Help
Cart
Skip main navigation

Available Issues

April 10, 2013 - April 2, 2026

Available Issues

April 10, 2013 - April 2, 2026

Lost Time in Crowdsourcing Contests

Published Online:23 Jan 2025https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2022.0502

References

  • Agrawal A, Catalini C, Goldfarb A, Luo H (2019) Slack time and innovation. Organ. Sci. 29(6):1056–1073.Link, Google Scholar
  • Ales L, Cho SH, Körpeoğlu E (2017) Optimal award scheme in innovation tournaments. Oper. Res. 65(3):693–702.Link, Google Scholar
  • Armstrong M (2006) Competition in two-sided markets. RAND J. Econom. 37(3):668–691.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Bai X, Marsden JR, Ross WT, Wang G (2020) A note on the impact of daily deals on local retailers’ online reputation: Mediation effects of the consumer experience. Inform. Systems Res. 31(4):1132–1143.Link, Google Scholar
  • Bayus BL (2013) Crowdsourcing new product ideas over time: An analysis of the Dell IdeaStorm community. Management Sci. 59(1):226–244.Link, Google Scholar
  • Becker BE, Huselid MA (1992) The incentive effects of tournament compensation systems. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(2):336–350.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Berger J, Pope D (2011) Can losing lead to winning? Management Sci. 57(5):817–827.Link, Google Scholar
  • Bockstedt J, Druehl C, Mishra A (2015) Problem-solving effort and success in innovation contests: The role of national wealth and national culture. J. Oper. Management 36:187–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Bockstedt J, Druehl C, Mishra A (2016) Heterogeneous submission behavior and its implications for success in innovation contests with public submissions. Production Oper. Management 25(7):1157–1176.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Bockstedt J, Druehl C, Mishra A (2022) Incentives and stars: Competition in innovation contests with participant and submission visibility. Production Oper. Management 31(3):1372–1393.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Bodas Freitas IM, Lawson C (2019) Imprints from idea origin on innovation and the development environment. Industrial Corporate Change 28(6):1533–1553.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Boudreau KJ, Lacetera N, Lakhani KR (2011) Incentives and problem uncertainty in innovation contests: An empirical analysis. Management Sci. 57(5):843–863.Link, Google Scholar
  • Boudreau KJ, Lakhani KR, Menietti M (2016) Performance responses to competition across skill levels in rank-order tournaments: Field evidence and implications for tournament design. RAND J. Econom. 47(1):140–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Chen PY, Pavlou P, Wu S, Yang Y (2021) Attracting high-quality contestants to contest in the context of crowdsourcing contest platform. Production Oper. Management 30(6):1751–1771.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Chen YJ, Dai T, Korpeoglu CG, Körpeoğlu E, Sahin O, Tang CS, Xiao S (2020) OM Forum—Innovative online platforms: Research opportunities. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(3):430–445.Link, Google Scholar
  • Dechenaux E, Kovenock D, Sheremeta RM (2015) A survey of experimental research on contests, all-pay auctions and tournaments. Experiment. Econom. 18(4):609–669.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Deodhar SJ, Gupta S (2023) The impact of social reputation features in innovation tournaments: Evidence from a natural experiment. Inform. Systems Res. 34(1):178–193.Link, Google Scholar
  • Dissanayake I, Zhang J, Gu B (2015) Task division for team success in crowdsourcing contests: Resource allocation and alignment effects. J. Management Inform. Systems 32(2):8–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Franke N, Keinz P, Klausberger K (2013) “Does this sound like a fair deal?”: Antecedents and consequences of fairness expectations in the individual’s decision to participate in firm innovation. Organ. Sci. 24(5):1495–1516.Link, Google Scholar
  • Gu Z, Bapna R, Chan J, Gupta A (2022) Measuring the impact of crowdsourcing features on mobile app user engagement and retention: A randomized field experiment. Management Sci. 68(2):1297–1329.Link, Google Scholar
  • Han W, Wang X, Ahsen ME, Wattal S (2022) The societal impact of sharing economy platform self-regulations—An empirical investigation. Inform. Systems Res. 33(4):1303–1323.Link, Google Scholar
  • Hayes A (2017) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis (Guilford Publications, New York).Google Scholar
  • Heckman JJ (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1):153–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Huang Y, Singh PV, Mukhopadhyay T (2012) How to design crowdsourcing contest: A structural empirical analysis. Conf. Inform. Systems Tech. 2012:1–18.Google Scholar
