To Split or to Merge? How Partitioning Affects Consumption and Engagement with Digital Content

References

• Ahn JH, Bae YS, Ju J, Oh W (2018) Attention adjustment, renewal, and equilibrium seeking in online search: An eye-tracking approach. J. Management Inform. Systems 35(4):1218–1250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amaldoss W, He C (2018) Reference-dependent utility, product variety, and price competition. Management Sci. 64(9):4302–4316.Link, Google Scholar
• Angrist J, Krueger AB (1994) Why do World War II veterans earn more than nonveterans? J. Labor Econom. 12(1):74–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Pischke JS (2008) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Atkinson JW (1953) The achievement motive and recall of interrupted and completed tasks. J. Experiment. Psych. 46(6):381–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baddeley A, Logie R, Bressi S, Della Sala S, Spinnler H (1986) Dementia and working memory. Quart. J. Experiment. Psych. A 38(4):603–618.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bandura A (1986) The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. J. Soc. Clinical Psych. 4(3):359–373.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bavafa H, Hitt LM, Terwiesch C (2018) The impact of e-visits on visit frequencies and patient health: Evidence from primary care. Management Sci. 64(12):5461–5480.Link, Google Scholar
• Belsky L (2022) Coursera launches clips to accelerate skills development through short videos and lessons. Coursera (May 5), https://blog.coursera.org/coursera-launches-clips-to-accelerate-skills-development-through-short-videos-and-lessons/.Google Scholar
• Breivik E, Troye SV, Olsson UH (1998) Dimensions of intangibility and their impact on product evaluation. Presentation, Annual Conference (October) of the Association for Consumer Research, Association for Consumer Research, Montreal.Google Scholar
• Cervantes R (2023) How rising action works in storytelling. Backstage (January 9), https://www.backstage.com/magazine/article/what-is-rising-action-of-a-story-75562/.Google Scholar
• Cheema A, Soman D (2008) The effect of partitions on controlling consumption. J. Marketing Res. 45(6):665–675.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen O, Castro-Alonso JC, Paas F, Sweller J (2018) Extending cognitive load theory to incorporate working memory resource depletion: Evidence from the spacing effect. Ed. Psych. Rev. 30(2):483–501.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheung CM, Lee MK (2012) What drives consumers to spread electronic word of mouth in online consumer-opinion platforms. Decision Support Systems 53(1):218–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coiro J (2011) Talking about reading as thinking: Modeling the hidden complexities of online reading comprehension. Theory Practice 50(2):107–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cowan N (2008) What are the differences between long-term, short-term, and working memory? Progress Brain Res. 169:323–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danaher PJ, Smith MS, Ranasinghe K, Danaher TS (2015) Where, when, and how long: Factors that influence the redemption of mobile phone coupons. J. Marketing Res. 52(5):710–725.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daneman M, Green I (1986) Individual differences in comprehending and producing words in context. J. Memory Language 25(1):1–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dhar R, Huber J, Khan U (2007) The shopping momentum effect. J. Marketing Res. 44(3):370–378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ely J, Frankel A, Kamenica E (2015) Suspense and surprise. J. Political Econom. 123(1):215–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forman C, Ghose A, Wiesenfeld B (2008) Examining the relationship between reviews and sales: The role of reviewer identity disclosure in electronic markets. Inform. Systems Res. 19(3):291–313.Link, Google Scholar
• Friedlander J (2018) Project focus: Long and complex books demand attention to detail. Book Designer (October 1), https://www.thebookdesigner.com/2018/10/project-focus-long-and-complex-books-demand-attention-to-detail/.Google Scholar
• Galak J, Kruger J, Loewenstein G (2013) Slow down! Insensitivity to rate of consumption leads to avoidable satiation. J. Consumer Res. 39(5):993–1009.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geier AB, Rozin P, Doros G (2006) Unit bias: A new heuristic that helps explain the effect of portion size on food intake. Psych. Sci. 17(6):521–525.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glover I, Xu Z, Hardaker G (2007) Online annotation—Research and practices. Comput. Ed. 49(4):1308–1320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hasler BS, Kersten B, Sweller J (2007) Learner control, cognitive load and instructional animation. Appl. Cognitive Psych. 21(6):713–729.