Encouraging Eco-driving with Post-trip Visualized Storytelling: An Experiment Combining Eye-Tracking and a Driving Simulator

References

• Acquisti A, Adjerid I, Balebako R, Brandimarte L, Cranor LF, Komanduri S, Leon PG, et al. (2017) Nudges for privacy and security: Understanding and assisting users’ choices online. ACM Comput. Surv. 50(3):1–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alter AL, Oppenheimer DM (2009) Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 13(3):219–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amini F, Henry Riche N, Lee B, Hurter C, Irani P (2015) Understanding data videos: Looking at narrative visualization through the cinematography lens. Proc. 33rd Annual ACM Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 1459–1468.Google Scholar
• Andrieu C, Saint Pierre G (2012) Comparing effects of eco-driving training and simple advices on driving behavior. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 54:211–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ayres P, Marcus N, Chan C, Qian N (2009) Learning hand manipulative tasks: When instructional animations are superior to equivalent static representations. Comput. Human Behav. 25(2):348–353.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bera P, Soffer P, Parsons J (2019) Using eye tracking to expose cognitive processes in understanding conceptual models. MIS Quart. 43(4):1105–1126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhattacherjee A, Premkumar G (2004) Understanding changes in belief and attitude toward information technology usage: A theoretical model and longitudinal test. MIS Quart. 28(2):229–254.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blascheck T, Schweizer M, Beck F, Ertl T (2017) Visual comparison of eye movement patterns. Comput. Graph. Forum 36(3):87–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bokare PS, Maurya AK (2013) Study of effect of speed, acceleration and deceleration of small petrol car on its tail pipe emission. Internat. J. Traffic Transport Engrg. 3(4):465–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borkin MA, Vo AA, Bylinskii Z, Isola P, Sunkavalli S, Oliva A, Pfister H (2013) What makes a visualization memorable? IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 19(12):2306–2315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boy J, Detienne F, Fekete JD (2015) Storytelling in information visualizations: Does it engage users to explore data? Proc. 33rd Annual ACM Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 1449–1458.Google Scholar
• Card M (1999) Readings in Information Visualization: Using Vision to Think (Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington, MA).Google Scholar
• Carpenter PA, Shah P (1998) A model of the perceptual and conceptual processes in graph comprehension. J. Experiment. Psych. Appl. 4(2):75–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen C, Zhao X, Zhang Y, Rong J, Liu X (2019) A graphical modeling method for individual driving behavior and its application in driving safety analysis using GPS data. Transportation Res. F Traffic Psych. Behav. 63:118–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheung MY, Hong W, Thong JY (2017) Effects of animation on attentional resources of online consumers. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 18(8):605–632.Google Scholar
• Choi B (2020) Social comparisons in sustaining exercise intensity. 24th Pacific Asia Conf. Inform. Systems (Association for Information Systems, Atlanta).Google Scholar
• Choi BC, Land L (2016) The effects of general privacy concerns and transactional privacy concerns on Facebook apps usage. Inform. Management 53(7):868–877.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi BC, Jiang Z, Xiao B, Kim SS (2015) Embarrassing exposures in online social networks: An integrated perspective of privacy invasion and relationship bonding. Inform. Systems Res. 26(4):675–694.Link, Google Scholar
• Choi B, Wu Y, Yu J, Land L (2018) Love at first sight: The interplay between privacy dispositions and privacy tradeoff in online social connectivity management. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 19(3):124–151.Google Scholar
• Dabic M, Daim T, Bayraktaroglu E, Novak I, Basic M (2012) Exploring gender differences in attitudes of university students toward entrepreneurship: An international survey. Internat. J. Gend. Entrep. 4(3):316–336.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Koning BB, Tabbers HK, Rikers RM (2011) Attention cueing in an instructional animation: The role of presentation speed. Comput. Human Behav. 27(1):41–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denjean S, Roussarie V, Kronland-Martinet R, Ystad S, Velay JL (2012) How does interior car noise alter driver’s perception of motion? Multisensory integration in speed perception. Proc. Acoustics 2012 Nantes Conf., 1063–1068.Google Scholar
