Bidding on a Peer-to-Peer Energy Market: An Exploratory Field Study

References

• Ableitner L, Tiefenbeck V, Meeuw A, Wörner A, Fleisch E, Wortmann F (2020) User behavior in a real-world peer-to-peer electricity market. Applied Energy 270:115061.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ågerfalk PJ (2014) Insufficient theoretical contribution: A conclusive rationale for rejection? Eur. J. Inform. Systems 23(6):593–599.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ansarin M, Ghiassi-Farrokhfal Y, Ketter W, Collins J (2020) Cross-subsidies among residential electricity prosumers from tariff design and metering infrastructure. Energy Policy 145:111736.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Avci E, Bunn D, Ketter W, van Heck E (2019) Agent-level determinants of price expectation formation in online double-sided auctions. Decision Support Systems 124:113068.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bapna R, Goes P, Gupta A (2003) Replicating online Yankee auctions to analyze auctioneers’ and bidders’ strategies. Inform. Systems Res. 14(3):244–268.Link, Google Scholar
• Bapna R, Goes P, Gupta A, Jin Y (2004) User heterogeneity and its impact on electronic auction market design: An empirical exploration. MIS Quart. 28(1):21–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bollinger BK, Hartmann WR (2020) Information vs. automation and implications on pricing. Management Sci. 66(1):1–25.Google Scholar
• Borenstein S, Bushnell JB, Wolak FA (2002) Measuring market inefficiencies in California’s restructured wholesale electricity market. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(5):1376–1405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buchanan K, Russo R, Anderson B (2015) The question of energy reduction: The problem(s) with feedback. Energy Policy 77:89–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carrington MJ, Neville BA, Whitwell GJ (2014) Lost in translation: Exploring the ethical consumer intention–behavior gap. J. Bus. Res. 67(1):2759–2767.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Cramton P, List J, Ockenfels A (2021) Market design, human behavior and management. Management Sci. 67(9):5317–5348.Link, Google Scholar
• Deci EL, Ryan RM (2012) Self-Determination Theory. In Van Lange PAM, Kruglanski AW, Higgins ET, eds. Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology (Sage Publications Ltd., London), 1:416–436. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249215.n21.Google Scholar
• Ebeling F, Lotz S (2015) Domestic uptake of green energy promoted by opt-out tariffs. Nature Climate Change 5(9):868–871.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ecker F, Spada H, Hahnel UJ (2018) Independence without control: Autarky outperforms autonomy benefits in the adoption of private energy storage systems. Energy Policy 122:214–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ehrhardt-Martinez K, Donnelly KA, Laitner S, York D, Talbot J, Friedrich K (2010) Advanced metering initiatives and residential feedback programs: A meta-review for household electricity-saving opportunities. Report, American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Einav L, Farronato C, Levin J (2016) Peer-to-peer markets. Annu. Rev. Econom. 8:615–635.Crossref, Google Scholar
• European Commission (2018) Renewable Energy Directive II. Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources (Text with EEA relevance.) PE/48/2018/REV/1 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.L_.2018.328.01.0082.01.ENG&toc=OJ:L:2018:328:TOC.Google Scholar
• Fabra N, Von Der Fehr NH, Harbord D (2002) Modeling electricity auctions. Electricity J. 15(7):72–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fishbein M, Ajzen I (1975) Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research (Addison-Wesley, Reading, PA).Google Scholar
• Gholami R, Watson RT, Hasan H, Molla A, Bjørn-Andersen N (2016) Information systems solutions for environmental sustainability: How can we do more? J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 17(8):521–536.Google Scholar
• Gode DK, Sunder S (1993) Allocative efficiency of markets with zero-intelligence traders: Market as a partial substitute for individual rationality. J. Political Econom. 101(1):119–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goes PB, Karuga GG, Tripathi AK (2012) Bidding behavior evolution in sequential auctions: Characterization and analysis. MIS Quart. 36(4):1021–1042.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gölz S, Hahnel UJJ (2016) What motivates people to use energy feedback systems? A multiple goal approach to predict long-term usage behaviour in daily life. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 21:155–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guo Z, Koehler GJ, Whinston AB (2012) A computational analysis of bundle trading markets design for distributed resource allocation. Inform. Systems Res. 23(3-part-1):823–843.Link, Google Scholar
