Dealing with the Social Media Polycontextuality of Work

References

• Aaen J, Dalsgaard C (2016) Student Facebook groups as a third space: Between social life and schoolwork. Learn. Media Tech. 41(1):160–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ali-Hassan H, Nevo D, Wade M (2015) Linking dimensions of social media use to job performance: The role of social capital. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 24(2):65–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bala H, Venkatesh V (2016) Adaptation to information technology: A holistic nomological network from implementation to job outcomes. Management Sci. 62(1):156–179.Link, Google Scholar
• Beaudry A, Pinsonneault A (2005) Understanding user responses to information technology: A coping model of user adaptation. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 28(3):493–524.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bechmann A, Lomborg S (2013) Mapping actor roles in social media: Different perspectives on value creation in theories of user participation. New Media Soc. 15(5):765–781.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beck R, Pahlke I, Seebach C (2014) Knowledge exchange and symbolic action in social media-enabled electronic networks of practice: A multilevel perspective on knowledge seekers and contributors. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 38(4):1245–1269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benson V, Morgan S, Filippaios F (2014) Social career management: Social media and employability skills gap. Comput. Human Behav. 30:519–525.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berkelaar BL (2014) Cybervetting, online information, and personnel selection: New transparency expectations and the emergence of a digital social contract. Management Comm. Quart. 28(4):479–506.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bharati P, Zhang W, Chaudhury A (2015) Better knowledge with social media? Exploring the roles of social capital and organizational knowledge management. J. Knowledge Management 19(3):456–475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Birks DF, Fernandez W, Levina N, Nasirin S (2013) Grounded theory method in information systems research: Its nature, diversity and opportunities. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 22(1):1–8.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boyd DM, Ellison NB (2008) Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. J. Comput. Mediated Comm. 13(1):210–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown JS, Duguid P (2001) Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organ. Sci. 12(2):198–213.Link, Google Scholar
• Bucher E, Fieseler C, Suphan A (2013) The stress potential of social media in the workplace. Inform. Comm. Soc. 16(10):1639–1667.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cardon PW, Marshall B (2015) The hype and reality of social media use for work collaboration and team communication. Internat. J. Bus. Comm. 52(3):273–293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chaiklin S, Lave J, eds. (1993) Understanding Practice: Perspectives on Activity and Context (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charmaz K (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis (Sage Publications, London).Google Scholar
• Colbert A, Yee N, George G (2016) The digital workforce and the workplace of the future. Acad. Management J. 59(3):731–739.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cranefield J, Yoong P, Huff SL (2015) Rethinking lurking: Invisible leading and following in a knowledge transfer ecosystem. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 16(4):213–247.Google Scholar
• Cristea IC, Leonardi PM, Vaast E (2019) Social media and teamwork: Formation, process, and outcomes. Landers RN, ed. The Cambridge Handbook of Technology and Employee Behavior (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 480–508.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crowdflower (2017) 2017 Data scientist report.Google Scholar
• Davenport TH, Patil D (2012) Data scientist. Harvard Bus. Rev. 90(10):70–76.Google Scholar
• Denzin NK, Lincoln Y, eds. (2000) Handbook of Qualitative Research (Sage, London).Google Scholar
• El Ouirdi A, El Ouirdi M, Segers J, Henderickx E (2015) Employees’ use of social media technologies: A methodological and thematic review. Behav. Inform. Tech. 34(5):454–464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Engeström Y, Engeström R, Kärkkäinen M (1995) Polycontextuality and boundary crossing in expert cognition: Learning and problem solving in complex work activities. Learn. Instruction 5(4):319–336.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS (1995) Strategies for Interpreting Qualitative Data (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferguson J, Soekijad M, Huysman M, Vaast E (2013) A vision for development? Blogging in Ict4d. Inform. Systems J. 23(4):307–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferro T, Zachry M (2014) Technical communication unbound: Knowledge work, social media, and emergent communicative practices. Tech. Comm. Quart. 23(1):6–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischer E, Reuber AR (2011) Social interaction via new social media: (How) can interactions on Twitter affect effectual thinking and behavior? J. Bus. Venturing 26(1):1–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ford D, Lustig K, Banks J, Parnin C (2018) “We don’t do that here”: How collaborative editing with mentors improves engagement in social Q&A communities. Proc. 2018 CHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems, 1–12.Google Scholar
