Does David Make A Goliath? Impact of Rival’s Expertise Signals on Online User Engagement

References

• Aral S, Walker D (2014) Tie strength, embeddedness, and social influence: A large-scale networked experiment. Management Sci. 60(6):1352–1370.Link, Google Scholar
• Azoulay P, Stuart T, Wang Y (2014) Matthew: Effect or fable? Management Sci. 60(1):92–109.Link, Google Scholar
• Bandura A (1977) Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psych. Rev. 84(2):191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartling B, Brandes L, Schunk D (2015) Expectations as reference points: Field evidence from professional soccer. Management Sci. 61(11):2646–2661.Link, Google Scholar
• Baumeister RF, Showers CJ (1986) A review of paradoxical performance effects: Choking under pressure in sports and mental tests. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 16(4):361–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bendersky C, Shah NP (2012) The cost of status enhancement: Performance effects of individuals’ status mobility in task groups. Organ. Sci. 23(2):308–322.Link, Google Scholar
• Benjamin BA, Podolny JM (1999) Status, quality, and social order in the California wine industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(3):563–589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berri D, Simmons R (2009) Race and the evaluation of signal callers in the National Football League. J. Sports Econom. 10(1):23–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bianchi AJ, Kang SM, Stewart D (2012) The organizational selection of status characteristics: Status evaluations in an open source community. Organ. Sci. 23(2):341–354.Link, Google Scholar
• Bitektine A (2011) Toward a theory of social judgments of organizations: The case of legitimacy, reputation, and status. Acad. Management Rev. 36(1):151–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bockstedt J, Druehl C, Mishra A (2016) Heterogeneous submission behavior and its implications for success in innovation contests with public submissions. Production Oper. Management 25(7):1157–1176.Google Scholar
• Bockstedt J, Druehl C, Mishra A (2022) Incentives and stars: Competition in innovation contests with participant and submission visibility. Production Oper. Management 31(3):1372–1393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bothner MS, Kang JH, Stuart TE (2007) Competitive crowding and risk taking in a tournament: Evidence from NASCAR racing. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(2):208–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bothner MS, Kim YK, Smith EB (2012) How does status affect performance? Status as an asset vs. status as a liability in the PGA and NASCAR. Organ. Sci. 23(2):416–433.Link, Google Scholar
• Bowers A, Prato M (2018) The structural origins of unearned status: How arbitrary changes in categories affect status position and market impact. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(3):668–699.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brabham DC (2010) Moving the crowd at Threadless: Motivations for participation in a crowdsourcing application. Inform. Comm. Soc. 13(8):1122–1145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burtch G, Ghose A, Wattal S (2016) Secret admirers: An empirical examination of information hiding and contribution dynamics in online crowdfunding. Inform. Systems Res. 27(3):478–496.Link, Google Scholar
• Burtch G, Hong Y, Bapna R, Griskevicius V (2018) Stimulating online reviews by combining financial incentives and social norms. Management Sci. 64(5):2065–2082.Link, Google Scholar
• Carver CS, Blaney PH, Scheier MF (1979) Reassertion and giving up: The interactive role of self-directed attention and outcome expectancy. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 37(10):1859.Google Scholar
• Chen W, Gu B, Ye Q, Zhu KX (2019) Measuring and managing the externality of managerial responses to online customer reviews. Inform. Systems Res. 30(1):81–96.Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen J (1968) Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psych. Bull. 70(4):213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Connolly T, Boyle E, MacArthur E, Hainey T, Boyle J (2012) A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Comput. Ed. 59(2):661–686.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Correll SJ, Ridgeway CL, Zuckerman EW, Jank S, Jordan-Bloch S, Nakagawa S (2017) It’s the conventional thought that counts: How third-order inference produces status advantage. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 82(2):297–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Creswell JW, Poth CN (2016) Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Deodhar SJ, Babar Y, Burtch G (2022) The influence of status on evaluations: Evidence from online coding contests. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 46(4):2085–2110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deodhar SJ, Tandon A, Tandon A, Tripathi A (2023) Effects of social information signals on user engagement: Evidence from randomized field experiments. Behav. Inform. Tech. 42(12):1877–1898.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deterding S (2011) Situated motivational affordances of game elements: A conceptual model. Gamification: Using game design elements in non-gaming contexts, a workshop at CHI. Proc. ACM Extended Abstracts Human Factors Comput. Systems (ACM, New York), 2425–2428.Google Scholar