• Dhar R, Kim EY (2007) Seeing the forest or the trees: Implications of construal level theory for consumer choice. J. Consumer Psych. 17(2):96–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Echeverria V, Martinez-Maldonado R, Granda R, Chiluiza K, Conati C, Shum SB (2018) Driving data storytelling from learning design. Proc. 8th Internat. Conf. Learn. Anal. Knowledge (ACM, New York), 131–140.Google Scholar
• Ericsson E (2001) Independent driving pattern factors and their influence on fuel-use and exhaust emission factors. Transportation Res. D Transportation Environ. 6(5):325–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fairclough SH, Dobbins C (2020) Personal informatics and negative emotions during commuter driving: Effects of data visualization on cardiovascular reactivity & mood. Internat. J. Human Comput. Stud. 144:1–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feng N, Hu Z, Wu Y, Choi B (2023) Avoiding the diffusion of responsibility in social networking groups: A field experiment on responses to online help-request referrals. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 24(2):430–451.Google Scholar
• Finn H (2012) Making data beautiful: The most inspiring new art is visualized information. Wall Street Journal (April 6), https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303299604577323743008395060.Google Scholar
• Fischer B, Ramsperger EJ (1984) Human express saccades: Extremely short reaction times of goal directed eye movements. Experiment. Brain Res. 57(1):191–195.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freling TH, Vincent LH, Henard DH (2014) When not to accentuate the positive: Re-examining valence effects in attribute framing. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 124(2):95–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fujita K, Trope Y, Liberman N, Levin-Sagi M (2006) Construal levels and self-control. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 90(3):351–367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghidini E, Santos CQ, Manssour I, Silveira MS (2017) Analyzing design strategies for narrative visualization. Proc. XVI Brazilian Sympos. Human Factors Comput. Systems (ACM, New York), 1–10.Google Scholar
• Goh RB (2008) Myths of reversal: Backward narratives, normative schizophrenia and the culture of causal agnosticism. Soc. Semiotics 18(1):61–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodwin S, Dykes J, Jones S, Dillingham I, Dove G, Duffy A, Kachkaev A, Slingsby A, Wood J (2013) Creative user-centered visualization design for energy analysts and modelers. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 19(12):2516–2525.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hauff JC, Carlander A, Gamble A, Gärling T, Holmen M (2016) Breaking the ice of low financial involvement: Does narrative information format from a trusted sender increase savings in mutual funds? Internat. J. Bank Marketing 34(2):151–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson MD, Wakslak CJ, Fujita K, Rohrbach J (2011) Construal level theory and spatial distance. Soc. Psych. 42(3):165–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ho C, Ke W, Liu H (2015) Choice decision of e-learning system: Implications from construal level theory. Inform. Management 52(2):160–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ho C, Ke W, Liu H, Chau PY (2020) Separate vs. joint evaluation: The roles of evaluation mode and construal level in technology adoption. MIS Quart. 44(2):725–746.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong W, Thong JY, Tam KY (2004) Does animation attract online users’ attention? The effects of flash on information search performance and perceptions. Inform. Systems Res. 15(1):60–86.Link, Google Scholar
• Huang L, Tan C-H, Ke W, Wei KK (2018) Helpfulness of online review content: The moderating effects of temporal and social cues. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 19(6):503–522.Google Scholar
• Hullman J, Drucker S, Riche NH, Lee B, Fisher D, Adar E (2013) A deeper understanding of sequence in narrative visualization. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 19(12):2406–2415.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hutchinson JW, Alba JW, Eisenstein EM (2010) Heuristics and biases in data-based decision making: Effects of experience, training, and graphical data displays. J. Marketing Res. 47(4):627–642.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jansen Y, Bucchieri F, Dragicevic P, Hachet M, Koval M, Petiot L, Isenberg P (2022) Envisioning situated visualizations of environmental footprints in an urban environment. VIS4Good – Visualization Soc. Good Workshop, 1–5.Google Scholar
