Space Norms for Constructing Quality Reviews on Online Consumer Review Sites

References

• Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 50(2):179–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ali-Hassan H, Nevo D (2009) Identifying social computing dimensions: A multidimensional scaling study. ICIS 2009 Proc. (Association for Information Systems, Phoenix), 1–19.Google Scholar
• Archak N, Ghose A, Ipeirotis PG (2011) Deriving the pricing power of product features by mining consumer reviews. Management Sci. 57(8):1485–1509. Link, Google Scholar
• Banerjee AV (1992) A simple model of herd behavior. Quart. J. Econom. 107(3):797–817.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bator RJ, Tabanico JJ, Walton ML, Schultz PW (2014) Promoting energy conservation with implied norms and explicit messages. Soc. Influence 9(1):69–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bicchieri C (2006) The Grammar of Society: The Nature and Dynamics of Social Norms (Cambridge University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Bicchieri C (2012) Norms, conventions, and the power of expectations. Cartwright N, Montuschi E, eds. Philosophy of Social Science: A New Introduction (Oxford University Press, New York), 208–229.Google Scholar
• Blei DM, Ng AY, Jordan MI (2003) Latent Dirichlet allocation. J. Machine Learn. Res. 3:993–1022.Google Scholar
• Bolton GE, Katok E, Ockenfels A (2004) How effective are electronic reputation mechanisms? An experimental investigation. Management Sci. 50(11):1587–1602.Link, Google Scholar
• BrightLocal (2018) Local consumer review survey. Accessed March 14, 2019, https://www.brightlocal.com/learn/local-consumer-review-survey/.Google Scholar
• Burtch G, Hong Y, Bapna R, Griskevicius V (2017) Stimulating online reviews by combining financial incentives and social norms. Management Sci. 64(5):2065–2082.Link, Google Scholar
• Chall JS, Dale E (1995) Readability Revisited: The New Dale-Chall Readability Formula (Brookline Books, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Cheema A, Kaikati AM (2010) The effect of need for uniqueness on word of mouth. J. Marketing Res. 47(3):553–563.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen W, Wei XH, Zhu KX (2018) Engaging voluntary contributions in online communities: A hidden Markov model. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 42(1):83–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Harper FM, Konstan J, Li SX (2010) Social comparisons and contributions to online communities: A field experiment on MovieLens. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(4):1358–1398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cialdini RB, Trost MR (1998) Social influence: Social norms, conformity and compliance. Gilbert DT, Fiske ST, Lindzey G, eds. The Handbook of Social Psychology (McGraw-Hill, New York), 151–192.Google Scholar
• Cialdini RB, Reno RR, Kallgren CA (1990) A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 58(6):1015–1026.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen J (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ).Google Scholar
• Dannals JE, Miller DT (2017) Social norm perception in groups with outliers. J. Experiment. Psych. General 146(9):1342–1359.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Darby MR, Karni E (1973) Free competition and the optimal amount of fraud. J. Law Econom. 16(1):67–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Decker S (2007) 87% of apparel reviews are positive. Accessed February 13, 2018, http://blog.bazaarvoice.com/2007/07/12/87-of-apparel-reviews-are-positive/.Google Scholar
• Dellarocas C (2003) The digitization of word of mouth: Promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms. Management Sci. 49(10):1407–1424.Link, Google Scholar
• Ernest-Jones M, Nettle D, Bateson M (2011) Effects of eye images on everyday cooperative behavior: A field experiment. Evolution Human Behav. 32(3):172–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Etzioni A (2000) The Third Way to a Good Society (Demos, London).Google Scholar
• Faraj S, Von Krogh G, Monteiro E, Lakhani KR (2016) Special section introduction—Online community as space for knowledge flows. Inform. Systems Res. 27(4):668–684.Link, Google Scholar
• Flüchter K, Wortmann F, Fleisch E (2014) Digital commuting: The effect of social normative feedback on e-bike commuting—Evidence from a field study. Proc. ECIS 2014 Proc. (Association for Information Systems, Tel Aviv, Israel), 1–14.Google Scholar
• Ford GT, Smith DB, Swasy JL (1988) An empirical test of the search, experience and credence attributes framework. Houston MJ, ed. NA—Advances in Consumer Research, vol. 15 (Association for Consumer Research, Provo, UT), 239–244.Google Scholar
• Fradkin A, Grewal E, Holtz D, Pearson M (2018) Bias and reciprocity in online reviews: Evidence from field experiments on AirBNB. Working paper, MIT Sloan School of Management, Boston.Google Scholar
• Ghose A, Ipeirotis PG (2007) Designing novel review ranking systems: Predicting the usefulness and impact of reviews. Proc. Ninth Internat. Conf. Electronic Commerce (ACM, New York), 303–310. Google Scholar