• Drivas K, Kremmydas D (2020) The Matthew effect of a journal’s ranking. Res. Policy 49(4):103951.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duan G, Gu B, Whinston AB (2009) Informational cascades and software adoption on the internet: An empirical investigation. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 33(1):23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edwards EA, Caton H, Lumsden J, Rivas C, Steed L, Pirunsarn Y, Jumbe S, et al. (2018) Creating a theoretically grounded, gamified health app: Lessons from developing the cigbreak smoking cessation mobile phone game. JMIR Serious Games 6(4):e10252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flynn FJ, Amanatullah ET (2012) Psyched up or psyched out? The influence of coactor status on individual performance. Organ. Sci. 23(2):402–415.Link, Google Scholar
• Fu D, Hong Y, Wang K, Fan W (2018) Effects of membership tier on user content generation behaviors: Evidence from online reviews. Electronic Commerce Res. 18:457–483.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fujita M, Harrigan P, Soutar GN, Roy SK, Roy R (2020) Enhancing member-institution relationships through social media: The role of other-user engagement behavior and similarity perceptions. J. Bus. Res. 121:642–654.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gu C, Lin S, Sun J, Yang C, Chen J, Jiang Q, Miao W, Wei W (2022) What do users care about? Research on user behavior of mobile interactive video advertising. Heliyon 8(10):e10910.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gunaratne J, Zalmanson L, Nov O (2018) The persuasive power of algorithmic and crowdsourced advice. J. Management Inform. Systems 35(4):1092–1120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu DH (2004) What do entrepreneurs pay for venture capital affiliation? J. Finance 59(4):1805–1844.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hu HF, Krishen AS (2019) When is enough, enough? Investigating product reviews and information overload from a consumer empowerment perspective. J. Bus. Res. 100:27–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang P, Lucas HC (2021) Early exploration of MOOCs in the US higher education: An absorptive capacity perspective. ACM Trans. Management Inform. Systems 12(3):1–2.Google Scholar
• Huang J, Boh WF, Goh KH (2017) A temporal study of the effects of online Opinions: Information sources matter. J. Management Inform. Systems 34(4):1169–1202.Google Scholar
• Kane G, Alavi M, Labianca G, Borgatti S (2014) What’s different about social media networks? A framework and research agenda. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 38(1):274–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kilduff GJ (2014) Driven to win: Rivalry, motivation, and performance. Soc. Psych. Personality Sci. 5(8):944–952.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kilduff GJ, Elfenbein HA, Staw BM (2010) The psychology of rivalry: A relationally dependent analysis of competition. Acad. Management J. 53(5):943–969.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim JW, King BG (2014) Seeing stars: Matthew effects and status bias in major league baseball umpiring. Management Sci. 60(11):2619–2644.Link, Google Scholar
• Lee HCB, Ba S, Li X, Stallaert J (2018) Salience bias in crowdsourcing contests. Inform. Systems Res. 29(2):401–418.Link, Google Scholar
• Liu T, Yang J, Adamic L, Chen Y (2014) Crowdsourcing with all-pay auctions: A field experiment on Taskcn. Management Sci. 60(8):2020–2037.Google Scholar
• Malter D (2014) On the causality and cause of returns to organizational status: Evidence from the Grands Crus Classés of the Médoc. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59(2):271–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merton RK (1968) The Matthew effect in science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science 159(3810):56–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meservy TO, Fadel KJ, Kirwan, CB, Meservy RD (2019) An fMRI exploration of information processing in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quart. 43(3):851–872.Google Scholar
• Mo J, Sarkar S, Menon S (2018) Know when to run. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 42(3):919–944.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore D, Kim T (2003) Myopic social prediction and the solo comparison effect. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 85(6):1121–1135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oestreicher-Singer G, Zalmanson L (2013) Content or community? A digital business strategy for content providers in the social age. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 37(2):591–616.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park S, Kim S (2019) A badge design framework for a gamified learning environment: Cases analysis and literature review for badge design. JMIS Serious Games 7(2):e14342.Google Scholar
• Peer E, Rothschild D, Gordon A, Evernden Z, Damer E (2022) Data quality of platforms and panels for online behavioral research. Behav. Res. Methods 54:1643–1662.Google Scholar
• Peng W, Hsieh G (2012) The influence of competition, cooperation, and player relationship in a motor performance centered computer game. Comput. Human Behav. 28(6):2100–2106.Google Scholar
• Phillips DJ, Zuckerman EW (2001) Middle-status conformity: Theoretical restatement and empirical demonstration in two markets. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(2):379–429.Google Scholar
