Beyond Risk: A Measure of Distribution Uncertainty

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2022.0089

References

  • Abdellaoui M, Vossmann F, Weber M (2005) Choice-based elicitation and decomposition of decision weights for gains and losses under uncertainty. Management Sci. 51(9):1384–1399.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Abdellaoui M, Baillon A, Placido L, Wakker PP (2011) The rich domain of uncertainty: Source functions and their experimental implementation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(2):695–723.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Abdellaoui M, Bleichrodt H, Kemel E, l’Haridon O (2021) Measuring beliefs under ambiguity. Oper. Res. 69(2):599–612.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Al-Natour S, Cavusoglu H, Benbasat I, Aleem U (2020) An empirical investigation of the antecedents and consequences of privacy uncertainty in the context of mobile apps. Inform. Systems Res. 31(4):1037–1063.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Amzal B, Bois FY, Parent E, Robert CP (2006) Bayesian-optimal design via interacting particle systems. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 101(474):773–785.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson EW, Ghysels E, Juergens JL (2009) The impact of risk and uncertainty on expected returns. J. Financial Econom. 94(2):233–263.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arrow KJ (1963) Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care. Amer. Econom. Rev. 53(5):941–973.Google Scholar
  • Augustin P, Izhakian Y (2020) Ambiguity, volatility, and credit risk. Rev. Financial Stud. 33(4):1618–1672.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ayyagari R, Grover V, Purvis R (2011) Technostress: Technological antecedents and implications. MIS Quart. 35(4):831–858.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bapna R, Ramaprasad J, Shmueli G, Umyarov A (2016) One-way mirrors in online dating: A randomized field experiment. Management Sci. 62(11):3100–3122.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Barclay MJ, Hendershott T, McCormick DT (2003) Competition among trading venues: Information and trading on electronic communications networks. J. Finance 18(6):2637–2665.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barro RJ (2006) Rare disasters and asset markets in the twentieth century. Quart. J. Econom. 121(3):823–866.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barro RJ (2009) Rare disasters, asset prices, and welfare costs. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(1):243–264.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barrow J (2002) The Constants of Nature from Alpha to Omega: The Numbers That Encode the Deepest Secrets of the Universe (Pantheon Books, New York).Google Scholar
  • Bates DS (1991) The crash of ‘87: Was it expected? The evidence from options markets. J. Finance 46(3):1009–1044.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benaroch M (2018) Real options models for proactive uncertainty-reducing mitigations and applications in cybersecurity investment decision making. Inform. Systems Res. 29(2):315–340.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Black F, Scholes M (1973) The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. J. Political Econom. 81(3):637–654.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brenner M, Izhakian Y (2018) Asset pricing and ambiguity: Empirical evidence. J. Financial Econom. 130(3):503–531.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E, Smith MD (2000) Frictionless commerce? A comparison of internet and conventional retailers. Management Sci. 46(4):563–585.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E, Wang A, Zhang XM (2021) The economics of IT and digitization: Eight questions for research. MIS Quart. 45(1):473–477.Google Scholar
  • Camerer C, Weber M (1992) Recent developments in modeling preferences: Uncertainty and ambiguity. J. Risk Uncertainty 5(4):325–370.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen J, Hong H, Stein JC (2001) Forecasting crashes: Trading volume, past returns, and conditional skewness in stock prices. J. Financial Econom. 61(3):345–381.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen P, Hitt LM, Hong Y, Wu S (2021) Measuring product type and purchase uncertainty with online product ratings: A theoretical model and empirical application. Inform. Systems Res. 32(4):1470–1489.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chung S, Animesh A, Han K, Pinsonneault A (2019) Software patents and firm value: A real options perspective on the role of innovation orientation and environmental uncertainty. Inform. Systems Res. 30(3):1073–1097.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Clemons EK, Weber BW (1996) Alternative securities trading systems: Tests and regulatory implications of the adoption of technology. Inform. Systems Res. 7(2):163–188.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Clemons EK, Weber BW (1997) Information technology and screen-based securities trading: Pricing the stock and pricing the trade. Management Sci. 43(12):1693–1708.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Csiszár I (1967) Information-type measures of difference of probability distributions and indirect observation. Studia Scientiarum Mathematicarum Hungarica 2:299–318.Google Scholar
