Artificial Intelligence and Firm Resilience: Empirical Evidence from Natural Disaster Shocks
References
- (2020) Robots and jobs: Evidence from us labor markets. J. Political Econom. 128(6):2188–2244.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Artificial intelligence and jobs: Evidence from online vacancies. J. Labor Econom. 40(S1):S293–S340.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Artificial intelligence and economic growth. Agrawal A, Gans J, Goldfarb A, eds. The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL), 237–282.Google Scholar
- (2019) Artificial intelligence: The ambiguous labor market impact of automating prediction. J. Econom. Perspectives 33(2):31–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) From prediction to transformation. Harvard Bus. Rev. 100(11–12):100.Google Scholar
- (2020) AI adoption and firm performance: Management versus it. Preprint, submitted September 14, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3677237.Google Scholar
- (2021) The demand for AI skills in the labor market. Labour Econom. 71:102002.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Firm’s resilience to supply chain disruptions: Scale development and empirical examination. J. Oper. Management 33:111–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Information, technology, and information worker productivity. Inform. Systems Res. 23(3-part-2):849–867.Link, Google Scholar
- (2024) Artificial intelligence, firm growth, and product innovation. J. Financial Econom. 151:103745.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Digital resilience: How work-from-home feasibility affects firm performance. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2019) The impact of big data on firm performance: An empirical investigation. AEA Papers Proc. 109:33–37.Google Scholar
- (2016) Measuring economic policy uncertainty. Quart. J. Econom. 131(4):1593–1636.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1999) Information technology effects on firm performance as measured by Tobin’s Q. Management Sci. 45(7):1008–1024.Link, Google Scholar
- (2002) Information technology, workplace organization, and the demand for skilled labor: Firm-level evidence. Quart. J. Econom. 117(1):339–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) The rapid adoption of data-driven decision-making. Amer. Econom. Rev. 106(5):133–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Does machine translation affect international trade? Evidence from a large digital platform. Management Sci. 65(12):5449–5460.Link, Google Scholar
- (2021) The power of prediction: Predictive analytics, workplace complements, and business performance. Bus. Econom. 56:217–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Understanding online job ads data. Technical report, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- (2013) Information technology competencies, organizational agility, and firm performance: Enabling and facilitating roles. Inform. Systems Res. 24(4):976–997.Link, Google Scholar
- (2013) An empirical analysis of technical efficiency: The role of it intensity and competition. Inform. Systems Res. 24(3):561–578.Link, Google Scholar
- (2023) Global disaster risk matters. Management Sci. 69(1):576–597.Link, Google Scholar
- (2021) Social learning in information technology investment: The role of board interlocks. Management Sci. 67(1):547–576.Link, Google Scholar
- (2004) Creating agile supply chains in the fashion industry. Internat. J. Retail Distribution Management 32(8):367–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) The impact of artificial intelligence on innovation. The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda, 115–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) The promises and pitfalls of robo-advising. Rev. Financial Stud. 32(5):1983–2020.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Skill requirements across firms and labor markets: Evidence from job postings for professionals. J. Labor Econom. 36(S1):S337–S369.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Investigating the risk–return relationship of information technology investment: Firm-level empirical analysis. Management Sci. 53(12):1829–1842.Link, Google Scholar
- (2020) The return on information technology: Who benefits most? Inform. Systems Res. 32(1):194–211.Link, Google Scholar
- (2019) The variable impact of artificial intelligence on labor: The role of complementary skills and technologies. Preprint, submitted May 7, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3368605.Google Scholar
- (2021) Occupational, industry, and geographic exposure to artificial intelligence: A novel dataset and its potential uses. Strategic Management J. 42(12):2195–2217.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Supply chain competitiveness and robustness: A lesson from the 2011 Tohoku earthquake and supply chain “virtual dualization”. Discussion Paper Series No. 362, Manufacturing Management Research Center, Tokyo.Google Scholar
- (2023) Could machine learning be a general purpose technology? A comparison of emerging technologies using data from online job postings. Res. Policy 52(1):104653.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) R&D and firm resilience during bad times. Preprint, submitted November 18, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3703103.Google Scholar
- (2019) Synthesizing micro and macro evidence on the us economy. NBER Reporter 3:14–17.Google Scholar
- (2021) Fintech as a game changer: Overview of research frontiers. Inform. Systems Res. 32(1):1–17.Link, Google Scholar
- (2018) Do recessions accelerate routine-biased technological change? Evidence from vacancy postings. Amer. Econom. Rev. 108(7):1737–1772.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1999) Information technology and firm boundaries: Evidence from panel data. Inform. Systems Res. 10(2):134–149.Link, Google Scholar
- (2024) Supercharged by advanced analytics, jd.com attains agility, resilience, and shared value across its supply chain. INFORMS J. Appl. Analytics 54(1):54–70.Link, Google Scholar
- (2023) Panic selling when disaster strikes: Evidence in the bond and stock markets. Management Sci. 69(12):7448–7467.Link, Google Scholar
- (1988) A causal model of linkages among environmental dimensions, macro-organizational characteristics, and performance. Acad. Management J. 31(3):570–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Information technology and intangible output: The impact of it investment on innovation productivity. Inform. Systems Res. 23(1):42–59.Link, Google Scholar
- (2014) Financial fragility and natural disasters: An empirical analysis. J. Financial Stability 13:180–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Missing R&D. J. Accounting Econom. 60(1):73–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2024) AI adoption in America: Who, what, and where. J. Econom. Management Strategy, ePub ahead of print January 24, https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12576.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1983) Strategy-making and environment: The third link. Strategic Management J. 4(3):221–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Creating the customer-responsive supply chain: A reconciliation of concepts. Internat. J. Oper. Production Management 27(11):1144–1172.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Engineering value: The returns to technological talent and investments in artificial intelligence. Preprint, submitted July 30, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3427412.Google Scholar
- (2014) Big data investment, skills, and firm value. Management Sci. 60(6):1452–1469.Link, Google Scholar
- (2012) The productivity of information technology investments: New evidence from IT labor data. Inform. Systems Res. 23(3-part-1):599–617.Link, Google Scholar
- (2012) The extroverted firm: How external information practices affect innovation and productivity. Management Sci. 58(5):843–859.Link, Google Scholar
- (2006) Reducing hazard vulnerability: Towards a common approach between disaster risk reduction and climate adaptation. Disasters 30(1):39–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Data analytics supports decentralized innovation. Management Sci. 65(10):4863–4877.Link, Google Scholar
- (2021) Advanced technologies adoption and use by us firms: Evidence from the annual business survey. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