• Jiang Y, Chun MM (2001) Selective attention modulates implicit learning. Quart. J. Experiment. Psych. Sect. A 54(4):1105–1124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jiang Z, Heng CS, Choi B (2013) Privacy concerns and privacy-protective behavior in synchronous online social interactions. Inform. Systems Res. 24(3):579–595.Link, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York).Google Scholar
• Kankanhalli A, Ye H, Teo HH (2015) Comparing potential and actual innovators. MIS Quart. 39(3):667–682.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karyda M, Ryöppy M, Buur J, Lucero A (2020) Imagining data-objects for reflective self-tracking. Proc. 2020 CHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (ACM, NewYork), 1–12.Google Scholar
• Kiatkawsin K, Han H (2017) Young travelers’ intention to behave pro-environmentally: Merging the value-belief-norm theory and the expectancy theory. Tour. Management 59:76–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim J, Lakshmanan A (2021) Do animated line graphs increase risk inferences? J. Marketing Res. 58(3):595–613.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim NW, Bach B, Im H, Schriber S, Gross M, Pfister H (2017) Visualizing nonlinear narratives with story curves. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 24(1):595–604.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ko I, Chang H (2017) Interactive visualization of healthcare data using tableau. Healthc. Inform. Res. 23(4):349–354.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Köhler CF, Breugelmans E, Dellaert BG (2011) Consumer acceptance of recommendations by interactive decision aids: The joint role of temporal distance and concrete vs. abstract communications. J. Management Inform. Systems 27(4):231–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumar N, Benbasat I (2004) The effect of relationship encoding, task type, and complexity on information representation: An empirical evaluation of 2D and 3D line graphs. MIS Quart. 28(2):255–281.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kurzhals K, Weiskopf D (2013) Space-time visual analytics of eye-tracking data for dynamic stimuli. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 19(12):2129–2138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lai Y-L, Kuan KK, Hui K-L, Liu N (2009) The effects of moving animation on recall, hedonic and utilitarian perceptions, and attitude. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 56(3):468–477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff L, Wouters P (1999) Between texts and contexts: Advances in theories of citation? (A rejoinder). Scientometrics 44(2):169–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li Z, Choi B (2021) Demystifying relative evaluation in social fitness apps. 42nd Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (Association for Information Systems, Atlanta).Google Scholar
• Li Z, Choi B (2023a) Debunking sustainability excuses with instrumentality and expectancy visualizations: A physiological perspective. Proc. 44th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (Association for Information Systems, Atlanta).Google Scholar
• Li Z, Choi B (2023b) Unlocking sustainability with visualizations: Driving the driven through the whys and hows. 44th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (Association for Information Systems, Atlanta).Google Scholar
• Lin H, Dwyer FM (2010) The effect of static and animated visualization: A perspective of instructional effectiveness and efficiency. Ed. Tech. Res. Developmental Psych. 58(2):155–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Jiang Z, Choi B (2022) Pushing yourself harder: The effects of touch modes on users’ self-regulation. Inform. Systems Res. 34(3):996–1016.Link, Google Scholar
• Lucio-Arias D, Leydesdorff L (2008) Main-path analysis and path-dependent transitions in HistCite™-based historiograms. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. Tech. 59(12):1948–1962.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maiella R, La Malva P, Marchetti D, Pomarico E, Crosta AD, Palumbo R, Cetara L, Domenico AD, Verrocchio MC (2020) The psychological distance and climate change: A systematic review on the mitigation and adaptation behaviors. Front. Psych. 11:1–14.Google Scholar