  • Dellarocas C, Zhang XM, Awad NF (2007) Exploring the value of online product reviews in forecasting sales: The case of motion pictures. J. Interactive Marketing 21(4):2–20.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dimoka A, Hong Y, Pavlou PA (2012) On product uncertainty in online markets: Theory and evidence. MIS Quart. 36(2):395–426.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Du X, Su M, Zhang XM, Zheng X (2017) Bidding for multiple keywords in sponsored search advertising: Keyword categories and match types. Inform. Systems Res. 28(4):711–722.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Duncan RB (1972) Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty. Admin. Sci. Quart. 17(3):313–327.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ellsberg D (1961) Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. Quart. J. Econom. 75(4):643–669.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Epstein LG, Zhang J (2001) Subjective probabilities on subjectively unambiguous events. Econometrica 69(2):265–306.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fama E, French KR (1992) The cross-section of expected stock returns. J. Finance 47(2):427–465.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fang Z, Ho YC, Tan JX, Tan Y (2021) Show me the money: The economic impact of membership free shipping programs on online retailers. Inform. Systems Res. 32(4):1115–1127.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gabaix X, Gopikrishnan P, Plerou V, Stanley HE (2003) A theory of power-law distributions in financial market fluctuations. Nature 423(6937):267–270.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gao G, Greenwood BN, McCullough JS, Agarwal R (2015) Vocal minority and silent majority: How do online ratings reflect population perceptions of quality? MIS Quart. 39(3):565–589.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ghose A (2009) Internet exchanges for used goods: An empirical analysis of trade patterns and adverse selection. MIS Quart. 33(2):263–291.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gibbs AL, Su FE (2002) On choosing and bounding probability metrics. Internat. Statist. Rev. 70(3):419–435.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gilboa I, Schmeidler D (1989) Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior. J. Math. Econom. 18(2):141–153.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gong J, Abhishek V, Li B (2018) Examining the impact of keyword ambiguity on search advertising performance: A topic model approach. MIS Quart. 42(3):805–829.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hansen LP, Sargent TJ (2001) Robust control and model uncertainty. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(2):60–66.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hellinger E (1909) Neue Begründung der Theorie quadratischer Formen von unendlichvielen Veränderlichen. J. Reine Angewandte Mathematik 136:210–271.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hendershott T, Zhang XM, Zhao JL, Zheng ZE (2021) Fintech as a game changer: Overview of research frontiers. Inform. Systems Res. 32(1):1–17.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hong Y, Pavlou PA (2014) Product fit uncertainty in online markets: Nature, effects, and antecedents. Inform. Systems Res. 25(2):328–344.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hu M, Li X, Shi Y, Zhang XM (2023) Numerological heuristics and credit risk in peer-to-peer lending. Inform. Systems Res. 34(4):1744–1760.Google Scholar
  • Izhakian Y, Yermack D, Zender JF (2022) Ambiguity and the tradeoff theory of capital structure. Management Sci. 68(6):4090–4111.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jiang ZJ, Benbasat I (2007) The effects of presentation formats and task complexity on online consumers’ product understanding. MIS Quart. 31(3):475–500.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jiang Y, Ho YC, Yan X, Tan Y (2022) What’s in a “username”? Examining the effect of perceived anonymity on herding in online crowdfunding. Inform. Systems Res. 33(1):1–17.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Karimi J, Somers TM, Gupta YP (2004) Impact of environmental uncertainty and task characteristics on user satisfaction with data. Inform. Systems Res. 15(2):175–193.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kim Y, Krishnan R (2015) On product-level uncertainty and online purchase behavior: An empirical analysis. Management Sci. 61(10):2449–2467.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kim JB, Li Y, Zhang L (2011) Corporate tax avoidance and stock price crash risk: Firm-level analysis. J. Financial Econom. 100(3):639–662.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim K, Park J, Pan Y, Zhang K, Zhang X (2022) Risk disclosure in crowdfunding. Inform. Systems Res. 33(3):1023–1041.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Klibanoff P, Marinacci M, Mukerji S (2005) A smooth model of decision making under ambiguity. Econometrica 73(6):1849–1892.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Knight FH (1921) Risk, Uncertainty and Profit (Houghton Mifflin, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Li Z, Müller J, Wakker PP, Wang TV (2018) The rich domain of ambiguity explored. Management Sci. 64(7):3227–3240.