Between Human and System Agency: Coping with Negative Incidents for Continued Effective Use of Wearables

References

• Abouzahra M, Ghasemaghaei M (2021) Effective use of information technologies by seniors: The case of wearable device use. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 31(2):241–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anthony C, Bechky BA, Fayard A-L (2023) “Collaborating” with AI: Taking a system view to explore the future of work. Organ. Sci. 34(5):1651–1996.Link, Google Scholar
• Archer M (1995) Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Attig C, Franke T (2020) Abandonment of personal quantification: A review and empirical study investigating reasons for wearable activity tracking attrition. Comput. Human Behav. 102:223–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Attig C, Franke T (2022) Why do people abandon activity trackers? The role of user diversity in discontinued use. Internat. J. Human–Comput. Interaction 39(8):1662–1674.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baird A, Maruping LM (2021) The next generation of research on IS use: A theoretical framework of delegation to and from agentic IS artifacts. MIS Quart. 45(1):315–341.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bao C, Bardhan IR, Singh H, Meyer BA, Kirksey K (2020) Patient–provider engagement and its impact on health outcomes: A longitudinal study of patient portal use. MIS Quart. 44(2):699–723.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bandura A (2001) Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annu. Rev. Psych. 52:1–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beaudry A, Pinsonneault A (2005) Understanding user responses to information technology: A coping model of user adaptation. MIS Quart. 29(3):493–524.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beaudry A, Pinsonneault A (2010) The other side of acceptance: Studying the direct and indirect effects of emotions on information technology use. MIS Quart. 34(4):689–720.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bellesia F, Mattarelli E, Bertolotti F (2022) Algorithms and their affordances: How crowdworkers manage algorithmic scores in online labour markets. J. Management Stud. 60(1):1–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benbunan-Fich R (2019) An affordance lens for wearable information systems. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 28(3):256–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhaskar R (1975) A Realist Theory of Science (Verso, London).Google Scholar
• Bhattacherjee A (2001) Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quart. 25(3):351–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhattacherjee A, Davis CJ, Connolly AJ, Hikmet N (2018) User response to mandatory IT use: A coping theory perspective. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 27(4):395–414.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brickwood K-J, Watson G, O’Brien J, Williams AD (2019) Consumer-based wearable activity trackers increase physical activity participation: Systematic review and meta-analysis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 7(4):e11819.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burton-Jones A, Grange C (2013) From use to effective use: A representation theory perspective. Inform. Systems Res. 24(3):632–658.Link, Google Scholar
• Burton-Jones A, Volkoff O (2017) How can we develop contextualized theories of effective use? A Demonstration in the context of community-care electronic health records. Inform. Systems Res. 28(3):468–489.Link, Google Scholar
• Burton-Jones A, Bremhorst M, Liu F, Trieu VH (2017) IT use: Notes from a journey from use to effective use. Galliers R, Stein M-K, eds. Routledge Companion to MIS (Routledge, Abingdon, UK), 152–165.Google Scholar
• Califf CB, Sarker S, Sarker S (2020) The bright and dark sides of technostress: A mixed-methods study involving healthcare IT. MIS Quart. 44(2):809–856.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Candi M, Beltagui A (2019) Effective use of 3D printing in the innovation process. Technovation 80(81):63–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carver CS, Scheier MF, Weintraub JK (1989) Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 56(2):267–283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen A, Lemmer K (2025) Seeking social support on social media: A coping perspective. Internet Res. 35(2):664–690.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen JV, Tran A, Nguyen T (2019) Understanding the discontinuance behavior of mobile shoppers as a consequence of technostress: An application of the stress-coping theory. Comput. Human Behav. 95:83–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Constantiou I, Mukkamala A, Sjöklint M, Trier M (2022) Engaging with self-tracking applications: How do users respond to their performance data? Eur. J. Inform. Systems 32(6):941–961.Crossref, Google Scholar
