Team Makes You Better: Evidence from Online Medical Consultation Platforms

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2022.0689

References

  • Adams R, Almeida H, Ferreira D (2009) Understanding the relationship between founder–CEOs and firm performance. J. Empirical Finance 16(1):136–150.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agha L, Ericson KM, Geissler KH, Rebitzer JB (2022) Team relationships and performance: Evidence from healthcare referral networks. Management Sci. 68(5):3735–3754.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Amodio F, Martinez-Carrasco MA (2018) Input allocation, workforce management and productivity spillovers: Evidence from personnel data. Rev. Econom. Stud. 85(4):1937–1970.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Angrist JD, Pischke J-S (2009) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Azoulay P, Stuart T, Wang Y (2014) Matthew: Effect or fable? Management Sci. 60(1):92–109.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baldwin M, Mussweiler T (2018) The culture of social comparison. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115(39):E9067–E9074.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bapna R, Umyarov A (2015) Do your online friends make you pay? A randomized field experiment on peer influence in online social networks. Management Sci. 61(8):1902–1920.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bapna S, Benner MJ, Qiu L (2019) Nurturing online communities: An empirical investigation. MIS Quart. 43(2):425–452.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bartelt VL, Dennis AR (2014) Nature and nurture: The impact of automaticity and the structuration of communication on virtual team behavior and performance. MIS Quart. 38(2):521–538.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bellemare C, Lepage P, Shearer B (2010) Peer pressure, incentives, and gender: An experimental analysis of motivation in the workplace. Labour Econom. 17(1):276–283.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beylat M, Woltin KA, Yzerbyt V, Sassenberg K (2024) With whom do people compare at work? The role of regulatory mode and social comparison motives. J. Appl. Soc. Pysch. 54(6):319–331.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blackwell M, Iacus S, King G, Porro G (2009) CEM: Coarsened exact matching in Stata. Stata J. 9(4):524–546.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blandford A, Wesson J, Amalberti R, AlHazme R, Allwihan R (2020) Opportunities and challenges for telehealth within, and beyond, a pandemic. Lancet Global Health 8(11):e1364–e1365.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bollinger B, Gillingham K, Kirkpatrick AJ, Sexton S (2022) Visibility and peer influence in durable good adoption. Marketing Sci. 41(3):453–476.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Burtch G, Hong Y, Bapna R, Griskevicius V (2018) Stimulating online reviews by combining financial incentives and social norms. Management Sci. 64(5):2065–2082.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cassar G, Ko T (2023) Peer effects in subjective performance evaluation. Contemporary Accounting Res. 40(3):1704–1732.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chan TY, Li J, Pierce L (2014) Learning from peers: Knowledge transfer and sales force productivity growth. Marketing Sci. 33(4):463–484.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen W, Wei X, Zhu K (2017) Engaging voluntary contributions in online communities: A hidden Markov model. MIS Quart. 42(1):83–100.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cheng TC, Fu H, Xu D, Yip W (2022) Technology platforms are revolutionizing health care service delivery in China. NEJM Catalyst 3(1):1–11.Google Scholar
  • Chevalier JA, Mayzlin D (2006) The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. J. Marketing Res. 43(3):345–354.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chintagunta PK, Gopinath S, Venkataraman S (2010) The effects of online user reviews on movie box office performance: Accounting for sequential rollout and aggregation across local markets. Marketing Sci. 29(5):944–957.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Choi SY, Lee H, Yoo Y (2010) The impact of information technology and transactive memory systems on knowledge sharing, application, and team performance: A field study. MIS Quart. 34(4):855–870.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Christakis NA, Fowler JH (2007) The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. New England J. Medicine 357(4):370–379.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Collins A, Tkaczyk D, Aizawa A, Beel J (2018) A study of position bias in digital library recommender systems. Preprint, submitted February 19, https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.06565.Google Scholar
  • Cragg JG (1971) Some statistical models for limited dependent variables with application to the demand for durable goods. Econometrica 39(5):829–844.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cummings JN (2004) Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Sci. 50(3):352–364.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • DeShon RP, Kozlowski SW, Schmidt AM, Milner KR, Wiechmann D (2004) A multiple-goal, multilevel model of feedback effects on the regulation of individual and team performance. J. Appl. Psych. 89(6):1035–1056.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Du W, Liu W, Guo X, Vogel D (2024) How team diversity influences online medical team service performance through shared leadership: An input-process-output perspective. Group Decision Negotiation 33(1):27–54.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eastburn J, Harris A, Nagarajan N, Rost J (2023) Is virtual care delivering on its promise of improving access? McKinsey & Company. Accessed January 10, 2025, https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/healthcare/our-insights/is-virtual-care-delivering-on-its-promise-of-improving-access.Google Scholar