• Hahnel UJ, Herberz M, Pena-Bello A, Parra D, Brosch T (2019) Becoming prosumer: Revealing trading preferences and decision-making strategies in peer-to-peer energy communities. Energy Policy 137:111098.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Halu A, Scala A, Khiyami A, González MC (2016) Data-driven modeling of solar-powered urban microgrids. Sci. Adv. 2(1):e1500700.Crossref, Google Scholar
• International Energy Agency (2018) Renewables 2018. Report, International Energy Agency, Paris.Google Scholar
• Ketter W, Collins J, Saar-Tsechansky M, Marom O (2018) Information systems for a smart electricity grid. ACM Trans. Management Inform. Systems 9(3):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klemperer P (2002) What really matters in auction design. J. Econom. Perspect. 16(1):169–189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kolb DA (1984) Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development (FT Press, Upper Saddle River, NJ), https://books.google.de/books?id=jpbeBQAAQBAJ&dq=Kolb+DA+(1984)+Experiential+Learning:+Experience+as+The+Source+of+Learning+and+Development.&lr=&source=gbs_navlinks_s.Google Scholar
• Koolen D, Ketter W, Qiu L, Gupta A (2017) The sustainability tipping point in electricity markets. Proc. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (Association for Information Systems, Atlanta).Google Scholar
• Lu Y, Gupta A, Ketter W, Heck EV (2016) Exploring bidder heterogeneity in multichannel sequential B2B auctions. MIS Quart. 40(3):1–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McAfee RP, Vincent D (1993) Declining price anomaly. J. Econom. Theory 60(1):191–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mengelkamp E, Staudt P, Garttner J, Weinhardt C (2017a) Trading on local energy markets: A comparison of market designs and bidding strategies. Proc. 14th Internat. Conf. Eur. Electricity Market (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ).Google Scholar
• Mengelkamp E, Gärttner J, Rock K, Kessler S, Orsini L, Weinhardt C (2017b) Designing microgrid energy markets. A case study: The Brooklyn microgrid. Applied Energy 210:870–880.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rassenti SJ, Smith VL, Wilson BJ (2003) Discriminatory price auctions in electricity markets: Low volatility at the expense of high price levels. J. Regulatory Econom. 23(2):109–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosen C, Madlener R (2013) An auction design for local reserve energy markets. Decision Support Systems 56:168–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth AE (2008) What have we learned from market design? Econom. J. 118(527):285–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siler-Evans K, Azevedo IL, Granger Morgan M, Apt J (2013) Regional variations in the health, environmental and climate benefits of wind and solar generation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110(29):11768–11773.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strengers Y (2013) Smart Energy Technologies in Everyday Life: Smart Utopia? (Springer, Berlin).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tiefenbeck V, Wörner A, Schöb S, Fleisch E, Staake T (2019) Real-time feedback promotes energy conservation in the absence of volunteer selection bias and monetary incentives. Nature Energy 4(1):35–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• United Nations (2019) Sustainable development goals. Accessed April 8, 2019, https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/.Google Scholar
• Wang X, Hu Y (2009) The effect of experience on internet auction bidding dynamics. Marketing Lett. 20:245–261.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilcox RT (2000) Experts and amateurs: The role of experience in internet auctions. Marketing Lett. 11(4):363–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wörner A, Ableitner L, Meeuw A, Wortmann F, Tiefenbeck V (2019) Peer-to-peer energy trading in the real world: Market design and evaluation of the user value proposition. Proc. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (Association for Information Systems, Atlanta).Google Scholar