Nagle F (2014) Digital dark matter and the economic contribution of Apache. Res. Policy 43(4):623–631.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griliches Z (1979) Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth. Bell J. Econom. 10(1):92–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gu B, Xue L, Ray GN (2008) IT governance and IT investment performance: An empirical analysis. Proc. 29th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems, Paris, France.Google Scholar
• Han K, Chang YB, Hahn J (2011) Information technology spillover and productivity: The role of information technology intensity and competition. J. Management Inform. Systems 28(1):115–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hitt LM, Brynjolfsson E (1996) Productivity, business profitability, and consumer surplus: Three different measures of information technology value. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 20(2):121–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hitt LM, Wu DJ, Zhou X (2002) Investment in enterprise resource planning: Business impact and productivity measures. J. Management Inform. Systems 19(1):71–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howe J (2008) Crowdsourcing: How the Power of the Crowd Is Driving the Future of Business (Random House, New York).Google Scholar
• Huang P, Zhang Z (2016) Participation in open knowledge communities and job-hopping: Evidence from enterprise software. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 40(3):785–806.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ichniowski C, Shaw K (2003) Beyond incentive pay: Insiders’ estimates of the value of complementary human resource management practices. J. Econom. Perspect. 17(1):155–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaccard J, Turrisi R, Wan CK (1990) Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression (Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences) (Sage Publications, New York).Google Scholar
• Ko DG, Kirsch LJ, King WR (2005) Antecedents of knowledge transfer from consultants to clients in enterprise system implementations. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 29(1):59–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B, Zander U (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. 3(3):383–397.Link, Google Scholar
• Lakhani KR, von Hippel E (2003) How open source software works: “Free” user-to-user assistance. Res. Policy 32(6):923–943.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lakhani KR, Wolf R (2005) Why hackers do what they do: Understanding motivation and effort in free/open source software projects. Feller J, Fitzgerald B, Hissam S, Lakhani KR, eds. Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 3–21.Google Scholar
• Lakhani KR, Iansiti M, Fisher N (2014) SAP 2014: Reaching for the cloud. Harvard Business School Case N1-614-052, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Lee DMS, Trauth EM, Farwell D (1995) Critical skills and knowledge requirements of IS professionals: A joint academic/industry investigation. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 19(3):313–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levy F, Murnane RJ (2005) The New Division of Labor: How Computers Are Creating the Next Job Market (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Lieberman MB (1984) The learning curve and pricing in the chemical processing industries. RAND J. Econom. 15(2):213–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McAfee A (2002) The impact of enterprise information technology adoption on operational performance: An empirical investigation. Production Oper. Management 11(1):33–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mehra A, Dewan R, Freimer M (2011) Firms as incubators of open-source software. Inform. Systems Res. 22(1):22–38.Link, Google Scholar
• Mirchandani V (2014) SAP Nation: A Runaway Software Economy (Deal Architect Inc.).Google Scholar
• Mortensen PS, Bloch CW (2005) Oslo Manual—Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data (Organisation for Economic Cooporation and Development).Google Scholar
• Mun SB, Nadiri MI (2002) Information technology externalities: Empirical evidence from 42 US industries. NBER Working Paper No. 9272, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Nagle F (2018) Learning by contributing: Gaining competitive advantage through contribution to crowdsourced public goods. Organ. Sci. 29(4):569–587.Link, Google Scholar
• Nagle F (2019) Open source software and firm productivity. Management Sci. 65(3):1191–1215.Link, Google Scholar
• Pavlou PA, El Sawy OA (2006) From IT leveraging competence to competitive advantage in turbulent environments: The case of new product development. Inform. Systems Res. 17(3):198–227.Link, Google Scholar
• Roberts N, Galluch PS, Dinger M, Grover V (2012) Absorptive capacity and information systems research: Review, synthesis, and directions for future research. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 36(2):625–648.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roodman D (2009) How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. Stata J. 9(1):86–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sambamurthy V, Bharadwaj A, Grover V (2003) Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 27(2):237–263.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Szulanski G (1996) Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management J. 17(S2):27–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tambe P (2014) Big data investment, skills, and firm value. Management Sci. 60(6):1452–1469.Link, Google Scholar
• Tambe P, Hitt LM (2012) The productivity of information technology investments: New evidence from IT labor data. Inform. Systems Res. 23(3-part-1):599–617.Link, Google Scholar
• Tambe P, Hitt LM (2014a) Job hopping, information technology spillovers, and productivity growth. Management Sci. 60(2):338–355.Link, Google Scholar
• Tambe P, Hitt LM (2014b) Measuring information technology spillovers. Inform. Systems Res. 25(1):53–71.Link, Google Scholar
• Tambe P, Hitt LM, Brynjolfsson E (2012) The extroverted firm: How external information practices affect innovation and productivity. Management Sci. 58(5):843–859.Link, Google Scholar
• Teece DJ (1977) Technology transfer by multinational firms: The resource cost of transferring technological know-how. Econom. J. (London). 87(346):242–261.Google Scholar
• Thornton RA, Thompson P (2001) Learning from experience and learning from others: An exploration of learning and spillovers in wartime shipbuilding. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(5):1350–1368.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tilton JE (1971) International Diffusion of Technology: The Case of Semiconductors (Brookings Institution Press, Washington D.C.).Google Scholar
• Trantopoulos K, von Krogh G, Wallin MW, Woerter M (2017) External knowledge and information technology: Implications for process innovation performance. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 41(1):287–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E (1994) Sticky information and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation. Management Sci. 40(4):429–439.Link, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E, Tyre MJ (1995) How learning by doing is done: Problem identification in novel process equipment. Res. Policy 24(1):1–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walker BASBB (2012) Successfully Navigating the Turbulent Skies of a Large-Scale ERP Implementation (HEC Montreal Centre for Case Studies).Google Scholar
• Wu L, Hitt LM, Lou B (2020) Data analytics skills, innovation and firm productivity. Management Sci. 66(5):2017–2039.Link, Google Scholar
• Wu L, Jin F, Hitt LM (2017) Are all spillovers created equal? A network perspective on information technology labor movements. Management Sci. 64(7):3168–3186.Link, Google Scholar
• Xu Q, Ma Q (2008) Determinants of ERP implementation knowledge transfer. Inform. Management 45(8):528–539.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yusuf Y, Gunasekaran A, Abthorpe MS (2004) Enterprise information systems project implementation: A case study of ERP in Rolls-Royce. Internat. J. Production Econom. 87(3):251–266.Crossref, Google Scholar