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hassanabadi H, Robatjazi ES, Savoji AP (2011) Cognitive consequences of segmentation and modality methods in learning from instructional animations. Procedia Soc. Behavioral Sci. 30:1481–1487.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hennig-Thurau T, Gwinner KP, Walsh G, Gremler DD (2004) Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the internet? J. Interactive Marketing 18(1):38–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirschman EC, Holbrook MB (1982) Hedonic consumption: Emerging concepts, methods and propositions. J. Marketing 46(3):92–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holbrook MB, Hirschman EC (1982) The experiential aspects of consumption: Consumer fantasies, feelings, and fun. J. Consumer Res. 9(2):132–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Jasin S, Manchanda P (2019) “Level up”: Leveraging skill and engagement to maximize player game-play in online video games. Inform. Systems Res. 30(3):927–947.Link, Google Scholar
• Johnson TE, Archibald TN, Tenenbaum G (2010) Individual and team annotation effects on students’ reading comprehension, critical thinking, and meta-cognitive skills. Comput. Human Behav. 26(6):1496–1507.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Just MA, Carpenter PA (1992) A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psych. Rev. 99(1):122–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kankanhalli A, Tan BCY, Wei K-K (2005) Contributing knowledge to electronic knowledge repositories: An empirical investigation. MIS Quart. 29(1):113–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kerameas K, Vartanian LR, Herman CP, Polivy J (2015) The effect of portion size and unit size on food intake: Unit bias or segmentation effect? Health Psych. 34(6):670–676.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khern-Am-Nuai W, Kannan K, Ghasemkhani H (2018) Extrinsic versus intrinsic rewards for contributing reviews in an online platform. Inform. Systems Res. 29(4):871–892.Link, Google Scholar
• Kleef GA (2014) Understanding the positive and negative effects of emotional expressions in organizations: EASI does it. Human Relations 67(9):1145–1164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleinbaum DG, Klein M (1996) Survival Analysis: A Self-Learning Text (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
• Koiso-Kanttila N (2004) Digital content marketing: A literature synthesis. J. Marketing Management 20(1–2):45–65.Google Scholar
• Kwon HE, So H, Han SP, Oh W (2016) Excessive dependence on mobile social apps: A rational addiction perspective. Inform. Systems Res. 27(4):919–939.Link, Google Scholar
• Laroche M, Bergeron J, Goutaland C (2001) A three-dimensional scale of intangibility. J. Service Res. 4(1):26–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee D, Hosanagar K, Nair HS (2018) Advertising content and consumer engagement on social media: Evidence from Facebook. Management Sci. 64(11):5105–5131.Link, Google Scholar
• Lee HA, Choi AA, Sun T, Oh W (2021) Reviewing before reading? An empirical investigation of book consumption patterns and their effects on reviews and sales. Inform. Systems Res. 32(4):1368–1389.Link, Google Scholar
• Li LY, Fan CY, Huang DW, Chen GD (2014) The effects of the e-book system with the reading guidance and the annotation map on the reading performance of college students. Educational Tech. Soc. 17(1):320–331.Google Scholar
• Li X, Hitt LM (2008) Self-selection and information role of online product reviews. Inform. Systems Res. 19(4):456–474.Link, Google Scholar
• Lin Z, Zhang Y, Tan Y (2019) An empirical study of free product sampling and rating bias. Inform. Systems Res. 30(1):260–275.Link, Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Feng J (2021) Does money talk? The impact of monetary incentives on user-generated content contributions. Inform. Systems Res. 32(2):394–409.Link, Google Scholar
• Liu Z (2005) Reading behavior in the digital environment: Changes in reading behavior over the past ten years. J. Documentation 61(6):700–712.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manset-Williamson G, Nelson JM (2005) Balanced, strategic reading instruction for upper-elementary and middle school students with reading disabilities: A comparative study of two approaches. Learn. Disability Quart. 28(1):59–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marchiori D, Waroquier L, Klein O (2011) Smaller food item sizes of snack foods influence reduced portions and caloric intake in young adults. J. Amer. Dietetic Assoc. 111(5):727–731.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayer RE, Moreno R (2003) Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist 38(1):43–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McFadden D (1974) The measurement of urban travel demand. J. Public Econom. 3(4):303–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mogilner C, Rudnick T, Iyengar SS (2008) The mere categorization effect: How the presence of categories increases choosers’ perceptions of assortment variety and outcome satisfaction. J. Consumer Res. 35(2):202–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nejad MR, Onay S (2014) Numerosity and cognitive complexity as moderators of the medium effect. Procedia Econom. Finance 14:445–453.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oladipo T (2022) How to get started with YouTube shorts. Buffer (December 19), https://buffer.com/library/what-is-youtube-shorts/.Google Scholar