• Mayer FS, Frantz CM (2004) The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. J. Environ. Psych. 24(4):503–515.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McLaren D, Markusson N (2020) The co-evolution of technological promises, modelling, policies and climate change targets. Nat. Clim. Chang. 10(5):392–397.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McMichael AJ, Lindgren E (2011) Climate change: Present and future risks to health, and necessary responses. J. Intern. Med. 270(5):401–413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Metoyer R, Zhi Q, Janczuk B, Scheirer W (2018) Coupling story to visualization: Using textual analysis as a bridge between data and interpretation. 23rd Internat. Conf. Intelligent User Interfaces (ACM, New York), 503–507.Google Scholar
• Milfont TL, Duckitt J (2010) The environmental attitudes inventory: A valid and reliable measure to assess the structure of environmental attitudes. J. Environ. Psych. 30(1):80–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moere AV (2008) Beyond the tyranny of the pixel: Exploring the physicality of information visualization. 2008 12th Internat. Conf. Inform. Visualization (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 469–474.Google Scholar
• Nadkarni A, Hofmann SG (2012) Why do people use Facebook? Personality Individual Differences 252(3):243–249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nan XJ (2007) Social distance, framing, and judgment: A construal level perspective. Human Comm. Res. 33(4):489–514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nurgaleeva L (2015) Cognitive integration as the dynamic aspect of modern educational practices. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 166:446–450.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Olsen EC, Lee SE, Wierwille WWJ (2005) Eye glance behavior during lane changes and straight-ahead driving. Transportation Res. Record 1937(1):44–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peng CH, Yin D, Zhang H (2020) More than words in medical question-and-answer sites: A content-context congruence perspective. Inform. Systems Res. 31(3):913–928.Link, Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Hayes AF (2004) SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. 36(4):717–731.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reber R, Schwarz N, Winkielman P (2004) Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience? Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 8(4):364–382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reynolds WM (1982) Development of reliable and valid short forms of the Marlowe‐Crowne Social Desirability Scale. J. Clin. Psych. 38(1):119–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robertson G, Fernandez R, Fisher D, Lee B, Stasko J (2008) Effectiveness of animation in trend visualization. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 14(6):1325–1332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenholtz R, Li Y, Nakano L (2007) Measuring visual clutter. J. Vis. 7(2):1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ryoo Y, Hyun NK, Sung Y (2017) The effect of descriptive norms and construal level on consumers’ sustainable behaviors. J. Advert. 46(4):536–549.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schnotz W, Lowe R (2008) A unified view of learning from animated and static graphics. Lowe R, Schnotz W, eds. Learning with Animation: Research Implications for Design (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 304–356.Google Scholar
• Schuetz S, Lowry PB, Pienta D, Thatcher J (2020a) Improving the design of information security messages by leveraging the effects of temporal distance and argument nature. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 22(5):1376–1428.Google Scholar
• Schuetz S, Lowry PB, Pienta D, Thatcher J (2020b) The effectiveness of abstract vs. concrete fear appeals in information security. J. Management Inform. Systems 37(3):723–757.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Segel E, Heer J (2010) Narrative visualization: Telling stories with data. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 16(6):1139–1148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shneiderman B, Plaisant C, Hesse BW (2013) Improving healthcare with interactive visualization. Computer 46(5):58–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singh H, Kathuria A (2021) Analyzing driver behavior under naturalistic driving conditions: A review. Accid. Anal. Prev. 150:11–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith SL, Goodwin NC (1971) Blink coding for information display. Human Factors 13(3):283–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith T, Henderson J (2008) Attentional synchrony in static and dynamic scenes. J. Vis. 8(6):773.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Son J, Flatley Brennan P, Zhou S (2020) A data analytics framework for smart asthma management based on remote health information systems with Bluetooth-enabled personal inhalers. MIS Quart. 44(1):285–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swaab RI, Postmes T, Neijens P, Kiers MH, Dumay AC (2002) Multiparty negotiation support: The role of visualization’s influence on the development of shared mental models. J. Management Inform. Systems 19(1):129–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tan B, Yi C, Chan HC (2015) Research note—Deliberation without attention: The latent benefits of distracting website features for online purchase decisions. Inform. Systems Res. 26(2):437–455.Link, Google Scholar