  • Fan W, Zhou Q, Qiu L, Kumar S (2023) Should doctors open online consultation services? An empirical investigation of their impact on offline appointments. Inform. Systems Res. 34(2):629–651.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Faraj S, Sproull L (2000) Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Management Sci. 46(12):1554–1568.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Festinger L (1954) A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations 7(2):117–140.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gao B, Wang J, Ding X, Guo Y (2024) The pitfalls of review solicitation: Evidence from a natural experiment on TripAdvisor. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print May 16, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.01006.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gilson LL, Maynard MT, Jones Young NC, Vartiainen M, Hakonen M (2015) Virtual teams research: 10 years, 10 themes, and 10 opportunities. J. Management 41(5):1313–1337.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goes PB, Lin M, Au Yeung C-M (2014) Popularity effect” in user-generated content: Evidence from online product reviews. Inform. Systems Res. 25(2):222–238.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Griffiths TL, Steyvers M (2004) Finding scientific topics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101(suppl_1):5228–5235.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gutiérrez E, Lourie B, Nekrasov A, Shevlin T (2020) Are online job postings informative to investors? Management Sci. 66(7):3133–3141.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Haas MR, Hansen MT (2005) When using knowledge can hurt performance: The value of organizational capabilities in a management consulting company. Strategic Management J. 26(1):1–24.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haas MR, Hansen MT (2007) Different knowledge, different benefits: Toward a productivity perspective on knowledge sharing in organizations. Strategic Management J. 28(11):1133–1153.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hahn J, Moon JY, Zhang C (2008) Emergence of new project teams from open source software developer networks: Impact of prior collaboration ties. Inform. Systems Res. 19(3):369–391.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • He Y, Xu X, Huang N, Hong Y, Liu D (2021) Preserving user privacy through ephemeral sharing design: A large-scale randomized field experiment in the online dating context. Preprint, submitted January 24, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3740782.Google Scholar
  • Horton JJ, Zeckhauser RJ (2018) Wielding peer effects in online production: Evidence from a series of field experiments. Accessed January 10, 2025, http://john-joseph-horton.com/papers/peer_effects.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Hou J, Liang C, Chen P-Y, Gu B (2024) Can telework adjustment help reduce disaster-induced gender inequality in job market outcomes? Inform. Systems Res. 35(4):1701–1720.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Huang N, Yan Z, Yin H (2021a) Effects of online-offline service integration on e-healthcare providers: A quasi-natural experiment. Production Oper. Management 30(8):2359–2378.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huang N, Zhang J, Burtch G, Li X, Chen P (2021b) Combating procrastination on massive online open courses via optimal calls to action. Inform. Systems Res. 32(2):301–317.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jarvenpaa SL, Leidner DE (1999) Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organ. Sci. 10(6):791–815.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jung J, Bapna R, Ramaprasad J, Umyarov A (2019) Love unshackled: Identifying the effect of mobile app adoption in online dating. MIS Quart. 43(1):47–72.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kanawattanachai P, Yoo Y (2007) The impact of knowledge coordination on virtual team performance over time. MIS Quart. 31(4):783–808.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kayworth TR, Leidner DE (2002) Leadership effectiveness in global virtual teams. J. Management Inform. Systems. 18(3):7–40.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kirkman BL, Rosen B, Tesluk PE, Gibson CB (2004) The impact of team empowerment on virtual team performance: The moderating role of face-to-face interaction. Acad. Management J. 47(2):175–192.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kleibergen F, Paap R (2006) Generalized reduced rank tests using the singular value decomposition. J. Econometrics 133(1):97–126.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kruglanski AW, Thompson EP, Higgins ET, Atash MN, Pierro A, Shah JY, Spiegel S (2000) To “do the right thing” or to “just do it”: Locomotion and assessment as distinct self-regulatory imperatives. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 79(5):793–815.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kudaravalli S, Faraj S, Johnson SL (2017) A configural approach to coordinating expertise in software development teams. MIS Quart. 41(1):43–64.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee HS, Griffith DA (2019) Social comparison in retailer–supplier relationships: Referent discrepancy effects. J. Marketing 83(2):120–137.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levina N, Vaast E (2005) The emergence of boundary spanning competence in practice: Implications for implementation and use of information systems. MIS Quart. 29(2):335–363.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li J, van Knippenberg D (2021) The team causes and consequences of team membership change: A temporal perspective. Acad. Management Ann. 15(2):577–606.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li J, Bao X, Liu X, Ma L (2020) The impact of joining a team on the initial trust in online physicians. Healthcare 8(1):33.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li X, Hitt LM (2008) Self-selection and information role of online product reviews. Inform. Systems Res. 19(4):456–474.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Liu H, Perera SC, Wang J-J, Leonhardt JM (2023) Physician engagement in online medical teams: A multilevel investigation. J. Bus. Res. 157:113588.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liu QB, Liu X, Guo X (2020) The effects of participating in a physician-driven online health community in managing chronic disease: Evidence from two natural experiments. MIS Quart. 44(1):391–419.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Majchrzak A, Malhotra A (2016) Effect of knowledge-sharing trajectories on innovative outcomes in temporary online crowds. Inform. Systems Res. 27(4):685–703.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Majchrzak A, Rice RE, Malhotra A, King N, Ba S (2000) Technology adaptation: The case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team. MIS Quart. 24(4):569–600.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Malhotra A, Majchrzak A, Rosen B (2007) Leading virtual teams. Acad. Management Perspect. 21(1):60–70.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Manski CF (1993) Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Rev. Econom. Stud. 60(3):531–542.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mas A, Moretti E (2009) Peers at work. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(1):112–145.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Massey AP, Montoya-Weiss M, Hung C, Ramesh V (2001) Cultural perceptions of task-technology fit. Comm. ACM 44(12):83–84.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maznevski ML, Chudoba KM (2000) Bridging space over time: Global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organ. Sci. 11(5):473–492.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mell JN, Jang S, Chai S (2021) Bridging temporal divides: Temporal brokerage in global teams and its impact on individual performance. Organ. Sci. 32(3):731–751.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Morgan S (2015) Counterfactuals and Causal Inference (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
  • Mortensen M (2014) Constructing the team: The antecedents and effects of membership model divergence. Organ. Sci. 25(3):909–931.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Olden A, Møen J (2022) The triple difference estimator. Econom. J. 25(3):531–553.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ozer M, Vogel D (2015) Contextualized relationship between knowledge sharing and performance in software development. J. Management Inform. Systems 32(2):134–161.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pangil F, Chan JM (2014) The mediating effect of knowledge sharing on the relationship between trust and virtual team effectiveness. J. Knowledge Management 18(1):92–106.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pearl R, Wayling B (2022) The telehealth era is just beginning. Harvard Bus. Rev. 87–94.Google Scholar
  • Pu J, Liu Y, Chen Y, Qiu L, Cheng HK (2022) What questions are you inclined to answer? Effects of hierarchy in corporate Q&A communities. Inform. Systems Res. 33(1):244–264.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Qiao W, Yan Z, Wang X (2021) Join or not: The impact of physicians’ group joining behavior on their online demand and reputation in online health communities. Inform. Processing Management 58(5):102634.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Qu Y (2023) Haodf wang hang: “Four pains” and “new problems.” Accessed January 10, 2025, http://www.eeo.com.cn/2023/0218/578638.shtml.Google Scholar