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lu T, Yuan M, Wang CA, Zhang XM (2022) Histogram distortion bias in consumer choices. Management Sci. 68(12):8963–8978.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Maafi H (2011) Preference reversals under ambiguity. Management Sci. 57(11):2054–2066.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mandelbrot B (1963) The variation of certain speculative prices. J. Bus. 36(4):394–419.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miao J, Wei B, Zhou H (2019) Ambiguity aversion and the variance premium. Quart. J. Finance 9(02):1950003.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mishra DP, Heide JB, Cort SG (1998) Information asymmetry and levels of agency relationships. J. Marketing Res. 35(3):277–295.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson P (1970) Information and consumer behavior. J. Political Econom. 78(2):311–329.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Olszewski W (2007) Preferences over sets of lotteries. Rev. Econom. Stud. 74(2):567–595.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pavlou PA, Liang H, Xue Y (2007) Understanding and mitigating uncertainty in online exchange relationships: A principal-agent perspective. MIS Quart. 31(1):105–136.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pedersen LH (2019) Efficiently Inefficient: How Smart Money Invests and Market Prices are Determined (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Ply JK, Moore JE, Williams CK, Thatcher JB (2012) IS employee attitudes and perceptions at varying levels of software process maturity. MIS Quart. 36(2):601–624.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rishika R, Ramaprasad J (2019) The effects of asymmetric social ties, structural embeddedness, and tie strength on online content contribution behavior. Management Sci. 65(7):3398–3422.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rizzo JR, House RJ, Lirtzman SI (1970) Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 15(2):150–163.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Savage LJ (1954) The Foundations of Statistics (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
  • Schmidt AF, Finan C (2018) Linear regression and the normality assumption. J. Clinical Epidemiology 98:146–151.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schrader S, Riggs WM, Smith RP (1993) Choice over uncertainty and ambiguity in technical problem solving. J. Engrg. Tech. Management 10(1–2):73–99.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shen H, Dang I, Zhang XM (2024) Mr. Right or Mr. Best: The role of information under preference mismatch in online dating. Inform. Systems Res., ePub ahead of print March 13, https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2022.0233.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shiller RJ (1987) The volatility of stock market prices. Science 235(4784):33–37.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uppal R, Wang T (2003) Model misspecification and underdiversification. J. Finance 58(6):2465–2486.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van De Kuilen G, Wakker PP (2011) The midweight method to measure attitudes toward risk and ambiguity. Management Sci. 57(3):582–598.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wang A, Zhang XM (2009) Sampling of information goods. Decision Support Systems 48(1):14–22.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williams CD (2015) Asymmetric responses to earnings news: A case for ambiguity. Accounting Rev. 90(2):785–817.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wooldridge JM (2010) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Wooldridge JM (2012) Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach, 5th ed. (Cengage Learning, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Xu SX, Zhang XM (2013) Impact of Wikipedia on market information environment: Evidence on management disclosure and investor reaction. MIS Quart. 37(4):1043–1068.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang J (2002) Subjective ambiguity, expected utility and Choquet expected utility. Econom. Theory 20(1):159–181.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang XM, Feng J (2011) Cyclical bid adjustments in search-engine advertising. Management Sci. 57(9):1703–1719.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang XM, Zhang L (2015) How does the internet affect the financial market? An equilibrium model of internet facilitated feedback trading. MIS Quart. 39(1):17–38.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang L, Zhang X (2024) Mispricing and algorithm trading. Inform. Systems Res., ePub ahead of print February 19, https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2021.0570.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang XM, Zhu F (2011) Group size and incentives to contribute: A natural experiment at Chinese Wikipedia. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(4):1601–1615.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhou J, Zhang Q, Zhou S, Li X, Zhang X (2023) Unintended emotional effects of online health communities: A text mining-supported empirical study. MIS Quart. 47(1):195–266.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhu F, Zhang XM (2010) Impact of online consumer reviews on sales: The moderating role of product and consumer characteristics. J. Marketing 74(2):133–148.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.