Skill-Biased Technical Change, Again? Online Gig Platforms and Local Employment

References

• Abadie A (2021) Using synthetic controls: Feasibility, data requirements, and methodological aspects. J. Econom. Literature 59(2):391–425.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acemoglu D (2002) Technical change, inequality, and the labor market. J. Econom. Literature 40(1):7–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acemoglu D, Autor D (2011) Skills, tasks and technologies: Implications for employment and earnings. Handbook of Labor Economics, vol. 4 (Elsevier, New York), 1043–1171.Google Scholar
• Acemoglu D, Restrepo P (2019) Automation and new tasks: How technology displaces and reinstates labor. J. Econom. Perspective 33(2):3–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agrawal A, Gans JS, Goldfarb A (2019) Artificial intelligence: The ambiguous labor market impact of automating prediction. J. Econom. Perspective 33(2):31–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson M, McClain C, Faverio M, Gelles-Watnick R (2021) The state of gig work in 2021. Report, Pew Research Center, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Autor DH (2003) Outsourcing at will: The contribution of unjust dismissal doctrine to the growth of employment outsourcing. J. Labor Econom. 21(1):1–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Autor DH, Dorn D (2013) The growth of low-skill service jobs and the polarization of the US labor market. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(5):1553–1597.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Autor DH, Levy F, Murnane RJ (2003) The skill content of recent technological change: An empirical exploration. Quart. J. Econom. 118(4):1279–1333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bai J (2009) Panel data models with interactive fixed effects. Econometrica 77(4):1229–1279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baker AC, Larcker DF, Wang CC (2022) How much should we trust staggered difference-in-differences estimates? J. Financial Econom. 144(2):370–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barrios JM, Hochberg YV, Yi HL (2020) Launching with a parachute: The gig economy and entrepreneurial entry. Working paper, University of Chicago, Becker Friedman Institute for Economics, Chicago.Google Scholar
• Benson A, Sojourner A, Umyarov A (2020) Can reputation discipline the gig economy? Experimental evidence from an online labor market. Management Sci. 66(5):1802–1825.Link, Google Scholar
• Berger T, Chen C, Frey CB (2018) Drivers of disruption? Estimating the Uber effect. Eur. Econom. Rev. 110:197–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger T, Frey CB, Levin G, Danda SR (2019) Uber happy? Work and well-being in the ‘gig economy’. Econom. Policy 34(99):429–477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blinder AS (2009) How many US jobs might be offshorable? World Econ. 10(2):41.Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Hui X, Liu M (2019) Does machine translation affect international trade? Evidence from a large digital platform. Management Sci. 65(12):5449–5460.Link, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Rock D, Syverson C (2018) Artificial intelligence and the modern productivity paradox: A clash of expectations and statistics. Agrawal A, Gans J, Goldfarb A, eds. The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 23–57.Google Scholar
• Burtch G, Carnahan S, Greenwood BN (2018) Can you gig it? An empirical examination of the gig economy and entrepreneurial activity. Management Sci. 64(12):5497–5520.Link, Google Scholar
• Callaway B, Sant’Anna PH (2021) Difference-in-differences with multiple time periods. J. Econometrics 225(2):200–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Card D, DiNardo JE (2002) Skill-biased technological change and rising wage inequality: Some problems and puzzles. J. Labor Econom. 20(4):733–783.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Casey G (2018) Technology-driven unemployment. Retrieved February 25, 2022, https://ideas.repec.org/p/red/sed018/302.html.Google Scholar
• Caudill SB (1988) An advantage of the linear probability model over probit or logit. Oxford Bull. Econom. Statist. 50(4):425–427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan J, Ghose A (2014) Internet’s dirty secret assessing the impact of online intermediaries on HIV transmission. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 38(4):955–976.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan J, Mojumder P, Ghose A (2019) The digital Sin City: An empirical study of Craigslist’s impact on prostitution trends. Inform. Systems Res. 30(1):219–238.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen DL, Horton JJ (2016) Research note—Are online labor markets spot markets for tasks? A field experiment on the behavioral response to wage cuts. Inform. Systems Res. 27(2):403–423.Link, Google Scholar
• Cheng S, Park B (2020) Flows and boundaries: A network approach to studying occupational mobility in the labor market. Amer. J. Sociol. 126(3):577–631.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheng Z, Dimoka A, Pavlou PA (2016) Context may be King, but generalizability is the Emperor! J. Inform. Tech. 31(3):257–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheng Z, Pang M-S, Pavlou PA (2020) Mitigating traffic congestion: The role of intelligent transportation systems. Inform. Systems Res. 31(3):653–674.Link, Google Scholar
• Cramer J, Krueger AB (2016) Disruptive change in the taxi business: The case of Uber. Amer. Econom. Rev. 106(5):177–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dixon J, Hong B, Wu L (2021) The robot revolution: Managerial and employment consequences for firms. Management Sci. 67(9):5586–5605.Link, Google Scholar
• Einav L, Farronato C, Levin J (2016) Peer-to-peer markets. Annu. Rev. Econom. 8:615–635.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ford M (2015) Rise of the Robots: Technology and the Threat of a Jobless Future (Basic, New York).Google Scholar