• Taylor PG (2017) Artistic data visualization and assessment in art education. Vis. Arts Res. 43(1):59–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor SE, Thompson SC (1982) Stalking the elusive “vividness” effect. Psych. Rev. 89(2):155–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thaler RH, Sunstein CR (2008) Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
• Tiefenbeck V, Wörner A, Schöb S, Fleisch E, Staake T (2019) Real-time feedback promotes energy conservation in the absence of volunteer selection bias and monetary incentives. Nat. Energy 4(1):35–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tory M, Moller T (2004) Rethinking visualization: A high-level taxonomy. IEEE Sympos. Inform. Visualization (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 151–158.Google Scholar
• Trope Y, Liberman NJ (2010) Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psych. Rev. 117(2):440–463.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vogel M, Girwidz R, Engel J (2007) Supplantation of mental operations on graphs. Comput. Ed. 49(4):1287–1298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walden E, Cogo GS, Lucus DJ, Moradiabadi E, Safi R (2018) Neural correlates of multidimensional visualizations: An fMRI comparison of bubble and three-dimensional surface graphs using evolutionary theory. MIS Quart. 42(4):1097–1116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wedel M, Pieters R (2008) A review of eye-tracking research in marketing. Malhotra NK, ed. Review of Marketing Research, vol. 4 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds, UK), 123–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weinmann M, Schneider C, vom Brocke J (2016) Digital nudging. Bus. Inform. Systems Engrg. 58(6):433–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wheeler C (2017) Relive outdoor adventures with a new app and Esri maps. https://www.esri.com/about/newsroom/arcwatch/relive-outdoor-adventures-with-a-new-app-and-esri-maps/.Google Scholar
• White K, MacDonnell R, Dahl DW (2011) It’s the mind-set that matters: The role of construal level and message framing in influencing consumer efficacy and conservation behaviors. J. Marketing Res. 48(3):472–485.Crossref, Google Scholar
• WHO (2022) Billions of people still breathe unhealthy air: New WHO data. WHO, Geneva. https://www.who.int/news/item/04-04-2022-billions-of-people-still-breathe-unhealthy-air-new-who-data.Google Scholar
• Wiesenfeld BM, Reyt JN, Brockner J, Trope Y (2017) Construal level theory in organizational research. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 4:367–400.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winkielman P, Huber DE, Kavanagh L, Schwarz N (2012) Fluency of consistency: When thoughts fit nicely and flow smoothly. Gawronski B, Strack F, eds. Cognitive Consistency: A Fundamental Principle in Social Cognition (The Guilford Press, New York), 89–111.Google Scholar
• Wu J, Zhao H, Chen H (2021) Coupons or free shipping? Effects of price promotion strategies on online review ratings. Inform. Systems Res. 32(2):633–652.Link, Google Scholar
• Xu M, Petty RE (2022) Two-sided messages promote openness for a variety of deeply entrenched attitudes. Pers. Soc. Psych. Bull., published ahead of print October 10, 10.1177/01461672221128113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ye X, Peng X, Wang X, Teo H-H (2020) Developing and testing a theoretical path model of web page impression formation and its consequence. Inform. Systems Res. 31(3):929–949.Link, Google Scholar
• Zacks J, Tversky B (1999) Bars and lines: A study of graphic communication. Mem. Cognit. 27(6):1073–1079.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang P (2000) The effects of animation on information seeking performance on the World Wide Web: Securing attention or interfering with primary tasks. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 1(1):1–28.Google Scholar
• Zhu F, Zhou X, Li Y, Choi B (2023) Outwitting Shakespeare: Unpacking the mechanics of immersive storytelling with physiological measurements. Proc. 44th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (Association for Information Systems, Atlanta).Google Scholar