• Ghose A, Ipeirotis PG (2011) Estimating the helpfulness and economic impact of product reviews: Mining text and reviewer characteristics. IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Engrg. 23(10):1498–1512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goes PB, Lin M, Yeung CA (2014) “Popularity effect” in user generated content: Evidence from online product reviews. Inform. Systems Res. 25(2):222–238.Link, Google Scholar
• Goldstein NJ, Cialdini RB, Griskevicius V (2008) A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. J. Consumer Res. 35(3):472–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green S (1991) How many subjects does it take to do a regression analysis? Multivariate Behav. Res. 26(3):499–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenwood BN, Gopal A (2017) Ending the mending wall: Herding, media coverage, and colocation in IT entrepreneurship. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 41(3):989–1007.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grover V, Lyytinen K (2015) New state of play in information systems research: The push to the edges. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 39(2):271–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hand DJ, Till RJ (2001) A simple generalisation of the area under the ROC curve for multiple class classification problems. Machine Learn. 45:171–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayes AF (2013) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach (Guilford Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Hennig-Thurau T, Gwinner KP, Walsh G, Gremler DD (2004) Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the internet? J. Interactive Marketing 18(1):38–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herzenstein M, Dholakia UM, Andrews RL (2011) Strategic herding behavior in peer-to-peer loan auctions. J. Interactive Marketing 25(1):27–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hollander CD, Wu AS (2011) Using the process of norm emergence to model consensus formation. IEEE Fifth Internat. Conf. Self-Adaptive Self-Organizing Systems (IEEE, Ann Arbor, MI), 148–157.Google Scholar
• Hou J (2017) Can interface cues nudge modeling of food consumption? Experiments on a food-ordering website. J. Comput. Mediated Comm. 22(4):196–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jahng M, Littau J (2016) Interacting is believing: Interactivity, social cue, and perceptions of journalistic credibility on Twitter. J. Mass Comm. Quart. 93(1):38–58.Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A (1982) Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khern-am-nuai W, Kannan K, Ghasemkhani H (2018) Extrinsic versus intrinsic rewards for contributing reviews in an online platform. Inform. Systems Res. 29(4):871–892.Link, Google Scholar
• Klare GR (1974) Assessing readability. Reading Res. Quart. 10(1):62–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koh NS, Hu N, Clemons EK (2010) Do online reviews reflect a product’s true perceived quality? An investigation of online movie reviews across cultures. Electronic Commerce Res. Appl. 9(5):374–385.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumar N, Benbasat I (2006) Research note: The influence of recommendations and consumer reviews on evaluations of websites. Inform. Systems Res. 17(4):425–439.Link, Google Scholar
• Lapinski MK, Rimal RN (2005) An explication of social norms. Comm. Theory 15(2):127–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Latané B (1981) The psychology of social impact. Amer. Psych. 36(4):343–356.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee KM (2004) Presence, explicated. Comm. Theory 14(1):27–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li X, Wu L (2018) Herding and social media word-of-mouth: Evidence from Groupon. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 42(4):1331–1351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lu Y, Jerath K, Singh PV (2013) The emergence of opinion leaders in a networked online community: A dyadic model with time dynamics and a heuristic for fast estimation. Management Sci. 59(8):1783–1799.Link, Google Scholar
• Manning CD, Schütze H (1999) Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA). Google Scholar
• Martono F, Salam U (2017) Students’ learning in asynchronous discussion forums: A meta-analysis. Internat. J. Inform. Comm. Tech. Ed. 13(1):48–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mudambi SM, Schuff D (2010) Research note: What makes a helpful online review? A study of customer reviews on Amazon.com. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 34(1):185–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niederhoffer KG, Pennebaker JW (2002) Linguistic style matching in social interaction. J. Language Soc. Psych. 21(4):337–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Otterbacher J (2009) ‘Helpfulness’ in online communities: A measure of message quality. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (ACM, Boston), 955–964.Google Scholar
• Parameswaran M, Whinston AB (2007) Research issues in social computing. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 8(6):336–350.Google Scholar