• Fossen FM, Sorgner A (2021) Digitalization of work and entry into entrepreneurship. J. Bus. Res. 125:548–563.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fraiberger SP, Sundararajan A (2017) Peer-to-peer rental markets in the sharing economy. NYU Stern School of Business Research paper, New York.Google Scholar
• Frey CB, Osborne MA (2017) The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Tech. Forecasting Soc. Change 114:254–280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gatta M, Boushey H, Appelbaum E (2009) High-touch and here-to-stay: Future skills demands in US low wage service occupations. Sociology 43(5):968–989.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldfarb A, Tucker C (2019) Digital economics. J. Econom. Literature 57(1):3–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gong J (2016) A structural two-sided matching model of online labor markets. Fox School of Business Research paper, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
• Goodman-Bacon A (2021) Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing. J. Econometrics 225(2):254–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall JV, Krueger AB (2018) An analysis of the labor market for Uber’s driver-partners in the United States. Industry Labor Related Rev. 71(3):705–732.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong Y, Pavlou PA (2017) On buyer selection of service providers in online outsourcing platforms for IT services. Inform. Systems Res. 28(3):547–562.Link, Google Scholar
• Horton JJ (2017) The effects of algorithmic labor market recommendations: Evidence from a field experiment. J. Labor Econom. 35(2):345–385.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hosanagar K (2017) Senior editor perspectives. Inform. Systems Res. 28(4):689–689.Link, Google Scholar
• Isaac E (2015) Innovative clusters & new work: A case study of TaskRabbit. Report, Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
• Jenkins ME, Isom B, Koopman C (2023) Tech-Enabled Gig Jobs: Policy Solutions for the Future of Work (The Center for Growth and Opportunity, Logan, UT).Google Scholar
• Kerr WR, Lincoln WF (2010) The supply side of innovation: H-1B visa reforms and US ethnic invention. J. Labor Econom. 28(3):473–508.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim K, Hann I-H (2019) Crowdfunding and the democratization of access to capital—An illusion? Evidence from housing prices. Inform. Systems Res. 30(1):276–290.Link, Google Scholar
• Krusell P, Ohanian LE, Ríos‐Rull JV, Violante GL (2000) Capital‐skill complementarity and inequality: A macroeconomic analysis. Econometrica 68(5):1029–1053.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazear EP (2004) Balanced skills and entrepreneurship. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(2):208–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levine R, Rubinstein YZ (2020) Selection into entrepreneurship and self-employment. CEP Discussion Paper No. CEPDP1722, London School of Economics and Political Science, Centre for Economic Performance, London.Google Scholar
• Li Z, Hong Y, Zhang Z (2021) The empowering and competition effects of the platform-based sharing economy on the supply and demand sides of the labor market. J. Management Inform. Systems 38(1):140–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Möhlmann M, Zalmanson L, Henfridsson O, Gregory RW (2021) Algorithmic management of work on online labor platforms: When matching meets control. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 45(4).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moscarini G, Vella FG (2008) Occupational mobility and the business cycle. NBER Working Paper No. 13819, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Nandakumar R (2020) Positive spillover effects of Uber on NYC’s yellow taxis. Report, Srini Raju Centre for IT and the Networked Economy, Hyderabad, India.Google Scholar
• Rayle L, Dai D, Chan N, Cervero R, Shaheen S (2016) Just a better taxi? A survey-based comparison of taxis, transit, and ridesourcing services in San Francisco. Transportation Policy 45:168–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robinson C (2018) Occupational mobility, occupation distance, and specific human capital. J. Human Resources 53(2):513–551.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ruggles S, Flood S, Goeken R, Grover J, Meyer E, Pacas J, Sobek M (2019) IPUMS USA: Version 9.0 [data set] (IPUMS 10:D010, Minneapolis, MN).Google Scholar
• Schor JB (2017) Does the sharing economy increase inequality within the eighty percent?: Findings from a qualitative study of platform providers. Cambridge J. Regions Econom. Soc. 10(2):263–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schor JB, Attwood-Charles W, Cansoy M, Ladegaard I, Wengronowitz R (2020) Dependence and precarity in the platform economy. Theory Soc. 49:833–861.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwellnus C, Geva A, Pak M, Veiel R (2019) Gig economy platforms: Boon or bane? Working paper, OECD Economics Department No. 1550, OECD Publishing, Paris.Google Scholar
• Silva BC, Moreira AC (2022) Entrepreneurship and the gig economy: A bibliometric analysis. Management Lett. 22(2):23–44.Google Scholar
• Sundararajan A (2017) The Sharing Economy: The End of Employment and the Rise of Crowd-Based Capitalism (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Vallas S, Schor JB (2020) What do platforms do? Understanding the gig economy. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 46:273–294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Violante GL (2008) Skill-biased technical change. New Palgrave Dictionary Econom. 2:1–6.Google Scholar
• Xu Y (2017) Generalized synthetic control method: Causal inference with interactive fixed effects models. Political Anal. 25(1):57–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zervas G, Proserpio D, Byers JW (2017) The rise of the sharing economy: Estimating the impact of Airbnb on the hotel industry. J. Marketing Res. 54(5):687–705.Crossref, Google Scholar