Cyberbullying Victimization, Mental Distress, and Adolescent Substance Use: The Role of Cyber Features

References

• Abadie A, Imbens GW (2006) Large sample properties of matching estimators for average treatment effects. Econometrica 74(1):235–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Al-Garadi MA, Hussain MR, Khan N, Murtaza G, Nweke HF, Ali I, Mujtaba G, Chiroma H, Khattak HI, Gani A (2019) Predicting cyberbullying on social media in the big data era using machine learning algorithms: Review of literature and open challenges. IEEE Access 7:70701–70718.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Albert D, Chein J, Steinberg L (2013) The teenage brain: Peer influences on adolescent decision making. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 22(2):114–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alexy EM, Burgess AW, Baker T, Smoyak SA (2005) Perceptions of cyberstalking among college students. Brief Treatment Crisis Intervention 5(3):279–289.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arria AM, Kuhn V, Caldeira KM, Ogrady KE, Vincent KB, Wish ED (2008) High school drinking mediates the relationship between parental monitoring and college drinking: A longitudinal analysis. Subst. Abuse Treat. Prev. Policy 3(1):1–11.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bachman R, Paternoster R, Ward S (1992) The rationality of sexual offending: Testing a deterrence/rational choice conception of sexual assault. Law Soc. Rev. 26(2):343–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bastiaensens S, Vandebosch H, Poels K, Van Cleemput K, DeSmet A, De Bourdeaudhuij I (2014) Cyberbullying on social network sites: An experimental study into bystanders’ behavioural intentions to help the victim or reinforce the bully. Comput. Human Behav. 31:259–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker GS, Murphy KM (1988) A theory of rational addiction. J. Polit. Econom. 96(4):675–700.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Biocca F, Harms C, Burgoon JK (2003) Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: Review and suggested criteria. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environments 12(5):456–480.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boulton MJ, Hardcastle K, Down J, Fowles J, Simmonds JA (2014) A comparison of preservice teachers’ responses to cyber versus traditional bullying scenarios: Similarities and differences and implications for practice. J. Teacher Ed. 65(2):145–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V, Boulton E, Davey L, McEvoy C (2021) The online survey as a qualitative research tool. Internat. J. Soc. Res. Methodology 24(6):641–654.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brewer G, Kerslake J (2015) Cyberbullying, self-esteem, empathy and loneliness. Comput. Human Behav. 48:255–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Broeck E, Poels K, Vandebosch H, Royen K (2014) Online perspective-taking as an intervention tool against cyberbullying. Annual Rev. Cybertherapy Telemedicine 199:113–117.Google Scholar
• Burnett S, Sebastian C, Cohen Kadosh K, Blakemore SJ (2011) The social brain in adolescence: Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging and behavioural studies. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 35(8):1654–1664.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caliendo M, Kopeinig S (2008) Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. J. Econom. Surveys 22(1):31–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Callaghan M, Kelly C, Molcho M (2015) Exploring traditional and cyberbullying among Irish adolescents. Internat. J. Public Health 60(2):199–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell MA (2005) Cyberbullying: An old problem in a new guise? Australian J. Guidance Counselling 15(1):68–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Casey BJ, Caudle K (2013) The teenage brain: Self-control. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 22(2):82–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cassiani-Miranda CA, Campo-Arias A, Caballero-Domínguez CC (2022) Factors associated with cyberbullying victimisation among Colombian high-school adolescents. J. Child Adolescent Trauma 15(1):27–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cauberghe V, Van Wesenbeeck I, De Jans S, Hudders L, Ponnet K (2021) How adolescents use social media to cope with feelings of loneliness and anxiety during COVID-19 lockdown. Cyberpsych. Behav. Soc. Networking 24(4):250–257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cénat JM, Blais M, Lavoie F, Caron PO, Hebert M (2018) Cyberbullying victimization and substance use among Quebec high schools students: The mediating role of psychological distress. Comput. Human Behav. 89:207–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chaffey D (2022) Global social media statistics research summary 2022. Accessed August 2, 2022, https://www.smartinsights.com/social-media-marketing/social-media-strategy/new-global-social-media-research/#:∼:text=More%20than%20half%20of%20the,social%20media%20is%202h%2027m.Google Scholar