  • Raghuram S, Tuertscher P, Garud R (2010) Research note—Mapping the field of virtual work: A cocitation analysis. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):983–999.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Robert LPJ, Dennis AR, Ahuja MK (2018) Differences are different: Examining the effects of communication media on the impacts of racial and gender diversity in decision-making teams. Inform. Systems Res. 29(3):525–545.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Roels G, Su X (2014) Optimal design of social comparison effects: Setting reference groups and reference points. Management Sci. 60(3):606–627.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sacerdote B (2001) Peer effects with random assignment: Results for Dartmouth roommates. Quart. J. Econom. 116(2):681–704.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Saifee DH, Bardhan IR, Lahiri A, Zheng Z (2019) Adherence to clinical guidelines, electronic health record use, and online reviews. J. Management Inform. Systems 36(4):1071–1104.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Saifee DH, Zheng Z, Bardhan IR, Lahiri A (2020) Are online reviews of physicians reliable indicators of clinical outcomes? A focus on chronic disease management. Inform. Systems Res. 31(4):1282–1300.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shepherd C (2020) China’s online health platforms boom in wake of coronavirus. Accessed January 10, 2025, https://www.ft.com/content/22b22543-0fb5-4a8a-8ec0-e3fd067a5190.Google Scholar
  • Smith RH (2000) Assimilative and contrastive emotional reactions to upward and downward social comparisons. Suls J, Wheeler L, eds. Handbook of Social Comparison: Theory and Research (Plenum, New York), 173–200.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Song H, Tucker AL, Murrell KL, Vinson DR (2018) Closing the productivity gap: Improving worker productivity through public relative performance feedback and validation of best practices. Management Sci. 64(6):2628–2649.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Stock JH, Yogo M (2002) Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression. Andrews DWK, Stock JH, eds. Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: Essays in Honor of Thomas Rothenberg (Cambridge University Press, New York), 80–108.Google Scholar
  • Suls J, Martin R, Wheeler L (2002) Social comparison: Why, with whom, and with what effect? Current Directions Psych. Sci. 11(5):159–163.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Trogdon JG, Nonnemaker J, Pais J (2008) Peer effects in adolescent overweight. J. Health Econom. 27(5):1388–1399.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vana P, Lambrecht A, Bertini M (2018) Cashback is cash forward: Delaying a discount to entice future spending. J. Marketing Res. 55(6):852–868.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van der Eijk M, Faber MJ, Aarts JW, Kremer JA, Munneke M, Bloem BR (2013) Using online health communities to deliver patient-centered care to people with chronic conditions. J. Medical Internet Res. 15(6):e115.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Von Krogh G, Spaeth S, Lakhani KR (2003) Community, joining, and specialization in open source software innovation: A case study. Res. Policy 32(7):1217–1241.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wakefield RL, Leidner DE, Garrison G (2008) Research note—A model of conflict, leadership, and performance in virtual teams. Inform. Systems Res. 19(4):434–455.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wasko MM, Faraj S (2005) Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quart. 29(1):35–57.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Webster P (2020) Virtual health care in the era of COVID-19. Lancet 395(10231):1180–1181.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weller J, Boyd M, Cumin D (2014) Teams, tribes and patient safety: Overcoming barriers to effective teamwork in healthcare. Postgraduate Medical J. 90(1061):149–154.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wilson J, Crisp CB, Mortensen M (2013) Extending construal-level theory to distributed groups: Understanding the effects of virtuality. Organ. Sci. 24(2):629–644.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wittenbaum GM, Park ES (2001) The collective preference for shared information. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 10(2):70–73.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wu N (2015) Guahao.com launches “WeDoctor” to create internet “team medical care”. CN-Healthcare. Accessed January 10, 2025, https://www.cn-healthcare.com/article/20150329/content-472032.html.Google Scholar
  • Ye T, Ai W, Chen Y, Mei Q, Ye J, Zhang L (2022) Virtual teams in a gig economy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119(51):e2206580119.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yue WT, Wang Q-H, Hui KL (2019) See no evil, hear no evil? Dissecting the impact of online hacker forums. MIS Quart. 43(1):73–95.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang B, Pavlou PA, Krishnan R (2018a) On direct vs. indirect peer influence in large social networks. Inform. Systems Res. 29(2):292–314.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang H, Fam K-S, Goh T-T, Dai X (2018b) When are influentials equally influenceable? The strength of strong ties in new product adoption. J. Bus. Res. 82:160–170.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang X, Guo X, Lai K-h, Yi W (2019) How does online interactional unfairness matter for patient–doctor relationship quality in online health consultation? The contingencies of professional seniority and disease severity. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 28(3):336–354.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhou M, Li X, Burtch G (2024) Healthcare across boundaries: Urban-rural differences in the consequences of telehealth adoption. Inform. Systems Res. 35(3):1092–1113.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zimmerman DJ (2003) Peer effects in academic outcomes: Evidence from a natural experiment. Rev. Econom. Statist. 85(1):9–23.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.