• Forsgren E, Byström K (2017) Multiple social media in the workplace: Contradictions and congruencies. Inform. Systems J. 28(3):442–464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fox J, Moreland JJ (2015) The dark side of social networking sites: An exploration of the relational and psychological stressors associated with Facebook use and affordances. Computers in Human Behavior 45:168–176.Google Scholar
• Glaser BG (2005) The Grounded Theory Perspective III: Theoretical Coding (Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA).Google Scholar
• Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1967) The Discovery of the Grounded Theory—Strategies for Qualitative Research (Aldine Publishing Co., Chicago).Google Scholar
• Griffin MA (2007) Specifying organizational contexts: Systematic links between contexts and processes in organizational behavior. J. Organ. Behav. 28(7):859–863.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang J, Baptista J, Galliers RD (2013) Reconceptualizing rhetorical practices in organizations: The impact of social media on internal communications. Inform. Management 50(2–3):112–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Introna LD, Hayes N (2011) On sociomaterial imbrications: What plagiarism detection systems reveal and why it matters. Inform. Organ. 21(2):107–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jarrahi MH, Sawyer S (2015) Theorizing on the take‐up of social technologies, organizational policies and norms, and consultants’ knowledge‐sharing practices. J. Assoc. Inform. Sci. Tech. 66(1):162–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johns G (2006) The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Acad. Management Rev. 31(2):386–408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johns G (2018) Advances in the treatment of context in organizational research. Annual Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 5:21–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kane GC (2017) The evolutionary implications of social media for organizational knowledge management. Inform. Organ. 27(1):37–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kane GC, Alavi M, Labianca GJ, Borgatti SP (2014) What’s different about social media networks? A framework and research agenda. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 38(1):275–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan AM, Haenlein M (2010) Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Bus. Horizons 53(1):59–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karahanna E, Xu SX, Xu Y, Zhang NA (2018) The needs–affordances–features perspective for the use of social media. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 42(3):737–756.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kvale S, Brinkmann S (2008) Interviews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Lave J (1988) Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics, and Culture in Everyday Life (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lave J, Wenger E (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee AS, Baskerville RL (2003) Generalizing generalizability in Information Systems Research. Inform. Systems Res. 14(3):221–243.Google Scholar
• Leftheriotis I, Giannakos MN (2014) Using social media for work: Losing your time or improving your work? Computers in Human Behavior 31:134–142.Google Scholar
• Leidner DE, Gonzalez E, Koch H (2018) An affordance perspective of enterprise social media and organizational socialization. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 27(2):117–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonardi PM (2011) When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: Affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 35(1):147–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonardi PM (2014) Social media, knowledge sharing, and innovation: Toward a theory of communication visibility. Inform. Systems Res. 25(4):796–816.Link, Google Scholar
• Leonardi PM (2015) Ambient awareness and knowledge acquisition: Using social media to learn “who knows what” and “who knows whom.” Management Inform. Systems Quart. 39(4):747–762.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonardi PM (2017) The social media revolution: Sharing and learning in the age of leaky knowledge. Inform. Organ. 27(1):47–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonardi PM, Vaast E (2017) Social media and their affordances for organizing: A review and agenda for research. Acad. Management Annals 11(1):150–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonardi PM, Huysman M, Steinfield C (2013) Enterprise social media: Definition, history, and prospects for the study of social technologies in organizations. J. Comput. Mediated Comm. 19(1):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levina N, Vaast E (2005) The emergence of boundary spanning competence in practice: Implications for implementation and use of information systems. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 29(2):335–364.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maier C, Laumer S, Eckhardt A, Weitzel T (2015a) Giving too much social support: Social overload on social networking sites. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 24(5):447–464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maier C, Laumer S, Weinert C, Weitzel T (2015b) The effects of technostress and switching stress on discontinued use of social networking services: A study of Facebook use. Inform. Systems J. 25(3):275–308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marabelli M, Vaast E, Li JL (2021) Preventing the digital scars of covid-19. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 30(2):176–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McFarland LA, Ployhart RE (2015) Social media: A contextual framework to guide research and practice. J. Appl. Psych. 100(6):1653–1677.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McLaughlin C, Vitak J (2012) Norm evolution and violation on Facebook. New Media Soc. 14(2):299–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oostervink N, Agterberg M, Huysman M (2016) Knowledge sharing on enterprise social media: Practices to cope with institutional complexity. J. Comput. Mediated Comm. 21(2):156–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ (2007) Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organ. Stud. 28(9):1435–1448.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ, Scott SV (2008) Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. Acad. Management Ann. 2(1):433–474.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pirkkalainen H, Salo M, Tarafdar M, Makkonen M (2019) Deliberate or instinctive? Proactive and reactive coping for technostress. J. Management Inform. Systems 36(4):1179–1212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reder S (1993) Watching flowers grow: Polycontextuality and heterochronicity at work. Quart. Newsletter Laboratory Comparative Human Cognition 15(4):116–125.Google Scholar
• Sarker S, Xiao X, Beaulieu T, Lee AS (2018) Learning from first-generation qualitative approaches in the IS discipline: An evolutionary view and some implications for authors and evaluators (part 1/2). J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 19(8):752–774.Google Scholar
• Schutt R, O’Neil C (2013) Doing Data Science: Straight Talk from the Frontline (O’Reilly Media, Inc.).Google Scholar
• Scott SV, Orlikowski WJ (2014) Entanglements in practice. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 38(3):873–894.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stein M-K, Newell S, Wagner EL, Galliers RD (2015) Coping with information technology: Mixed emotions, vacillation and non-conforming use patterns. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 39(2):367–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strauss AM, Corbin J, eds. (1997) Grounded Theory in Practice (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Strauss AL, Corbin J (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research—Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (Sage, London).Google Scholar
• Tarafdar M, Maier C, Laumer S, Weitzel T (2020) Explaining the link between technostress and technology addiction for social networking sites: A study of distraction as a coping behavior. Inform. Systems J. 30(1):96–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson M, Walsham G (2004) Placing knowledge management in context. J. Management Stud. 41(5):725–747.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Treem JW, Leonardi PM (2013) Social media use in organizations—Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Ann. Internat. Comm. Assoc. 36(1):143–189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turel O (2015) Quitting the use of a habituated hedonic information system: A theoretical model and empirical examination of Facebook users. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 24(4):431–446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Urquhart C (2012) Grounded Theory for Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Urquhart C (2019) Grounded theory’s best kept secret: The ability to build theory. Bryant A, Charmaz K, eds. The Sage Handbook of Current Developments in Grounded Theory (Sage Publications, London, UK), 89–106.Google Scholar
• Vaast E, Kaganer E (2013) Social media affordances and governance in the workplace: An examination of organizational policies. J. Comput. Mediated Comm. 19(1):78–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vaast E, Pinsonneault A (2021) When digital technologies enable and threaten occupational identity: The delicate balancing act of data scientists. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 45(3):1087–1112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vaast E, Walsham G (2009) Trans-situated learning: Supporting a network of practice with an information infrastructure. Inform. Systems Res. 20(4):547–564.Link, Google Scholar
• Vaast E, Walsham G (2013) Grounded theorizing for electronically-mediated social contexts. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 22(1):9–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vaast E, Safadi H, Lapointe L, Negoita B (2017) Social media affordances for connective action: An examination of microblogging use during the Gulf of Mexico oil spill. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 41(4):1179–1205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van der Aalst WM (2014) Data scientist: The engineer of the future. Enterprise Interoperability VI. Mertins K, Bénaben F, Poler R, Bourrières J-P, eds. Proc. I-ESA, March 24–28, Albi, France (Springer), 13–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Volkoff O, Strong DM (2013) Critical realism and affordances: Theorizing IT-associated organizational change processes. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 37(3):819–834.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wagner EL, Newell S, Piccoli G (2010) Understanding project survival in an ES environment: A sociomaterial practice perspective. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 11(5):276–297.Google Scholar
• Wu L (2013) Social network effects on productivity and job security: Evidence from the adoption of a social networking tool. Inform. Systems Res. 24(1):30–51.Link, Google Scholar