Understanding Volunteer Crowdsourcing from a Multiplex Perspective

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2022.0290

References

  • Alam SL, Campbell J (2017) Temporal motivations of volunteers to participate in cultural crowdsourcing work. Inform. Systems Res. 28(4):744–759.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Alonso O, Lease M (2011) Crowdsourcing 101: Putting the WSDM of crowds to work for you. Proc. Fourth ACM Internat. Conf. Web Search Data Mining (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 1–2.Google Scholar
  • Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev. Econom. Stud. 58(2):277–297.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Backstrom L, Huttenlocher D, Kleinberg J, Lan X (2006) Group formation in large social networks: Membership, growth, and evolution. Proc. 12th ACM SIGKDD (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 44–54.Google Scholar
  • Baruch A, May A, Yu D (2016) The motivations, enablers and barriers for voluntary participation in an online crowdsourcing platform. Comput. Human Behav. 64:923–931.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt RS (1980) Autonomy in a social topology. Amer. J. Sociol. 85(4):892–925.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt RS (2009) Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Coleman JS (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. Amer. J. Sociol. 94:S95–S120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gould RV (1991) Multiple networks and mobilization in the Paris commune, 1871. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 56:716–729.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter MS (1973) The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. 78(6):1360–1380.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter M (1985) Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. 91(3):481–510.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greene WH (2003) Econometric Analysis (Pearson Education, Delhi, India).Google Scholar
  • Grewal R, Lilien GL, Mallapragada G (2006) Location, location, location: How network embeddedness affects project success in open source systems. Management Sci. 52(7):1043–1056.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hanaki N, Peterhansl A, Dodds PS, Watts DJ (2007) Cooperation in evolving social networks. Management Sci. 53(7):1036–1050.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hoffman R (2014) The Linkedin volunteer marketplace: Connecting professionals to nonprofit volunteer opportunities. Accessed February 17, 2024, https://www.linkedin.com/blog/member/impact/the-linkedin-volunteer-marketplace-connecting-professionals-to-nonprofit-volunteer-opportunities.Google Scholar
  • Howe J (2006) The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired Magazine 14(6):1–4.Google Scholar
  • Huang CY, Chin WCB, Fu YH, Tsai YS (2019) Beyond bond links in complex networks: Local bridges, global bridges and silk links. Phys. A 536:121027.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huang Y, Vir Singh P, Srinivasan K (2014) Crowdsourcing new product ideas under consumer learning. Management Sci. 60(9):2138–2159.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Huang N, Burtch G, Hong Y, Pavlou PA (2020) Unemployment and worker participation in the gig economy: Evidence from an online labor market. Inform. Systems Res. 31(2):431–448.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ingram P, Zou X (2008) Business friendships. Res. Organ. Behav. 28:167–184.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Israel GD, Beaulieu LJ, Hartless G (2001) The influence of family and community social capital on educational achievement. Rural Sociol. 66(1):43–68.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • James W (2007) The Principles of Psychology, vol. 1 (Cosimo, New York).Google Scholar
  • Jin Y, Lee HCB, Ba S, Stallaert J (2021) Winning by learning? Effect of knowledge sharing in crowdsourcing contests. Inform. Systems Res. 32(3):836–859.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kanawati R (2015) Multiplex network mining: A brief survey. IEEE Intelligent Inform. Bull. 16(1):24–27.Google Scholar
  • Kane GC (2009) It’s a network, not an encyclopedia: A social network perspective on wikipedia collaboration. Academy of Management Proc. (Academy of Management, Briarcliff Manor, NY), 1–6.Google Scholar
  • Kankanamge N, Yigitcanlar T, Goonetilleke A, Kamruzzaman M (2019) Can volunteer crowdsourcing reduce disaster risk? A systematic review of the literature. Internat. J. Disaster Risk Reduction 35:101097.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazega E (2001) The Collegial Phenomenon: The Social Mechanisms of Cooperation Among Peers in a Corporate Law Partnership (Oxford University Press on Demand, Oxford, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee HCB, Ba S, Li X, Stallaert J (2018) Salience bias in crowdsourcing contests. Inform. Systems Res. 29(2):401–418.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lee KM, Kim JY, Cho WK, Goh KI, Kim I (2012) Correlated multiplexity and connectivity of multiplex random networks. New J. Phys. 14(3):033027.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li JB, Piezunka H (2020) The uniplex third: Enabling single-domain role transitions in multiplex relationships. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(2):314–358.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marwell G, Oliver PE, Prahl R (1988) Social networks and collective action: A theory of the critical mass. III. Amer. J. Sociol. 94(3):502–534.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McAdam D (1986) Recruitment to high-risk activism: The case of freedom summer. Amer. J. Sociol. 92(1):64–90.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oster E (2019) Unobservable selection and coefficient stability: Theory and evidence. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 37(2):187–204.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Petru A (2014) Linkedin, VolunteerMatch team up to connect nonprofits with volunteers. Triple Pundit (July 1), https://www.triplepundit.com/story/2014/linkedin-volunteermatch-team-connect-nonprofits-volunteers/42706.Google Scholar
  • Pooley JA, Cohen L, Pike LT (2005) Can sense of community inform social capital? Soc. Sci. J. 42(1):71–79.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ransbotham S, Kane GC (2011) Membership turnover and collaboration success in online communities: Explaining rises and falls from grace in Wikipedia. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 35(3):613–627.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ransbotham S, Kane GC, Lurie NH (2012) Network characteristics and the value of collaborative user-generated content. Marketing Sci. 31(3):387–405.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Reitzes DC, Mutran EJ (2006) Lingering identities in retirement. Sociol. Quart 47(2):333–359.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ren Y, Chen J, Riedl J (2016) The impact and evolution of group diversity in online open collaboration. Management Sci. 62(6):1668–1686.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shi Y, Dokshin FA, Genkin M, Brashears ME (2017) A member saved is a member earned? The recruitment-retention trade-off and organizational strategies for membership growth. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 82(2):407–434.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shipilov AV, Li SX (2012) The missing link: The effect of customers on the formation of relationships among producers in the multiplex triads. Organ. Sci. 23(2):472–491.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shipilov A, Li S (2014) Toward the relational multiplexity perspective on inter-firm networks. Brass DJ, Labianca G (JOE), Mehra A, Halgin DS, Borgatti SP, eds. Contemporary Perspectives on Organizational Social Network Analysis (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK), 95–109.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shipilov A, Gulati R, Kilduff M, Li S, Tsai W (2014) Relational pluralism within and between organizations. Acad. Management J. 57(2):449–459.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simpson B, Willer R (2015) Beyond altruism: Sociological foundations of cooperation and prosocial behavior. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 41:43–63.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Singh PV, Tan Y, Mookerjee V (2011) Network effects: The influence of structural capital on open source project success. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 35(4):813–829.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Snow D (1987) Organization, ideology, and mobilization: The case of Nichiren Shoshu of America. Bromley DG, Hammond PE, eds. The Future of New Religious Movements (Mercer University Press, Macon, GA), 153–172.Google Scholar
  • Van Vugt M, Roberts G, Hardy C (2007) Competitive altruism: Development of reputation-based cooperation in groups. Barrett L, Dunbar R, eds. Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology (Oxford University Press, Oxfordshire, UK), 531–540.Google Scholar
  • Verbrugge LM (1979) Multiplexity in adult friendships. Soc. Forces 57(4):1286–1309.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Von Krogh G, Haefliger S, Spaeth S, Wallin MW (2012) Carrots and rainbows: Motivation and social practice in open source software development. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 36(2):649–676.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang X, Butler BS, Ren Y (2013) The impact of membership overlap on growth: An ecological competition view of online groups. Organ. Sci. 24(2):414–431.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Yin J, Luo J, Brown SA (2021) Learning from crowdsourced multi-labeling: A variational Bayesian approach. Inform. Systems Res. 32(3):752–773.AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • Yoganarasimhan H (2012) Impact of social network structure on content propagation: A study using youtube data. Quant. Marketing Econom. 10:111–150.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang S, Singh PV, Ghose A (2019) A structural analysis of the role of superstars in crowdsourcing contests. Inform. Systems Res. 30(1):15–33.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zuckerman EW (1999) The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. Amer. J. Sociol. 104(5):1398–1438.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zuckerman EW (2004) Structural incoherence and stock market activity. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 69(3):405–432.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.