  • Huang Y, Vir Singh P, Srinivasan K (2014) Crowdsourcing new product ideas under consumer learning. Management Sci. 60(9):2138–2159.Link, Google Scholar
  • Jeppesen LB, Lakhani KR (2010) Marginality and problem-solving effectiveness in broadcast search. Organ. Sci. 21(5):1016–1033.Link, Google Scholar
  • Jiang J, Wang Y (2020) A theoretical and empirical investigation of feedback in ideation contests. Production Oper. Management 29(2):481–500.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Jiang Z, Huang Y, Beil DR (2021) The role of problem specification in crowdsourcing contests for design problems: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 23(3):637–656.Link, Google Scholar
  • Kagan E, Leider S, Lovejoy WS (2018) Ideation-execution transition in product development: An experimental analysis. Management Sci. 64(5):2238–2262.Link, Google Scholar
  • Koh TK, Cheung MYM (2022) Seeker exemplars and quantitative ideation outcomes in crowdsourcing contests. Inform. Systems Res. 33(1):265–284.Link, Google Scholar
  • Korpeoglu CG, Körpeoğlu E, Tunç S (2021) Optimal duration of innovation contests. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 23(3):657–675.Link, Google Scholar
  • Körpeoğlu E, Korpeoglu CG, Hafalır İE (2022) Parallel innovation contests. Oper. Res. 70(3):1506–1530.Link, Google Scholar
  • Kucherbaev P, Daniel F, Marchese M, Casati F, Reavey B (2014) Toward effective tasks navigation in crowdsourcing. Garzotto F, Paolini P, De Angeli A, Jacucci G, Malizia A, Matera M, Lanzilotti R, eds. Internat. Working Conf. Adv. Vis. Interf. (ACM, New York), 401–404.Google Scholar
  • Lee HCB, Ba S, Li X, Stallaert J (2018) Salience bias in crowdsourcing contests. Inform. Systems Res. 29(2):401–418.Link, Google Scholar
  • Lemus J, Marshall G (2021) Dynamic tournament design: Evidence from prediction contests. J. Political Econom. 129(2):383–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Liang C, Hong Y, Gu B (2017) Home bias in global employment. Preprint, submitted October 10, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3049357.Google Scholar
  • Liang C, Hong Y, Chen PY, Shao BBM (2022) The screening role of design parameters for service procurement auctions in online service outsourcing platforms. Inform. Systems Res. 33(4):1324–1343.Link, Google Scholar
  • Liu TX, Yang J, Adamic LA, Chen Y (2014) Crowdsourcing with all-pay auctions: A field experiment on Taskcn. Management Sci. 60(8):2020–2037.Link, Google Scholar
  • Malhotra D (2010) The desire to win: The effects of competitive arousal on motivation and behavior. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processing 111(2):139–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Mo J, Sarkar S, Menon S (2018) Know when to run: Recommendations in crowdsourcing contests. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 42(3):919–944.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Mo J, Sarkar S, Menon S (2021) Competing tasks and task quality: An empirical study of crowdsourcing contests. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 45(4):1921–1948.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Park S, Gupta S (2012) Handling endogenous regressors by joint estimation using copulas. Marketing Sci. 31(4):567–586.Link, Google Scholar
  • Rochet JC, Tirole J (2003) Platform competition in two-sided markets. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 1(4):990–1029.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Rysman M (2009) The economics of two-sided markets. J. Econom. Perspective 23(3):125–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Sanyal P, Ye S (2023) An examination of the dynamics of crowdsourcing contests: Role of feedback type. Inform. Systems Res. 35(1):394–413.Link, Google Scholar
  • Simonsohn U (2010) eBay’s crowded evenings: Competition neglect in market entry decisions. Management Sci. 56(7):1060–1073.Link, Google Scholar
  • Terwiesch C, Xu Y (2008) Innovation contests, open innovation, and multiagent problem solving. Management Sci. 54(9):1529–1543.Link, Google Scholar
  • Wei X, Fan M, You W, Tan Y (2021) An empirical study of the dynamic and differential effects of prefunding. Production Oper. Management 30(5):1331–1349.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Wooldridge JM (2002) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Wooten JO, Ulrich KT (2017) Idea generation and the role of feedback: Evidence from field experiments with innovation tournaments. Production Oper. Management 26(1):80–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
  • Zhang S, Singh PV, Ghose A (2019) A structural analysis of the role of superstars in crowdsourcing contests. Inform. Systems Res. 30(1):15–33.Link, Google Scholar
  • Zur HB, Breznitz S (1981) The effect of time pressure on risky choice behavior. Acta Psych. (Amsterdam) 47(2):89–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
Previous
Back to Top
Next
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.
Agree