• Pelham BW, Sumarta TT, Myaskovsky L (1994) The easy path from many to much: The numerosity heuristic. Cognitive Psych. 26(2):103–133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pressley M, Harris KR (2006) Cognitive strategies instruction: From basic research to classroom instruction. Alexander PA, Winne PH, eds. Handbook of Educational Psychology (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah, NJ), 265–286.Google Scholar
• Profy S (2019) How to timestamp a YouTube video. Accessed January 12, 2023, https://howtonow.com/how-to-timestamp-a-youtube-video/.Google Scholar
• Pu J, Chen Y, Qiu L, Cheng HK (2020) Does identity disclosure help or hurt user content generation? Social presence, inhibition, and displacement effects. Inform. Systems Res. 31(2):297–322.Link, Google Scholar
• Puranam D, Narayan V, Kadiyali V (2017) The effect of calorie posting regulation on consumer opinion: A flexible latent Dirichlet allocation model with informative priors. Marketing Sci. 36(5):726–746.Link, Google Scholar
• Raynor HA, Wing RR (2007) Package unit size and amount of food: Do both influence intake? Obesity 15(9):2311–2319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ricketson M (2016) When slow news is good news: Book-length journalism’s role in extending and enlarging daily news. Journalism Practice 10(4):507–520.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scherer A, Wünderlich NVV, Wangenheim F (2015) The value of self-service. MIS Quart. 39(1):177–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schweidel DA, Moe WW (2016) Binge watching and advertising. J. Marketing 80(5):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singh SN, Cole CA (1993) The effects of length, content, and repetition on television commercial effectiveness. J. Marketing Res. 30(1):91–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spanjers IAE, Wouters P, van Gog T, van Merrienboer JJG (2011) An expertise reversal effect of segmentation in learning from animated worked-out examples. Comput. Human Behav. 27(1):46–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stock J, Yogo M (2005) Asymptotic distributions of instrumental variables statistics with many instruments. Andrews D, Stock J, eds. Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: Essays in Honor of Thomas Rothenberg (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 109–120.Google Scholar
• Sweller J (1988) Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Sci. 12(2):257–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sweller J, Chandler P, Tierney P, Cooper M (1990) Cognitive load as a factor in the structuring of technical material. J. Experiment. Psych. General 119(2):176–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Terza JV, Basu A, Rathouz PJ (2008) Two-stage residual inclusion estimation: Addressing endogeneity in health econometric modeling. J. Health Econom. 27(3):531–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Voyles K (2018) The long short story: Detective fiction in the age of Netflix. Clues J. Detection 36(2):91–101.Google Scholar
• Wertenbroch K (1998) Consumption self-control by rationing purchase quantities of virtue and vice. Marketing Sci. 17(4):317–337.Link, Google Scholar
• Wong A, Leahy W, Marcus N, Sweller J (2012) Cognitive load theory, the transient information effect and e-learning. Learn. Instruction 22(6):449–457.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2010) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Woolley G (2011) Reading comprehension. Reading Comprehension: Assisting Children with Learning Difficulties (Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands), 15–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu J, Zhao H, Chen H (2021) Coupons or free shipping? Effects of price promotion strategies on online review ratings. Inform. Systems Res. 32(2):633–652.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Li B, Luo X, Wang X (2019) Personalized mobile targeting with user engagement stages: Combining a structural hidden Markov model and field experiment. Inform. Systems Res. 30(3):787–804.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhou M, Chen GH, Ferreira P, Smith MD (2021) Consumer behavior in the online classroom: Using video analytics and machine learning to understand the consumption of video courseware. Working paper, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
• Zündel J (2019) Serial skipper: Netflix, binge-watching and the role of paratexts in old and new “televisions.” Participations J. Audience Reception Stud. 16(2):196–219.Google Scholar