• D’Arcy J, Herath T, Shoss MK (2014) Understanding employee responses to stressful information security requirements: A coping perspective. J. Management Inform. Systems 31(2):285–318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Moya J-F, Pallud J (2020) From panopticon to heautopticon: A new form of surveillance introduced by quantified-self practices. Inform. Systems J. 30(6):940–976.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farr C (2020) About 30% of fitness-trackers are abandoned—Non-profit recycle health finds them a second home. Accessed May 22, 2024, https://www.cnbc.com/2020/02/21/recycle-health-finds-home-for-abandoned-fitbits-apple-watches.html.Google Scholar
• Folkman S, Lazarus RS (1988) Coping as a mediator of emotion. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 54(1):466–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Folkman S, Moskowitz JT (2004) Coping: Pitfalls and promise. Annu. Rev. Psych. 55:745–774.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fügener A, Grahl J, Gupta A, Ketter W (2022) Cognitive challenges in human–artificial intelligence collaboration: Investigating the path toward productive delegation. Inform. Systems Res. 31(3):313–338.Google Scholar
• Gartner (2016) Gartner survey shows wearable devices need to be more useful. Accessed May 22, 2024, https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2016-12-07-gartner-survey-shows-wearable-devices-need-to-be-more-useful.Google Scholar
• Gerlach JP, Cenfetelli RT (2022) Overcoming the single-IS paradigm in individual-level IS research. Inform. Systems Res. 33(2):476–488.Link, Google Scholar
• Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research (Aldine Publishing, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Hedström P, Swedberg R (1996) Social mechanisms. Acta Sociol. 39(3):281–308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hiremath S, Yang G, Mankodiya K (2014) Wearable internet of things: Concept, architectural components and promises for person-centered healthcare. Proc. 4th Internat. Conf. Wireless Mobile Comm. Healthcare-Transforming Healthcare Through Innovations Mobile Wireless Technologies (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 304–307.Google Scholar
• Hornyak R, Rai A, Dong JQ (2020) Incumbent system context and job outcomes of effective enterprise system use. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 21(2):364–387.Google Scholar
• Islam AKMN, Mäntymäki M, Laato S, Turel O (2022) Adverse consequences of emotional support seeking through social network sites in coping with stress from a global pandemic. Internat. J. Inform. Management 62:102431.Crossref, Google Scholar
• James TL, Deane JK, Wallace L (2019) An application of goal content theory to examine how desired exercise outcomes impact fitness technology feature set selection. Inform. Systems J. 29:1010–1039.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jennings NR, Sycara K, Wooldridge M (1998) A roadmap of agent research and development. Autonomic Agent Multiagent Systems 1:7–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johns G (2006) The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Acad. Management Rev. 31(2):386–408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khedhaouria A, Montani F, Jamal A, Shah MH (2024) Consequences of technostress for users in remote (home) work contexts during a time of crisis: The buffering role of emotional social support. Tech. Forecasting Soc. Change 199:123065.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lally P, van Jaarsveld CHM, Potts HWW, Wardle J (2010) How are habits formed: Modelling habit formation in the real world. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 40(6):998–1009.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lanzl J (2023) Social support as technostress inhibitor: Even more important during the COVID-19 pandemic? Bus. Inform. Systems Engrg. 65(3):329–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lauterbach J, Mueller B, Kahrau F, Maedche A (2020) Achieving effective use when digitalizing work: The role of representational complexity. MIS Quart. 44(3):1023–1048.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazarus RS (1993) Coping theory and research: Past, present, and future. Psychosomatic Medicine 55:234–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazarus RS, Folkman S (1987) Transactional theory and research on emotions and coping. Eur. J. Personality 1:141–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lehrer C, Eseryel UY, Rieder A, Jung R (2021) Behavior change through wearables: The interplay between self-leadership and IT-based leadership. Electronic Marketing 31:747–764.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leidner DE, Gonzalez E, Koch H (2018) An affordance perspective of enterprise social media and organizational socialization. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 27:117–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liang H, Xue Y (2009) Avoidance of information technology threats: A theoretical perspective. MIS Quart. 33(1):71–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liang H, Xue Y, Pinsonneault A, Wu Y (2019) What users do besides problem-focused coping when facing IT security threats: An emotion-focused coping perspective. MIS Quart. 43(2):373–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liang H, Peng Z, Xue Y, Guo X, Wang N (2015) Employees’ exploration of complex systems: An integrative view. J. Management Inform. Systems 32(1):322–357.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin YK, Lin M, Chen H (2019) Do electronic health records affect quality of care? Evidence from the HITECH act. Inform. Systems Res. 30(1):1–39.Link, Google Scholar