• Chan TKH, Cheung CMK, Lee ZWY (2021) Cyberbullying on social networking sites: A literature review and future research directions. Inform. Management 58(2):103411.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan TK, Cheung CM, Wong RY (2019) Cyberbullying on social networking sites: The crime opportunity and affordance perspectives. J. Management Inform. Systems 36(2):574–609.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chassin L, Hussong A, Barrera M Jr, Molina BSG, Trim R, Ritter J (2004) Adolescent substance use. Lerner RM, Steinberg L, eds. Handbook of Adolescent Psychology (John Wiley & Sons Inc., Hoboken, NJ), 665–696.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corbin JM, Strauss A (1990) Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociol. 13(1):3–21.Google Scholar
• D’cruz P, Noronha E (2013) Navigating the extended reach: Target experiences of cyberbullying at work. Inform. Organ. 23(4):324–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Degenhardt L, Stockings E, Patton G, Hall WD, Lynskey M (2016) The increasing global health priority of substance use in young people. Lancet Psychiatry 3(3):251–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dehejia R (2005) Practical propensity score matching: A reply to Smith and Todd. J. Econom. 125(1–2):355–364.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dehejia RH, Wahba S (2002) Propensity score-matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies. Rev. Econom. Statist. 84(1):151–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dennerlein T, Kirkman BL (2022) The hidden dark side of empowering leadership: The moderating role of hindrance stressors in explaining when empowering employees can promote moral disengagement and unethical pro-organizational behavior. J. Appl. Psych. 107(12):2220–2242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dennis AR, Fuller RM, Valacich JS (2008) Media, tasks, and communication processes: A theory of media synchronicity. MIS Quart. 32(3):575–600.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dhabhar FS (2000) Acute stress enhances while chronic stress suppresses skin immunity: The role of stress hormones and leukocyte trafficking. Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 917:876–893.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming RL, Wilson WA, Swartzwelder HS (2007) Magnitude and ethanol sensitivity of tonic GABAA receptor-mediated inhibition in dentate gyrus changes from adolescence to adulthood. J. Neurophysiology 97:3806–3811.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedman AS (2020) Smoking to cope: Addictive behavior as a response to mental distress. J. Health Econom. 72:102323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garrido MM, Kelley AS, Paris J, Roza K, Meier DE, Morrison RS, Aldridge MD (2014) Methods for constructing and assessing propensity scores. Health Service Res. 49(5):1701–1720.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gioia DA, Corley KG, Hamilton AL (2013) Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organ. Res. Methods 16(1):15–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gould D (1996) Using vignettes to collect data for nursing research studies: How valid are the findings? J. Clinical Nursing 5(4):207–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gray MJ, Litz BT, Hsu JL, Lombardo TW (2004) Psychometric properties of the life events checklist. Assessment 11(4):330–341.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hao Z, Cowan BW (2019) The effects of graduation requirements on risky health behaviors of high school students. Amer. J. Health Econom. 5(1):97–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrington SJ (1996) The effect of codes of ethics and personal denial of responsibility on computer abuse judgments and intentions. MIS Quart. 20(3):257–278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imbens GW, Wooldridge JM (2009) Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation. J. Econom. Literature 47(1):5–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jablonska B, Lindberg L (2007) Risk behaviours, victimisation and mental distress among adolescents in different family structures. Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatric Epidemiology 42(8):656–663.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan HB (1996) Psychosocial stress from the perspective of self theory. Kaplan HB, ed. Psychosocial Stress: Perspectives on Structure, Theory, Life Course and Methods (Academic Press, San Diego), 175–244.Google Scholar
• Khantzian EJ (2003) The self-medication hypothesis revisited: The dually diagnosed patient. Primary Psychiatry 10(9):47–54.Google Scholar
• Khine AT, Saw YM, Htut ZY, Khaing CT, Soe HZ, Swe KK, Thike T, et al. (2020) Assessing risk factors and impact of cyberbullying victimization among university students in Myanmar: A cross-sectional study. PLoS One 15(1):e0227051.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kowalski RM, Giumetti GW, Schroeder AN, Lattanner MR (2014) Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psych. Bull. 140(4):1073–1137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kreijns K, Xu K, Weidlich J (2022) Social presence: Conceptualization and measurement. Ed. Psych. Rev. 34(1):139–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kritsotakis G, Papanikolaou M, Androulakis E, Philalithis AE (2017) Associations of bullying and cyberbullying with substance use and sexual risk taking in young adults. J. Nursing Scholarship 49(4):360–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leuven E, Sianesi B (2018) PSMATCH2: Stata module to perform full Mahalanobis and propensity score matching, common support graphing, and covariate imbalance testing (Statistical Software Components No. S432001). Accessed Feburary 23, 2021, https://econpapers.repec.org/software/bocbocode/S432001.htm.Google Scholar