• Phillips N, Hertwig R, Kareev Y, Avrahami J (2014) Rivals in the dark: How competition influences search in decisions under uncertainty. Cognition 133(1):104–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piazza A, Castellucci F (2014) Status in organization and management theory. J. Management 40(1):287–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prato M, Ferraro F (2018) Starstruck: How hiring high-status employees affects incumbents’ performance. Organ. Sci. 29(5):755–774.Link, Google Scholar
• Roberts PW, Sterling AD (2012) Network progeny? Prefounding social ties and the success of new entrants. Management Sci. 58(7):1292–1304.Link, Google Scholar
• Rutz O, Aravindakshan A, Rubel O (2019) Measuring and forecasting mobile game app engagement. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 36(2):185–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sharkey AJ, Kovács B (2018) The many gifts of status: How attending to audience reactions drives the use of status. Management Sci. 64(11):5422–5443.Link, Google Scholar
• Simcoe TS, Waguespack DM (2011) Status, quality, and attention: What’s in a (missing) name? Management Sci. 57(2):274–290.Link, Google Scholar
• Smirnova I, Reitzig M, Sorenson O (2022) Building status in an online community. Organ. Sci. 33(6):2519–2540.Link, Google Scholar
• Smith JA, Faris R (2015) Movement without mobility: Adolescent status hierarchies and the contextual limits of cumulative advantage. Soc. Networks 40:139–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Statista (2023a) Mobile gaming content market value worldwide 2011–2027. Accessed October 23, 2023, https://www.statista.com/statistics/292512/mobile-contents-market-value-worldwide/.Google Scholar
• Statista (2023b) Mobile share of total digital gaming revenue worldwide 2017–2027. Accessed October 23, 2023, https://www.statista.com/statistics/260167/mobile-gaming-share-of-total-gaming-revenue-worldwide/.Google Scholar
• Statista (2023c) Google Play: Number of available gaming apps as of Q3 2022. Accessed October 23, 2023, https://www.statista.com/statistics/780229/number-of-available-gaming-apps-in-the-google-play-store-quarter/.Google Scholar
• Stewart D (2005) Social status in an open-source community. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 70(5):823–842.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teplitskiy M, Duede E, Menietti M, Lakhani KR (2022) How status of research papers affects the way they are read and cited. Res. Policy 51(4):104484.Crossref, Google Scholar
• To C, Leslie LM, Torelli CJ, Stoner JL (2020) Culture and social hierarchy: Collectivism as a driver of the relationship between power and status. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 157:159–176.Google Scholar
• To C, Yan TT, Sherf EN (2022) Victorious and hierarchical: Past performance as a determinant of team hierarchical differentiation. Organ. Sci. 33(6):2346–2363.Link, Google Scholar
• Vance R, Colella A (1990) Effects of two types of feedback on goal acceptance and personal goals. J. Appl. Psych. 75(1):68–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ventura RB, Richmond S, Nadini M, Nakayama S, Porfiri M (2019) Does winning or losing change players’ engagement in competitive games? Experiments in virtual reality. IEEE Trans. Games 13(1):23–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vieira SM, Kaymak U, Sousa JM (2010) Cohen’s kappa coefficient as a performance measure for feature selection. Proc. Internat. Conf. Fuzzy Systems (IEEE, New York), 1–8.Google Scholar
• Wang C, Zhang X, Hann IH (2018) Socially nudged: A quasi-experimental study of friends’ social influence in online product ratings. Inform. Systems Res. 29(3):641–655.Link, Google Scholar
• Wang J, Yang Y, Xia B (2019) A simplified Cohen’s kappa for use in binary classification data annotation tasks. IEEE Access 7:164386–164397.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Washington M, Zajac EJ (2005) Status evolution and competition: Theory and evidence. Acad. Management J. 48(2):282–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weibel D, Wissmath B, Habegger S, Steiner Y, Groner R (2008) Playing online games against computer- vs. human-controlled opponents: Effects on presence, flow, and enjoyment. Comput. Human Behav. 24(5):2274–2291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whetten DA (2009) An examination of the interface between context and theory applied to the study of Chinese organizations. Management Organ. Rev. 5(1):29–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams EL, Jones HS, Sparks SA, Marchant DC, Midgley AW, Mc Naughton LR (2015) Competitor presence reduces internal attentional focus and improves 16.1 km cycling time trial performance. J. Sci. Medicine Sport 18(4):486–491.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Willson VL (1983) A meta‐analysis of the relationship between science achievement and science attitude: Kindergarten through college. J. Res. Sci. Teaching 20(9):839–850.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang JC, Chung CJ, Chen MS (2022) Effects of performance goal orientations on learning performance and in‐game performance in digital game‐based learning. J. Comput. Assisted Learn. 38(2):422–439.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Goh KY, Teo HH, Tan SS (2023) Compete with me? The impact of online gamified competition on exercise behavior. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 24(3):912–935.Google Scholar
• Ye Q, Law R, Gu B (2009) The impact of online user reviews on hotel room sales. Internat. J. Hospitality Management 28(1):180–182.Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Singh P, Ghose A (2019) A structural analysis of the role of superstars in crowdsourcing contests. Inform. Systems Res. 30(1):15–33.Link, Google Scholar