Psychological Reactance to the Algorithmic Management of Online Expressions

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2022.0446

References

  • Allcott H, Gentzkow M (2017) Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. J. Econom. Perspective 31(2):211–236.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bai B, Dai H, Zhang D, Zhang F, Hu H (2022) The impacts of algorithmic work assignment on fairness perceptions and productivity: Evidence from field experiments. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 24(6):3060–3078.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baker CE (1992) Human Liberty and Freedom of Speech (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bakshy E, Messing S, Adamic LA (2015) Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science (1979) 348(6239):1130–1132.Google Scholar
  • Brehm JW (1966) A Theory of Psychological Reactance (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Brehm SS, Brehm JW (1981) Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control (Academic Press, New York). Google Scholar
  • Bryant D, Howard A (2019) A comparative analysis of emotion-detecting AI systems with respect to algorithm performance and dataset diversity. Proc. 2019 AAAI/ACM Conf. AI Ethics Soc. (ACM, New York), 377–382.Google Scholar
  • Burton JW, Stein MK, Jensen TB (2020) A systematic review of algorithm aversion in augmented decision making. J. Behav. Decision Making 33(2):220–239.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Conger JA, Kanungo RN (1988) The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Acad. Management Rev. 13(3):471–482.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deci EL, Ryan RM (1985) Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior (Springer Science & Business Media, Boston, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dorison CA, Minson JA, Rogers T (2019) Selective exposure partly relies on faulty affective forecasts. Cognition 188:98–107.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feinberg M, Willer R (2015) From gulf to bridge: When do moral arguments facilitate political influence? Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 41(12):1665–1681.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gentzkow M, Shapiro JM (2010) What drives media slant? Evidence from US daily newspapers. Econometrica 78(1):35–71.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenstein S, Zhu F (2016) Open content, Linus’ law, and neutral point of view. Inform. Systems Res. 27(3):618–635.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Greenstein S, Gu G, Zhu F (2021) Ideology and composition among an online crowd: Evidence from Wikipedians. Management Sci. 67(5):3067–3086.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • He Q, Hong Y, Raghu TS (2025) Platform governance with algorithm-based content moderation: An empirical study on Reddit. Inform. Systems Res. 36(2):1078–1095.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hu S, Boman CD, Warner BR (2023) Waiting for a match: Mitigating reactance in prosocial health behavior using psychological distance. Health Comm. 38(4):753–764.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kwan CMC, Dai X, Wyer RS (2017) Contextual influences on message persuasion: The effect of empty space. J. Consumer Res. 44(2):448–464.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazarus R, Folkman S (1984) Stress, Appraisal, and Coping (Springer, Berlin).Google Scholar
  • Parker GG, Van Alstyne MW, Choudary SP (2016) Platform Revolution: How Networked Markets Are Transforming the Economy and How to Make Them Work for You (W.W. Norton & Company, New York).Google Scholar
  • Paternoster R, Brame R, Mazerolle P, Piquero A (1998) Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology 36(4):859–876.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pew Research Center (2017) The partisan divide on political values grows even wider (October 5), https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2017/10/05/the-partisan-divide-on-political-values-grows-even-wider/.Google Scholar
  • Rai A, Constantinides P, Sarker S (2019) Next generation digital platforms: Toward human–AI hybrids. MIS Quart. 43(1):iii–iix.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Raisch S, Fomina K (2025) Combining human and artificial intelligence: Hybrid problem-solving in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 50(2):441–464.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Raisch S, Krakowski S (2021) Artificial intelligence and management: The automation–augmentation paradox. Acad. Management Rev. 46(1):192–210.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenberg BD, Siegel JT (2018) A 50-year review of psychological reactance theory: Do not read this article. Motivation Sci. 4(4):281–300.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shen L (2010) Mitigating psychological reactance: The role of message-induced empathy in persuasion. Human Comm. Res. 36(3):397–422.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shi F, Teplitskiy M, Duede E, Evans JA (2019) The wisdom of polarized crowds. Nature Human Behav. 3(4):329–336.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sorenson O, Assenova V, Li GC, Boada J, Fleming L (2016) Expand innovation finance via crowdfunding. Science (1979) 354(6319):1526–1528.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sundararajan A (2017) The Sharing Economy: The End of Employment and the Rise of Crowd-Based Capitalism (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Wicklund RA (1974) Freedom and Reactance (Lawrence Erlbaum).Google Scholar
  • Wiesinger J, Marlow P, Vuskovic V (2024) Google Whitepaper: Agents (Google).Google Scholar
  • Zhang XM, Zhu F (2011) Group size and incentives to contribute: A natural experiment at Chinese Wikipedia. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(4):1601–1615.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhou X, Zafarani R (2020) A survey of fake news: Fundamental theories, detection methods, and opportunities. ACM Comput. Survey 53(5):94.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.