• Li Q, Wilson WA, Swartzwelder HS (2002) Differential effect of ethanol on NMDA EPSCs in pyramidal cells in the posterior cingulate cortex of juvenile and adult rats. J. Neurophysiology 87(2):705–711.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Litwiller BJ, Brausch AM (2013) Cyber bullying and physical bullying in adolescent suicide: The role of violent behavior and substance use. J. Youth Adolescence 42(5):675–684.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lowenthal PR (2010) Social presence. Dasgupta S, ed. Social Computing: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (IGI Global, Hershey, PA), 129–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Machmutow K, Perren S, Sticca F, Alsaker FD (2013) Peer victimisation and depressive symptoms: Can specific coping strategies buffer the negative impact of cybervictimisation? Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties Associated with Bullying and Cyberbullying (Routledge, London), 174–191.Google Scholar
• Madden C, Loh J (2020) Workplace cyberbullying and bystander helping behaviour. Internat. J. Human Resource Management 31(19):2434–2458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martínez V, Jiménez-Molina Á, Gerber MM (2023) Social contagion, violence, and suicide among adolescents. Current Opinions Psychiatry 36(3):237–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milosevic T, Verma K, Carter M, Vigil S, Laffan D, Davis B, O’Higgins Norman J (2023) Effectiveness of artificial intelligence–based cyberbullying interventions from youth perspective. Soc. Media Soc. 9(1):20563051221147325.Google Scholar
• Mohseny M, Zamani Z, Akhondzadeh Basti S, Sohrabi M, Najafi A, Tajdini F (2020) Exposure to cyberbullying, cybervictimization, and related factors among junior high school students. Iran J. Psychiatry Behav. Sci. 14(4):e99357.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Obermaier M, Fawzi N, Koch T (2016) Bystanding or standing by? How the number of bystanders affects the intention to intervene in cyberbullying. New Media Soc. 18(8):1491–1507.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ofcom (2021) Children and parents: Media use and attitudes report. Accessed July 15, 2022, https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0025/217825/children-and-parents-media-use-and-attitudes-report-2020-21.pdf.Google Scholar
• O’Kane SM, Lahart IM, Gallagher AM, Carlin A, Faulkner M, Jago R, Murphy MH (2021) Changes in physical activity, sleep, mental health, and social media use during COVID-19 lockdown among adolescent girls: A mixed-methods study. J. Phys. Activity Health 18(6):677–685.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paul S, Smith PK, Blumberg HH (2012) Comparing student perceptions of coping strategies and school interventions in managing bullying and cyberbullying incidents. Pastoral Care Ed. 30(2):127–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peper JS, Dahl RE (2013) The teenage brain: Surging hormones—brain-behavior interactions during puberty. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 22(2):134–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piquero AR, Hickman M (1999) An empirical test of Tittle’s control balance theory. Criminology 37(2):319–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piquero NL, Tibbetts SG, Blankenship MB (2005) Examining the role of differential association and techniques of neutralization in explaining corporate crime. Deviant Behav. 26(2):159–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. 88(5):879–903.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powell-Jackson T, Hanson K (2012) Financial incentives for maternal health: Impact of a national programme in Nepal. J. Health Econom. 31(1):271–284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70(1):41–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sarker S, Bala H, Hong Y, Kankanhalli A, Rossi M, Gu B, Oestreicher-Singer G (2025) Advancing next-generation multimethod research in information systems: A framework and some recommendations for authors and evaluators. Inform. Systems Res. 36(2):647–668.Link, Google Scholar