• Matt C, Becker M, Kolbeck A, Hess T (2019) Continuously healthy, continuously used?—A thematic analysis of user perceptions on consumer health wearables. Pacific Asia J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 11(1):108–132.Google Scholar
• Mettler T, Wulf J (2019) Physiolytics at the workplace: Affordances and constraints of wearable use from an employee’s perspective. Inform. Systems J. 29:245–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mingers J (2004) Real-izing information systems: Critical realism as an underpinning philosophy for information systems. Inform. Organ. 14(2):87–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murray A, Rhymer JEN, Sirmon DG (2021) Humans and technology: Forms of conjoined agency in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 46(3):552–571.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Myers MD (1997) Qualitative research in information systems. MIS Quart. 21(2):241–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oinas-Kukkonen H, Harjumaa M (2009) Persuasive systems design: Key issues, process model, and system features. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems 24(28):485–500.Google Scholar
• Oliver RL (1980) A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. J. Marketing Res. 17(4):460–469. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ortiz de Guinea A (2016) A pragmatic multi-method investigation of discrepant technological events: Coping, attributions, and ‘accidental’ learning. Inform. Management 53(6):787–802.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pirkkalainen H, Salo M, Tarafdar M, Makkonen M (2019) Deliberate or instinctive? Proactive and reactive coping for technostress. J. Management Inform. Systems 36(4):1179–1212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Qahri-Saremi H, Turel O (2020) Ambivalence and coping responses in post-adoptive information systems use. J. Management Inform. Systems 37(3):820–848.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rieder A, Eseryel UY, Lehrer C, Jung R (2021) Why users comply with wearables: The role of contextual self-efficacy in behavioral change. Internat. J. Human-Comput. Interaction 37(3):281–294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Russell SJ, Norvig P (2016) Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (Pearson).Google Scholar
• Salo M, Makkonen M, Hekkala R (2020) The interplay of IT users’ coping strategies: Uncovering momentary emotional load, routes, and sequences. MIS Quart. 44(3):1143–1175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salo M, Pirkkalainen H, Koskelainen T (2018) Technostress and social networking services: Explaining users’ concentration, sleep, identity, and social relation problems. Inform. Systems J. 29:408–435.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salo M, Pirkkalainen H, Chua CEH, Koskelainen T (2022) Formation and mitigation of technostress in the personal use of IT. MIS Quart. 46(2):1–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sarker S, Xiao X, Beaulieu T, Lee AS (2018) Learning from first-generation qualitative approaches in the IS discipline: An evolutionary view and some implications for authors and evaluators (part 1/2). J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 19(8):752–774.Google Scholar
• Savoli A, Barki H, Paré G (2020) Examining how chronically ill patients’ reactions to and effective use of information technology can influence how well they self-manage their illness. MIS Quart. 44(1):351–389.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaikh M, Vaast E (2023) Algorithmic interactions in open source work. Inform. Systems Res. 34(2):744–765.Link, Google Scholar
• Statista (2022) Digital fitness and well-being Geräte-Schweiz. Accessed August 27, 2022, https://de.statista.com/outlook/dmo/digital-health/digital-fitness-well-being/digital-fitness-well-being-geraete/schweiz?currency=CHF.Google Scholar
• Stein M-K, Lim ETK, Tan C-W (2022) Explaining persistent ineffectiveness in professional online communities: Multilevel tensions and misguided coping strategies. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 23(1):372–400.Google Scholar