• Parsons T (1949) The Structure of Social Action: A Study in Social Theory with Special Reference to a Group of Recent European Writers (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Perkins HW, Berkowitz AD (1986) Perceiving the community norms of alcohol use among students: Some research implications for campus alcohol education programming. Internat. J. Addictions 21(9–10):961–976. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips LT, Slepian ML, Hughes BL (2018) Perceiving groups: The people perception of diversity and hierarchy. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 114(5):766–785.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reno RR, Cialdini RB, Kallgren CA (1993) The transsituational influence of social norms. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 64(1):104–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Resnick P, Zeckhauser R (2002) Trust among strangers in Internet transactions: Empirical analysis of Ebay’s reputation system. Baye MR, ed. The Economics of the Internet and E-Commerce (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 127–157.Google Scholar
• Rimal RN, Real K (2005) How behaviors are influenced by perceived norms: A test of the theory of normative social behavior. Comm. Res. 32(3):389–414. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salganik MJ, Dodds PS, Watts DJ (2006) Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market. Sci. 311(5762):854–856.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sharma S, Durand RM, Gur-Arie O (1981) Identification and analysis of moderator variables. J. Marketing Res. 18(3):291–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shen W, Hu YJ, Ulmer JR (2015) Competing for attention: An empirical study of online reviewers strategic behaviors. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 39(3):683–696.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shoham M, Moldovan S, Steinhart Y (2017) Positively useless: Irrelevant negative information enhances positive impressions. J. Consumer Psych. 27(2):147–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Short J, Williams E, Christie B (1976) The Social Psychology of Telecommunications (Wiley, London).Google Scholar
• Siering U, Eikermann M, Hausner E, Hoffmann-Eßer W, Neugebauer EA (2013) Appraisal tools for clinical practice guidelines: A systematic review. PLoS One 8(12):e82915.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith A, Anderson M (2016) Online Shopping and E-Commerce. Pew Research Center, Washington, DC. Accessed October 18, 2017, http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/12/19/online-shopping-and-e-commerce/.Google Scholar
• Stephen A, Bart Y, Du Plessis C, Goncalves D (2012) Does paying for online product reviews pay off? The effects of monetary incentives on content creators and consumers. Gürhan-Canli Z, Otnes C, Zhu R, eds. Advances in Consumer Research, vol. 40 (Association for Consumer Research, Duluth, MN), 228–231.Google Scholar
• Tajfel H, Turner JC (1986) The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. Worchel S, Austin WG, eds. Psychology of Intergroup Relations (Nelson-Hall Publishers, Chicago), 7–24.Google Scholar
• Tilly R, Posegga O, Fischbach K, Schoder D (2017) Towards a conceptualization of data and information quality in social information systems. Bus. Inform. Systems Engrg. 59(1):3–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsai H-T, Bagozzi RP (2014) Contribution behavior in virtual communities: Cognitive, emotional, and social influences. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 38(1):143–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Krogh G, Haefliger S, Spaeth S, Wallin M (2012) Carrots and rainbows: Motivation and social practice in open source software development. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 36(2):649–676.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Chaudhry A (2018) When and how managers’ responses to online reviews affect subsequent reviews. J. Marketing Res. 55(2):163–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weathers D, Swain SD, Grover V (2015) Can online product reviews be more helpful? Examining characteristics of information content by product type. Decision Support Systems 79(3):12–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Willer R (2009) A status theory of collective action. Thye SR, Lawler EJ, ed. Altruism and Prosocial Behavior in Groups, Advances in Group Processes, vol. 26 (Emerald Group Publishing Ltd., Bingley, UK), 133–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilson JQ, Kelling GL (1982) Broken windows: The police and neighborhood safety. Atlantic Monthly 249:29–38.Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2010) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, 2nd ed. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Young P (2015) The evolution of social norms. Annual Rev. Econom. 7:359–387.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zheng R, Li J, Chen H, Huang Z (2006) A framework for authorship identification of online messages: Writing-style features and classification techniques. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. Tech. 57(3):378–393.Crossref, Google Scholar