• Schneider SK, O’Donnell L, Stueve A, Coulter RWS (2012) Cyberbullying, school bullying, and psychological distress: A regional census of high school students. Amer. J. Public Health 102(1):171–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schuckit MA (1994) Low level of response to alcohol as a predictor of future alcoholism. Amer. J. Psychiatry 151(2):184–189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shrout PE, Bolger N (2002) Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psych. Methods 7(4):422–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Silveri MM, Spear LP (2004) The effects of NMDA and GABAA pharmacological manipulations on acute and rapid tolerance to ethanol during ontogeny. Alcoholism: Clinical Experiment. Res. 28:884–894.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siponen M, Vance A (2010) Neutralization: New insights into the problem of employee information systems security policy violations. MIS Quart. 34(3):487–502.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Slonje R, Smith PK, Fris A (2013) The nature of cyberbullying and strategies for prevention. Comput. Human Behav. 29(1):26–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith PK, Mahdavi J, Carvalho M, Fisher S, Russell S, Tippett N (2008) Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. J. Child Psych. Psychiatry 49(4):376–385.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Somerville LH (2013) The teenage brain: Sensitivity to social evaluation. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 22(2):121–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spear LP (2009) The Behavioral Neuroscience of Adolescence (W.W. Norton & Company, New York).Google Scholar
• Spear LP (2011) Adolescent neurobehavioral characteristics, alcohol sensitivities, and intake: Setting the stage for alcohol use disorders? Child Development Perspect. 5(4):231–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spear LP, Varlinskaya EI (2005) Low dose effects in psychopharmacology: Ontogenetic considerations. Nonlinearity Biol. Toxicology Medicine 3(1):97–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stubbs-Richardson M, May DC (2021) Social contagion in bullying: An examination of strains and types of bullying victimization in peer networks. Amer. J. Criminal Justice 46:748–769.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Suler J (2004) The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsych. Behav. 7(3):321–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor BJ (2006) Factorial surveys: Using vignettes to study professional judgement. British J. Soc. Work 36(7):1187–1207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• The Children’s Society (2019) Safety net: Cyberbullying’s impact on young people’s mental health: Inquiry report. Accessed July 30, 2019, https://www.childrenssociety.org.uk/sites/default/files/social-media-cyberbullying-inquiry-full-report_0.pdf.Google Scholar
• Tokunaga RS (2010) Following you home from school: A critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Comput. Human Behav. 26(3):277–287.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vieno A, Gini G, Satinello M (2011) Different forms of bullying and their association to smoking and drinking behavior in Italian adolescents. J. School Health 81(7):393–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber J (1992) Scenarios in business ethics research: Review, critical assessment, and recommendations. Bus. Ethics Quart. 2(2):137–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber M, Koehler C, Schnauber-Stockmann A (2019) Why should I help you? Man up! Bystanders’ gender stereotypic perceptions of a cyberbullying incident. Deviant Behav. 40(5):585–601.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wellman N, Tröster C, Grimes M, Roberson Q, Rink F, Gruber M (2023) Publishing multimethod research in AMJ: A review and best-practice recommendations. Acad. Management J. 66(4):1007–1015.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiguna T, Ismail RI, Sekartini R, Rahardjo NSW, Kaligis F, Prabowo AL, Hendarmo R (2018) The gender discrepancy in high-risk behavior outcomes in adolescents who have experienced cyberbullying in Indonesia. Asian J. Psychiatry 37:130–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wood FR, Graham R (2020) “Safe” and “at-risk”: Cyberbullying victimization and deviant health risk behaviors in youth. Youth Soc. 52(3):449–468.Google Scholar
• Worsley JD, McIntyre JC, Bentall RP, Corcoran R (2018) Childhood maltreatment and problematic social media use: The role of attachment and depression. Psychiatry Res. 267(2018):88–93.Google Scholar
• Wray-Lake L, Maggs JL, Johnston LD, Bachman JG, O’Malley PM, Schulenberg JE (2012) Associations between community attachments and adolescent substance use in nationally representative samples. J. Adolescent Health 51(4):325–331.Google Scholar
• Yokotani K, Takano M (2021) Social contagion of cyberbullying via online perpetrator and victim networks. Comput. Human Behav. 119:106719.Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Leidner DE (2018) From improper to acceptable: How perpetrators neutralize workplace bullying behaviors in the cyber world. Inform. Management 55(7):850–865.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Yu L, Wakefield RL, Leidner DE (2016) Friend or foe: Cyberbullying in social network sites. ACM SIGMIS Database: DATABASE Adv. Inform. Systems 47(1):51–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhu Y, Li W, O’Brien JE, Liu T (2021) Parent–child attachment moderates the associations between cyberbullying victimization and adolescents’ health/mental health problems: An exploration of cyberbullying victimization among Chinese adolescents. J. Interpersonal Violence 36(17–18):NP9272–NP9298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zigmond AS, Snaith RP (1983) The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 67(6):361–370.Crossref, Google Scholar