• Stein M, Newell SM, Wagner EL, Galliers RD (2015) Coping with information technology: Mixed emotions, vacillation, and nonconfirming use patterns. MIS Quart. 39(2):367–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stelmaszak M, Möhlmann M, Sørensen C (2025) When algorithms delegate to humans: Exploring human-algorithm interaction at Uber. MIS Quart. 49(1):305–330.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sun H, Wright RT, Thatcher JB (2019) Revisiting the impact of system use on task performance: An exploitative-explorative system use framework. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 20(4):398–433.Google Scholar
• Sykes TA, Aljafari R (2022) We are all in this together, or are we? Job strain and coping in the context of an e-healthcare system implementation. J. Management Inform. Systems 39(4):1215–1247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tams S, Dulipovici A, Thatcher JB, Craig K, Srite M (2020) The role of basic human values in knowledge sharing: How values shape the postadoptive use of electronic knowledge repositories. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 21(1):201–237.Google Scholar
• Tarafdar M, Cooper CL, Stich JF (2019) The technostress trifecta: Techno eustress, techno distress and design: Theoretical directions and an agenda for research. Inform. Systems J. 29:6–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tarafdar M, Maier C, Laumer S, Weitzel T (2020a) Explaining the link between technostress and technology addiction for social networking sites: A study of distraction as a coping behavior. Inform. Systems J. 30(1):96–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tarafdar M, Pirkkalainen H, Salo M, Makkonen M (2020b) Taking on the “dark side”––Coping with technostress. IT Professional 22(6):82–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Te’eni D, Yahav I, Zagalsky A, Schwartz D, Silverman G, Cohen D, Mann Y, et al. (2023) Reciprocal human-machine learning: A theory and an instantiation for the case of message classification. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print November 14, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.03518.Link, Google Scholar
• Torres R, Sidorova A (2019) Reconceptualizing information quality as effective use in the context of T business intelligence and analytics. Internat. J. Inform. Management 49:316–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trieu VH, Burton-Jones A, Green P, Cockcroft S (2022) Applying and extending the theory of effective use in a business intelligence context. MIS Quart. 46(1):645–678.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Urquhart C, Lehmann H, Myers MD (2010) Putting the ‘theory’ back into grounded theory: Guidelines for grounded theory studies in information systems. Inform. Systems J. 20:357–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD (2003) User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quart. 27(3):425–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Volkoff O, Strong DM (2013) Critical realism and affordances: Theorizing IT-associated organizational change processes. MIS Quart. 37(3):819–834.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Volkoff O, Strong DM, Eimes MB (2007) Technological embeddedness and organizational change. Organ. Sci. 18(5):832–848.Link, Google Scholar
• Walsham G (1995) Interpretive case studies in IS research: Nature and method. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 4(2):74–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang J, Li Y, Rao HR (2017) Coping responses in phishing detection: An investigation of antecedents and consequences. Inform. Systems Res. 28(2):378–396.Link, Google Scholar
• Wiegard RB, Breitner MH (2019) Smart services in healthcare: A risk-benefit-analysis of pay-as-you-live services from customer perspective in Germany. Electronic Marketing 29(1):107–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (2014) Global status report on noncommunicable diseases. Accessed May 22, 2024, https://iris.who.int/server/api/core/bitstreams/83f2cb9d-8c31-482a-baa8-83b6005ce5e5/content.Google Scholar
• Wynn D, Williams CK (2012) Principles for conducting critical realist case study research in information systems. MIS Quart. 36(3):787–810.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang H, Guo X, Peng Z, Lai KH (2021) The antecedents of effective use of hospital information systems in the Chinese context: A mixed-method approach. Inform. Processing Management 58:102461.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yazdanmehr A, Wang J, Rao HR (2022) Employee responses to information security-related stress: Coping and implications for burnout. Inform. Systems J. 32(2):287–318.Google Scholar
• Yin P, Ou CXJ, Davison RM, Wu J (2018) Coping with mobile technology overload in the workplace. Internet Res. 28(5):1189–1212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zachariadis M, Scott S, Barrett M (2013) Methodological implications of critical realism for mixed-methods research. MIS Quart. 37(3):855–879.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhu Q, Deng Z, Zhang C, Wang Y (2023) The dualistic view of challenge–hindrance technostress: Evidence from mobile health app use. Inform. Management 60(3):103689.Google Scholar